Roman Serbski wrote: >Hi all, > >What was the highest score you've ever seen? I received a message >yesterday that was scored with 51.9(!). =) >
I hate to say it, but I've seen scores over 1000.0. All you need to do is include a GTUBE :) USER_IN_BLACKLIST will also jack it up quite a bit with a +100 score. GTUBE and blacklists aside, my highest spam score in recent history (past 4 weeks) was 45.74: score=45.74, required 5, autolearn=spam, AB_URI_RBL 1.00, BAYES_99 5.40, DCC_CHECK 1.00, DRUGS_ERECTILE 1.00, HTML_70 _80 0.10, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 1.00, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10, INFO_GREYLIST_NOTDELAYED -0.01, JP_URI_RBL 1.00, LOCAL_RCVD_HELO_XIP 1.50, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.32, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 1.10, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM 1.65, OB_URI_RBL 2.10, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.20, RAZOR2_CHECK 1.05, RCVD_IN_CHINA_KR 2.50, RCVD_IN_DSBL 0.71, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 2.34, RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0.00, RCVD_IN_XBL 4.92, SARE_RAND_2V 1.50, SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 3.00, SUBJ_VIAGRA 4.10, VIAGRA_ONLINE 4.06, WS_URI_RBL 2.10, X_MESSAGE_INFO 2.00 But I tend to lean towards lowering rule scores from their defaults. I tend to find some SARE rules, etc are a bit overly aggressive in scoring for my tastes.
