Re: Sync bayes between multiple servers.

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Big Wave Dave wrote: > On 1/2/07, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 January 2007 18:01, Big Wave Dave wrote: > > > I currently have several machines providing mail relay for my domains. > > > I have started training one of the machines using sa-learn

SpamAssassin trying to create directory for wrong userid

Hello, I have just installed SA 3.1.7 (built RPM from tarball) on a new CentOS 4.4 system. spamd is being started as root from the rc script as follows: /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H -r /var/run/spamd.pid We are calling spamc via procmail (/etc/procmailrc): DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ DROPPRIVS=yes

Re: Move body report to bottom of email?

If you are using report_safe then you can see by looking at rewrite_report_safe in Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus.pm that it orders the attachments such that the report is first and the original is second. You could easily reverse those. $newmsg .= <<"EOM"; MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type

Re: spamassassin and spamc calculate different results

Thomas Schlosser wrote: > Hi, > > I have a SUSE 9.3 mailserver with Postfix and SA 3.1.7 running. > > Unfortunately the commands (run as root) > spamassassin and > spamc calculate different results. In fact they seem to run different tests. > > I postet the details in a german forum: > http://ww

Re: localhost bypass?

Justin Mason wrote: > To be honest, I intended them as a whitelist ;) > > If a message never touched an untrusted host (ALL_TRUSTED), in > a correctly-configured trust setup, is that not safe to whitelist? > > Only if the trust-path auto-detector code works perfectly, for all sites. Which is imp

Re: Move body report to bottom of email?

Do you have report safe on or off? On Jan 2, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Rick Vestal wrote: It has been requested that I move the report generated by spamassassin (summary, content preview, etc) to the bottom of the email. Reading about, I haven't found any way of doing this, nor anyone else inquiring

Re: Making use of other spam checkers

On Tuesday 02 January 2007 19:28, Rick van der Zwet wrote: > A lot of e-mail derived today is already scanned by an other (relay) > spam checker. Does sa has some way of making use of this information and > store this information instead of deleting it. Not AFAIK. > Most preferably I would

Re: Sync bayes between multiple servers.

On 1/2/07, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 02 January 2007 18:01, Big Wave Dave wrote: > I currently have several machines providing mail relay for my domains. > I have started training one of the machines using sa-learn. However > I would like the other relays to be knowl

Re: Sync bayes between multiple servers.

On Tuesday 02 January 2007 18:01, Big Wave Dave wrote: > I currently have several machines providing mail relay for my domains. > I have started training one of the machines using sa-learn. However > I would like the other relays to be knowledgable of the training I > have done. I have considere

Re: sa-stats.pl blows up on maillog covering turn of year

Bob McClure Jr wrote: sa-stats.pl as distributed with SA v3.1.7 blows out a ton of WARNING: ignoring future date in syslog line: Dec 31 20:26:56 bubba spamd[7149]: prefork: child states: II and the like, and ends up reporting zeros for results. Another machine with the same sa-stats.pl (and

Move body report to bottom of email?

It has been requested that I move the report generated by spamassassin (summary, content preview, etc) to the bottom of the email. Reading about, I haven't found any way of doing this, nor anyone else inquiring about it. Is this possible? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mo

sa-stats.pl blows up on maillog covering turn of year

sa-stats.pl as distributed with SA v3.1.7 blows out a ton of WARNING: ignoring future date in syslog line: Dec 31 20:26:56 bubba spamd[7149]: prefork: child states: II and the like, and ends up reporting zeros for results. Another machine with the same sa-stats.pl (and an earlier version as we

Re: sa-update problem...

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:01:09 -0600, "Mike French" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Thanks for the heads-up I didn't think the Ident and INet6 was a big >deal, but then again I'm still learning... I'm going to do some more reading >on the sa-update stuff and get it fleshed out. In the mean time, I'm

Re: (no subject)

At 12:48 PM 1/2/2007, you wrote: unsubscribe As the headers say: list-unsubscribe:

RE: sa-update problem...

Thanks for the heads-up I didn't think the Ident and INet6 was a big deal, but then again I'm still learning... I'm going to do some more reading on the sa-update stuff and get it fleshed out. In the mean time, I'm running my older rule set which has been real stable for me. I would eventually

Re: RBLs

In a lot of cases, that seems to boil down to "sending a legitimate email to a recipient who once *asked* to be sent such email, who has now forgotten they signed up in the first place". :( There's not much a sender can do about that - particularly for periodic emails of the type *many* c

(no subject)

unsubscribe -- Nicholas Anderson Administrador de Sistemas Unix LPIC-1 Certified Rede Fiocruz e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RBLs

Kris Deugau wrote: Jeff Chan wrote: The SpamCop BL is a fair representation of the sending IPs of the messages that its users are reporting as spam. One of your goals as an ESP should be to not get perceived as spam in the mailboxes of those users. If the users get your messages and report the

Re: RBLs

Jeff Chan wrote: The SpamCop BL is a fair representation of the sending IPs of the messages that its users are reporting as spam. One of your goals as an ESP should be to not get perceived as spam in the mailboxes of those users. If the users get your messages and report them as spam (via SpamC

Re: spamassassin and spamc calculate different results

Thomas Schlosser wrote: Hi, I have a SUSE 9.3 mailserver with Postfix and SA 3.1.7 running. Unfortunately the commands (run as root) spamassassin http://www.linuxforen.de/forums/showthread.php?t=229016 (including the scan reports!) One source could be the associated user, but when trying to r

Having trouble getting botnet-0.7 running

I could have sworn I saw something about this problem on this list, but I haven't been able to find it in the archives. I'm trying to install botnet-0.7 with SA 3.1.7. I'm getting a message when the test runs, saying: Failed to run BOTNET test, skipping: ^I(Can't locate object method "new"

Re: RelayCountry plugin doesn't add header

Nick Radov wrote the following on 02/01/2007 18:35: I am running SpamAssassin 3.1.7 in serial mode on Windows 2003. I would like to use the RelayCountry plugin and have enabled it as described on this web page: . But when I ran a test mess

RE: errors with spamassain in windows

Answer n when it asks about building spamc. Or try this port: http://physics.ucsd.edu/~epivovar/anti-spam.htm Bret > Im trying to install SpamAssasin under Windows,I installed > perl and nmake. > But I'm getting these errors: > > --- > C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe version.h.pl > version.h.pl: creating

Re: Any modules use String::Approx?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Nicholson wrote: > Are there any plugins that use String::Approx as used by FuzzyOCR > but used to match non-image spam? > Not that I know of but it would definetly be possible. There are only problems with some words which are too similar to s

Re: dsbl.org

On Tue, January 2, 2007 17:55, vertito wrote: > sorry to ask this, but just like to know some hit stats if anybody here > is using dsbl.org from blocking IP as an addition to zen.spamhaus.org? KEY: 0: zen.spamhaus.org 3765/3800 = 99% 1: list.dsbl.org 503/3800 =

RelayCountry plugin doesn't add header

I am running SpamAssassin 3.1.7 in serial mode on Windows 2003. I would like to use the RelayCountry plugin and have enabled it as described on this web page: . But when I ran a test message through, the X-Relay-Countries header wasn't add

spamassassin and spamc calculate different results

Hi, I have a SUSE 9.3 mailserver with Postfix and SA 3.1.7 running. Unfortunately the commands (run as root) spamassassin

Making use of other spam checkers

Hi all, A lot of e-mail derived today is already scanned by an other (relay) spam checker. Does sa has some way of making use of this information and store this information instead of deleting it. Most preferably I would like to see/make this kind of setup -set in config, spam checker hos

Making use of other spam checkers

Hi all, A lot of e-mail derived today is already scanned by an other (relay) spam checker. Does sa has some way of making use of this information and store this information instead of deleting it. Most preferably I would like to see/make this kind of setup -set in config, spam checker hos

Any modules use String::Approx?

Are there any plugins that use String::Approx as used by FuzzyOCR but used to match non-image spam?

Re: localhost bypass?

Then isn't it unnecessary/redundant to send it through SA at all? On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 17:29 +, Justin Mason wrote: > > To be honest, I intended them as a whitelist ;) > > If a message never touched an untrusted host (ALL_TRUSTED), in > a correctly-configured trust setup, is that not safe t

Re: localhost bypass?

Matt Kettler writes: > Sander Holthaus wrote: > > Jason Faulkner wrote: > > >>> trusted_networks 127.0.0.1 > > >>> internal_networks 127.0.0.1 > > >>> > > >> trusted_networks is *NOT* a whitelist. Do NOT try to use it as one. > > EVER. > > >> > > > I'm confused as to what you mean by this. I

Re: sa-update problem...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike French wrote: > I'm on : > > SpamAssassin version 3.1.4 > running on Perl version 5.8.8 > > with Postfix and amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) > > I get a couple of errors when I run sa-update -D: > > [8798] dbg: diag: module not installed: Net::Ide

Re: FuzzyOCR doesn't appear to be working as expected

Ok found the problem It seems the samples in FuzzyOCR won't fire because of the default focr_autodisable_score It might be worthwhile making a mention of that somewhere when performing the tests. "These eml files are sample spam emails to test your installation of FuzzyOCR. As sumin

RE: sa-update problem...

I'm on : SpamAssassin version 3.1.4 running on Perl version 5.8.8 with Postfix and amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) I get a couple of errors when I run sa-update -D: [8798] dbg: diag: module not installed: Net::Ident ('require' failed) [8798] dbg: diag: module not installed: IO::Socket::INET6 ('r

Sync bayes between multiple servers.

All, First time poster... and noobie. I currently have several machines providing mail relay for my domains. I have started training one of the machines using sa-learn. However I would like the other relays to be knowledgable of the training I have done. I have considered a few options: -- use

dsbl.org

sorry to ask this, but just like to know some hit stats if anybody here is using dsbl.org from blocking IP as an addition to zen.spamhaus.org? tnx

Re: sa-update problem...

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:36:19 -0600, "Mike French" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >After the recent sa-update I get this after a lint: > > > >[8042] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule >SUBJECT_IN_BLACKLIST > When you ran sa-update did you add any extra instructions like install di

spamassassin and spamc calculate different results

Hi, I have a SUSE 9.3 mailserver with Postfix and SA 3.1.7 running. Unfortunately the commands (run as root) spamassassin http://www.linuxforen.de/forums/showthread.php?t=229016 (including the scan reports!) One source could be the associated user, but when trying to run either spamd/spamc or

FuzzyOCR doesn't appear to be working as expected

Fuzzy OCR plugin doesn't appear to be working as expected. Can anybody tell from this log why it's not firing with the sample images that come with the plugin? The Plugin seems to be loading ok and I did once see it create the logfile but it doesn't anymore. $ perl ~/perlscripts/filter.pl

sa-update problem...

After the recent sa-update I get this after a lint: [8042] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_IN_BLACKLIST [8042] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL [8042] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule USER_IN_BLACKLI

RE: Problems compiling gocr 43 on freebsd

As per this message: checking for library containing pnm_readpnminit... no * * * try option --with-netpbm=PATH You are lacking some dependencies. Running a make does not make sense when configure returns these errors. Read the documentation to see what dependencies need to be satisfied. At leas

Problems compiling gocr 43 on freebsd

Trying to setup FuzzyOCR Here's what I get $ ./configure --prefix=$HOME --with-netpbm=/usr/local/lib --verbose checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for

Re: localhost bypass?

Sander Holthaus wrote: > Jason Faulkner wrote: > >>> trusted_networks 127.0.0.1 > >>> internal_networks 127.0.0.1 > >>> > >> trusted_networks is *NOT* a whitelist. Do NOT try to use it as one. > EVER. > >> > > I'm confused as to what you mean by this. I'm using these in my > > environment, an

Re: localhost bypass?

Jason Faulkner wrote: > >>> trusted_networks 127.0.0.1 >>> internal_networks 127.0.0.1 >>> >> trusted_networks is *NOT* a whitelist. Do NOT try to use it as one. EVER. >> > > I'm confused as to what you mean by this. I'm using these in my > environment, and they do a good job of making sure

One spam offer definitely not worth it..

"Invoice #: 33021 - TOTAL: $15.00 We Email Advertise Your Web Site to 0,000,000 People" Wow! Only $15 for..er..nothing! Happy New Year etc. to all - and my eternal thanks for everyone involved in the discussion, support and development of SpamAssassin and associated tools - my life would be hel

Re: localhost bypass?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Faulkner wrote: > >>> trusted_networks 127.0.0.1 >>> internal_networks 127.0.0.1 >>> >> trusted_networks is *NOT* a whitelist. Do NOT try to use it as one. EVER. >> > > I'm confused as to what you mean by this. I'm using these in my > envi