On Sun, 2025-03-09 at 16:51 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> The Spectrum modem only has oneport. It would only connect to their
> proprietary router with an extra monthly charge not my Reyee.
If a PC can connect to it, so can a router.
They may require you to connect something to it so
On 3/2/25 8:10 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
On 2 Mar 2025, at 12:25, Will McDonald wrote:
Your life would be made a lot simpler if you had a small switch or
router, as Tim suggested. You can even get USB-powered devices.
All the ISP modems I have ever seen have a 3 or 4 port switch built in.
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 19:42 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> What is daisy-chaining?
Named after making a necklace from intertwining daisies together, it's
one thing connected to another, to another through another, to another
through another, etc.
Internet <--> PC <--> PC <--> PC
--
uname -r
On 3/6/25 5:42 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
What is daisy-chaining?
Forwarding (each device has two distinct connections)?
This.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject
What is daisy-chaining?
Multi-drop bus (each device connected to a common wire)?
Forwarding (each device has two distinct connections)?
Something else?
Discovering the topology was easy.
Details, not so much.
--
Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 17:21 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> Following your suggestion, I set the following
>
> On PC A, the interface for PC C with IP 10.42.1.1 with a gateway to 10.42.0.2
> and on PC C
> IP 10.42.1.2 with a gateway to 10.42.1.1
I am thoroughly confused by that descriptio
On 3/3/25 3:30 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Connection between A and B work fine.
The only think that I cannot build is the connection with PC C
(I manually set up the ip address, etc..)
What do you mean by
You could
configure the two ethernet ports on PC A as a bridge or you could again
>
> On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 12:30 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > Is bridge synonymy of "shared to other computers"?
>
> No, it's more of a straight through (or over, hence the name). Or, you
> might think of it as a pass-through.
>
> > If yes, every time that I do that, it generates an a
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 12:30 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> Is bridge synonymy of "shared to other computers"?
No, it's more of a straight through (or over, hence the name). Or, you
might think of it as a pass-through.
> If yes, every time that I do that, it generates an address in 10.40
55.255.255.0 broadcast 10.42.0.255
> >
> > but PC B cannot connect (connection fails)
>
> I just tested this setup and it works with no problem.
> I don't have wifi on the desktop, just two ethernet ports, but it should
> be the same.
> One ethernet port goes to "
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 20:38 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> Trying to add a nameserver.
>
> On PC B, I have
> Global
> Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
> resolv.conf mode: stub
>
> Link 2 (enp3s0)
> Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6
>
just tested this setup and it works with no problem.
I don't have wifi on the desktop, just two ethernet ports, but it should
be the same.
One ethernet port goes to "the internet" (internal network, but same).
The other ethernet port I configured in the Gnome network manager as
&
Trying to add a nameserver.
On PC B, I have
Global
Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
resolv.conf mode: stub
Link 2 (enp3s0)
Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6
Protocols: -DefaultRoute LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS
DNSSEC=no/unsupported
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 09:58 -0500, bruce wrote:
> hey Tim.
>
> saw your post. could u let us know who the offending is is so we can
> avoid if possible!!
Hi Bruce,
My fired FTTP ISP was Telstra (Australia's service from hell), that
thinks it's a premium service provider despite having outsour
hey Tim.
saw your post. could u let us know who the offending is is so we can avoid
if possible!!
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025, 9:50 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> Patrick Dupre:
>
> > Yes the schamatics is correct.
> > I set the gateway and now it works.
> >
> > Now
> > 1) I wish to use internet from PC A
Patrick Dupre:
> Yes the schamatics is correct.
> I set the gateway and now it works.
>
> Now
> 1) I wish to use internet from PC A.
> I guess that I need to set a name server
> But not possible manually
Presuming that you just mean for using the internet... If internet
sharing is working, the
Thank for the feedback.
It is just a temporally solution. I must get a new doogle at the end of next week.
Before I had PC A with the 2 internet interfaces connected to PC B and PC C.
The setup was easy, and new had problem.
Now
From PC B
nmcli connection show
NAME
> On 2 Mar 2025, at 12:25, Will McDonald wrote:
>
> Your life would be made a lot simpler if you had a small switch or router, as
> Tim suggested. You can even get USB-powered devices.
All the ISP modems I have ever seen have a 3 or 4 port switch built in.
Doesn't yours?
Barry
--
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 at 09:12, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I set the gateway and now it works.
>
> Now
> 1) I wish to use internet from PC A.
> I guess that I need to set a name server
> But not possible manually
>
nmcli connection modify ipv4.dns
(From: https://idroot.us/fedora-41-network-configurati
Thank for the feedback.
Yes the schamatics is correct.
I set the gateway and now it works.
Now
1) I wish to use internet from PC A.
I guess that I need to set a name server
But not possible manually
2) How do I need to set for PC 3
From PC A
From PC C
I tried several things
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 23:22 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> I had a configuration with was working, but my usb WiFi doogle does
> not work anymore.
Replacing it isn't an option?
As for the best way forward... It might be worth letting us know if
you were using a mix of cabled ethernet an
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 16:03 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> I have 2 PC A and B.
> Before A what connected to the world wireless
> and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired).
> PC A lost its wireless connection.
> Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I wa
On 3/1/25 4:18 PM, Will McDonald wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 at 22:22, Patrick Dupre via users
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
wrote:
I am lost.
I had a configuration with was working, but my usb WiFi doogle does
not work anymore.
The configuration which was working
On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 at 22:22, Patrick Dupre via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I am lost.
>
> I had a configuration with was working, but my usb WiFi doogle does not
> work anymore.
> The configuration which was working
>
> Doogle on PC A with 2 ethernet cards.
> One connected to P
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: internal network
>
> On 3/1/25 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > I have 2 PC A and B.
> > Before A what connected to the world wireless
> > and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired).
> > P
On 3/1/25 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
I have 2 PC A and B.
Before A what connected to the world wireless
and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired).
PC A lost its wireless connection.
Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I want to
have PC A connecte
Hello,
I have 2 PC A and B.
Before A what connected to the world wireless
and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired).
PC A lost its wireless connection.
Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I want to
have PC A connected also through the same internet cable and
It seems I badly misnterpreted the verb "to give".
--
Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number,
a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin."
-- some
On 3/25/22 00:48, Tim via users wrote:
R. G. Newbury:
edit your /etc/hosts file to give the hdhomerun unit a fixed IP
address.
Tim
When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address?
R. G. Newbury
You are correct, and I am completely wrong. A static address for
the computer wo
R. G. Newbury:
> edit your /etc/hosts file to give the hdhomerun unit a fixed IP
> address.
Tim >>> When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address?
R. G. Newbury
>>> You are correct, and I am completely wrong. A static address for
>>> the computer would be set by editing
On 3/24/22 20:34, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2022, R. G. Newbury wrote:
On 2022-03-20 8:00 a.m., Tim >R. G.
Newbury wrote:
edit your /etc/hosts file to give the hdhomerun unit a fixed IP
address.
When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address?
You are correct, an
On Sun, 20 Mar 2022, R. G. Newbury wrote:
On 2022-03-20 8:00 a.m., Tim >R. G. Newbury
wrote:
edit your /etc/hosts file to give the hdhomerun unit a fixed IP
address.
When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address?
You are correct, and I am completely wrong. A static address f
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:34:55 -0600
Robin Laing wrote:
> In my network, devices are assigned DHCP IP address according to their MAC
> address. My wireless access point uses mac filtering.
>
> With DHCP being assigned via MAC address, then they get a static IP address
> fixed to that device. T
On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 00:34 -0600, Robin Laing wrote:
> In my network, devices are assigned DHCP IP address according to
> their MAC address.
Mine too, virtually all DHCP servers do (even if not providing fixed
static addresses, but just nearly always giving the same addresses),
that's always been
On 2022-03-20 12:50, Tim via users wrote:
On Sun, 2022-03-20 at 12:13 -0400, R. G. Newbury wrote:
'Configuring the DHCP server to work that way', is to set it to
deliver a static address. With a dhcp server, the problem is that any
change in the network, or the items connecting to it, can cause
Tim wrote:
>> If you want a predictable LAN, then I really only see two ways to
>> manage that without major pain:
>>
>> 1. Run a DHCP server with a DNS server...
>> 2. Manually configure each device to have a fixed IP.
R. G. Newbury:
> I think you left out a third method, which uses part of your
On Sun, 2022-03-20 at 12:13 -0400, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> 'Configuring the DHCP server to work that way', is to set it to
> deliver a static address. With a dhcp server, the problem is that any
> change in the network, or the items connecting to it, can cause the
> dhcp server to deliver a differen
On 3/20/22 07:10, Tim via users wrote:
Some of those protocols can have a look inside their own hosts file to
find the answer (if they have one). However, that's going to go wrong
if the devices don't get the same IP each time. Apparently mDNS can
somehow get answers from a DHCP server. I'm no
On 2022-03-20 10:11 a.m.,
Tim wrote:
If you want a predictable LAN, then I really only see two ways to
manage that without major pain:
1. Run a DHCP server with a DNS server...
2. Manually configure each device to have a fixed IP.
I think you left out a third method, which uses part of your
On 2022-03-20 8:00 a.m.,
Tim wrote
R. G. Newbury wrote:
Controlling an hdhr with a dhcp served IP address is basically
impossible as it is hard to find that address and remember it for use
in your program. Control of the unit with most digital tv programs
requires a static IP address. Mythtv for
On 2022-03-20 8:00 a.m., Tim >R. G.
Newbury wrote:
edit your /etc/hosts file to give the hdhomerun unit a fixed IP
address.
When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address?
You are correct, and I am completely wrong. A static address for the
computer would be set by editing
/e
On Sun, 2022-03-20 at 13:08 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I think Tim's point is that the /etc/hosts file doesn't *assign* IP
> addresses, it merely *records* them.
Yep.
In a nutshell, if you haven't manually configured your PC (or other
device) to use a specific IP address, your PC gets gi
On Sun, 2022-03-20 at 08:50 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2022, at 04:17, Tim via users
> wrote:
> >
> > When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address?
>
> I don’t know the exact details of this particular problem, but if you
> install the “dnsmasq” package, it in
On Mar 20, 2022, at 04:17, Tim via users wrote:
>
> When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address?
I don’t know the exact details of this particular problem, but if you install
the “dnsmasq” package, it includes dns and dhcp service, and by default it
parses /etc/hosts and use
On Sun, 2022-03-20 at 00:01 -0400, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> Controlling an hdhr with a dhcp served IP address is basically
> impossible as it is hard to find that address and remember it for use
> in your program. Control of the unit with most digital tv programs
> requires a static IP address. Myth
On Sat, 2022-03-19 at 23:44 -0400, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> edit your /etc/hosts file to give the hdhomerun unit a fixed IP
> address.
When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address?
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.59.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 23 16:47:03 UTC 2022 x86_64
Bo
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
It will take me a while to try to understand the output from your
suggestions.
In the meantime, yes, it is a direct cable to the hdhomerun.
Then you will have to set a static IP address in your /etc/hosts file.
There is some sort of NETGEAT unit listed in your output.
response to ping) The interface was configured with the
NetworkManager app, that assigned the device eno1.
eno1 is your internal network port. Not the hdhomerun unit. My hdhr
units (I have 2 therefor 4 tuners) respond to ping. But it sounds like
your computer does not know where the hdhr is (ie its
Yes, it has worked on Fedora 32. The hardware is unchanged. I'll need to
verify the dhcp server
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 18:09:30 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 3/19/22 17:41, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > It will take me a while to try to understand the output from your
> > suggestions.
> >
> > In the m
On 3/19/22 17:41, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
It will take me a while to try to understand the output from your
suggestions.
In the meantime, yes, it is a direct cable to the hdhomerun.
The simple answer is that won't work. Has this ever worked?
You either need a dhcp server on your computer to p
It will take me a while to try to understand the output from your
suggestions.
In the meantime, yes, it is a direct cable to the hdhomerun.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 4:54 PM Roger Heflin wrote:
> I am pretty sure the hdhomerun usually needs a dhcp server to get an ip
> address. there may be some
I am pretty sure the hdhomerun usually needs a dhcp server to get an ip
address. there may be some default ip address. I don't see that my
hdhomeruns have a way to set an ip address.
If there is a default ip address then both the adapter and the hdhome run
need to be in the same subnet, and netw
ethtool -i eno1
ethtool eno1
will tell you what the connection status is.
dmesg| grep -i eno1 will give you the init messages for the card.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 6:19 PM Geoffrey Leach
wrote:
> F35, fresh install. I have an ethernet-connected device (HDHomerun, fwiw)
> newly re-compiled on
There is only one computer involved
HDHomerun is a box that converts OTA TV channels (i.e., a tuner) to a feed
that is accessed by the local system.
What is working? the code that accesses the ethernet feed, as far as I can
tell
What isn't working? The connection between the local computer and t
On 3/19/22 16:18, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
F35, fresh install. I have an ethernet-connected device (HDHomerun,
fwiw) newly re-compiled on the newly-installed F35 xfce4 workstation. As
far as I can tell from trying every network analysis I can find, the
connection is good (exception, no response to
F35, fresh install. I have an ethernet-connected device (HDHomerun, fwiw)
newly re-compiled on the newly-installed F35 xfce4 workstation. As far as I
can tell from trying every network analysis I can find, the connection is
good (exception, no response to ping) The interface was configured with the
56 matches
Mail list logo
