On 01/25/2016 03:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.01.2016 um 14:41 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:11:30 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header when
the HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and matches PTR/A
perfectly too
Of course there's a point. It's intended to detect spam software that's
relaying through a real MTA - typically someone else's.
no there is no point
"Received: from unknown (HELO 46.137.93.51) with ESMTPA" is the MTA
client (the A is for Authenticated = SASL)
at least 1.5 points is unacceptable for (in general questionable)
deep header inspection
It works well for me, if you don't like it rescore it
it would work well if it only checks the own received header
Received: from mail1.intellij.net (mail1.intellij.net [46.137.178.215])
"mail1.intellij.net" is one time for the HELO and one time for the PTR
Not worth an argument - masschecker set the score based on spam corpus
lower the score and have a nice day.
