one small clarification, which didnt come to me until after I went to
IPchicken. Our ISP is NOT our EmailSP We are using authenticaion on port 25.
Tried 587, not configured on ESP side.
John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, djjmj wrote:
>
>> John Hardin wrote:
>>>
>> Dana may not have th
Thanks for the info Kris and John. I have something to work with the ISP now
and somethings I can try on the client. BTW I agree with you on the Outlook
existing comment. I have asked our ISP your questions throught our support
post with them. We'll see what their response is.
Kris Deugau wrote
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 19:09 -0200, Rob Lingelbach wrote:
> The other
> possibility arose that because SELinux was also somewhat changed in
> the multi-package update, that it was being more strict, but adjusting
> iptables for port 53 fixed. thank you Mark.
>
IME SELinux is a pain in the
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, djjmj wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
Dana may not have that information - saying "which our ISP uses" suggests
SA is not under their control.
Correct SA is not under our control, just trying to find an answer to our
problem.
Dana:
Does your ISP bounce the messages back
djjmj wrote:
We have been discussing with them since Sept 17th with no fixes yet. Once
they found out
Windows Mail Client didn't have an issue they have been unwilling to help.
"Not a server side problem, your clients are the problem"
Then tell them you're walking as soon as you find another
On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:13 PM, djjmj wrote:
Outlook 2007 for most of the clients under our domain are now having
outgoing
emails blocked by Spam Assassin,
No they aren't. First, SpamAssassin doesn't block mail, ever. Second,
SpamAssassin doesn't generally scan outbound mail. Your ISP has
ma
John,
Thank you for your interest and support. I will keep pushing our ISP to use
this forum for a resolution.
John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, djjmj wrote:
>
>>> Try to ask your ISP's tech support to send you debugging info on some
>>> of your emails.
>>
>> 11:53:31 [24.181.159
John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Kevin Gagel wrote:
>
>> What are you doing to SpamAssassin?
>> Post your configuration then perhaps someone can help you.
>
>>>Dana may not have that information - saying "which our ISP uses" suggests
>>>SA is not under their control.
>
> Correct S
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, djjmj wrote:
Try to ask your ISP's tech support to send you debugging info on some
of your emails.
11:53:31 [24.181.159.14][19038377] Authenticated as .org
11:53:31 [24.181.159.14][19038377] cmd: MAIL FROM:
11:53:31 [24.181.159.14][19038377] rsp: 250 OK Sender ok
11:
Toni Mueller-17 wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 30.10.2009 at 14:13:45 -0700, djjmj wrote:
>> Outlook 2007 for most of the clients under our domain are now having
>> outgoing
>> emails blocked by Spam Assassin, which our ISP uses. This started in
>> late
>> September (Outlook/MS update??). Sim
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Kevin Gagel wrote:
What are you doing to SpamAssassin?
Post your configuration then perhaps someone can help you.
Dana may not have that information - saying "which our ISP uses" suggests
SA is not under their control.
Dana:
Does your ISP bounce the messages back to yo
Hi,
On Fri, 30.10.2009 at 14:13:45 -0700, djjmj wrote:
> Outlook 2007 for most of the clients under our domain are now having outgoing
> emails blocked by Spam Assassin, which our ISP uses. This started in late
> September (Outlook/MS update??). Simple Text emails with "hello" or "test"
> get s
Outlook 2007 for most of the clients under our domain are now having outgoing
emails blocked by Spam Assassin, which our ISP uses. This started in late
September (Outlook/MS update??). Simple Text emails with "hello" or "test"
get scored over 30. If I switch the users over to "windows mail" vs.
"
On Oct 30, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
immediately perceptible relevant update) and now this error: (CentOS)
Oct 30 15:34:31 spamd[16264]: dns: sendto()
failed: Connection refused at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/
SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line 395
Check health of the
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On fre 30 okt 2009 16:39:04 CET, Charles Gregory wrote
Once again, I'm finding a piece of spam getting through
because of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4 .
what is the ip ?
Don't think it really matters. As I stated in my OP, it looks like
a reputable ISP t
On Fre, 2009-10-30 at 19:23 +, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 15:10 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
> > >> approval to a plan to permit Web addresses in characters other than the
> > >> Latin alphabet, including Arabic, Chines
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 15:40 -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
> While the new character-sets are great for business within a country,
> they're not great for anybody planning on doing business in foreign (to
> them) locations.
>
> "The Excellent Rice Company" can pick any Chinese characters they want,
Oh yes ... there's no denying its complexity. But the desire to use
one's native tongue is quite simple.
James Butler
Pete McNeil wrote:
> James Butler wrote:
>> We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
>> domain names over the past several years. Don't underestimate th
James Butler wrote:
We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
domain names over the past several years. Don't underestimate the
backlash against everything being in English for so long ... there are
hordes (sorry) of folks who want to be able to use their native
characte
Terry Carmen wrote:
James Butler wrote:
We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
domain names over the past several years. Don't underestimate the
backlash against everything being in English for so long ... there are
hordes (sorry) of folks who want to be able to us
On fre 30 okt 2009 19:45:13 CET, Michael Scheidell wrote
ICANN Approves Use Of Non-Latin Alphabets In Web Domain Names
if the domain names conform to idn standard its okay with me
--
xpoint
On fre 30 okt 2009 16:39:04 CET, Charles Gregory wrote
Once again, I'm finding a piece of spam getting through
because of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4 .
what is the ip ?
http://www.dnswl.org/ make a request for change
dont change problem in sa
--
xpoint
James Butler wrote:
We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
domain names over the past several years. Don't underestimate the
backlash against everything being in English for so long ... there are
hordes (sorry) of folks who want to be able to use their native
characte
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Rose, Bobby wrote:
Does anyone know how a rule can be written to compare two header markers
for similar info?
Take a look at MAILER_EQ_ORG here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?view=log
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
domain names over the past several years. Don't underestimate the
backlash against everything being in English for so long ... there are
hordes (sorry) of folks who want to be able to use their native
charactersets.
James Butler
Does anyone know how a rule can be written to compare two header markers for
similar info? I don't think SA can do variable storage so I was thinking maybe
a regex rule that normalizes what I want to focus on from a header in the regex
search of another header. For example, let's say that I wa
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 15:10 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
> >> approval to a plan to permit Web addresses in characters other than the
> >> Latin alphabet, including Arabic, Chinese, Hindi and Korean.
> > I'd be *really* surprised if these became popular
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
approval to a plan to permit Web addresses in characters other than the
Latin alphabet, including Arabic, Chinese, Hindi and Korean.
I'd be *really* surprised if these became popular. The last thing any
business wants to do is create a domain name that
Michael Scheidell wrote:
ICANN Approves Use Of Non-Latin Alphabets In Web Domain Names
http://www.crn.com/software/221400038
By Rick Whiting, ChannelWeb
9:14 AM EDT Fri. Oct. 30, 2009
Web surfers might begin seeing some very different Internet addresses
next year. The governing body that over
ICANN Approves Use Of Non-Latin Alphabets In Web Domain Names
http://www.crn.com/software/221400038
By Rick Whiting, ChannelWeb
9:14 AM EDT Fri. Oct. 30, 2009
Web surfers might begin seeing some very different Internet addresses
next year. The governing body that oversees Internet addresses ha
Rob,
> Been running Spamassassin for a long time with no problems until a
> recent update of various packages including perl (but no other
> immediately perceptible relevant update) and now this error:
>
> Oct 30 15:34:31 spamd[16264]: dns: sendto()
> failed: Connection refused at /usr/lib/perl
Been running Spamassassin for a long time with no problems until a
recent update of various packages including perl (but no other
immediately perceptible relevant update) and now this error:
Oct 30 15:34:31 spamd[16264]: dns: sendto()
failed: Connection refused at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_pe
Once again, I'm finding a piece of spam getting through
because of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4 .
Is this just the 'occasional' FP that we have to live with?
Or should I rethink scoring that DNSWL?
According to the headers, it looks like an end user of a web mail account
had their password hacked
John Hardin wrote:
>
> Suggestion: open a feature request bug to allow bayes autolearn to use a
> different database connection string than bayes scoring. That way you
> could configure all the daemons' autolearns to write to the master, but
> distribute their scoring queries across X number
Anyone else noticing lots of DNS timeouts on the Barracuda List today?
Looks like it's really struggling.
Perhaps they are hosting it on their own hardware now LOL.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 02:21:10AM -0700, Mynabbler wrote:
>
>
> Alex-325 wrote:
> > I'm interested in experimenting with shortcircuiting, and wondered if
> > anyone had some examples they're using that they could share?
> We are using it to shortcircuit HAM and prevent blowing CPU cycles on
> ne
> >> I believe they all need full participation for them to be effective?
> >
> > That depends on your definition of "effective". Each of these methods
> > provides the recipient a way of determining the legitimacy of an email.
> > If the sender is using one or more of these on his outgoing emails
Alex-325 wrote:
> I'm interested in experimenting with shortcircuiting, and wondered if
> anyone had some examples they're using that they could share?
We are using it to shortcircuit HAM and prevent blowing CPU cycles on
newsletters that people expect to never contain spam. So, there is a
'short
39 matches
Mail list logo
