Stuart Johnston wrote:
Here is a project that will export the Mozilla Bayes tokens which
would at least be the first step. I'm not sure how hard it would be
to then import them into SA.
http://bayesjunktool.mozdev.org/
Wonderful! Thank you very much. I'll see about exporting my Mozilla
baye
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Joe Kletch wrote:
>
>
>>So excited--I created my first rule.
>>
>>
>
>Congratulations!
>
>
>
>>It ran through lint with no
>>errors and seems to be achieving the requested outcome: move messages
>>from this sender to the recipients Spam folder, but do not reject (
On May 2, 2005, at 4:39 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Kletch wrote:
So excited--I created my first rule.
Congratulations!
It ran through lint with no
errors and seems to be achieving the requested outcome: move messages
from this sender to the recipients Spam folder, but do not reject (I
have
Joe Kletch wrote:
> So excited--I created my first rule.
Congratulations!
> It ran through lint with no
> errors and seems to be achieving the requested outcome: move messages
> from this sender to the recipients Spam folder, but do not reject (I
> have simscan rejecting scores over 18 points). T
I've noticed some inconsistencies in how spamassassin is marking up
messages on my host.
At first I thought it was the way mimedefang was in the mix on my host
but now that I'm digging a little further I am noticing something weird
and would appreciate some help troubleshooting it.
If I run th
So excited--I created my first rule. It ran through lint with no errors
and seems to be achieving the requested outcome: move messages from
this sender to the recipients Spam folder, but do not reject (I have
simscan rejecting scores over 18 points). The Threshold for moving to
the Spam folder
Michael Parker wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:44:25PM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
Bookworm wrote:
I've read through the archives several times, and hoped that over the
last year or so someone would build the functionality, or at least
mention it one way or another - I haven't seen it.
Is th
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:44:25PM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Bookworm wrote:
> >I've read through the archives several times, and hoped that over the
> >last year or so someone would build the functionality, or at least
> >mention it one way or another - I haven't seen it.
> >
> >Is there a
Roman Serbski wrote:
What was the highest score you've ever seen? I received a message
yesterday that was scored with 51.9(!). =)
Unfortunately I just purged the spamtraps, but that's what log files are
for. Here's the highest one from this week:
Score: 63.173
BAYES_99
BIZ_TLD
DOMAIN_RATIO
FORGE
Bookworm wrote:
I've read through the archives several times, and hoped that over the
last year or so someone would build the functionality, or at least
mention it one way or another - I haven't seen it.
Is there any way to take an already trained Mozilla bayes structure and
hand it directly of
Kelson wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> Robert Swan wrote:
>>
>>> How do I clear, or unlearn the bayes filter it seems that it is picking
>>> up wrong. E-mail that is SPAM has autolearn=ham in the header and this
>>> is wrong.
>>
>>
>> Is it?
>
>
> If it's spam being learned as ham, then yes, it
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>Everyone,
>
>I installed 3.03 this afternoon and everything looks good.
>
>I finally decided to set up a user alias e-mail address to take
>advantage of the following command:
>
>spamassassin --add-to-blacklist < /tmp/$FILENAME
>
>When I run this command from root I get
Hello all, I am using file based bayes DB and do Not have autolearn
enabled, I do manual learning using IMAP Spam Begone.
Robert
Peace he would say instead of goodbyepeace my brother.
-Original Message-
From: James R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Robert Swan wrote:
How do I clear, or unlearn the bayes filter it seems that it is picking
up wrong. E-mail that is SPAM has autolearn=ham in the header and this
is wrong.
Is it?
If it's spam being learned as ham, then yes, it is wrong. Autolearn may
be doing what it's suppose
Robert Swan wrote:
How do I clear, or unlearn the bayes filter it seems that it is picking
up wrong. E-mail that is SPAM has autolearn=ham in the header and this
is wrong.
I am Running SPAMASSASSIN 3.0.3 on a Linux Red Hat 9 server. (just
upgraded) did this in version 3.0.2 also, unrelated I
Roman Serbski wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>What was the highest score you've ever seen? I received a message
>yesterday that was scored with 51.9(!). =)
>
I hate to say it, but I've seen scores over 1000.0. All you need to do
is include a GTUBE :)
USER_IN_BLACKLIST will also jack it up quite a bit with a
Robert Swan wrote:
>How do I clear, or unlearn the bayes filter it seems that it is picking
>up wrong. E-mail that is SPAM has autolearn=ham in the header and this
>is wrong.
>
>
>
Is it?
The autolearner uses the score the message would have gotten if bayes
was disabled, all userconf (ie: white
"Robert Swan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 05/02/2005 02:15:45 PM:
> How do I clear, or unlearn the bayes filter it seems that it is
> picking up wrong. E-mail that is SPAM has autolearn=ham in the
> header and this is wrong.
>
> I am Running SPAMASSASSIN 3.0.3 on a Linux Red
Hat 9 server. (j
How do I clear, or unlearn the bayes filter it seems that it
is picking up wrong. E-mail that is SPAM has autolearn=ham in the header and
this is wrong.
I am Running SPAMASSASSIN 3.0.3 on a Linux Red Hat 9 server.
(just upgraded) did this in version 3.0.2 also, unrelated I know.
Payal Rathod wrote:
>On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:11:19PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>
>>How is SA called? from procmail, or something else?
>>
>>
>
>For .qmail file with a script ifspamh
>
>
>
>>One major problem I see is that the bayes files have permissions of 400,
>>but the bayes DB is
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:11:19PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> How is SA called? from procmail, or something else?
For .qmail file with a script ifspamh
>
> One major problem I see is that the bayes files have permissions of 400,
> but the bayes DB is site-wide. You generally need to use bayes_
Pardon the newbish question, I am new to my position and SA in general.
We have 2 mail relay servers running SA 3.0.2 and a test server that I have
upgraded to 3.0.3.
I would like a solid testing process where I can run a test of a bunch of
Spam emails against the test server (SA 3.0.3) then t
Payal Rathod wrote:
>Hi,
>I am looking after a friend's email server till he returns from his
>vacation. In his local.cf (SA 2.61 and yes I know it is time for
>upgrade) file he has,
>bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
>use_bayes 1
>score BAYES_50 0.001
>
>Also bayes is well trained with,
Kris Deugau said:
>> If you use a competent email client you will be offered the option
>> of keeping a local copy, which saves the redundant recipient.
>
> Some people deliberately turn this off. I'm not sure why. (I can
> *sort* of understand it for mailing list mail, but not for "direct"
> mai
--On Monday, May 02, 2005 7:48 AM -0400 Kevin Peuhkurinen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The interesting thing is that now, about a month later, I'm still seeing
spam going to that server! I wonder if the spammers have cached the old
MX entry or if they have some database of mail server addresses a
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 06:09:32PM +0200, Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
> >
> Thanks. This shouldn't be all that much changes. Is there a patch for
> getting this in 3.0.3?
Search bugzilla, there was a review patch for the 3.0 tree but it
never got enough votes to go in so I dropped it. I think it s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niek writes:
> On 5/2/2005 1:48 PM +0200, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
> > spam going to that server! I wonder if the spammers have cached the
> > old MX entry
>
> Jup.
BTW I've seen a few discussions recently where people rediscover
(sorry Kevin) th
Roman Serbski wrote:
> What was the highest score you've ever seen? I received a message
> yesterday that was scored with 51.9(!). =)
Bah. I've seen a few that scored ~55 with stock 2.64 scores. With
SpamCopURI, and custom scores, they jumped to ~80.
I *think* I found one that scored ~80 on the
Michael Parker wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:57:54PM -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
I'm the only one with problems checking the pgp sig of the tarball?
Are you by chance using GPG 1.4.x? There is this note in the release
announcement:
Note: GnuPG 1.4.0, and possibly 1.3.x versions, seem t
John Andersen wrote:
> If you use a competent email client you will be offered the option
> of keeping a local copy, which saves the redundant recipient.
Some people deliberately turn this off. I'm not sure why. (I can
*sort* of understand it for mailing list mail, but not for "direct"
mail.)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: wolfgang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 2:03 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: regexp: exclude a string
>
>
>In an older episode (Sunday 01 May 2005 12:49), Loren Wilton wrote:
>> > /p(?:0|o)rtf(?:0|o)(?:\||l)i(?:0|o)/
>>
Michael Parker wrote:
Probably not, there is a concept in 3.1 that allows you to do
systemwide or groupwide AWL dbs in SQL, similar to how you can
currently do it in Bayes (via override_username).
Michael
Thanks. This shouldn't be all that much changes. Is there a patch for
getting this in 3.0.
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:57:54PM -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
>
> I'm the only one with problems checking the pgp sig of the tarball?
>
Are you by chance using GPG 1.4.x? There is this note in the release
announcement:
Note: GnuPG 1.4.0, and possibly 1.3.x versions, seem to have probl
Hello,
I'm the only one with problems checking the pgp sig of the tarball?
BR,
Matías.
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Mike Grice wrote:
>
> Nope, but think of how it would scale. The design above is bad because
> there is no unique data in there, so the table will get slow. A better
> design would be this:
>
Howdy,
SpamAssassin is an open source project that welcomes
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 09:34 +0200, Arvinn L?kebakken wrote:
>
> Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
>
> >OK, this is probably just an over-cautious MySQL question.
> >
> >All of the examples I look at for setting up per-user prefs using SQL show
> >creating a table that looks like:
> >
> >username pr
Dan O'Brien wrote:
Now that I'm trying to update my production server from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3
(since Friday eve), every CPAN mirror I try results in the following
messages
Going to read /root/.cpan/sources/modules/02packages.details.txt.gz
Database was generated on Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:41:38 GMT
CPA
Hello,
I am receiving the following errors every time mail is processed by
spamd. Any ideas on a solution or what the problem is?
Derril H
May 2 08:04:52 admin2 spamd[19328]: Use of uninitialized value in
hash element at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/Metadata/Received
First, Thanks for the help.
Craig noticed that the rule ALL_TRUSTED was matched. There was a
potential issue with Trusted Path if trusted_networks was not
configured. I tried that. The final mail server is Exchange, and I am
having a hard time getting the headers back from the users.
I posted a l
I'm getting this errormessage:
Failed to run WRONGMX SpamAssassin test, skipping:__(Can't use an
undefined value as an ARRAY reference at /usr/lib/perl
5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/WrongMX.pm line 31,
line 62._)
this is SA 3.0.3
Thanks
Wolfgang
---
Kevin Peuhkurinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 05/02/2005 06:59:01 AM:
> Lately I've been thinking that something that would really be useful
for
> SA is a web based helpdesk tool. The idea is to help out companies
> that use SA as a proxy in front of their Notes/Exchange/Groupwise
> servers
>...
>
>About a month ago, there was a discussion on the list about how spammers
>specifically target secondary MX records. After reading I verified
>that indeed 99% of the mail that flowed through my store-and-forward
>secondary mail server was spam. So, I removed the second MX record
>fro
Jo wrote:
Bookworm wrote:
I've read through the archives several times, and hoped that over the
last year or so someone would build the functionality, or at least
mention it one way or another - I haven't seen it.
Is there any way to take an already trained Mozilla bayes structure
and hand it d
Hi,
I have just install the latest release of spamassassin (3.03 from the
tarball) on a debian
Everything seems to work fine but i 've got a syntax error during URIDNS
test when i run spamd -D:
...
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8496a28)
implements 'parsed_metadata'
deb
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:54:31PM +0200, Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
> >
> >Yes. Follow the instructions in the readme files.
> >for user prefs and mysql see
> >http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL
> >
> >
> Allready read it. System-wide AWL is not disucussed there, is it?
>
Probably not,
>>So, looking at:
>>
>>"/GUID:QPywoUg6DZ06+yvqCupCVJw*/G=Cam/S=Dowlat/OU=Corporate-Markham/O=A
>>lcate l Cable/PRMD=ACAB/ADMD=ATTMAIL/C=CA/"@MHS
>>
>>"-GUID:QnGodydG460CKmx35BCOvbw*-G=Cam-S=Dowlat-OU=Corporate-Markham-O=A
>>lcate l Cable-PRMD=ACAB-ADMD=ATTMAIL-C=CA-"@MHS
>
>Looking at the rule, I'm
Chris Santerre wrote:
IMHO, this is something that is needed. However, it would have to be
seperate user based quarantines. Otherwise there would be privacys issues on
one big quarantine that everyone could sift through.
I believe that most commercial anti-spam systems provide a means for
adm
Hello,
I have an old email address that a few contacts still use to reach me.
I've tried to get everyone up to date on the new address but no luck.
That's not really the issue though...
The reason I changed addresses was that the spam that was coming in was
all addressed to the old address.
>-Original Message-
>From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:41 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: The highest score?
>
>
>I cheat. I have a couple personal rules guaranteed to hit spam and no
>ham whatsoever. They hit 100. "MOM Agent" is guaran
>-Original Message-
>From: Kevin Peuhkurinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:59 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Web based helpdesk tool for SA?
>
>
>Lately I've been thinking that something that would really be
>useful for
>SA is a web based helpd
Philipp Snizek wrote:
Hi. Is it possible to keep my system-wide AWL setup when
using 'spamc -u recipient' with user preference and AWL stored in
SQL?
Yes. Follow the instructions in the readme files.
for user prefs and mysql see
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL
Philipp
All
Lately I've been thinking that something that would really be useful for
SA is a web based helpdesk tool. The idea is to help out companies
that use SA as a proxy in front of their Notes/Exchange/Groupwise
servers (such as my own). The MTA on the SpamAssassin box would
quarantine spam on th
On 5/2/2005 1:48 PM +0200, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
spam going to that server! I wonder if the spammers have cached the
old MX entry
Jup.
Niek
About a month ago, there was a discussion on the list about how spammers
specifically target secondary MX records. After reading I verified
that indeed 99% of the mail that flowed through my store-and-forward
secondary mail server was spam. So, I removed the second MX record
from my DNS zon
> Hi. Is it possible to keep my system-wide AWL setup when
> using 'spamc -u recipient' with user preference and AWL stored in
SQL?
Yes. Follow the instructions in the readme files.
for user prefs and mysql see
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL
Philipp
Hello,
I have an old email address that a few contacts still use to reach me.
I've tried to get everyone up to date on the new address but no luck.
That's not really the issue though...
The reason I changed addresses was that the spam that was coming in was
all addressed to the old address. I
Bookworm wrote:
I've read through the archives several times, and hoped that over the
last year or so someone would build the functionality, or at least
mention it one way or another - I haven't seen it.
Is there any way to take an already trained Mozilla bayes structure
and hand it directly of
Hi. Is it possible to keep my system-wide AWL setup when using 'spamc -u
recipient' with user preference and AWL stored in SQL?
I currently have a system-wide AWL of more than a million rows that it
would be a pity to loose.
.. or should I switch to personal AWL's anyway?
Arvinn
Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
OK, this is probably just an over-cautious MySQL question.
All of the examples I look at for setting up per-user prefs using SQL show
creating a table that looks like:
username pref value
So, if I want to allow users to control 5 values I would have a table that
lo
Hi,
I am looking after a friend's email server till he returns from his
vacation. In his local.cf (SA 2.61 and yes I know it is time for
upgrade) file he has,
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
use_bayes 1
score BAYES_50 0.001
Also bayes is well trained with,
-rw---1 root root
I cheat. I have a couple personal rules guaranteed to hit spam and no
ham whatsoever. They hit 100. "MOM Agent" is guaranteed spam. It seems
to hit 200. So it's not fair. I have, however, seen over 100 with pure
SARE rule sets so many of them were hit.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: "Ro
Loren, Greg,
Thanks. The problem was that I had set up a single-user config prior
to the system-wide config. Greg, my system-wide config looks almost
exactly as you described. Loren, your comment about procmail doing the
move reminded me that the single-user set up included a .procmailrc in
> Apologies if I missed this rather simple question in the FAQ's, but I
really did look.
Good reason for you to miss it, it isn't there.
SA doesn't route messages, it only filters them. Something else looks at
the filtering and decides what to do with the message.
As someone else suggested this
On Sunday 01 May 2005 07:46 am, Chris wrote:
>
> Nope, I finally managed to get an email off to the tech- support contact to
> whom the domain is registered to, I'll have to see what happens from there.
>
> Chris
Found out the entire fraudwatchinternational site had been down for over
32hrs. It
64 matches
Mail list logo
