Am 25.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:11:30 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:

there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header when
the HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and matches PTR/A
perfectly too

Of course there's a point. It's intended to detect spam software that's
relaying through a real MTA - typically someone else's.

no there is no point

"Received: from unknown (HELO 46.137.93.51) with ESMTPA" is the MTA client (the A is for Authenticated = SASL)

at least 1.5 points is unacceptable for (in general questionable)
deep header inspection

It works well for me, if you don't like it rescore it
it would work well if it only checks the own received header

Received: from mail1.intellij.net (mail1.intellij.net [46.137.178.215])
"mail1.intellij.net" is one time for the HELO and one time for the PTR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to