On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:11:30 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > there is *no point* on fire a rule on the third Received header when > the HELO is pretty clear "mail1.intellij.net" and matches PTR/A > perfectly too
Of course there's a point. It's intended to detect spam software that's relaying through a real MTA - typically someone else's. > at least 1.5 points is unacceptable for (in general questionable) > deep header inspection It works well for me, if you don't like it rescore it.
