Payal Rathod wrote:

>On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:11:19PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>  
>
>>How is SA called? from procmail, or something else?
>>    
>>
>
>For .qmail file with a script ifspamh
>
>  
>
>>One major problem I see is that the bayes files have permissions of 400,
>>but the bayes DB is site-wide. You generally need to use bayes_file_mode
>>    
>>
>[...]
>
>Right. Do I need 777 or just 744?
>  
>
In general 777. All users that need to access the bayes DB need to be
able to write to it, and create/delete temporary files and lock files.

This happens most extensively in the event of opportunistic expiry or
autolearning.

In your case I might do 744, just because the box isn't yours and the
admin might not want world-writable files (in which case he shouldn't be
using a global bayes DB).

However, 744  is really a half-baked solution and won't eliminate bayes
problems.

>  
>
>>As for receiving more spam than ever. Well, you're using SA 2.61, 
>>which
>>IS massively outdated. Spam is a moving target, and SpamAssassin does
>>require reasonably frequent updates to keep abreast of changing 
>>trends.
>>    
>>
>
>How safe is it to change to the new version? His is a live server and we 
>don't want to risk anything at all.
>  
>
I wouldn't be doing extensive upgrades on a box you don't normally
administer. However, you should let him know that all versions from 2.60
through 2.63 are vulnerable to a DoS attack if a person sends you a
maliciously crafted email (it's a bug in the mime decoder which was
fixed in 2.64, as well as 3.0.0)


Reply via email to