Re: localhost bypass?

[Thomas S. Crum]

Then isn't it unnecessary/redundant to send it through SA at all?

On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 17:29 +0000, Justin Mason wrote:
> 
> To be honest, I intended them as a whitelist ;)
> 
> If a message never touched an untrusted host (ALL_TRUSTED), in
> a correctly-configured trust setup, is that not safe to whitelist?
> 
> --j.