On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 06:09:32PM +0200, Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote: > > > Thanks. This shouldn't be all that much changes. Is there a patch for > getting this in 3.0.3?
Search bugzilla, there was a review patch for the 3.0 tree but it never got enough votes to go in so I dropped it. I think it should still apply cleanly to 3.0.3. > But maybe I should concider per-user AWL anyway. Sound a little awkward > to me though, as I have setup with system-wide bayes. > What are the opinions? I'm a firm believer in per-user dbs. It's pretty unlikely that anyone elses mailstream is going to exactly match yours, so you do your users a disservice in trying to make them all fit the same mold. Michael
pgpR0wwmeTYhK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
