Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

Tom H gmail.com> writes: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Tom Horsley gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:04:12 + (UTC) > > JB wrote: > >> > >> Some of these Ubuntu and Unity frustrated users are so clueless that they > >> seek a remedy by wanting to move to Fedora ... > >> T

Re: No sound after update today -

On 13/07/11 12:51, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 13/07/11 11:28, Genes MailLists wrote: >> >>Was it rebooting that fixed it - or rebooting with an older kernel? >> Can you try rebooting with newer kernel? >> >>gene > >A good question and that only adds to the confusion. To begin >

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 07/13/2011 08:54 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:04:12 + (UTC) > JB wrote: > >> Some of these Ubuntu and Unity frustrated users are so clueless that they >> seek >> a remedy by wanting to move to Fedora ... >> There are some wolves waiting for them: GNOME 3, systemd, ... :-)

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:36 AM, JB wrote: > > Are you, Tom Horsley and Tom H, the same guys, but just very playful with us > by always standing on the opposite sides of the issue ? :-) No relation. Always on opposites sides?! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe o

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

> [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r > 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 > What irritates me, and others, was that we found Gnome 2 to be just > about what we wanted, in a myriad of ways.  But Gnome 3 is just too > different that we now need to find something else that is how Gnome 2 > used to be.  Or, jumping d

Re: No sound after update today -

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 04:05 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: > The only other thing I found necessary was to "fix" LibreOffice > Calc configuration in order to get it to run. Could you be more explicit? That sounds like either a bug or a configuration error. I know I've never seen it. poc -- u

how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????

Dear All Gurus, I want to deny a particular IP (172.16.158.111) address in my network to FTP on server (RHEL6), I'm trying to add the following[1][2] iptabls rules on server and getting error [3] [1] iptables -A INPUT -s! 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport 21 -j DROP [2] iptables -A INPUT -s!

Re: how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????

On 07/14/2011 02:48 PM, Jatin K wrote: > So how to go ...??? and any one guide to the right direction ? how > do I add a rule like IP or the PORTs is not equal to ? man iptables: ... [!] -s, --source address[/mask][,...] ... Put the ! before -s. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http:/

Re: how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????

On 07/14/2011 07:48 AM, Jatin K wrote: > Dear All Gurus, > > I want to deny a particular IP (172.16.158.111) address in my network to > FTP on server (RHEL6), I'm trying to add the following[1][2] iptabls > rules on server and getting error [3] > > >[1] iptables -A INPUT -s! 172.16.158.111 -p

FC14, sleeping forever

I've got a virtual FC14 image running under virtual box on a win7 laptop. Something hung it up yesterday and I had to hard boot the image. Now when I try and restart it progresses to a point of almost completing and stops with the message "No root device found. Boot has failed, sleeping forever.

Samsung Genio photos not uploadable on F14

I have a Samsumg B5310 phone, and under F13, connecting it with a USB cable caused gphoto to be launched, which then allowed me to transfer photos from the phone to my laptop. Sometime during the last two months I have lost that ability; most likely when I upgraded from F13 to F14. Now, gphoto is

Re: how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/14/2011 08:48 PM, Jatin K wrote: > Dear All Gurus, > > I want to deny a particular IP (172.16.158.111) address in my network to > FTP on server (RHEL6), I'm trying to add the following[1][2] iptabls > rules on server and getting error [3] >

Re: how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????

On 07/14/2011 12:48 PM, Jatin K wrote: <> > So how to go ...??? and any one guide to the right direction ? how > do I add a rule like IP or the PORTs is not equal to ? when using the negation, "!", you need to use a before and after, such as; [1] iptables -A INPUT -s ! 172.16.158.111

Re: Help with NetworkManager

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:23 PM, j.e.aneiros > wrote: > > > > I hope this is the right place for posting this question. > > I'm trying to perform an installation using kickstart and I having a hard > > time trying to disable NetworkManager during t

Re: how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jatin K wrote: > > I want to deny a particular IP (172.16.158.111) address in my network to > FTP on server (RHEL6), I'm trying to add the following[1][2] iptabls > rules on server  and getting error [3] > >  [1] iptables -A INPUT -s! 172.16.158.111 -p tcp --dport

Re: Help with NetworkManager

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM, j.e.aneiros wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Tom H wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:23 PM, j.e.aneiros >> wrote: >> > >> > I hope this is the right place for posting this question. >> > I'm trying to perform an installation using kickstart and I havin

Re: XDMCP Remote login

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/13/2011 01:43 PM, Doug Kuvaas wrote: > All right, my woes for this beast are down to one. For some reason, > if I try to run X directly in 8 bit color mode, I get only greyscale > output. Because the legacy application I am running doesn't work

Re: Help with NetworkManager

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM, j.e.aneiros > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Tom H wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:23 PM, j.e.aneiros > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > I hope this is the right place for posting this question. > >> >

Re: [389-users] Replication trouble when promoting dedicated Consumer to Multiple master

Do a ldapsearch -b 'nsuniqueid=---,dc=mydomain,dc=com' -D -w -s base objectclass=nstombstone This gives you all the configured (history) of replication ids. The following is the output in my setup. dn: nsuniqueid=---,o=base ob

Re: Help with NetworkManager

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 10:10 -0400, j.e.aneiros wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Tom H wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM, j.e.aneiros > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Tom H > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:23

Re: XDMCP Remote login

I have not looked into using XNest, but it might be worth checking out. Is it set up in a similar manner as Xorg? These computers will have touchscreens for control and that is the one issue that I have that has the highest priority. If I can't get the color depth thing figured out, it may be ea

Re: Help with NetworkManager

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Terry Polzin wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 10:10 -0400, j.e.aneiros wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Tom H wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM, j.e.aneiros > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Tom H

Re: [389-users] Replication trouble

On 07/13/2011 04:44 AM, Andrea Modesto Rossi wrote: > Ciao, > > Since last week i had no problem and all my configuration worked properly. > Due to NTPD error (my VMs runs on KVM server), ntpd error? Did this have the effect of incorrectly changing the time on one or more systems? > today i have

Re: [389-users] SSL certificate issue

On 07/14/2011 01:29 AM, s.varadha rajan wrote: Hi, Thanks for the reply.but i have a problem with my system for enabling ssl,then only i go for consumer and then replication e.t.c. my system name is varad.india.xxx.com and i have to use "star_dot_india_xxx_cert.c

Re: XDMCP Remote login

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/14/2011 09:46 AM, Doug Kuvaas wrote: > I have not looked into using XNest, but it might be worth checking out. > > Is it set up in a similar manner as Xorg? These computers will have > touchscreens for control and that is the one issue that I h

Re: No sound after update today -

On 14/07/11 08:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 04:05 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> The only other thing I found necessary was to "fix" LibreOffice >> Calc configuration in order to get it to run. > Could you be more explicit? That sounds like either a bug or a > confi

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: > Tim wrote: >> I don't...  They all (Linux too) seem to be heading for being some sort >> of iPad clone.  Being all the more inappropriate for trying to use a >> touch-screen type of interface, when you don't have a touch-screen. >> >> Th

re: FC14, sleeping forever

Subject: FC14, sleeping forever From: Tod Thomas Date: 06:07 AM To: Community support for Fedora users I've got a virtual FC14 image running under virtual box on a win7 laptop. Something hung it up yesterday and I had to hard boot the image. Now when I try and restart it progresses to a

Software update has bugs

Under KDM I asked for software updates and got an option called Get and Remove Software. I ran it and chose to add the Content group. I was shown the three documents I could add. One on Python, one on Java and one on Linux drivers. I chose to install the first and third. Processing started until I

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 12:53 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik > wrote: > > Tim wrote: > >> I don't... They all (Linux too) seem to be heading for being some sort > >> of iPad clone. Being all the more inappropriate for trying to use a > >> touch-

missing alerts from Osmo in upgrade to F15: LXDE spin

Hi, A month ago, I upgraded from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15 (LXDE spin). I have been using the LXDE spin since Fedora 12. I use Osmo and find it pretty adequate for my needs. However, up til Fedora 14, the osmo task manager (or whatever it is called) would pop up an alert when the time to do a particu

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 12:53 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik >> wrote: >> > Tim wrote: >> >> I don't...  They all (Linux too) seem to be heading for being some sort >> >> of iPad clone.  Be

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 07/14/2011 09:53 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik > wrote: >> Tim wrote: > Now, back to what I said earlier. YOU, the Linux user, have a CHOICE > of desktop/window managers. > YOU should avail yourself of this > feature. If you want to 'resure

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8? => choosing the fedora desktop

On 07/14/2011 03:53 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > > Gnome 2 is now offically dead Fine i agree whole heartedly .. that leaves .. > > Now, back to what I said earlier. YOU, the Linux user, have a CHOICE > of desktop/window managers. YOU should avail yourself of this Ok then - so then the de

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8? => choosing the fedora desktop

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 20:16 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > Ok then - so then the debate here should not be about gnome 3 missing > features - we all agree - that should be an upstream discussion. > > The discussion should turn to what the default desktop should be - in > the past it was gnome

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8? => choosing the fedora desktop

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:53:57 +0900 夜神 岩男 wrote: > but the underlying base is so > solid and logical that people who are really familiar with it are just > enduring the arguments for now while they prepare Good Things. I > consider this to be fairly likely Really, Can I sell you some swampland? :-

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8? => choosing the fedora desktop

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 21:27 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:53:57 +0900 > 夜神 岩男 wrote: > > > but the underlying base is so > > solid and logical that people who are really familiar with it are just > > enduring the arguments for now while they prepare Good Things. I > > consider

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 7/14/11 3:38 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/14/2011 09:53 PM, James McKenzie wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik >> wrote: >>> Tim wrote: >> Now, back to what I said earlier. YOU, the Linux user, have a CHOICE >> of desktop/window managers. >> YOU should avail yo

Re: Software update has bugs

On 07/14/2011 01:27 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Under KDM I asked for software updates and got an option called Get and > Remove Software. I ran it and chose to add the Content group. I was > shown the three documents I could add. One on Python, one on Java and > one on Linux drivers. I chose to ins

How can I install F15 without a desktop environment

I need to install F15 without Gnome, KDE, XFCE, or LXDE. The target has 1 GB of flash for the filesystem. So how can I install F15 with X, but without a DE? Thanks, John -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedorapro

Re: Gnome 3 ~ Windows 8?

On 7/13/11 11:36 AM, Tim wrote: > I see the sense in pushing the boundaries for high end computing. I > don't see the sense in making low end computing require high end > hardware. What's low end computing? Email, web browsing, not playing > video games. It's just gross inefficiency to require

Re: How can I install F15 without a desktop environment

Absolutely! You will probably need to get either the installation DVD or the Network install CD, I don't recall seeing package options when installing from live media. http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all I would opt for the minimum install and then select "Customize now". From there you

Re: [SOVLED by '!' ]how to specify IP not equal to in iptables rules ????

On Thursday 14 July 2011 06:37 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 07/14/2011 07:48 AM, Jatin K wrote: >> Dear All Gurus, >> >> I want to deny a particular IP (172.16.158.111) address in my network to >> FTP on server (RHEL6), I'm trying to add the following[1][2] iptabls >> rules on server and getting

Re: How can I install F15 without a desktop environment

On 07/14/2011 08:25 PM, Doug Kuvaas wrote: Absolutely! You will probably need to get either the installation DVD or the Network install CD, I don't recall seeing package options when installing from live media. http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all I would opt for the minimum install a

Re: How can I install F15 without a desktop environment

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:40 AM, John Wendel wrote: > Nothing special require, just a very small install. > I would suggest 2 things: 1. febootstrap - # yum install febootstrap 2. use kickstart files to install, you can start here: > Regards