Am 25.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:11:30 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote:there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header when the HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and matches PTR/A perfectly tooOf course there's a point. It's intended to detect spam software that's relaying through a real MTA - typically someone else's.
no there is no point"Received: from unknown (HELO 46.137.93.51) with ESMTPA" is the MTA client (the A is for Authenticated = SASL)
at least 1.5 points is unacceptable for (in general questionable) deep header inspectionIt works well for me, if you don't like it rescore it
it would work well if it only checks the own received header Received: from mail1.intellij.net (mail1.intellij.net [46.137.178.215]) "mail1.intellij.net" is one time for the HELO and one time for the PTR
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature