Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 08:53:
On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote:
poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03:
On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981738
he
On 07/13/13 15:01, antonio wrote:
> Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 08:53:
>> On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote:
>>> poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03:
On 12.07.2013 11:12, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
>
>
>
On 07/12/2013 04:02 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
<>
This is why an incandescent lightbulb is much more likely to fail when
you turn it on than at any other time.
this is mainly caused by the 'inrush current" when bulb first has voltage
applied.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current
I've r
Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 09:03:
On 07/13/13 15:01, antonio wrote:
Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 08:53:
On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote:
poma ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 12/07/2013 23:03:
On 07/13/13 15:47, antonio montagnani wrote:
> Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 09:03:
>> On 07/13/13 15:01, antonio wrote:
>>> Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 13/07/2013 08:53:
On 07/13/13 13:52, antonio wrote:
> poma ha scri
On 12 July 2013 21:45, lee wrote:
>
> And there needs to be something like an option for extended partitioning
> that allows you to do whatever you want. Having the installer do it for
> you is a nice option to have and it's not enough.
>
On install from live discs at least there is definitely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 12/07/2013 22:45, lee a écrit :
> "D. Hugh Redelmeier" writes:
>
> You're probably screwed when you need LVM or software raid or
> encryption with the partitioning you need. Is there any way to get
> that? Can you install Fedora on software rai
Cannot get chronyd.service to start after fedup F18 > F19
I don't know what mdmonitor has to do with it, no raid on box.
journalctl -xn
-- Logs begin at Thu 2013-07-11 13:15:03 IST, end at Sat 2013-07-13
09:29:41 IST. -- Jul 13 09:29:41 my.upgraded.pc systemd[1]: Cannot
add dependency job for un
Hello,
How do I add an application launcher to the top panel (fedora 18/19)?
For example from the application list.
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-
On 07/13/13 18:33, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Cannot get chronyd.service to start after fedup F18 > F19
>
> I don't know what mdmonitor has to do with it, no raid on box.
>
>
> journalctl -xn
> -- Logs begin at Thu 2013-07-11 13:15:03 IST, end at Sat 2013-07-13
> 09:29:41 IST. -- Jul 13 09:29:41 my.upgr
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
>
> If people on the users list don't agree with me, there's no point
> submiting to developers.
>
>
Well I for one certainly don't agree with you.
If you disable it everywhere it's too much of a pain to turn it all
back on when you need it.
On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 01:57 -0500, g wrote:
> i have a dual lamp fixture in kitchen that has been on a dimmer
> control from back in late 80's. neither of the bulbs have burned out
> because the dimmer is a 'zero cross on' type and because the dimmer
> always starts out at minimal voltage, there is
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
>> When I login, I get the following problem:
>>
>> -- psmith: /home/psmith: change directory failed: Permission denied
>>
>> I have the following:
>>
>> drwx--. 191 psmith psmith 12288 Jul 12 23:13 psmith
>>
>> Any ideas?
>
>
>
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 08:54 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> The best practices have largely been agreed to (as much as any best
> practices ever are). IPv6 is as mature as it can get until a billion
> end-users get on it. Large ISPs around the world have rolled it out
> in production. Major OSes sup
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:51:52PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> How do I add an application launcher to the top panel (fedora 18/19)?
> For example from the application list.
I think you can do it using an extension "Frippery Panel Favorites".
I don't know if it works or how well but you can t
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:01:31 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> To fix this problem create the file /etc/sysconfig/chronyd with the
> contents
>
> OPTIONS= -4
>
Sorted Thanks Ed,
--
Regards,
Frank "When in doubt PANIC!"
I check for new mail app. 20min
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
use
>
> I tried what you reccommended,
>
> restorecon /home
>
>
>
Well as that is listed it would do nothing...
It needs to be recrusive - ie restorecon -Rv /home
In addition since it has not been clarified can you please confirm /home is
on a) a local partition (ie not nfs or cifs) and b) the files
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:20 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> I tried what you reccommended,
>>
>> restorecon /home
>
> Well as that is listed it would do nothing...
>
> It needs to be recrusive - ie restorecon -Rv /home
>
> In addition since it has not been clarified can you please confirm /home is
Dear All,
I was playing with the permissions of
/home
/home/psmith
because of the issue reported in previous posts.
Could someone please tell me the commands to restore the correct
permissions to those both directories?
In previous posts, some people recommended
chmod 755 /home
But what abou
Hello,
In fedora18, when I go on application, I can see "browse and run applications".
I cannot get the same in fedora 19!
Did I miss to install something?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> Something strange is happening. I have just installed F19 XFCE, and
> copied my home directory from an external drive, but now I cannot
> login via the graphical login manager; I need to go to
>
> CNTRL + ALT + F2
>
> to login and then startx.
I'm getting a yum dependency problem when running "yum update"
and I'm not sure how to solve it.
I'd be very grateful for advice.
Some exerpts from the error messages are:
---
Error: Package: perl-core-5.10.1-131.el6_4.x86_64 (@updates)
Requires: perl-IO-Comp
Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödinger’s Cat.
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
Hi,
Just checking if this is a bug and if there's a workaround. It happened
in F18 too when a recent set of HPLIP updates came through, but I've
since update the same box to F19 and I'm seeing the same problem. I have
an HP multifunction printer with a builtin scanner which has always
worked
On 07/13/13 21:15, Ian Chapman wrote:
> Just checking if this is a bug and if there's a workaround. It happened in
> F18 too when a recent set of HPLIP updates came through, but I've since
> update the same box to F19 and I'm seeing the same problem. I have an HP
> multifunction printer with a b
On 13/07/13 21:24, Ed Greshko wrote:
The HPLIP stuff is at 3.13.6 but I'm not sure what it's telling me is at 3.13.3
but anyway it prevents the scanner from working.
I believe you can simply run the hp-plugin utility to clear this up.
Great - thanks Ed, that fixed it.
--
Ian Chapman.
--
I used to remove rhgb, in order to be able to watch the boot
messages; but this new thing seems to handle other tasks in addition to
hiding those messages.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 13:43:37 +,
Beartooth wrote:
I used to remove rhgb, in order to be able to watch the boot
messages; but this new thing seems to handle other tasks in addition to
hiding those messages.
You can modify the boot parameters in order to see the boot messages
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:43:37 + (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
>
> I used to remove rhgb, in order to be able to watch the
> boot messages; but this new thing seems to handle other tasks in
> addition to hiding those messages.
>
>
Just remove rhgb as you used to do.
Also remove "quiet" if pr
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
> On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
>> Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of
>> package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and
>> version 2 from Fedora 18. Imagine this package A provides a file
>> '/bin/ls'.
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
> ALL!).And now for.."fedup-cli --network 19"...and I'll keep my
> fingers crossedbut what's the time frame?like an
> hour?2?...2+1/2?
About an hour or two --- it depends on how fast you can download
packages and on how fast your computer c
Paul Smith writes:
> Dear All,
>
> Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What
> are the main reasons?
Besides all the reasons already mentioned: It can be much more
manageable to adjust one or two things when upgrading from one release
to the next than it may be havin
Paul Smith writes:
> chmod 755 /home
>
> But what about
>
> /home/psmith
It depends on what you want. There is some tradition that home
directories are readable for everyone and writable for their owners
only. It may be a good idea to make them readable for their owners only
--- or a bad idea
Matthew Miller writes:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:57:04PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> The upgrade from 17 to 18 silently broke apache because the
>> configuration had changed. That is something that shouldn't happen, the
>> devs know when there are changes like that and make sure the users are
>> inf
Klaus-Peter Schrage writes:
> Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
> menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödinger’s Cat.
Like "Schroedingers Cat"? ;)
There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
,
| [...]
| if [ x$feature_default_font_path = xy ] ; then
|
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 03:11:20 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> imagine you have the following:
>>
>>
>> package A, depends on C, installed
>> package B, depends on C, not installed
>> package C, installed
>>
>>
>> All the packages are version 1. After a while, you ins
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 04:39:32PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Klaus-Peter Schrage writes:
>
> > Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
> > menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödinger’s Cat.
>
> Like "Schroedingers Cat"? ;)
>
> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
On 07/13/2013 07:49 AM, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
> menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödingerâs Cat.
>
> Thanks
I also find this annonying. Apparently the default font isn't unicode,
but the OS name is coded that way.
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:20:49 -0500
Steven Stern wrote:
> I also find this annonying. Apparently the default font isn't unicode,
> but the OS name is coded that way.
Just show how successful unicode support has been after all
these decades :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> You could install the NVIDIA drivers instead of using nouveau. They're
> are at least ten times faster, so it makes sense anyway.
>
I think I'll give this a try. Originally I wanted to use the free drivers,
but if they will not work this seems like the most practical solution.
--
users maili
On 10/07/13 07:05, Dick Roark wrote:
R
est in peace, Seth.
May he Rest In Peace and condolences for his family.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fe
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 03:34:18PM +0200, lee wrote:
> The package management tools in Debian send you emails about changes
> like that, even about very little changes, when packages are being
> replaced by more recent versions. Maybe this could be done in Fedora as
> well?
You could try using yu
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
Besides all the reasons already mentioned: It can be much more
manageable to adjust one or two things when upgrading from one release
to the next than it may be having to suddenly adjust five or ten after
skipping some releases.
What are the main reasons not to u
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 05:57:57PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> what he menat was showing the difference between
> present and new config file before updates and the
> option to merge them - not that the merge is useful
> in many cases but *that* is was Debian offers
Oh, I see. There used to be
I posted about this issue on the devel list and it was recommended
that I try here. That conversation can be found at:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185305.html
Here's a description of the issue:
I have a ThinkPad T60 that I recently upgraded to Fedora 19 from
CentOS 6
On 13/07/13 09:43, Beartooth wrote:
I used to remove rhgb, in order to be able to watch the boot
messages; but this new thing seems to handle other tasks in addition to
hiding those messages.
Hi, you should be able to set the default to show the boot messages with;
sudo plymouth-set-d
On 07/13/2013 10:39 AM, lee wrote:
> Klaus-Peter Schrage writes:
>
>> Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
>> menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödinger’s Cat.
>
> Like "Schroedingers Cat"? ;)
>
> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
>
/snip/
Schröding
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:27:52 +0200
lee wrote:
> Assuming that package A doesn't work with the more recent version of
> package C?
Right, that was my assumption. If it does, then it would just update
them all.
...snip...
> Yes, this situation was the result of an upgrade that didn't finish.
>
On 07/13/2013 02:13 PM, Doug wrote:
On 07/13/2013 10:39 AM, lee wrote:
Klaus-Peter Schrage writes:
Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the
menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödinger’s Cat.
Like "Schroedingers Cat"? ;)
There's something about fonts in grub.c
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:20:49 -0500
Steven Stern wrote:
> On 07/13/2013 07:49 AM, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> > Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in
> > the menu, like in /etc/fedora-release: Schrödingerâs Cat.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> I also find this annonying. Appare
On 07/13/2013 09:44 AM, lee wrote:
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
ALL!).And now for.."fedup-cli --network 19"...and I'll keep my
fingers crossedbut what's the time frame?like an
hour?2?...2+1/2?
About an hour or two --- it depends on how fast you can download
packages
On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote:
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of
package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and
version 2 from Fedora 18. Imagine this package A p
On 07/13/2013 11:57 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, lee wrote:
Besides all the reasons already mentioned: It can be much more
manageable to adjust one or two things when upgrading from one release
to the next than it may be having to suddenly adjust five or ten after
skipping s
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:47 PM, lee wrote:
>> chmod 755 /home
>>
>> But what about
>>
>> /home/psmith
>
> It depends on what you want. There is some tradition that home
> directories are readable for everyone and writable for their owners
> only. It may be a good idea to make them readable for
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, lee wrote:
> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
(Boot Manager for Humans)
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On 07/13/2013 02:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, lee wrote:
>> There's something about fonts in grub.cfg:
>
> When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
> (Boot Manager for Humans)
>
> FC
>
I added this to the kernel line in grub.conf and it made t
On 7/13/2013 12:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
(Boot Manager for Humans)
Once the fundamental Transhumanism technologies are fully
operational.
--
An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest.
-Benjamin Franklin
--
u
I have just reported a crash in Libre Office. The system took about an
hour for it. Is this normal. I don't remember submitting crash reports
taking so long. The bulk of the time was spent in "Generating
backtrace", though "Initializing virtual root" also took a fair while.
Here's the log:
Hello,
I tried to create an application launcher but I cannot find the clue
in fedora 19!
Right click does not offer such an option.
alacarte either.
firppery (add panel favorite), in theory yes, but not in pratice. Seceral
frippery applications do not work like SystemMonitor
Thank for any help.
Am 13.07.2013 17:50, schrieb Matthew Miller:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 03:34:18PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> The package management tools in Debian send you emails about changes
>> like that, even about very little changes, when packages are being
>> replaced by more recent versions. Maybe this could
Am 12.07.2013 16:04, schrieb Chris Adams:
> Once upon a time, Tim said:
>> How is your firewall set up? When you allow something for IPv4, does it
>> make a corresponding rule for IPv6, at the same time. Likewise, for if
>> you block something. And I mean that in two ways, dealing with ports,
Am 12.07.2013 17:49, schrieb Fernando Lozano:
> [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the kernel.
> Just the network interfaces configs
> that should come with IPv6 disabled by default, if the user wants it should
> be easy to enable]
exactly *that* is my point
it is
this is childish
there is a difference between well aware ipv4 and
all sorts of firewalls and proctections configured
or startup in a network with ipv6 enabled without
knowing it or not configured at all
coming up with a "link-local" address inside a network
which is *pure ipv4* on a server means
Am 12.07.2013 18:44, schrieb Fernando Lozano:
>> [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the kernel.
>> Just the network interfaces configs
>> that should come with IPv6 disabled by default, if the user wants it should
>> be easy to enable]
>> exactly *that* is my point
Am 12.07.2013 21:45, schrieb Paul Smith:
> Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What
> are the main reasons?
because after F19 is released a month later F17 is EOL and
get no security updates and no support and the same for F19
after F20 is released
if you do not wa
Am 12.07.2013 19:41, schrieb Fernando Lozano:
>> hence it would be enough if "ifup" would respect the configuration
>> i can not see "just having IPv6 enabled means there is an IPv6 address"
>> below - where is there ipv6 enabled? there is even a "IPV6INIT=no"
> I have overlooked that. I'm not a
Am 12.07.2013 20:24, schrieb David G.Miller:
> Fernando Lozano lozano.eti.br> writes:
>>> [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the
> kernel. Just the network interfaces configs
>
>
> Perhaps Fedora is the wrong distribution for you.
>
> The whole idea behind Fedor
Am 12.07.2013 19:49, schrieb Paul Smith:
> I am experiencing the following problem while booting Fedora 19:
>
> smpboot: CPU2: Not responding.
>
> The computer seems to be blocked. Is there some way of rebooting it
> without having to power off the computer?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Document
Am 12.07.2013 22:00, schrieb Paul Smith:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> I am experiencing the following problem while booting Fedora 19:
>>>
>>> smpboot: CPU2: Not responding.
>>>
>>> The computer seems to be blocked. Is there some way of rebooting it
>>> without hav
Am 12.07.2013 22:17, schrieb d...@davenjudy.org:
>>
>>
>> Am 12.07.2013 20:24, schrieb David G.Miller:
>>> Fernando Lozano lozano.eti.br> writes:
> [As I changed the subject, let me clear: IPv6 still compiled in the
>>> kernel. Just the network interfaces configs
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps Fedora
Am 12.07.2013 23:33, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 07/12/2013 02:17 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
>> 1. Users should be able to disable IPv6. Today they can't and this is a
>> bug that hopefully will be solved soon. I think no one ever intended
>> IPv6 to be mandatory. ;-)
>
> Actually, they can, but they
Am 13.07.2013 00:01, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 07/12/2013 02:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> so please read this and if possible please tell me the
>> magic where NM writes whatever in a unknown config file
>> to get rid of the ipv6-link-local address
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Am 13.07.2013 01:18, schrieb poma:
>> Unfortunately those module options are currently not being honored (bug
>> already opened). Changing those defaults (specifically, disabled=1 being
>> the new default) would be a way to implement what I propose. But I guess
>> it would not be easy for Network
Am 13.07.2013 02:34, schrieb David Beveridge:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> and the answer comes back to exactly this port
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateful_firewall
>>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UDP_hole_punching
> "On some routers where port randomizati
Am 13.07.2013 00:45, schrieb David Beveridge:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>> Can you give a practical example, please. I've no reason to disbelieve you,
>> but I've also never run across such a case and would like to see one.
>>
> This kind of depends on what iptables o
Am 12.07.2013 21:57, schrieb lee:
> The upgrade from 17 to 18 silently broke apache because the
> configuration had changed. That is something that shouldn't happen, the
> devs know when there are changes like that and make sure the users are
> informed accordingly.
don't get me wrong but if you
Am 13.07.2013 13:07, schrieb David Beveridge:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Fernando Lozano
> wrote:
>>
>> If people on the users list don't agree with me, there's no point
>> submiting to developers.
>>
> Well I for one certainly don't agree with you.
> If you disable it everywhere it's t
Am 13.07.2013 13:55, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
> I'm getting a yum dependency problem when running "yum update"
> and I'm not sure how to solve it.
> I'd be very grateful for advice.
>
> Some exerpts from the error messages are:
> ---
> Error: Package: perl-core-5.10.1-
Am 13.07.2013 15:47, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 13:43:37 +,
> Beartooth wrote:
>>
>> I used to remove rhgb, in order to be able to watch the boot
>> messages; but this new thing seems to handle other tasks in addition to
>> hiding those messages.
>
> You can modify t
Am 13.07.2013 14:49, schrieb Klaus-Peter Schrage:
> Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the menu,
> like in /etc/fedora-release:
> Schrödinger’s Cat
that's a known problem and the result of careless
choosen release-names with special chars
signature.asc
Descripti
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Isaac Cortés González
wrote:
> I support the idea, it should be done at least something like when
> Verne was released and Dennis Ritchie, not only the Fedora Community
> has lost a great developer; but also CentOS and RHEL.
>
> -Isaac C.
>
>
> 2013/7/11 Ra
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Rick Walker wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
>> > I did a fedup from F17 to F18 on my work desktop. Now I get an
>> > infinite boot loop. Fdisk can't look at the partition table of
>> > /dev/sda because it has been coverted to GPT format (who did that?).
>
> Ian Chapman wri
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Rick Walker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I did a fedup from F17 to F18 on my work desktop. Now I get an infinite
> boot loop. Fdisk can't look at the partition table of /dev/sda because
> it has been coverted to GPT format (who did that?).
>
> As near as I can tell, the bo
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.
wrote:
> On 07/12/2013 03:19 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>> On 07/11/2013 11:38 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>>>
>>> Only speaking for myself: I always try to upgrade first, having a
>>> complete backup, of course. If it doesn't work, I reinstall. There'
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:41 PM, John Wendel wrote:
> Can someone please post the incantation necessary to remove the nouveau
> driver in Fedora 19. I'd really like to install the driver directly from
> Nvidia, instead of from rpmfusion.
>
> Thanks
>
> John Wendel
> --
You might want to go to the
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 12.07.2013 21:57, schrieb lee:
>> The upgrade from 17 to 18 silently broke apache because the
>> configuration had changed. That is something that shouldn't happen, the
>> devs know when there are changes like that and make sure the users are
>> informed accordingly.
>
On 13/07/13 09:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.07.2013 14:49, schrieb Klaus-Peter Schrage:
Is there any way to tell grub2 to display this somewhat nicer in the menu, like
in /etc/fedora-release:
Schrödinger’s Cat
that's a known problem and the result of careless
choosen release-names with sp
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> this is childish
>
> there is a difference between well aware ipv4 and
> all sorts of firewalls and proctections configured
> or startup in a network with ipv6 enabled without
> knowing it or not configured at all
>
> coming up with a "link-l
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:59:23PM +0200, lee wrote:
> > don't get me wrong but if you hvae manually configured services
> > especially a webserver it's your job to look *before* you upgrade
> > if there is a major change and prepare your manual configuration
> > for it - untouched configuration is
The machine details:
- Dell XPS 17 (L702X) BIOS A19
- Intel Core i7-2720QM (2.2GHZ)
- Intel Sandybridge
- Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
>From a complete fresh install of F19, I’m seeing 214 updates. The updates
>break down into 8 security, 80 bugfix, 22 enhanceme
The question, should IPv6, be disabled by default, is asked of people of
the user list.
At the moment, I am on the fence.
Is there a compromise where, during the Fedora install, when the person is
asked for some network information and asked for time zone and root
password, can the question be po
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.07.2013 13:07, schrieb David Beveridge:
> > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Fernando Lozano
> wrote:
> >>
> >> If people on the users list don't agree with me, there's no point
> >> submiting to developers.
> >>
> > Well I for one
On 07/14/13 06:46, Powell, Michael wrote:
> Is there some way I can have yum update based on a timestamp or display a
> timestamp on when these updates were posted to help me narrow the field?
/var/log/yum.log has date/time updates were applied
--
The only thing worse than a poorly asked questi
Greshko, Ed wrote:>
> /var/log/yum.log has date/time updates were applied
Thanks, Ed. Unfortunately I don't need a timestamp of when the updates were
applied to the machine, but instead, I need a timestamp of when those updates
were posted to the yum server. My thought is that since I know 191
On 07/14/2013 05:17 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 7/13/2013 12:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
When do we get rid of grub and grub2 and design a BM4H?
(Boot Manager for Humans)
Once the fundamental Transhumanism technologies are fully
operational.
That's the best answer I've seen in
On 07/12/2013 09:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
coming up with a "link-local" address inside a network
which is*pure ipv4* on a server means *any* random
device which does the same may bypass all your firewall
rule ssince iptables and ip6tables are two different
services
It might be a good idea,
On 07/14/13 07:30, Powell, Michael wrote:
> Greshko, Ed wrote:>
>> /var/log/yum.log has date/time updates were applied
> Thanks, Ed. Unfortunately I don't need a timestamp of when the updates were
> applied to the machine, but instead, I need a timestamp of when those updates
> were posted to th
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:16:40 -0700 Richard Vickery
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Isaac Cortés González
> wrote:
> > I support the idea, it should be done at least something like when
> > Verne was released and Dennis Ritchie, not only the Fedora Community
> > has lost a great develop
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:48:40 +0200 Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.07.2013 21:45, schrieb Paul Smith:
> > Why should one upgrade Fedora whenever a new version is released? What
> > are the main reasons?
>
> because after F19 is released a month later F17 is EOL and
> get no security updates a
I recently submitted a crash report using the gnome-abrt
application/applet and would like to file a comment to it. Which
bugzilla did gnome-abrt submit it to? I had assumed that the gnome-abrt
user interface would tell me, or I would get an email from the bugzilla;
but neither has happened.
Tha
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
