Greetings,
I'm testing a new mailserverr now based on
the HOWTO at workaround.org/articles/ispmail-sarge/ and have
a couple of remaining issues before I can actually deploy this.
1. How do I use whitelists in a configuration where users don't
have their own UID/GID since everything is owned by th
Anyone else seeing this junk when sending messages to the list?
gbierman at mochamail.com, apparently the address at this site
subscribed to the SA users list - please tell the postmaster of your
system to fix this.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 12:03:01PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> users@spama
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 08:08:24AM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
> From: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Much better to simply not spam filter critical e-mail accounts
> > > like postmaster/abuse/support/sales/etc.
> > With around 35.000-70.000 mails to those above boxes daily thats no
After all that it seems my problems were related to having changed versions
of perl and spamd's inability to find the new libraries on it's path.
Many thanks all for your help!
hugh
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Spamassassin
The only thing I wanted to prove with this is that line, that is created by my
local mail server (the last hop, and the most important one for SPF), does
indeed contains the EHLO string that isn't detected correctly by SA 3.0rc5.
And since nothing is special about my own MS SMTPSVC (Win2k3 SMTP
Hi!
Much better to simply not spam filter critical e-mail accounts like
postmaster/abuse/support/sales/etc.
With around 35.000-70.000 mails to those above boxes daily thats not
really do-able...
Do you see a lot of spam to these addresses? The reason I'm asking is
because we don't. To bad there
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Probably unrealistic to expect customers to know how to "bounce" a
message.
>
> Yes. Exactly my point.
>
> > Much better to simply not spam filter critical e-mail accounts like
> > postmaster/abuse/support/sales/etc.
Hi!
This is why people are encouraged to _bounce_ the original
message, so the sender email address is still the original one, and then
won't hurt the customer.
http://www.stearns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html#autoreporting
http://www.stearns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html#restri
> - Original Message -
> From: "William Stearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Good afternoon, Raymond, all,
> > (Raymond, you probably already know this, but I wanted to quickly
> > cover it for other people that may also be considering whether or not to
> > use AWL).
> >
> [SNIP]
> > That's
- Original Message -
From: "William Stearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Good afternoon, Raymond, all,
> (Raymond, you probably already know this, but I wanted to quickly
> cover it for other people that may also be considering whether or not to
> use AWL).
>
[SNIP]
> That's a different issue.
Hi!
We turned off AWL, we had a customer that forwarded two spam messages to
our helpdesk, the third normal message never came in, since his AWL beat
him...
That's a different issue. If the customer used _forward_ rather
than _bounce_, SA treats the entire message as coming from that emai
Good afternoon, Raymond, all,
(Raymond, you probably already know this, but I wanted to quickly
cover it for other people that may also be considering whether or not to
use AWL).
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> >> I gotta think this isn't gonna happen... but anyone know i
Hi!
We turned off AWL, we had a customer that forwarded two spam messages to
our helpdesk, the third normal message never came in, since his AWL beat
him...
Probably should not be spam filtering postmaster/abuse/support e-mails.
Probably not, but at the moment its about the only way to get a norma
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We turned off AWL, we had a customer that forwarded two spam messages to
> our helpdesk, the third normal message never came in, since his AWL beat
> him...
Probably should not be spam filtering postmaster/abuse/supp
Avi Shatz wrote on Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:52:49 +0300:
> telnet mailserver.localmta.org 25
> ehlo blabla
>
What do you want to prove with this? What needs to happen is that
[66.111.4.30] sends a HELO with an FQDN when it connects to another SMTP.
Your example above doesn't prove this, it just prov
Matt Kettler wrote on Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:43:01 -0400:
> Chris S reported his spamd swelling to 45mb with a huge version of
> bigevil.cf he was testing.
>
The latest bigevil.cf needs about 40 - 50 MB *alone*! Together with
several SARE rules our spamd processes were around 90 MB lately. That's
Hi!
I gotta think this isn't gonna happen... but anyone know if it can? If so,
I'm not going to enable AWL on my server.
You're asking the right questions.
To the best of my knowledge, this has already been addressed.
What goes in the AWL isn't just the raw email address, it's the emai
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:05:29 -0500
"Jason J. Ellingson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure someone thought of this, but I don't see it asked before... so...
> =
> 1) Person X regularly gets emails from Person Y (good friends)
>
> 2) Person Z is a bad guy... so he sends Person X a GTUBE ema
Not mine and I sent about 25 or so about an hour ago.
I have seen it once or twice in the past but it was temporary. I
attributed it to a busy or down server.
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Roger E. Rustad, Jr. wrote:
> Is anyone else's [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail bouncing?
>
> All the mail I've forwarded
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 08:05:29PM -0500, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
> I'm sure someone thought of this, but I don't see it asked before... so...
> =
> 1) Person X regularly gets emails from Person Y (good friends)
> 2) Person Z is a bad guy... so he sends Person X a GTUBE email with a
> faked
- Original Message -
From: "Jason J. Ellingson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Okay, follow-up question:
>
> Where does SpamAssassin get the IP? Is it the oldest IP in the received
> headers (low), or the most recent (top)?
>
> If it is oldest (assuming originating IP), then that could be faked e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is anyone else's [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail bouncing?
All the mail I've forwarded there over the last day or so has been
getting
returned with
Delay reason: Connection refused
Roger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.1.1
iQA/AwUBQU0rb+
Okay, follow-up question:
Where does SpamAssassin get the IP? Is it the oldest IP in the received
headers (low), or the most recent (top)?
If it is oldest (assuming originating IP), then that could be faked easily
enough.
If it is top, then what does it do if there is no IP (as many SpamAssass
Good evening, Jason,
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
> I'm sure someone thought of this, but I don't see it asked before... so...
> =
> 1) Person X regularly gets emails from Person Y (good friends)
>
> 2) Person Z is a bad guy... so he sends Person X a GTUBE email with a fake
- Original Message -
From: "Jason J. Ellingson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm sure someone thought of this, but I don't see it asked before... so...
> =
> 1) Person X regularly gets emails from Person Y (good friends)
>
> 2) Person Z is a bad guy... so he sends Person X a GTUBE email with
YOu might want to direct this at a Samba list.
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Ed Kasky wrote:
> I just upgraded to 3.0.7-1 and noticed an slight oddity in the logs now beig
> created. In my smb.conf I have:
>
> log level = 2
> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
>
> Since upgrading I now get two logs for
Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
I'm sure someone thought of this, but I don't see it asked before... so...
=
1) Person X regularly gets emails from Person Y (good friends)
2) Person Z is a bad guy... so he sends Person X a GTUBE email with a faked
FROM: address of Person Y.
3) Now, GTUBE scores a 100
I'm sure someone thought of this, but I don't see it asked before... so...
=
1) Person X regularly gets emails from Person Y (good friends)
2) Person Z is a bad guy... so he sends Person X a GTUBE email with a faked
FROM: address of Person Y.
3) Now, GTUBE scores a 1000 points, and gets set t
28 matches
Mail list logo
