Re: rc.local question/problem

On 02Jul2011 22:26, Paul Allen Newell wrote: | On 7/2/2011 10:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: | > On 07/02/2011 09:45 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: | >> That should be the case. (Of course, SELinux can break anything - if you | >> run out of ideas you could turn it off to see if the behaviour changes.) | > I'

phpeclipse stop working

I'm used to work with eclipse-phpeclipse (from the repository) After installing eclipse-egit and eclipse-jgit, PHP project are no more available... After removing git stuff, workspace, .eclipse, reinstalling eclipse, still not working... PHP Eclipse is listed in the Installed software, but not a

Re: rc.local question/problem

On 02Jul2011 22:24, Paul Allen Newell wrote: | inline and at tail ... As things should be :-) | On 7/2/2011 9:45 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: | >On 02Jul2011 20:40, Paul Allen Newell wrote: [...] | >Thought: is clamscan setuid or something? | >If you get nowhere there, try stracing the clamscan r

Apps Virtualization with OpenSource?

Hi, I'm going to give you some quick context: Last week I went to a "Startup Weekend" Event in Guadalajara, Jalisco, (My county is Mexico) and I live in Mexico City. Usually I use Desktop machines, in fact, I ONLY own one computer and it's a Desktop (F15 KDE 64 Bits BTW) And it has never gave me

Re: DAMNED Re: Fedora Security and the Uverse 3800HGV-B router

Am 03.07.2011 05:32, schrieb JD: > At the very least, javascript should be blocked just because > it is invasive! your probem is that everybody can see how you started this discussion which showed that you are a technical noob and so you can not be qualified for rants like "When will the linux c

Re: Fedora Security and the Uverse 3800HGV-B router

On 02/07/11 05:14, JD wrote: > You are right. > It turns out it does it via the intruder which the whole > world was deceived by Sun Javascript, Sun? that it only plays in a sandbox > and has no access to anything outside that sandbox: Javascript. I have js enabled on all web boxes, no leaks

Re: Fedora Security and the Uverse 3800HGV-B router

On 07/03/2011 01:45 AM, JD wrote: > On 07/02/2011 01:07 PM, Craig White wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 21:14 -0700, JD wrote: >> >>> You are right. >>> It turns out it does it via the intruder which the whole >>> world was deceived by Sun that it only plays in a sandbox >>> and has no access to an

Re: [OT] was, Re: DAMNED Re: Fedora Security and the Uverse 3800HGV-B router

On Sunday 03 July 2011 06:40:21 JD wrote: > Well, javascript is known to be "craftable" to do evil. > I am sure you have already seen the links I sent. You know, I can provide you with a whole bunch of links on the net about people being abducted by aliens and experimented on. Does that mean that

Re: Fedora Security and the Uverse 3800HGV-B router

On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 16:45 -0700, JD wrote: > On 07/02/2011 01:07 PM, Craig White wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 21:14 -0700, JD wrote: > > > >> You are right. > >> It turns out it does it via the intruder which the whole > >> world was deceived by Sun that it only plays in a sandbox > >> and ha

Laptop processor.

Good day, Looking to buy a new laptop. This does not happen often. 2 laptops in 10 yrs. Say processor speed about 2 gig. There is a lot of variations. Version i3 or i5 or i7. Now there is AMD and Intel. Would like to buy the best for my budget. Kindly some pointers please. Thanks Joh

Laptop Graphics

Good day, Looking around to buy a new laptop. Now I see some conflicting opinions on the lists between Nvidia and ATI. Will be using Fedora and Ubuntu latest versions. Now I am confused. Kindly some advice please. Thanks. Johan S -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: Laptop processor.

On 07/03/2011 02:49 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > Looking to buy a new laptop. This does not happen often. 2 laptops in 10 > yrs. > > Say processor speed about 2 gig. There is a lot of variations. > > Version i3 or i5 or i7. > > Now there is AMD and Intel. > > Would like to buy

Re: Laptop Graphics

On 07/03/2011 02:49 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > Looking around to buy a new laptop. > > Now I see some conflicting opinions on the lists between Nvidia and ATI. > > Will be using Fedora and Ubuntu latest versions. > > Now I am confused. > > Kindly some advice please. > Thanks. > J

Re: Laptop processor.

On 07/03/2011 02:49 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > > Looking to buy a new laptop. This does not happen often. 2 laptops in 10 > yrs. > > Say processor speed about 2 gig. There is a lot of variations. > > Version i3 or i5 or i7. > > Now there is AMD and Intel. > > Would like to buy

Re: Apps Virtualization with OpenSource?

On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:25:39 -0500, Manuel Escudero wrote: > As maybe I can't run a VM in all the computers that I might have access to > and because Wine Can't Emulate some programs correctly, I Know the solution > is using the cloud to carry my apps with me, I was wondering if there is a >

Re: DAMNED Re: Fedora Security and the Uverse 3800HGV-B router

JD writes: At the very least, javascript should be blocked just because it is invasive! And you were told, several times, how to block javascript. Have you already blocked Javascript from being executed in your browser, as I and others have told you to do? pgpd7JpP03Szk.pgp Description:

Re: Laptop processor.

On 03/07/2011 14:51, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > On 07/03/2011 02:49 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: >> Good day, >> >> Looking to buy a new laptop. This does not happen often. 2 laptops in 10 >> yrs. >> >> Say processor speed about 2 gig. There is a lot of variations. >> >> Version i3 or i5 or i

Re: Laptop processor.

On 03/07/2011 14:58, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > On 07/03/2011 02:49 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: >> Good day, >> >> Looking to buy a new laptop. This does not happen often. 2 laptops in 10 >> yrs. >> >> Say processor speed about 2 gig. There is a lot of variations. >> >> Version i3 or i5 or i

Re: [OT] was, Re: DAMNED Re: Fedora Security and the Uverse 3800HGV-B router

Marko Vojinovic wrote: > So my advice to you is to just drop the subject. If you don't trust > javascript yourself, you are welcome to disable it or use no-script. > But please don't try to convince the whole world that there is a > major security hole in it, because there isn't, and people will >

Re: Apps Virtualization with OpenSource?

On 3 July 2011 13:57, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:25:39 -0500, >  Manuel Escudero wrote: >> As maybe I can't run a VM in all the computers that I might have access to >> and because Wine Can't Emulate some programs correctly, I Know the solution >> is using the cloud to ca

HD permissions stay put

Good day, I have a multiple boot internal drive (different linux flavors)(excluding windows). Have a external usb drive for backup between these different systems. Now booting in a different flavor the permissions change to numbers. My normal permission is johan johan. I am the only user at ho

Re: HD permissions stay put

On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 17:49 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > I have a multiple boot internal drive (different linux > flavors)(excluding windows). > > Have a external usb drive for backup between these different systems. > > Now booting in a different flavor the permissions change to numbers. >

Re: My eyes! My eyes!

Christopher Svanefalk gmail.com> writes: > ... > ...I guess I never learn to research before writing. It appears that > some (if not all) programs with internal settings for appearance resort > primarily to their own default settings rather than global settings > (this seems to be the case with

Kicad question

Hi, I just installed Kicad and I have a couple question for some one familiar with "PCB design" I generated a new part and saved in my user directory, but the program does not give me the option to access any other directory other the default. The second question, can PCB design show a picture

Re: Laptop Graphics

Johan Scheepers wrote: > Looking around to buy a new laptop. I like Intel. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Laptop processor.

USD $1,400s . You could practically purchase anything. On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 03/07/2011 14:58, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > > On 07/03/2011 02:49 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > >> Good day, > >> > >> Looking to buy a new laptop. This does not happen often. 2

Re: HD permissions stay put

Johan Scheepers wrote: > I have a multiple boot internal drive (different linux > flavors)(excluding windows). > > Have a external usb drive for backup between these different systems. > > Now booting in a different flavor the permissions change to numbers. > > My normal permission is johan joh

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 07/03/2011 10:55 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > Johan Scheepers wrote: > >> I have a multiple boot internal drive (different linux >> flavors)(excluding windows). >> >> Have a external usb drive for backup between these different systems. >> >> Now booting in a different flavor the permission

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 03/07/2011 20:01, JD wrote: > On 07/03/2011 10:55 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: >> Johan Scheepers wrote: >> >>> I have a multiple boot internal drive (different linux >>> flavors)(excluding windows). >>> >>> Have a external usb drive for backup between these different systems. >>> >>> Now boo

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 07/03/2011 08:49 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Now booting in a different flavor the permissions change to numbers. > > My normal permission is johan johan. I am the only user at home. I think you're slightly confused here. What's changing isn't the permissions but the way the system reports t

Re: Laptop Graphics

On 07/03/2011 10:46 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > Johan Scheepers wrote: > >> Looking around to buy a new laptop. > > I like Intel. > That's what I have on the laptop I'm using right now. It has the advantage that you don't have to worry about binary blob drivers, like you do with ATI and n

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 07/03/2011 03:49 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: <> > Now as root I change the owner and group -R. > This is annoying . Is there a way to make it stick please. in addition to tim's post; actually, it is _file_ and _directory_ permissions, not hd permissions. linux has a file '/etc/login.defs, to

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 07/03/2011 11:09 AM, Johan Scheepers wrote: > On 03/07/2011 20:01, JD wrote: >> On 07/03/2011 10:55 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: >>> Johan Scheepers wrote: >>> I have a multiple boot internal drive (different linux flavors)(excluding windows). Have a external usb drive for

Buttonless Touchpads

Many HP (and perhaps other) laptops are now shipping with 'buttonless' touchpads. There is a T-shaped line drawn on the pad dividing out two 'button areas' on the pad, but there is no physical button in each area. Instead, the entire touchpad is sensitive (you can move the cursor around even when y

Gnome Q: Application window save-data for restore when reopened?

I am sorry if this question was asked before, but I was wondering why is it, that most app- lication's main window do not restore it's last save-data the next time it is opened? What I am talking about is window position and size data, but not limited to these only. How many times does an applica

Re: phpeclipse stop working

On 3 July 2011 11:53, Remi Collet wrote: > I'm used to work with eclipse-phpeclipse (from the repository) > > After installing eclipse-egit and eclipse-jgit, PHP project are no more > available... > > After removing git stuff, workspace, .eclipse, reinstalling eclipse, > still not working... > > P

Re: Gnome Q: Application window save-data for restore when reopened?

On 07/03/2011 12:04 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > I am sorry if this question was asked before, > but I was wondering why is it, that most app- > lication's main window do not restore it's > last save-data the next time it is opened? > What I am talking about is window position > and size data, bu

Re: rc.local question/problem

On 7/3/2011 12:53 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 02Jul2011 22:26, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > | On 7/2/2011 10:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > |> On 07/02/2011 09:45 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > |>> That should be the case. (Of course, SELinux can break anything - if you > > > You can put it into non-e

Re: Sound Juicer offers no profiles

On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:31:03 -0700, MS (Matthew) wrote: > > > > Is the libgnome-media-profiles package installed and complete? > > > > > > > > > > Looks that way. > > > > > > $ rpm -q libgnome-media-profiles > > > libgnome-media-profiles-3.0.0-1.fc15.x86_64 > > > $ rpm

Re: rc.local question/problem (correction)

On 7/3/2011 12:35 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 7/3/2011 12:53 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote: >> On 02Jul2011 22:26, Paul Allen Newell wrote: >> | On 7/2/2011 10:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> |> On 07/02/2011 09:45 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: >> |>> That should be the case. (Of course, SELinux can br

Re: HD permissions stay put

JD wrote: >> Machine one..johan 1000:1000 >> Machine two ..johan 500:500 This is the problem I had with Debian and friends. Fedora starts users at 500, while Debian&c uses 1000. So, if you use the same username on both, you now have the same user with both 500 and 1000 uid. When you log back i

/.autofsck continually updated every reboot

[byers@f14 ~]$ uname -r 2.6.35.13-92.fc14.i686.PAE [Background: Re: backup copy of F14 boots, but can't login. endless recycle of login screen: fixed by 'touch /.autorelabel, reboot'. Still was unable to make id:3:initdefault: take effect. Ctrl-Alt-F2 does get me to text login screen. Also

Re: /.autofsck continually updated every reboot

On 3 July 2011 22:29, jackson byers wrote: > Any advice re /.autofsck? > Does its continual reappearance indicate a problem? http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-list/2004-November/msg02920.html ### The /.autofsck file is created by the syst

Re: Gnome Q: Application window save-data for restore when reopened?

> I am sorry if this question was asked before, > but I was wondering why is it, that most app- > lication's main window do not restore it's > last save-data the next time it is opened? Because you are using Gnome ? and Gnome 3 even gets rid of the bits of it they didn't manage to hose before. I

Re: Gnome Q: Application window save-data for restore when reopened?

On 3 July 2011 22:35, Alan Cox wrote: >> I am sorry if this question was asked before, >> but I was wondering why is it, that most app- >> lication's main window do not restore it's >> last save-data the next time it is opened? > > Because you are using Gnome ? and Gnome 3 even gets rid of the bit

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

On 7/3/2011 12:53 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 02Jul2011 22:26, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > | On 7/2/2011 10:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > |> On 07/02/2011 09:45 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > |>> That should be the case. (Of course, SELinux can break anything - if you > > > You can put it into non-e

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

On Jul 3, 2011 5:38 PM, "Paul Allen Newell" wrote: > > On 7/3/2011 12:53 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > On 02Jul2011 22:26, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > | On 7/2/2011 10:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > > |> On 07/02/2011 09:45 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > |>> That should be the case. (Of course, SEL

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

On 7/3/2011 2:54 PM, Paul Morgan wrote: On Jul 3, 2011 5:38 PM, "Paul Allen Newell" > wrote: it really is bad form to run a script out of root's home directory. Perhaps put it in /usr/sbin , restorecon, and leave selinux enforcing the whole time. -paul Yeah,

Re: /.autofsck continually updated every reboot

Sam Sharpe wrote >The /.autofsck file is created by the system automatically at boot time >by the /etc/rc.sysinit script by simply touching the file. It has no >content. The logic behind it is, that if the host went down not properly >(i.e. power loss) the /etc/rc.sysinit script will find this .au

Re: /.autofsck continually updated every reboot

On 3 July 2011 23:03, jackson byers wrote: > Sam Sharpe wrote > >>The /.autofsck file is created by the system automatically at boot time >>by the /etc/rc.sysinit script by simply touching the file. It has no >>content. The logic behind it is, that if the host went down not properly >>(i.e. power

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 07/03/2011 02:26 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > JD wrote: > >>> Machine one..johan 1000:1000 >>> Machine two ..johan 500:500 > This is the problem I had with Debian and friends. > > Fedora starts users at 500, while Debian&c uses 1000. So, if you use the same > username on both, you now have

Re: Partitioning in anaconda

Sorry for the delayed response, and thank you all for the replies and clarifications! Frode -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Maili

Re: /.autofsck continually updated every reboot

On 07/03/2011 03:09 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote: > If the file is detected at startup,_then_ the system will perform an > fsck. So it is normal for this file to exist while the system is > running normally. If you really want to test this, shut down your > system normally and then boot it from a livecd -

Re: /.autofsck continually updated every reboot

Sam Sharpe wrote >I think you misunderstand then. Sam, you are right, I had badly misinterpreted. Your suggested test convinced me. I rebooted out of my backupf14 into my mainf14. backupf14 now shows no /.autofcsk mainf14 _does_, completely in accord with what you said. thanks much Jack -- u

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 07/03/2011 09:26 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: <> > It was a real mess! And the problem with Debian systems is that I could not > find a way to get users to start at 500, so as to be the same as Fedora. check for file '/etc/login.defs'. if not present as 'login.defs', you might find it in '

Re: HD permissions stay put

On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 14:46 -0700, JD wrote: > I think you have exposed a very interesting problem. It would be interesting if the problem hadn't been known about for the last 20 or 30 years, i.e. since Unix systems started being networked in large numbers. This is exactly the reason Sun created

Re: Apps Virtualization with OpenSource?

2011/7/3 Sam Sharpe > On 3 July 2011 13:57, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:25:39 -0500, > > Manuel Escudero wrote: > >> As maybe I can't run a VM in all the computers that I might have access > to > >> and because Wine Can't Emulate some programs correctly, I Know the >

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

On 03Jul2011 15:02, Paul Allen Newell wrote: | On 7/3/2011 2:54 PM, Paul Morgan wrote: | >On Jul 3, 2011 5:38 PM, "Paul Allen Newell" > wrote: | > | >it really is bad form to run a script out of root's home | >directory. A little untidy, sure. But... | Perhaps put it i

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

On 7/3/2011 5:15 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 03Jul2011 15:02, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > | On 7/3/2011 2:54 PM, Paul Morgan wrote: > |>On Jul 3, 2011 5:38 PM, "Paul Allen Newell" |>> wrote: > |> > |>it really is bad form to run a script out of root's home > |>direct

F15-64 update process out of sync

Use of update repo's causes general update process to stall because some packages depend on rawhide. This situation needs to be fixed. At least F15 is working OK. -- http://clients.teksavvy.com/~echapin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription op

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

On 03Jul2011 17:35, Paul Allen Newell wrote: | On 7/3/2011 5:15 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: | > On 03Jul2011 15:02, Paul Allen Newell wrote: | > | On 7/3/2011 2:54 PM, Paul Morgan wrote: | > |>it really is bad form to run a script out of root's home | > |>directory. | > | > A little untidy, sure.

Re: Laptop Graphics

On 04/07/11 04:13, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 07/03/2011 10:46 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: >> Johan Scheepers wrote: >> >>> Looking around to buy a new laptop. >> I like Intel. >> > That's what I have on the laptop I'm using right now. It has the > advantage that you don't have to worry about binary

Re: HD permissions stay put

On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 19:25 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 14:46 -0700, JD wrote: > > I think you have exposed a very interesting problem. > > It would be interesting if the problem hadn't been known about for the > last 20 or 30 years, i.e. since Unix systems started be

Re: rc.local question/problem (partly solved w/ setenforce=0)

inline and at tail ... On 7/3/2011 6:22 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 03Jul2011 17:35, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > > My habit for a virus scanner would be sbin; these days bin is for general > purpose commands which sbin is for administrative commands (eg setenforce) > and daemons (eg sshd). >

Re: Laptop Graphics

On 07/03/2011 06:27 PM, Roger wrote: > My daughters both use Dell laptops with ubuntu11.04 / nvidia and have > great results > One does fairly intensive Blender 3D with her students > Roger Ubuntu installs the proprietary drivers for you and takes care of reinstalling them every time the kernel's

Re: Gnome Q: Application window save-data for restore when reopened?

On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 12:04 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > I am sorry if this question was asked before, > but I was wondering why is it, that most app- > lication's main window do not restore it's > last save-data the next time it is opened? > What I am talking about is window position > and si

Re: F15-64 update process out of sync

On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 20:44 -0400, Elliott Chapin wrote: > Use of update repo's causes general update process to stall because some > packages depend on rawhide. This situation needs to be fixed. For example? poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subs

Re: HD permissions stay put

?? ?? wrote: > Every time > you create a user on any system, specify the UID & GID explicitly, and > always use UIDs/GIDs <= 1000. Fedora doesn't care if you have a UID much > higher than 500, but Debian does care if your UID is lower than 1000 (in > fact, the man page for "useradd" on Fedora even

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 7/3/2011 6:43 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > > [...] > > Fedora doesn't care if you have a UID much > higher than 500, but Debian does care if your UID is lower than 1000 (in > fact, the man page for "useradd" on Fedora even says that 1000 is the > standard, Fedora just doesn't actually follow that). > > [s

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 07/03/2011 08:38 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 7/3/2011 6:43 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: >> [...] >> >> Fedora doesn't care if you have a UID much >> higher than 500, but Debian does care if your UID is lower than 1000 (in >> fact, the man page for "useradd" on Fedora even says that 1000 is the >> stan

Thunderbird 5

Just FYI, I downloaded Thunderbird 5 from Mozilla.com into ~/bin and it's working just fine on F15. Unfortunately, not all Thunderbird extensions are supporting the new version. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 7/3/2011 8:59 PM, JD wrote: > > How about just modifying the user's uid gid (while su'ed to root): > usermod -u NEW-UID -g NEW-GID LoginName > chown -R NEW-UID.NEW-GID ~LoginName > exit su shell > Log out > and log back in. > > I was assuming that uid shouldn't be changed once committed to a use

Re: Thunderbird 5

On 7/3/2011 11:59 PM, Steven Stern wrote: > Just FYI, I downloaded Thunderbird 5 from Mozilla.com into ~/bin and > it's working just fine on F15. Unfortunately, not all Thunderbird > extensions are supporting the new version. Use this extension "Add-on Compatibility Reporter 0.8.5"

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 07/03/2011 09:09 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 7/3/2011 8:59 PM, JD wrote: >> How about just modifying the user's uid gid (while su'ed to root): >> usermod -u NEW-UID -g NEW-GID LoginName >> chown -R NEW-UID.NEW-GID ~LoginName >> exit su shell >> Log out >> and log back in. >> >> > I was ass

Re: Thunderbird 5

On 07/03/2011 11:59 PM, Steven Stern wrote: > Just FYI, I downloaded Thunderbird 5 from Mozilla.com into ~/bin and > it's working just fine on F15. Unfortunately, not all Thunderbird > extensions are supporting the new version. > > > Since this is the stable release, I have to assume F15 will g

Re: HD permissions stay put

> This is well put :-) I believe you meant to say that you always choose > UIDs/GIDs >= 1000. Indeed I did... that sort of typo is the kind that leaves a sleepy coder scratching his head sometimes ヽ(ｏ`皿′ｏ)ﾉ I'm glad you got the idea anyway. I've found this to be a simple solution for tiny envir

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 7/3/2011 9:19 PM, JD wrote: > On 07/03/2011 09:09 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: >> On 7/3/2011 8:59 PM, JD wrote: >>> How about just modifying the user's uid gid (while su'ed to root): >>> usermod -u NEW-UID -g NEW-GID LoginName >>> chown -R NEW-UID.NEW-GID ~LoginName >>> exit su shell >>> Log ou

Re: HD permissions stay put

On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 20:38 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 7/3/2011 6:43 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > Fedora doesn't care if you have a UID much > > higher than 500, but Debian does care if your UID is lower than 1000 (in > > fact, the man page for "useradd" on Fedora even says that

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 7/3/2011 9:33 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 20:38 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > [...] > > Creating that first user throught the firstboot dialogue isn't required, > it is just a nice way to get the ball rolling. You can > to the next tty and login as root right then yourself and r

Re: HD permissions stay put

On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 21:42 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 7/3/2011 9:33 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 20:38 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > > [...] > > > > Creating that first user throught the firstboot dialogue isn't required, > > it is just a nice way to get the ball rollin

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 07/04/2011 03:59 AM, JD wrote: <> > How about just modifying the user's uid gid (while su'ed to root): > usermod -u NEW-UID -g NEW-GID LoginName > chown -R NEW-UID.NEW-GID ~LoginName from "USERMOD(8)" -g, --gid GROUP The group name or number of the user’s new initial login group. The

Re: HD permissions stay put

On 7/3/2011 9:56 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: > > The root account already exists, and you can log directly into it from a > text login prompt. You just can't do it through GDM, so you will have to > hop to another tty by hitting++ or boot to runlevel 3 > (or the equivalent now that we are in the opening days

tftp from home dir running under xinetd

I can manually run a tftp server that allows access to files in a directory under ~ with no problem. But when I try to run the server under xinetd using the /etc/xinetd.d/tftp configuration file a "permission denied" error shows up in /var/log/message with no indication it is selinux related. B

Re: tftp from home dir running under xinetd

Can you show here the error in the log? Do you have SELinux enabled in enforcing mode? Try to do this: getsetbool -a | grep tftpd to see all boolean related to this service. Regards On 07/04/2011 12:50 AM, Gene Smith wrote: I can manually run a tftp server that allows access to files in a dir

Re: Laptop processor.

On 07/03/2011 07:50 PM, Javier Perez wrote: > USD $1,400s . You could practically purchase anything. > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Johan Scheepers > mailto:johans...@telkomsa.net>> wrote: > > On 03/07/2011 14:58, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > > On 07/03/2011 02:49 PM, Johan Scheepers

Re: tftp from home dir running under xinetd

On 07/04/2011 06:02 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > Can you show here the error in the log? > Do you have SELinux enabled in enforcing mode? > Try to do this: getsetbool -a | grep tftpd to see all boolean related to > this service. getsebool -a | grep tftpd -- peace out. tc.hago, g . signa

Re: HD permissions stay put

夜神 岩男 wrote: > >> This is well put :-) I believe you meant to say that you always choose >> UIDs/GIDs >= 1000. > > Indeed I did... that sort of typo is the kind that leaves a sleepy coder > scratching his head sometimes ヽ(ｏ`皿′ｏ)ﾉ > > I'm glad you got the idea anyway. I've found this to be a sim

F15 intermittent kernel dump with skge network driver for D-Link DGE-530T card

I have a PCI network card that intermittently stops transmitting traffic under Fedora 15, perhaps once every couple days. The network traffic is not necessarily high when this randomly occurs, and usually the machine is relatively idle. Kernel: 2.6.38.8-32.fc15.x86_64 Driver: skge Network c

Re: HD permissions stay put

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:59 PM, JD wrote: > > How about just modifying the user's uid gid (while su'ed to root): You won't be able to change a user's UID while that user's logged in. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin