Hi!
Since a few days ago (can't pinpoint exactly how long, but a few days)
Nautilus is telling me "nautilus unable to access location failed to
retrieve share list from server: invalid argument" when trying to
connect to my Synology NAS.
Checking on the NAS side I had SM
nodes, each with a disk, so you could distribute the files to
> the disks and have the output files appear in some
> network filesystem.
>
> There are some youtube videos for R-pi NAS -- getting power to all
> the drives is an issue and without staging you need a very capable
>
output files appear in some
network
filesystem.
There are some youtube videos for R-pi NAS -- getting power to all the
drives is
an issue and without staging you need a very capable PS.
--
George N. White III
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedor
From: "George N. White III" mailto:gnw...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, 23 December 2021 at 00:02:02
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
Subject: Re: NAS purchase advice
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 05:47, Walter Cazzola
ma
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 05:47, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Dear Fedoers,
>
> I'm planning to buy a NAS to backup my Linux boxes. I've spent few days at
> looking for it on the Internet but I've some hard time to find a NAS that
> fits
> my needs.
>
> I intend to
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 17:05, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Usually a spinning disk need about 1amp at 12v to spin up each disk. I
> have had to upsize a power supply because the original ps was no longer
> quit big enough after the disks had aged and increased startup current
> closer to the max specif
Usually a spinning disk need about 1amp at 12v to spin up each disk. I
have had to upsize a power supply because the original ps was no longer
quit big enough after the disks had aged and increased startup current
closer to the max specified for the disk. Max x disks was a few amps over
the ps ra
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 10:36, Tim via users
wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 10:45 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> [...]
It's scary when you see PCs with 500 watt power supplies (or the
> hardware manuals saying you need one), but they don't use 500 watts all
> the time, if at all. It's just their
ly
> my backups and Truenas with a more powerful machine for all my other NAS
> needs.
>
> I guess the Synology was a good and easy start into the NAS world for me.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Fred
Like others here, I have a Synology box. Little guy -- 2 drives
-- bough
peed being
automatically controlled without me customising it), two 8 gig RAM
sticks, a hard disc drive, mouse and keyboard. Pretty much a minimum
basic PC setup.
There may be some small NAS devices that use less power, but I don't
think it's going to be significantly less power usage to c
> Am 03.12.2021 um 17:30 schrieb Stephane Travostino :
>
> That's why out-of-the-box support for Docker is a life saver on my Synology.
> I'm running plenty of unsupported software that are portable to any other
> linux system of the same architecture.
Yes, indeed. My Synology supports Docker
sn't.
So this is something you need to verify before purchase if you want
Docker and pick a Synology.
I use Pfsense for firewalling (on a Protectli), Synology for exclusively
my backups and Truenas with a more powerful machine for all my other NAS
needs.
I guess the Synology was a good
re portable to any other linux
system of the same architecture.
I don't even use any official Synology package when I've got the whole of
Dockerhub at my disposal. I'm running Plex, Sonarr, Radarr, qBittorrent,
Jackett all containerised, going through a VPN container.
So a maj
> Am 02.12.2021 um 10:46 schrieb Walter Cazzola :
>
> From your experience do you have some brand/model to suggest? Or something
> that I should consider that I didn't list?
According to your list you may need rather a „full blown“ NAS like QNap or
Synology. Both have a
asured it,
I'm not going by the labels on the equipment). There's just the
motherboard, no plugged in cards. The fans are temperature controlled,
so very quiet (some cases make fan motor noise much worse by resonating
along with it).
The non-surprise is that you can put on it what you
On Dec 2, 2021, at 05:06, Stephane Travostino wrote:
>
> * Exports via WebDAV, NFS, SMB, AFS out of the box
I was excited they supported the Andrew File System, but I looked and I think
you mean AFP (AppleShare).
--
Jonathan Billings
___
users maili
I've used Thecus NAS's for many years, recommended them to co-workers and
friends seeking the same kinds of solutions. Back when I was looking to go way
beyond local USB-connected hard drives for my home network, I did my own
research into what existed for NAS solutions at the time
setup it up, and how old of kernel/tools that they
used.
A number of NAS uses in that situation have ended up on the mdadm list
working through how to recover from the failure and not lose data.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 8:30 AM Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:46:30 +0100 (CE
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:46:30 +0100 (CET)
Walter Cazzola wrote:
> From your experience do you have some brand/model to suggest? Or something
> that I should consider that I didn't list?
I'm not sure it hits all your points, but I have a NAS I made
from an old PC that happened to ha
My solution
https://github.com/Germano0/reliable-data-storage-project/blob/master/index.md
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fe
such as access rights,
> > attributes, links, name lengths/characters, ...
>
> I used to use WD MyBook and MyCloud NAS devices, and while it offered
> NFS access, it's normal way for you to use it was for everything to get
> dumped into in an all-user location, owned by root o
Hello Walter,
On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 10:05:19 + "Stephane Travostino" wrote:
> I've been running a Synology NAS (DS718+ with two 1TB SSDs) for the past 2
> years and I'm pleased with it.
>
> It's mostly closed source but:
> * Provides SSH access (with
D MyBook and MyCloud NAS devices, and while it offered
NFS access, it's normal way for you to use it was for everything to get
dumped into in an all-user location, owned by root on the disk drive,
with access restrictions (mis)handled through the networking file
system. It seemed the same hairb
Hello Walter,
I've been running a Synology NAS (DS718+ with two 1TB SSDs) for the past 2
years and I'm pleased with it.
It's mostly closed source but:
* Provides SSH access (with root), so I run Docker on it and all my media
management tools
* Runs on btrfs (https://www.synolog
Dear Fedoers,
I'm planning to buy a NAS to backup my Linux boxes. I've spent few days at
looking for it on the Internet but I've some hard time to find a NAS that fits
my needs.
I intend to use it both the backup my data but also to keep consistent the
data on several linux-boxe
s like play things outside the home
or a few other things they insist on an account for. I mostly
play things from the server on various smart TV devices with
plex clients. Seems to work pretty well.
The server I'm running on my NAS doesn't get metadata from
filenames, but from some rand
fter a while. Been putting all my videos
> > on it and running a Plex server in a jail.
>
> Our home NAS is also our local Ubuntu server (pick whatever distro you
> like). It's got a pair (well, 2 pairs) of big drives in RAID-1 - there
> live our media and other large
On 3/16/21 1:04 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Plex: I keep toying with plex. I find it very frustrating.
I'd love to hear about your setup. We still play media on our PVR, which
has the server's media tree NFS mounted on it.
I use Gerbera (formerly MediaTomb). It's very simple and provides a
DL
a jail.
Our home NAS is also our local Ubuntu server (pick whatever distro you
like). It's got a pair (well, 2 pairs) of big drives in RAID-1 - there
live our media and other large things. It shares via NFS and SMB/CIFS.
I do recommend, if you have the $s, to RAID your storage - it gets yo
I installed TrueNAS on an old system (along with a ton of disk
space), it isn't as familiar as fedora, but it seems to work very well
and you get used to it after a while. Been putting all my videos
on it and running a Plex server in a jail.
___
users mai
>
> After a painful experience of the lack of support of a Seagate Goflex Home
> never updated from smb1, and finding the inadequacies of a WD MyCloudUltra2,
> I'm ready to tackle configuring an older Dell system as the NAS for my
> network. What do I need to configure
On 3/15/21 2:17 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
After a painful experience of the lack of support of a Seagate Goflex
Home never updated from smb1, and finding the inadequacies of a WD
MyCloudUltra2, I'm ready to tackle configuring an older Dell system as
the NAS for my network. What
After a painful experience of the lack of support of a Seagate Goflex
Home never updated from smb1, and finding the inadequacies of a WD
MyCloudUltra2, I'm ready to tackle configuring an older Dell system as
the NAS for my network. What do I need to configure besides NFS and smb
se
On 10/03/2021 08:56, George N. White III wrote:
If you did a "df -T" on your system does it show the mount as "nfs" or
"nfs4"?
If it shows "nfs", it might be helpful to adjust the mount command to use nfs4
for the build-in file locking.
If it shows "nfs" I'm not sure adjusting the moun
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 17:01, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 09/03/2021 23:21, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> > yes, adding the client userid and password as a user on the MyCloud
> enabled nfs to connect.
>
> OK. I find that quite odd. But I've not heard much praise of those WD
> products.
>
Networ
On 09/03/2021 23:21, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
yes, adding the client userid and password as a user on the MyCloud enabled nfs to connect.
OK. I find that quite odd. But I've not heard much praise of those WD
products.
If you did a "df -T" on your system does it show the mount as "nfs
mnt/HD/HD_a2/SmartWare *
/mnt/HD/HD_a2/Public *
Apparently both smb and nfs access are provided to the shares. As was
suggested in another response adding the user and password of the
client
system to the NAS allowed access. Also it was suggested that ssh
access
ha
Ddata
SmartWare Disk WDdata
TimeMachineBackup Disk
mcstuffyDisk
TransmissionDisk
Anti-Virus Essentials Disk
rm3 Disk
Share_Aggregation Disk Samba MSDFS Server
IPC$IPC IPC Service (2-Bay NAS)
mb and nfs access are provided to the shares. As was
> suggested in another response adding the user and password of the client
> system to the NAS allowed access. Also it was suggested that ssh access
> had been noted elsewhere. The web page for the NAS provides a check box
> to ena
Ddata
TimeMachineBackup Disk
mcstuffyDisk
TransmissionDisk
Anti-Virus Essentials Disk
rm3 Disk
Share_Aggregation Disk Samba MSDFS Server
IPC$IPC IPC Service (2-Bay NAS)
SMB1 disabled -- no workgroup avai
IPC Service (2-Bay NAS)
SMB1 disabled -- no workgroup available
~]# showmount -e 192.168.1.248
Export list for 192.168.1.248:
/mnt/HD/HD_a2/mcstuffy *
/mnt/HD/HD_a2/SmartWare *
/mnt/HD/HD_a2/Public *
Apparently both smb and nfs access are provided to the shares. As was
suggested in another
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 01:44, Robert McBroom via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Added a WD Mycloud Ultra NAS to my local network. Some variant of NFS is
> used. There are two shares, one designated as public for access by all
> systems on the network and one
On 07/03/2021 14:17, Ed Greshko wrote:
smbclient -L 192.168.1.248
Also,
showmount -e 192.168.1.248
may provide some insight
--
People who believe they don't make mistakes have already made one.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraprojec
On 07/03/2021 13:44, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
~]# mount -t nfs 192.168.1.248:/mnt/HD/HD_a2/mcstuffy /mnt/mcstuffy
Created symlink /run/systemd/system/remote-fs.target.wants/rpc-statd.service →
/usr/lib/systemd/system/rpc-statd.service.
mount.nfs: Protocol not supported
-
I don't se
Added a WD Mycloud Ultra NAS to my local network. Some variant of NFS is
used. There are two shares, one designated as public for access by all
systems on the network and one with a user and password.
Both are accessible on Windows systems on the network. The public share
can be mounted on
On 12/28/20 8:50 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
Hi Francois I use a FritzBox 7490 . You can configure a NAS. I did : It
runs fine.
I do not now if Fedora has NAS possibilities.
It really depends on what you mean by being a NAS. My server provides a
NAS service to the computers on my network
Hi Francois I use a FritzBox 7490 . You can configure a NAS. I did : It
runs fine.
I do not now if Fedora has NAS possibilities.
Ger van Dijck.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--2NdOkd51Ld6e0mXpDX2rvrVbsTyzlLd0z
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:09:16 +0100
François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> Is there a nas install which is fedora based?
>
> I tried openmediavault which is debian based but I am not fully convinced.
>
> Thank you.
>
Not remotely fedora based, but I use truenas and am v
Bonjour,
Is there a nas install which is fedora based?
I tried openmediavault which is debian based but I am not fully convinced.
Thank you.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:52 AM Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> On 21Aug2020 01:46, Joe Wulf wrote:
> > I've been a Thecus.com NAS consumer for well over a decade. I personally
> > own two now.
> [... detailed and encouraging information ...]
>
> Many thanks! This is
On 21Aug2020 01:46, Joe Wulf wrote:
> I've been a Thecus.com NAS consumer for well over a decade. I personally own
> two now.
[... detailed and encouraging information ...]
Many thanks! This is very helpful. - Cameron Simpson
___
users m
I've been a Thecus.com NAS consumer for well over a decade. I personally own
two now.
I bought the N7700SAS, in 2009 when it would support a max of seven 2TB drives,
with about 10.5 GB RAID5 storage.In all this time, it's got about 98% uptime
and I've only had to ever replac
On 21Aug2020 10:29, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>In a former life we ran our backups to QNAP NASes in a data centre.
>They
>were nice boxes with a little LED console strip on the front and for
>when desperate, a video out and a USB socket which would take a keyboard
>on the back. We were happy.
BTW,
Disclaimer: not Fedora specific.
In a former life we ran our backups to QNAP NASes in a data centre. They
were nice boxes with a little LED console strip on the front and for
when desperate, a video out and a USB socket which would take a keyboard
on the back. We were happy.
On that basis we o
te school. Part of the consulting consists
> of helping the school to evaluate how to set up some infrastructure,
> using Linux/Free Software as much as possible.
>
> I have been just asked to, quoting, "suggest an all-in-one
> NAS-VPN-firewall for the school". We are talking ~
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 08:56 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Returning to the "do not put the NAS on the firewall/VPN host", the
> NAS really ought to be a non-external service. So hosting on the
> firewall itself is a security risk because a small misconfiguration
> can ex
,
using Linux/Free Software as much as possible.
I have been just asked to, quoting, "suggest an all-in-one
NAS-VPN-firewall for the school". [...]
I am a bit surprised that so far nobody has commented on that
request that it is not a good idea to combine the 3 features your
client ask
infrastructure,
using Linux/Free Software as much as possible.
I have been just asked to, quoting, "suggest an all-in-one
NAS-VPN-firewall for the school". We are talking ~80 students in the
8/13 years age range, maybe more after summer, plus teachers and
administration. The "all-in-o
as possible.
I have been just asked to, quoting, "suggest an all-in-one
NAS-VPN-firewall for the school". We are talking ~80 students in the
8/13 years age range, maybe more after summer, plus teachers and
administration. The "all-in-one" part is the key requirement, and also
a small private school. Part of the consulting consists
of helping the school to evaluate how to set up some infrastructure,
using Linux/Free Software as much as possible.
I have been just asked to, quoting, "suggest an all-in-one
NAS-VPN-firewall for the school". We are talking ~80 s
On 6/29/19 4:51 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> I know how to handle this stuff the 100%
> DIY/hacker way, but that is not an option in this case.
I could be wrong, but it sounds as if you're asking for a "commercial" solution
as opposed
to build one.
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wro
> of helping the school to evaluate how to set up some infrastructure,
> > using Linux/Free Software as much as possible.
> >
> > I have been just asked to, quoting, "suggest an all-in-one
> > NAS-VPN-firewall for the school". We are talking ~80 students in the
&
. Part of the consulting consists
> of helping the school to evaluate how to set up some infrastructure,
> using Linux/Free Software as much as possible.
>
> I have been just asked to, quoting, "suggest an all-in-one
> NAS-VPN-firewall for the school". We are talking ~
Hi
> I have been just asked to, quoting, "suggest an all-in-one
> NAS-VPN-firewall for the school". We are talking ~80 students in the
> 8/13 years age range, maybe more after summer, plus teachers and
> administration. The "all-in-one" part is the key requirement
, quoting, "suggest an all-in-one
NAS-VPN-firewall for the school". We are talking ~80 students in the
8/13 years age range, maybe more after summer, plus teachers and
administration. The "all-in-one" part is the key requirement, and also
the reason why I am asking for recommendation
On 2/13/19 4:50 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 02/12/19 23:39, Samuel Sieb wrote:
The kernel defaults to version 2 now, but if that's an old NAS, it
might still be using version 1. Try:
"mount -t cifs -o vers=1.0 //192.168.1.1/sdb1 /mnt/test"
.
Yes, that works. The equipment is
On 02/12/19 23:39, Samuel Sieb wrote:
The kernel defaults to version 2 now, but if that's an old NAS, it
might still be using version 1. Try:
"mount -t cifs -o vers=1.0 //192.168.1.1/sdb1 /mnt/test"
.
Yes, that works. The equipment is not so old but the Samba/cifs is f
t:
[root@Box83 bobg]# mount.cifs //192.168.1.1/sdb1 /mnt/test
Password for bobg@//192.168.1.1/sdb1:
mount error(112): Host is down
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)
The kernel defaults to version 2 now, but if that's an old NAS, it might
still be using versio
On 02/12/19 16:48, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/12/19 1:37 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
The Man page says "smbclient - ftp-like client to access SMB/CIFS
resources on servers."
Can you suggest a comman do list files on "sda1" perhaps?
You looked at the man page, it has instructions.
Try "smbclient /
On 2/12/19 1:37 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
The Man page says "smbclient - ftp-like client to access SMB/CIFS
resources on servers."
Can you suggest a comman do list files on "sda1" perhaps?
You looked at the man page, it has instructions.
Try "smbclient //192.168.1.1/sda1".
You can also mount i
On 02/12/19 16:15, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Does "smbclient -L 192.168.1.1" work?
Once you can mount the SMB shared you should be able to cd around in
them from the terminal and do the usual stuff.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson
__
I didn't see that in google,
On 12Feb2019 15:37, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have a router connected NAS, via a USB port. it is a samba server
and works. There is a "send to" function that works for saving files
and it works well enough from various Apple devices but I would prefer
to be able to connect to it from
I have a router connected NAS, via a USB port. it is a samba server and
works. There is a "send to" function that works for saving files and it
works well enough from various Apple devices but I would prefer to be
able to connect to it from a terminal and do thins like create
direc
On 02/05/2018 09:43 PM, Robert McBroom wrote:
Curious things. Using a LINKSYS AC3200 router as the server for the
NAS. Can connect the NAS either as usb or esata. Swapped from the usb
to the esata line and createrepo worked.
That's good for you. But I'm still curious abou
send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Samuel
Curious things. Using a LINKSYS AC3200 router as the server for the
NAS. Can connect the NAS either as usb or esata. Swapped from the usb
to the esata line and createrepo worked.
___
user
On 02/04/2018 12:02 PM, Robert McBroom wrote:
about transfer of the permissions on the files. However, createrepo
gets into trouble and gives errors of the form
C_CREATEREPOLIB: Warning: Cannot copy
Packages/repodata/1f3b3f3f1e6f83cd3ce15c483203d0233352bef2c1fb9bdc84cf264c24637984-other.sql
For years I've kept a local repo on NAS so that I can update several
systems without having to download everything for each one. The drives
on the NAS are formatted as ntfs for communication with Win systems.
Now I'm getting all kinds of file attributes problems with rsync
transf
me on their clocks.
All appropriate NFS services running on the server.
Firewalls (server and client).
Same USER IDs on server and client if you're owning own files.
Correct use of no_squash/squash.
NFS versions.
If your NAS is one that auto-updates itself, then you may need to
recheck things f
an wrote:
> >>>>On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 08:09 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >>>>>On 11/06/17 05:30, François Patte wrote:
> >>>>>>Does anyone have some experience in building a NAS --- stocking and
> >>>>>>broadcasting multimed
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 07:25 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I
> am accessing the same mount point under Windows 10 without requiring any
> special configuration, which from the man documentation either Windows
> 10 is accessing the mount point with smbV3.0 or it is auto falling back
> to smbV1.0
ote:
Does anyone have some experience in building a NAS --- stocking and
broadcasting multimedia stuff on home network --- using fedora?
In the past, yes. But then more, and varied, devices were bought. Android
devices,
SmartTV, etc. Then friends learned what I had and asked for access. And
t; > > > Does anyone have some experience in building a NAS --- stocking and
> > > > > broadcasting multimedia stuff on home network --- using fedora?
> > > >
> > > > In the past, yes. But then more, and varied, devices were bought.
> > &
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 08:43 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/06/17 08:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 08:09 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 11/06/17 05:30, François Patte wrote:
> > > > Does anyone have some experience
On 06/11/2017 11:43, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/06/17 08:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 08:09 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/06/17 05:30, François Patte wrote:
Does anyone have some experience in building a NAS --- stocking and
broadcasting multimedia stuff on home ne
On 11/06/17 08:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 08:09 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 11/06/17 05:30, François Patte wrote:
>>> Does anyone have some experience in building a NAS --- stocking and
>>> broadcasting multimedia stuff on home networ
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 08:09 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/06/17 05:30, François Patte wrote:
> > Does anyone have some experience in building a NAS --- stocking and
> > broadcasting multimedia stuff on home network --- using fedora?
>
>
> In the past, yes. But then m
On 11/06/17 05:30, François Patte wrote:
> Does anyone have some experience in building a NAS --- stocking and
> broadcasting multimedia stuff on home network --- using fedora?
In the past, yes. But then more, and varied, devices were bought. Android
devices,
SmartTV, etc. Then f
On 11/05/2017 01:30 PM, François Patte wrote:
Does anyone have some experience in building a NAS --- stocking and
broadcasting multimedia stuff on home network --- using fedora?
It depends on what you're trying to do. I use mediatomb to share media
files via dlna/upnp that my LG b
Bonsoir,
Does anyone have some experience in building a NAS --- stocking and
broadcasting multimedia stuff on home network --- using fedora?
Thank you to share your experience.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45
On 06/02/2017 04:22, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Stephen Morris
wrote:
My Nas device now fails to mount at boot time via the CIFS definition in
fstab but the corresponding NFS definition mounts quite happily. Also after
the system comes up and I log into KDE
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Stephen Morris
wrote:
> My Nas device now fails to mount at boot time via the CIFS definition in
> fstab but the corresponding NFS definition mounts quite happily. Also after
> the system comes up and I log into KDE I can manually mount the CIFS dev
On 19/1/17 10:58 pm, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:13:11PM +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
Stephen, are you using NetworkManager?
I am still using NetworkManager, but I am having problems with it at
the moment with it not connecting to my usb wireless device, which
I'm still try
that the NAS doesn't handle it well when both mounts
occur at the same time?
Either way, try adding "x-systemd.requires=/mnt/nfs" to the CIFS
options in fstab. That should tell systemd to mount them sequentially.
Thanks Samuel, I have added that option to the CIFS mount in fstab and
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:06:35AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119787
> Just as a matter of interest, why does "After=network.target" even
> exist? In what circumstance would this ever be the right thing to do?
It exists for _shutdown_ orderin
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:25:31PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Any service that can be configured to bind to a specific IP should have
> "After=network-online.target" rather than "After=network.target". This
> can be servers for web, mail, FTP, SSH, DNS, logging, and more.
>
> This is a long-stan
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:13:11PM +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> >Stephen, are you using NetworkManager?
> I am still using NetworkManager, but I am having problems with it at
> the moment with it not connecting to my usb wireless device, which
> I'm still trying to sort out.
Is that the same net
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 21:25 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Rick Stevens said:
> > So, it launches
> > the network, says the network is up and moves along even though the
> > network isn't actually up. Your mount is sometimes attempted with a
> > functioning network and sometimes not
On 19/1/17 11:28 am, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:37:34PM -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
I think the issue here is that systemd is non-determinate as to when
things actually get done. systemd simply spawns off some command, flags
itself saying "Ok, that's done" and then goes of
Once upon a time, Rick Stevens said:
> So, it launches
> the network, says the network is up and moves along even though the
> network isn't actually up. Your mount is sometimes attempted with a
> functioning network and sometimes not. You're left to figure out why.
That's not true. systemd dist
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:37:34PM -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I think the issue here is that systemd is non-determinate as to when
> things actually get done. systemd simply spawns off some command, flags
> itself saying "Ok, that's done" and then goes off on its merry way. It
> doesn't verify th
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
