On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:40:30 -0500, Matt Kettler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Does anyone have any idea why there are such scoring disparities
>> between these two emails? I've been seeing a few of these creep
>> through lately.
>>
>> http://dev.blue-canoe.net
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone have any idea why there are such scoring disparities
> between these two emails? I've been seeing a few of these creep
> through lately.
>
> http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/spam01.txt
> http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/spam02.txt
> http://dev.blue-canoe.
Hi All,
Does anyone have any idea why there are such scoring disparities
between these two emails? I've been seeing a few of these creep
through lately.
http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/spam01.txt
http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/spam02.txt
http://dev.blue-canoe.net/spam/spam03.txt
http://dev.blue-ca
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:01:58PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Am I correct in understanding that I have to run sa-learn for every user
> who is going to have a bayes token store?
If you are running per-user Bayes (nothing else makes much sense,
IMHO), yes, but only if they want to train their Ba
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:11:50PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I just did so. Nothing was returned.
sa-update provides no output by default. Run with -D to see what it's doing.
> I originally updated with CPAN. That left no executable binary file. Then
> I updated from the tarball. That mad
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Have you actually run sa-update?
I just did so. Nothing was returned.
There's usually no output if you run it without the debug option -D. An
exit code is returned though.
I have no idea what rules you're copying, whe
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Have you actually run sa-update?
I just did so. Nothing was returned.
I always run sa-update -D to see what is happening.
--
-Doc
Penguins: Do it on the ice.
10:12pm up 11 days, 7:10, 15 users, load average: 0.9
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Have you actually run sa-update?
I just did so. Nothing was returned.
I have no idea what rules you're copying, where you're copying them to, or
why your even copying them anywhere.
I originally updated with CPAN. That left no executable b
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Use sa-update.
Thank you, Daryl. I guess that I'm up to date on those rules so I need to
tweak elsewhere.
I read in the man page that the default directory is
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007. That directory does not exist
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Use sa-update.
Thank you, Daryl. I guess that I'm up to date on those rules so I need to
tweak elsewhere.
I read in the man page that the default directory is
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007. That directory does not exist here. I have
/usr/sha
Rich Shepard wrote:
The quantity of spam for various varieties of quicker-dicker-upper pills
into my inbox has increased over the past couple of weeks. The filters in
/usr/share/spamassassin/20_drugs.cf don't seem to be up to full strength.
Are there newer rules (I'm running 3.1.7) to cover
The quantity of spam for various varieties of quicker-dicker-upper pills
into my inbox has increased over the past couple of weeks. The filters in
/usr/share/spamassassin/20_drugs.cf don't seem to be up to full strength.
Are there newer rules (I'm running 3.1.7) to cover the changing landscap
Florent Gilain wrote:
Hi all,
It seems i have a problem with sa-update using my SARE rules channels ;
i followed the doc at URL :
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt and used
the rules from here : http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SareChannels
Any idea o
Am I correct in understanding that I have to run sa-learn for every user who is
going to have a bayes token store?
Tom Allison wrote:
> [1174] dbg: bayes: using username: tallison
> [1174] dbg: bayes: unable to connect to database: missing "=" after
> "bayes:192.168.0.100:5432" in connection info string
>
>
> bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::PgSQL
> bayes_sql_dsn DBI:Pg:bayes:192.168.0.
NEVER MIND!!
I'm not paying attention to the ruddy docs!
Tom Allison wrote:
[1174] dbg: bayes: using username: tallison
[1174] dbg: bayes: unable to connect to database: missing "=" after
"bayes:192.168.0.100:5432" in connection info string
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesSt
[1174] dbg: bayes: using username: tallison
[1174] dbg: bayes: unable to connect to database: missing "=" after
"bayes:192.168.0.100:5432" in connection info string
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::PgSQL
bayes_sql_dsn DBI:Pg:bayes:192.168.0.100:5432
bayes_sql_username ta
Hi all,
It seems i have a problem with sa-update using my SARE rules channels ; i
followed the doc at URL :
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt and used the
rules from here : http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SareChannels
Any idea of what I have to do ?
[EM
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
You are running the latest version of amavisd, correct? I know for
*sure* that a milter must fake a received header before passing the
message to SA and I'm 99.9% sure that it was amavisd that wasn't doing
this only a couple of months ago.
I
On 1/24/2007 12:37 PM, IT_Architect wrote:
> I'm thinking about using SpamAssassin. Is it possible to have the suspected
> spam to one account to have one person clear or delete possible spam. When
> they say it's good, will it then go to the correct user?
It's possible to do that but not with
IT_Architect wrote:
Evan Platt wrote:
Yes, but that would be done in your MUA, or with something like procmail.
SpamAssassin can only mark messages. It cannot do any sort of what you're
attempting to do. Doesn't sound like the right fit.
Thanks!
www.mailscanner.info can do that and a l
On 1/24/2007 3:29 PM, Chris Purves wrote:
> I was wondering what is the best way to deal with spam that comes
> through on mailing lists? For mailing lists like spamassassin I
> whitelist all mail because I expect to see examples of spam, but for
> other lists, is it a good idea to run 'sa-lea
See attach python script written by one of the folks on the MailScanner
list.
Its designed for use with exchange, so i will describe the Exchange
usage and you can modify as you see fit to work on your pop3 server.
In Exchange 2003 create a public folder called SPAM, give everyone
contributo
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
>You are running the latest version of amavisd, correct? I know for
>*sure* that a milter must fake a received header before passing the
>message to SA and I'm 99.9% sure that it was amavisd that wasn't doing
>this only a couple of months ago.
I am running the lates
Chris Purves wrote:
I was wondering what is the best way to deal with spam that comes
through on mailing lists? For mailing lists like spamassassin I
whitelist all mail because I expect to see examples of spam, but for
other lists, is it a good idea to run 'sa-learn --spam'?
As long as you a
I would like to suppress user_prefs and stick with a single site-wide
user_prefs.
I don't think I actually need to do much for this. But I get a lot of warnings.
I also want to be able to switch users for the bayes list (SQL) but continue
using the same prefs for all users.
If I call signal_
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:37:01AM -0800, R Lists06 wrote:
> Do you know what the size or time threshold is?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf, look for bayes and or journal. :)
> Im sure time is a factor in there too right as maybe the size wouldn't make
> it there in a reasonable timeframe?
Gen
I was wondering what is the best way to deal with spam that comes
through on mailing lists? For mailing lists like spamassassin I
whitelist all mail because I expect to see examples of spam, but for
other lists, is it a good idea to run 'sa-learn --spam'? What about
reporting those spam to ra
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Adam Lanier wrote:
Did you do a grep for 'DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL' (for example)
in /etc/mail/spamassassin?
Adam,
I _thought_ that I had, but I'm trying to simultaneously fix problems with
three applications, so I missed doing this.
I'm betting you have a 'score DNS_FROM_
Hello Henrik,
Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 2:17:04 PM, you wrote:
> I tried File001 some time ago, and didn't need wait long for FPs. The scores
> are way too high (many are 10+? whats up with that?), and the rules are
> _very_ broad. For example, just mistype "remov" or "ssex" in your mail, and
>
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 11:26 -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
>
>I was looking in the wrong file, it should be 50_scores.cf. And, in that
> file there are:
>
> score DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL 0 0.306 0 0.231
> score DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0 0.479 0 0.200
> score DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX 0 2.034 0 1.945
> score DN
Further question,
Since the *combined.njabl.org*: dnsbl.njabl.org and dynablock.njabl.org
in a single zone is what you get
and :
With the advent of Spamhaus's PBL (http://spamhaus.org/pbl/),
dynablock.njabl.org has become obsolete. Rather than maintain separate
similar DNSBL zones, NJA
Problem solved, I had to forward combined.njabl.org in named conf on the
cachers... duh!
THANKS!
Vasiliy Boulytchev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vasiliy Boulytchev wrote:
Excellent,
Now we are in the right direction.
Now. I use the NJABL-provided rsync syntax to sync...
$ cat /usr/local/bi
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Rich Shepard wrote:
[22906] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line,
"DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL .4" is not valid for "score", skipping: score
DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL .4
[22906] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
.4" is not valid for "score", s
Excellent,
Now we are in the right direction.
Now. I use the NJABL-provided rsync syntax to sync...
$ cat /usr/local/bin/njablrsync
#!/bin/sh
rsync -vaL rsync.njabl.org::njabl/rbldnsd/ /var/dnsbl/njabl/
which provides me with:
ls /var/lib/rbldns/work/
bhnc.gz dnsbl.n
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:28AM -0500, Vasiliy Boulytchev wrote:
> be tested via dig @dnscacheserver 2.0.0.127.dnsbl.njabl.org... i see
[...]
> Can someone please help me setup NJABL properly? I am invoking SA via
> MS... as you can see below, SA does seem to check NJABL...
[...]
> [15101] db
> -Original Message-
> From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 12:54 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: One person to filter spam
>
>
> At 09:37 AM 1/24/2007, you wrote:
>
> >I'm thinking about using SpamAssassin. Is it possibl
Evan Platt wrote:
> Yes, but that would be done in your MUA, or with something like procmail.
> SpamAssassin can only mark messages. It cannot do any sort of what you're
> attempting to do. Doesn't sound like the right fit.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/One
At 09:37 AM 1/24/2007, you wrote:
I'm thinking about using SpamAssassin. Is it possible to have the suspected
spam to one account to have one person clear or delete possible spam. When
they say it's good, will it then go to the correct user?
Yes, but that would be done in your MUA, or with s
[back on list]
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 16:55 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
Looking through /usr/sbin/amavisd, it appears that it *does not* add the
Received header if it is called via a milter (which it is). So, this wouldn't
seem to be the
I'm thinking about using SpamAssassin. Is it possible to have the suspected
spam to one account to have one person clear or delete possible spam. When
they say it's good, will it then go to the correct user?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/One-person-to-filter-s
I have posted the promised error-generating file for antidrug.cf to the
comcast webspace. Anyone RDJ'ing antidrug from comcast (instead of
verizon) will start getting lint errors so they will hopefully pay
attention to the new site notice in the rulefile.
For those that have missed my numerous pre
Vasiliy Boulytchev wrote:
> GENTS!
>
> I have setup rbldnsd daemon, and am rsyncing down from NJABL...
>
> I have made the local DNS cachers forward queries to rbldnsd. That can
> be tested via dig @dnscacheserver 2.0.0.127.dnsbl.njabl.org... i see
> that query get forwarded to rbldnsd, and i see
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
If you run in debug mode, you'll see all the files that SA is using for
configs. At least one of those files will have the invalid config lines.
My guess is something in the site-wide config directory
(/etc/mail/spamassassin).
Theo,
Here is the
GENTS!
I have setup rbldnsd daemon, and am rsyncing down from NJABL...
I have made the local DNS cachers forward queries to rbldnsd. That can
be tested via dig @dnscacheserver 2.0.0.127.dnsbl.njabl.org... i see
that query get forwarded to rbldnsd, and i see the query in the log so i
know 100
Sherman Lilly wrote:
[Snipped text about forged mail from own domains whitelisted...]
> I was looking on the net and I came across a plugin on spamassassin I don't
> think i have loaded. Will the SPF plugin help with this problem?
If you publish SPF records for your domains, you can use whiteli
Hi there!
Most of our email is delivered through pop3, so right now bayes
filtering is off. Nevertheless Spamassassin is doing a good job
filtering email, but we want to setup a way for our customers to report
to us undetected spam by forwarding that spam to an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] account in our ser
>
> I didn't quite parse that. But "man sa-learn", it has many an
> informational
> statement about how it all works.
>
> In short, by default, it stores token timestamp updates. Whenever the
> journal
> goes over a certain size, SA will automatically sync it for you.
>
Thank you Theo and Mat
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:25:24PM +0100, Leonardo Secci wrote:
> Can I configure the SA executed by MDA to start from the spam score obtained
> from the systemwide SA to minimize rule checking?
No. SA is designed specifically to only be run once on a message.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Gun
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:22:07AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
>When I look for '.4' in the rules files I cannot find it. Otherwise I
> would have changed it.
If you run in debug mode, you'll see all the files that SA is using for
configs. At least one of those files will have the invalid conf
Hi,
I'm testing a Mail Server with sendmail+maildrop, and I'd like to include
antivirus+antispam features.
I'd like the system checks spam in incoming and outgoing messages so I need a
systemwide configuration for SA. I installed amavisd-new as a milter
(amavisd-new-milter) that performs antiv
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
".4" isn't a valid number and so can't be parsed. Try "0.4".
Theo,
When I look for '.4' in the rules files I cannot find it. Otherwise I
would have changed it.
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. |The Environmental Permitting
A
Or doing whatever it shows itself to be doing, anyway.
I have several *old* systems, running 2.64. I've finally managed to
find the key bit of hardware necessary to allow upgrading to 3.x. (This
amounts to complete cascading replacement of the systems in question.)
I'm now trying to get the
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:25:38AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> [22906] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line,
> "DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL .4" is not valid for "score", skipping: score
> DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL .4
".4" isn't a valid number and so can't be parsed. Try "0.4".
--
Randomly Selecte
I have posted the promised error-generating file for antidrug.cf to the
comcast webspace. Anyone RDJ'ing antidrug from comcast (instead of
verizon) will start getting lint errors so they will hopefully pay
attention to the new site notice in the rulefile.
For those that have missed my numerous pre
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Gary V wrote:
I placed ImageInfo.pm in the SA Plugin directory
/./Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin
Gary,
Aha! Found it. I had it in /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/.
There are several directories with perl modules in them. Gets me confused
as to what belongs where.
Now this lin
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 07:25 -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
>When I run spamassassin --lint I see a number of rule-related warnings.
> However, when I look in /etc/mail/spamassassin/rules/ I can't find the
> specific text referenced.
>
>Here's the pertinent lint output:
Unless you've installe
Last issue from lint: same problem with ImageInfo. I have no
ImageInfo.cf,
so from where should I load that? Other than from
/etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre, that is.
Thanks,
Rich
I placed ImageInfo.pm in the SA Plugin directory
/./Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin
and in v310.pre:
loadplugin
When I run spamassassin --lint I see a number of rule-related warnings.
However, when I look in /etc/mail/spamassassin/rules/ I can't find the
specific text referenced.
Here's the pertinent lint output:
[22906] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line,
"DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL .4" is not
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> With sa-update ran within the last week, I run it once a week, and rules
> du jour, there is one type of spam still getting through. The subject
> varies and the body usually starts with a paragraph then stock info:
>
> The Motion Picture Group
> Symbol: MPRG
> Price: $0
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:17:15PM +0530, Ramprasad wrote:
> But If I have /var/lib/spamassassin with some files in it SA is
> apparently ignoring /usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf
Yes. That's how updates work.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"A polar bear is a rectangular bear after a coordinate tr
Ramprasad wrote:
> I have been using SA for more than 3 years now and I have a dumb
> question
>
> I am using SA 3.1.5 on Centos
>
> AFAIK By default Spamassassin reads from /usr/share/spamassassin
> and /etc/mail/spamassassin
>
> But If I have /var/lib/spamassassin with some files in it SA is
>
On Tue, January 23, 2007 16:58, bryan haase wrote:
> My whitelist file currently has 13,500 lines and is 503K. spamd is about
> 58-59M.
amavisd-new sql whitelist/blacklist would love this
> Is there a point when the whitelist file becomes to large?
is spam scanning needed for the recipients at
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Gary V wrote:
Are you using SpamAssassin version 3.1.4 or newer? If not, you need to.
Gary,
SpamAssassin-3.1.7.
What version of FuzzyOcr?
3.5.1
Are you trying to load the plugin from more than one place - in other
words if you are trying to load it via an entry
--On Wednesday, January 24, 2007 2:11 PM +0200 Henrik Krohns
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess this works until spammers just use a "remove the space from
domain" method, which pretty much defeats the uri handler. :)
Perhaps a simpler test is to see if the domain is resolvable by the
recipi
I'm having problems with SA provided by debian, version 3.1.7-1.
I run spamc from /etc/procmail. spamd is run with `-x --max-children 5'.
Anyway, the problem is, messages are classified as EMPTY_MESSAGE, which
has description of `Message appears to have no textual parts and no
Subject: text', which
On 1/23/07, R Lists06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Redhat or CentOS machines would that be under SPAMDOPTIONS ?
Using the RPM install of spamassassin from either the CentOS project
or rpmforge, you make changes to the spamd command line in
/etc/sysconfig/spamassassin, and yes, you place those
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:11:20AM +0200, Henrik Krohns wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:41:33AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > since yesterday I have seen quite a few of them:
>> > > Will we eventually get a check for obfuscated urls?
>> > >
>> > > Wolfgang
>>
68 matches
Mail list logo
