Re: urgent major problem after f39 to f40 upgrade.

On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 12:07 AM home user via users wrote: > > On 10/12/24 7:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/12/24 6:13 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >> I would definitely consider some post-upgrade clean-ups as detailed in > >> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 8:17 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote: > > Folks, > this is an issue that has me frustrated. I created a VM under VMware > and VirtualBox and allocated 400GB as the disk size. I installed the > F40 server iso on the VM, and it showed the disk size as 400GB, and the > install wen

Re: urgent major problem after f39 to f40 upgrade.

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 8:16 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/12/24 5:07 PM, home user via users wrote: > > [...] > >> What does "systemctl status gdm" show now? I have no idea how it got > >> disabled, but if it still is, then try "systemctl enable --now gdm". > > > > It showed "disabled". I enter

Re: filezilla and firewalls

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:44 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:43 AM Tim via users > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 15:03 +0100, Will McDonald wrote: > > > If it's definitely FTPS (as opposed to SSH-based SFTP) it looks like

Re: urgent major problem after f39 to f40 upgrade.

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:46 PM home user via users wrote: > > (replying to multiple posts) > [...] > > (Samuel) > > If I boot from the f-39 entry, uname -a says I'm running f-39. > > If I boot from the f-40 entry, uname -a says I'm running f-40. > > Regardless of which grub line I use to boot, rp

Re: filezilla and firewalls

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:43 AM Tim via users wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 15:03 +0100, Will McDonald wrote: > > If it's definitely FTPS (as opposed to SSH-based SFTP) it looks like > > that needs ports 990 and 989. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTPS > > The Filezilla configuration is

Re: filezilla and firewalls

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 7:49 PM Tim via users wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 14:05 +0100, Will McDonald wrote: > > Can you use `openssl s_client` to validate the certificate chains in > > each scenario? > > On the one PC, only the timestamps differ... > > using working ethernet

Re: why am I still on 39?

On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 8:18 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 10/20/24 17:09, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/20/24 4:34 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >> More info: > >> > >> # dnf install fedora-beta-repo > > > > I don't know what you're expecting that to do. That package doesn't > > s

Re: why am I still on 39?

On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 8:57 PM Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2024, at 20:30, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > (Fedora 41 is called Rawhide at the moment until it is released. See > <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/rawhide/>). > > Fedora Linux 41 w

Re: My from address on this list

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:58 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/21/24 9:09 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > Why does my "From:" come out "Community support for > > Fedora users" when my posts show on this list? > > There are certain providers who have spam protection settings that cause > proble

Re: My from address on this list

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 3:09 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/21/24 11:28 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:58 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> > >> On 10/21/24 9:09 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >>> Why does my "From:"

Re: dnf disable-repo???

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 5:25 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 10/28/24 13:39, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/28/24 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> fedora 41 > >> > >> What am I doing wrong here? > >> > >> # cd /etc/yum.repos.d/ > >> # ls > >> brave-browser-rpm-r

Re: Problem during upgrade to F41

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:35 AM Frank Elsner via users wrote: > > my "dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=41" gives > > Error: > Problem: package network-scripts-openvswitch-3.2.2-1.fc39.x86_64 from > @System requires network-scripts, but none of the providers can be installed >

Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 5:14 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-11-03 at 17:02 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 4:57 PM Stephen Morris > > wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > Does this mean that with the tracer add

Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 4:57 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > [...] > > Does this mean that with the tracer addin no longer working there is no way > to get the equivalent functionality with dnf at update time? According to the dnf5 man page, you should install the 'dnf5-plugins' package. Then the 'nee

Re: OT: Fedora 40 to 41 update - Strange WINEHQ issue.

On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 7:13 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > > Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well > except for WINEHQ? > The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade > the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17?? > > So, not clear why t

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:38 PM wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 12:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > RPMFusion users may want to wait for the third party repository to > > rebuild its packages for F41. > > RPMfusion repos are already on F41. Conflicting NVIDIA Packages

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:18 PM Dave Close wrote: > > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? > I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. I don't run X so I can't say for certain. But there's a lot of X11 gear in the standard repos: $ d

dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Hi Everyone, I just upgraded three machines to Fedora 41 using . The machines were two desktops and one server. All the machines use the default Fedora repos; and they do not use third party repos. The process went as expe

Re: Strange DNF Post Install Script Message With F41

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:47 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > >> Running trigger-install scriptlet: > >> glibc-common-0:2.40-3.fc41.x86_64warning: posix.fork(): .fork(), .exec(), > >> .wait() and .redirect2null() are deprecated, use rpm.spawn() or > >> rpm.execute() instead This is being worked on

Re: Strange DNF Post Install Script Message With F41

On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 4:10 AM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 1/11/24 10:32, Colin J Thomson wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thursday 31 October 2024 22:46:29 Greenwich Mean Time Stephen Morris wrote: > > HI, > Following Patrick's thread about dnf tracer plugin I installed that > plugin again and got the

Re: How do I start MATE from the command line?

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 7:20 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > I have both MATE and Xfce installed. > Whilst I work on my xinit/lightdm problems, > I am firing up my GUI with startx. > > startx fires up xfce by default. > > How to I tell startx I want to fire up MATE? Let me Google that for yo

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:04 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 11/11/24 1:59 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Am I doing something wrong then when I did not have to do any cleanup > > for the system to be in this state? > > As a side issue, I might be treading on thin ice here, I have never done > > any o

Re: DNF Group Issue

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:28 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > In earlier versions of Fedora to F41, and earlier versions of DNF, the > command dnf group list used to list the Gnome and KDE/Plasma groups as > installed, and listed the Mate and XFCE groups as installable, now it no > longer does

Re: clean-up of old kernel fragments.

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:15 PM home user via users wrote: > > On 11/8/24 5:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 11/8/24 10:15 AM, home user via users wrote: > >> While doing those "rpm -qf" commands, 2 questions came to mind. > >> 1. Suppose [dir] has sub-directories. If I do "rpm -qf [dir]/*", will

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 11:07 PM Tim via users wrote: > > Samuel Sieb: > > > I have never done any of those post-install processes. > > Patrick O'Callaghan: > > Not even 'rpmconf' to merge .rpmnew files? > > Some people never customise their configurations, so even that probably > shouldn't be a c

Re: terminal open errors

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 12:39 AM Tim via users wrote: > > ToddAndMargo: > > Sort of like the firefighter whose house burns down > > whilst he is out putting someone else's house out. > > Just up the road from me, the firestation's kitchen caught fire while > they were out on a job, another station

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:47 AM Max Pyziur wrote: > > My personal setup is three Fedora machines (two laptops), a Windows 10 > laptop, and an older desktop used for backup/storage. > > The last has been running a variant of CentOS for the longest time; backup is > done hourly on the Fedora machi

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:40 PM Tim via users wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 19:16 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > > And note I was the person that worked the hard cases for a company > > with > 5,000 licenses, so if most senior linux resource at a company > > with that sort of licenses are gettin

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Post Fedora 41 upgrade - sshd problem

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:40 PM Max Pyziur wrote: > > > On 10/31/2024 1:32 PM EDT Charlie Dennett wrote: > > > > > /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 57: Bad key types > > > 'ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ssh-ed25519'. > > > /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 58: Bad key types > >

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 9:37 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:27:43 -0700 > ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > > And Bugzilla got things fixed > > Not everything. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451562 > > Reported 2008, now listed on the historic bug register :

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 2:15 PM Charlie Dennett wrote: > > When upgrading following the instructions at > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline/, > make sure you perform the optional post upgrade tasks like Clean up retired > packages, clean up old packages, c

Re: Valeton GP-100

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 6:59 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-09-22 at 17:05 +0100, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > > On 19 Sep 2024, at 16:56, Patrick O'Callaghan > > > wrote: > > > > > > 0024:err:ole:com_get_class_object class > > > {4ce576fa-83dc-4f88-951c-9d0782b4e376} not register

Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

Hi Everyone, I have a Fedora Server running F40 on an old Proliant G5 with hardware RAID1. The machine is giving too much trouble so I would like to migrate to newer hardware with a single SSD. Both machines are x86_64. I've been researching methods to perform the migration, but I am not clear on

Re: Publican

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 2:32 PM Steve Underwood wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to do some work with docbook, so I looked for tools in the Fedora > repository. I found publican, installed it, tried following the > instructions and I am getting nowhere. The documentation says I should > add lines to .pub

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 8:57 AM Barry Scott wrote: > > On 28 Sep 2024, at 00:05, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Does anyone have experience with a migration like this? If so, can you > provide feedback? > > I have always considered it better to make a new install on new hardware

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 1:42 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > Am 28.09.2024 um 01:05 schrieb Jeffrey Walton : > > > > I have a Fedora Server running F40 on an old Proliant G5 with hardware > > RAID1. The machine is giving too much trouble so I would like to > > migrat

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 11:23 AM Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > > On 27 Sep 2024 at 19:05, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > From: Jeffrey Walton > Date sent: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 19:05:31 -0400 > Subject:Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 3:41 PM Roger Heflin wrote: > > I have personally done g1(3.5" scsi) -> g5(2.5" sas) (initrd rebuild > to use the correct drivers + dd to clone onto a SAN disk, boot up new > machine on livecd and dd back to the local disk). > > And done many g5/g6/g7/g8/g9/g10 to various d

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 2:02 PM George N. White III wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:07 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I have a Fedora Server running F40 on an old Proliant G5 with hardware >> RAID1. The machine is giving too much trou

emacs-nox installs 622 MB of packages???

Does this look reasonable to anyone, given I am trying to install a lightweight version of emacs without the gear for window managers and desktop environments on a Fedora Server? I just need to edit files... - $ sudo yum install emacs-nox ... =

Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 1:10 PM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > On Wed Nov06'24 11:59:42AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > From: Jeffrey Walton > > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:59:42 -0500 > > To: Community support for Fedora users > > CC: Ranjan Maitra > >

Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 2:55 PM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > On Wed Nov06'24 01:50:18PM, Roger Heflin wrote: > > From: Roger Heflin > > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:50:18 -0600 > > To: noloa...@gmail.com, Community support for Fedora users > > > > CC: Ranjan Maitra > > Reply-To: Community sup

Re: DNF Needs Restarting Repository Update

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:57 PM Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2024, at 17:11, Stephen Morris wrote: > > why was that updated again, surely that repository was flagged as up to > > date by the prior dnf update? > > Not 100% sure but I suspect something in dnf needs-restarting is looking f

Re: DNF Needs Restarting Repository Update

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:57 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 7/11/24 19:30, Barry wrote: > > On 6 Nov 2024, at 22:11, Stephen Morris wrote: > > I ran a sudo dnf update which updated and loaded the two F41 Updates > repositories and then put on the updates. Immediately after the update > fini

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > $ rpm -qa kernel > kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64 > kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64 > kernel-6.11.4-201.fc40.x86_64 > > Problem, only the 38 kernel shows in grub. > > How do I get the 40 kernel to show in grub? Let me Google that for

Re: clean-up of old kernel fragments.

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:42 PM home user via users wrote: > > (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3) > > Selected command output... > > -bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel > kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64 > kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64 > -bash.3[~]: > > -bash.3[~]: rpm -qa kernel

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 1:07 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 10/23/24 21:26, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users > > wrote: > >> > >> $ rpm -qa kernel > >> kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64 > >

List manually installed packages for a machine migration

Hi Everyone, I have some old hardware that needs a refresh. The old machine is running Fedora 40 x86_64 fully patched. The new machine is running the same on a fresh OS install. I want to get a list of packages I manually installed on the old machine, like Certbot, Emacs and Nginx, so I can config

Re: clean-up of old kernel fragments.

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 5:04 PM home user via users wrote: > > On 11/6/24 11:12 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > [...] > >>> Related, be sure to look in /lib/modules for old kernel artifacts. > >>> There have been several bugs related to proceccessing old kernel

Re: clean-up of old kernel fragments.

On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 5:43 PM home user via users wrote: > > On 10/25/24 12:45 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:42 PM home user via users > > wrote: > >> > >> (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.

Re: DNF Needs Restarting Repository Update

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 5:26 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-11-07 at 09:11 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Hi, > > I ran a sudo dnf update which updated and loaded the two F41 > > Updates repositories and then put on the updates. Immediately after the > > update finished I ran

Re: Certbot fails

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:47 PM steven stern wrote: > > I'm having issues with SSL renewal via certbot. The script that's been > working for years is now failing with a "timeout" trying to fetch the > ".well-known/acme-challenge" files. I don't think anything's changed in my > configuration. I'

Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:54 AM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > I recently got a 16TB USB disk and was trying to mount it on Fedora 40 using > spacefm. I get the following: > > Mount /dev/sdb: > > Status: Finished with error (Exit status 1). > > Object /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/block_devices/sd

Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:54 AM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > I recently got a 16TB USB disk and was trying to mount it on Fedora 40 using > spacefm. I get the following: > > Mount /dev/sdb: > > Status: Finished with error (Exit status 1). > > Object /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/block_devices/sd

Re: Remove disk encryption in Maintenance Mode

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 8:03 PM Roger Heflin wrote: > > The encryption defaults changed sometime recently. I don't see the change documented at or . That's unfortunate. > The

Re: Systemd-resolved

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 1:02 AM jarmo wrote: > [...] > > So, I disable systemd-resolved and manually create /etc/resolv.conf > to get my network working. Disabling a service only lasts until the next (re)boot. And it does not stop currently executing services, and the service can still be started

Re: security issue?

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:25 PM home user via users wrote: > > (f-40, stand-alone workstation, gnome) > > A few times in the past couple of months, I've received the following > warning from "chkrootkit": > - - - - - - > bash.1[~]: chkrootkit > ROOTDIR is `/' > Checking `amd'... not found > [snip

Re: Strange DNF Scriptlet Message for F42 Received on F41

On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:21 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > What do these messages mean for F41? > > >>> Running post-install scriptlet: > >>> java-17-openjdk-headless-1:17.0.13.0.11-3.fc41.x86_64 > >>> Finished post-install scriptlet: > >>> java-17-openjdk-headless-1:17.0.13.0.11-3.fc41.x86_6

Re: Fedora F41 Hard Disk Performance

On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:46 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 18/11/24 10:36, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Yes, a full cache can cause performance issues, but I would expect to be able > to play around with the caching algorithms to control what gets cached and > what doesn't, particularly when looking

Re: After upgrade to F41 unable to change propeties of Plasma desktop icons

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 1:23 PM Frank Bures wrote: > > On 2024-11-20 13:06, Frank Bures wrote: > > > I was talking about right-clicking an icon on the desktop, clicking > > Properties and then trying to save the change by clicking OK. > > That's when the error message is generated. > > > > I belie

Re: Python 2 to 3 conversion

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:16 AM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Go Canes wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:45 AM Patrick O'Callaghan > > wrote: > >> > >> I'm attempting to convert a small Python-2 script to Python-3. > > > > How small? It might be easy to do by-hand. I.e., if it is aborting > > o

Re: might be off topic

On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 10:04 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 2024-11-16 18:35, bruce wrote: > > Hi Roger. If I understand your reply. You're saying you purchased a > > wifi adapter and I guess got a USB wifi adapter?? Am I missing something? > > No, you open it up and replace the internal wifi mo

Re: gcc/gsl

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 1:33 PM Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > I am not sure this issue is entirely relevant on this mailing list. > Maybe you could redirect me. > > The same application (relatively heavy code), provides different values when > it > is run and compiled on 2 different machines

Partial dnf-system-upgrade and broken dnf?

Hi Everyone, I attempted a dnf-system-upgrade on an old server (F40) to match the new server (F41) I've been setting up for the migration. The dnf-system-upgrade on the old server went sideways after step 3: `dnf system-upgrade reboot`. On the old server, it appears the upgrade partially happened.

Re: Fedora 41, TrippLite UPS connecting and disconnecting continuously?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:08 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > > I installed fedora 41 workstation on a spare partition on > my system, when I try to boot I get a neverending series of > messages about the TrippLite UPS connecting then disconnecting. > > I fixed this by unplugging the USB cable on the UPS

Does Dragon Player support MP4 on Fedora?

Hi Everyone, I have an MP4 clip that I am trying to watch on F41. When I double click the MP4, Dragon Player opens with two buttons: Play File and Play Stream. (It does not show the MP4 that caused Dragon Player to launch). I cannot seem to get the MP4 to play, even if I select Play File and brows

Re: Fedora 41, TrippLite UPS connecting and disconnecting continuously?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:25 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:08 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > > > > I installed fedora 41 workstation on a spare partition on > > my system, when I try to boot I get a neverending series of > > messages about the

Re: QR code scanning

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 8:55 PM Tim via users wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 16:34 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > > I want to read a code that comes to me via web page. > > My usual browser is firefox. > > I'm kind of curious what websites give you a QR code to scan, but don't > give you any l

Re: startx fails

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:56 AM Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > suspend failed to do its thing, so I powered-down. dropping me into the startup correctly, but no X. Running startx as root gave me a display. > However, running startx as a normal user, fails. > > So, I have the startx log, but its unc

Re: It's a brick :-<(

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:09 PM Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > I find myself in need of a bootable rescue disk that provides (at least) disk > diagnostics and disk wipe programs. (I have a F36 thumb - I assume that it > has neither) > Referrals would be greatly appreciated. I don't think Fedora prov

Re: Something keeps creating Events.json in my home directory

On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 9:12 AM Matti Pulkkinen wrote: > > Something keeps creating a file, Events.json, in my home directory. It > only ever contains an empty JSON array, but if I remove the file, > something just creates it again. Has anyone seen this before? What > program could be behind this?

VirtualBox and Fedora 37

Hi Everyone, I'm hoping someone has a contact at VirtualBox or Oracle and can nudge someone to have VirtualBox updated for Feedora 37. * https://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora If someone has a contact, please ping them. Thanks in advance. ___

Re: Upgrade to f37 left system in messed up state

On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 10:45 AM Paolo Galtieri wrote: > > I just upgraded from fedora 36 to 37. There were no errors reported but > after the update I get: > > dnf list all > Adobe Systems Incorporated 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:00 > Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'adobe-linux-x

Re: Upgrade to f37 left system in messed up state

On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 1:10 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote: > > I was a little premature in saying thins started working. It seems to > be very hit and miss. Wireshark shows many dns requests as refused, but > then they start to work for a while and then start failing again. > > If I run dig cnn.com f

Re: VirtualBox and Fedora 37

Hi Jamie, On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:36 AM Jamie Fargen wrote: > > Fedora has long supported virtualization with libvirt and kvm, there > is a suitable gui interface via virt-manager to make it easier for > mere mortals to manage VMs, Images, etc. What are the considerations > in using these tool

Re: Backup data from Firefox

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:04 AM Andreas Fournier wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 09:57 -0500, John Mellor wrote: > > > > On 2022-11-29 09:41, Andreas Fournier wrote: > > > I'm wondering what would be best practice in how to backup the user > > > data from Firefox on a Fedora desktop? I'm thinkin

Re: spam through Hyperkitty

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 5:33 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 06:38 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > > Well, so much for the notion that web forums are better at stopping > > spam than mailing lists... > > > > I didn't believe it then, and I don't believe it now. > > Reported i

Re: Are Meta/Facebook servers using Fedora Linux?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:56 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > > Subject: Are Meta/Facebook servers using Fedora Linux? > > Good day from Singapore, > > I have just come across this article. > > Article: Fedora's FESCo Rejects The Idea Of "-fno-omit-frame-pointer" > As Default Compiler Fl

Re: Are Meta/Facebook servers using Fedora Linux?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:04 PM Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2022, at 08:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > I often recommend Fedora Server anytime I see folks using RHEL or > > CentOS. I don't understand why organizations run that antique software > > tha

Re: Are Meta/Facebook servers using Fedora Linux?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 11:46 PM Tim wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-12-06 at 19:30 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > The keyword is "known". Developers don't work on 5 or 10 year old > > software. Existing bugs don't get uncovered and fixed. They don't > >

Re: Weird selinux message

On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 11:16 AM Robert McBroom via users wrote: > > SELinux is preventing gdb from read access on the chr_file pcmC0D0p. > > What would call debug on boot sequence? More information may be found in /var/log/audit/audit.log. `sealert -l "*"` might also provide more information. I

Re: Weird selinux message

On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 11:43 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: > > ... > There is nothing in audit.log referring to any of the files or processes in > the alerts. > > I've run the relabel command several times and the alerts are still there. > ... > Raw Audit Messages > type=AVC msg=audit(164352

Re: Clearing DNS cache without rebooting

On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 4:53 PM Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2022, at 15:55, Joe Zeff wrote: > > Command not found, and dnf can't find it either. I should mention that for > > various reasons this box is still running F 25, although I'm planning to > > reinstall with 37 very soon. > >

Re: Clearing DNS cache without rebooting

On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 5:18 PM Joe Zeff wrote: > > On 12/09/2022 02:59 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Yes, this. > > Do you know why I haven't upgraded before this? If not, you're not in a > position to decide when or if I upgrade. The reasons are your own. But

Re: chrome hangs

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 5:26 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-12-11 at 13:34 -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > So, no joy. Chrome help suggests closing other apps, and then (the > > ultimate windows fix) reboot. That's given me trouble in the past, > > but I'll try anything :-) > >

Re: How do I identify a bluetooth device in bluetooth add device?

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 7:14 PM Tim via users wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 17:53 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: > > Because bluetooth is the most persnickety unreliable temperamental protocol > > ever invented? > > Bluetooth: noun, worse than WiFi Good one. ___

Re: Clearing DNS cache without rebooting

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 3:20 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 12/10/22 01:06, Tim via users wrote: > > Tim: > >>> Are you supposed to remember which epson printer is which without any > >>> clues? Are they both going to get the same name? Will they self- > >>> modify one of their names? Will they a

Re: Clearing DNS cache without rebooting

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 10:49 AM Tim via users wrote: > > Likewise, I use Apache rather than some other half-baked HTTP server. > Though, unfortunately, my hosting provider has decided they're now > going to use LightSpeed, which isn't Apache-compatible in the areas > that I want (not to mention i

Re: Clearing DNS cache without rebooting

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 11:14 AM Barry wrote: > > On 14 Dec 2022, at 15:49, Tim via users > > wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 16:11 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: > >> I used to use bind, but it became impossible to configure when > >> they started enforcing DNS encryption, > > ... > > Likewise, I

Re: 127.0.0.53 question

On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:31 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > I am use to seeing 127.0.0.1, but now I am seeing > things like 127.0.0.53. > > This is used with my caching named server on > port 53. > > So I figured that the last digit was the (local) > port. > > So I tried CUPS: 127.0.0.631.

Re: 127.0.0.53 question

On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 12:27 AM Tim via users wrote: > [...] > Both are valid addresses. > > 127.0.0.631 is *unlikely* to be in use, but is valid. Huh? Citation, please. Jeff ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Fedora 37: How to rename and set a custom Network interface Name with NetworkManager and nmcli

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 8:48 AM Dario Lesca wrote: > > I have two network device named ens192 and ens224 > > 2: ens192: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group > default qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:0c:29:e6:6d:d7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 3: ens224: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN > group default qlen

Re: OT: Can Fedora upgrade firmware on WD SSD drives?

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 2:26 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > > Contacted them, since web site seemed to only have > option to upgrade firmware using a windows program? > Got a reply that that is currently the case, and only option > would be to install windows on machine, or remove driv

Re: I HAVE NOY USE FEDOREA AT ALL

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:30 PM Mike Wright wrote: > [...] > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Or, from a GUI, https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/ . But I've got a feeling this person is just trolling the list. Jeff ___

Re: FC37 corked my passive FTP, nf_conntrack_helper vanished

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 8:24 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > [...] > I have tried googling this. I get tons of hits > but nothing specific to FC37. The latest Fedora docs are at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/system-administrators-guide/ . > Just noticed that I can not

Re: fwupd broke my wifi on new laptop

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:18 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > Brand new lenovo x1 carbon. > > Today the "discover" sw update app suggest fw updates. I went ahead with > them. Now wifi isn't working properly. At boot, I get a hang on > Job NetworkManager-wait-online.service/start running Sorry to he

Re: FC37 corked my passive FTP, nf_conntrack_helper vanished

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 5:05 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 12/20/22 11:18, Barry Scott wrote: > > [...] > > I found this comment "But keep in mind this is considered a security > > vulnerability - that's why newer kernels changed the default value of > > nf_conntrack_helper to false." on >

Re: OT: Can Fedora upgrade firmware on WD SSD drives?

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:06 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > [...] > Just for Information. I did get a response from WD that > was a little concerning.. Some messages had mentioned > perhaps hooking the disk to a windows machine and > doing the updates, but the WD respone mentioned tha

Re: OT: Can Fedora upgrade firmware on WD SSD drives?

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:47 PM Roger Heflin wrote: > >> Just for Information. I did get a response from WD that >> was a little concerning.. Some messages had mentioned >> perhaps hooking the disk to a windows machine and >> doing the updates, but the WD respone mentioned that >> they could not

<    1   2   3   4   5   >