On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 9:21 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 9 Nov 2023 at 13:22, Celso Viana wrote:
>
> From: Celso Viana
> Date sent: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 13:22:15 -0300
> Subject:
On 9 Nov 2023 at 13:22, Celso Viana wrote:
From: Celso Viana
Date sent: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 13:22:15 -0300
Subject:Power management
To: Community support for Fedora users
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
On Nov 9, 2023, at 11:22, Celso Viana wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I set Fedora 38 Workstation's power mode to performance, but if any
> user doesn't login the computer hibernates. How do I change this
> behavior so that the computer does not go to sleep if there is no user
> logged in?
>
> Thanks
>
tings-daemon.plugins.power
This will show you the current values and settings for power management.
3. Modify Power Settings:
To change the behavior when no user is logged in, you can set the
sleep-inactive-ac-timeout and sleep-inactive-battery-timeout values to
-1, which effectively disables sleep
mand:
>
> bash
>
> gsettings list-recursively org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.power
>
> This will show you the current values and settings for power management.
>
> 3. Modify Power Settings:
> To change the behavior when no user is logged in, you can set the
> sl
pen a terminal on your Fedora system.
2.Check the Current Power Settings:
To see the current power settings, you can use the following command:
bash
gsettings list-recursively org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.power
This will show you the current values and settings for power managemen
Hi all,
I set Fedora 38 Workstation's power mode to performance, but if any
user doesn't login the computer hibernates. How do I change this
behavior so that the computer does not go to sleep if there is no user
logged in?
Thanks
--
Celso Vianna
BSD User: 51318
http://www.bsdcounter.org
Palmas
> > Much to my surprise, I'm running X11 - I thought for sure everything
> > had been replaced by Wayland.
> >
> > XDG_SESSION_TYPE=x11
> > XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=X-Cinnamon
>
> I don't know if Wayland works with anything except Gnome and KDE as yet.
I thought Cinnamon was a window manager? Can I get
On 2/10/22 16:50, Alex wrote:
Much to my surprise, I'm running X11 - I thought for sure everything
had been replaced by Wayland.
XDG_SESSION_TYPE=x11
XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=X-Cinnamon
I don't know if Wayland works with anything except Gnome and KDE as yet.
laced by Wayland.
XDG_SESSION_TYPE=x11
XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=X-Cinnamon
> There might be other settings that clash with "Power Management
> settings" (no idea what you mean by that: probably some GUI where you
> set that?)
>
> On X11 I'd try
> xset q
>
>
Now, when I set the "turn off the screen when inactive for" option to
5m in the Power Management settings, I find that it takes far longer
than five minutes for it to actually turn off the monitors, but then
not only do they all immediately turn back on, but all of the windows
on the mi
tings menu and can't find any way to determine which it is. I'd
> like all three monitors to turn off after 15 minutes of inactivity.
> What is the best way to do that? Simple question, but clearly not a
> simple answer.
> Now, when I set the "turn off the screen when inact
m I have for a long time, totally unrelated to the desktop
environment used and distribution.
I'm also experincing issues with display power management not working,
I don't know which one it is really and do these match with the issues
you are experiencing, but one thing is common and tha
kept up with the desktop, even though fedora and whatever graphical
display it provides by default has been my primary desktop since
before Windows XP.
Now, when I set the "turn off the screen when inactive for" option to
5m in the Power Management settings, I find that it takes far longer
t
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:25:27 -0400, Lester Petrie wrote:
> Yes, I see this also. I have a Dell desktop with AMD graphics. I have
> turned screen blanking off, so that my screen saver runs all the time
> after my machine goes idle. I hadn't discovered that switching to a VT
> and back would activ
On 7/4/2016 3:12 PM, George Avrunin wrote:
Some additional information:
- The same thing happens on a very old Dell Inspiron (I think) desktop,
also with Intel integrated graphics, that my wife uses. (But the two
Precision workstations are less than 1.5 years old and the other machine
i
Some additional information:
- The same thing happens on a very old Dell Inspiron (I think) desktop,
also with Intel integrated graphics, that my wife uses. (But the two
Precision workstations are less than 1.5 years old and the other machine
is definitely more than 5 years old. )
- The p
After upgrading to F24, I'm having the following problem. I have KDE
Settings -> Power Management -> Energy Saving set to turn on "screen
energy saving" after 10 minutes. This blanks the screen after 10 minutes
of inactivity, as expected. (xset -q shows that DPMS is en
Been banging my head against a minor problem for months now. Finally
giving up and asking...
Have a Thinkpad and a dock. Mate still allows for this arrangement, I
can even configure it to stay powered on with the lid closed off of the
dock if I want. The problem is I can't logout and back in or
T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> systemd (by default) doesn't put idle systems to sleep, but it does
> put closed laptops to sleep when no desktop power management system
> is active (e.g. when KDM is running).
>
> Just set HandleLidSwitch=ignore in /etc/systemd/logind.conf to turn
t goes to suspend within a few minutes. That is what I'm trying
> to prevent.
Oh, this is probably systemd. I glossed over the word "laptops" in
the beginning of your e-mail, sorry.
systemd (by default) doesn't put idle systems to sleep, but it does
put closed laptops to sleep
Allegedly, on or about 05 August 2014, CLOSE Dave sent:
> If the laptop is closed, it goes to suspend within a few minutes.
As a side issue, you need to check that your laptop won't overheat if
the lid is shut. Some of them have ventilation around the keyboard, and
need it.
--
[tim@localhost ~
and doesn't even do power management, so I don't
> think you're using it?
>
> I'm pretty sure you have to either be using GDM or lightdm to even
> have power management on the login screen, in which case switching to
> KDM (`yum install kdm && systemctl ena
continue to run so that remote users can reach the private
> network. So I need to prevent these laptops from going to sleep.
>
> It appears that KDE's power management function applies to the user
> logged into the console. If a user is logged in, I can easily prevent
> sleep.
I asked:
> Is there a way to keep the power management function active even
> when no one is logged into the console?
On 08/02/2014 08:19 AM, Tim wrote:
> Perhaps you can configure power management options for the kdm user
> (that which the KDM logon screen runs as)? Assuming th
Allegedly, on or about 01 August 2014, CLOSE Dave sent:
> Is there a way to keep the power management function active even when
> no one is logged into the console?
Perhaps you can configure power management options for the kdm user
(that which the KDM logon screen runs as)? Assuming th
. So I need to prevent these laptops from going to sleep.
It appears that KDE's power management function applies to the user
logged into the console. If a user is logged in, I can easily prevent
sleep. But if the user logs out or the laptop is booted by a remote
user, no power management see
On 05/27/2014 02:54 PM, V.99 wrote:
> On 19.5.2014 12:15, Trever L. Adams wrote:
>> The problem I am having is figuring out how to set it up so it
>> automatically goes to sleep after X period of time and stay asleep.
>>
> Hi Trever.
>
> I played with systemd a bit and made a script you can be insp
On 19.5.2014 12:15, Trever L. Adams wrote:
The problem I am having is figuring out how to set it up so it
automatically goes to sleep after X period of time and stay asleep.
Hi Trever.
I played with systemd a bit and made a script you can be inspired with
(I hope).
Create a script /usr/lib/
Hello everyone,
I am having some difficulty finding the right information. I have a
server that is only needed at certain times. Wake-on-lan works well, so
I can do administration, etc.
rtcwake works, so I can tell it to wake each day 3-5 minutes or so
(haven't decided) before when it is needed.
This appears to have happened recently, but just when I can't say. Is it a bug
or a feature?
Settings->Screensaver->Advanced->Display Power Management->Standby After
When Standby is activated, in addition to blanking the screen the code now
(this is new) reduces the power draw
l.
Can't underclock the Nvidia chip much more, so am hoping to find a way to
get reliable power management post-resume from suspend as something is
going off the rails at this time and not on system start/login.
Thanks for ideas.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
More on my f17 ee 701 install, this time with power management.
If I boot from AC I can switch to battery and it runs ~3hr on battery.
Same if I boot directly from battery. I can poweroff and power on and
still get about 3 hours.
But if I suspend, then whether on AC of battery I only get
On 30 June 2011 14:38, Rex Dieter wrote:
> support for that was removed from kde in... 4.5 I believe... , as that was
> an old feature of hal (that fedora purposesly removed from it's hal
> packaging even earlier).
See http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/power/good_practices.html
Richard
--
users ma
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! So the problem is in $subj ... until now was possible that in power
> management profiles to associate with a specific governor ..
support for that was removed from kde in... 4.5 I believe... , as that was
an old feature of hal (that fedora purposesly remove
Hi! So the problem is in $subj ... until now was possible that in power
management profiles to associate with a specific governor ..
its true that i can use (and i do) cpu speed .. but it would be nice to
change the governor with a single click ...
So .. has anyone any idea about this problem
power consumption nor does it go into C4
state. When I looked at /proc/acpi/processor/CPU*/cpuinfo I found "power
management: no". Is that normal or should I simply run a more recent
kernel? In found nothing regarding i5/arrandale power management in the
2.6.36 changelog though.
thanks
ecause this always
hangs on logout/shutdown/reboot, i installed again the latest F12
kernel. Lo and behold, power management works again. This is without
/usr/libexec/upowerd running, so maybe the 2.6.33 kernel handles this
in a different way and kde has yet to catch up.
Hopefully by the time th
JB yahoo.com> writes:
> ...
> Hi, I forgot it.
> ...
I would do this as well.
You may lose some custom settings, but it appears it is effective (I removed
battery widget from my panel unintentionally and could not add it back via
panel's add widgets; I nuked .kde and battery was back again.).
l
application to have access to its functionality. It
is configurable within System Settings (under the Advanced tab), and can be
controlled with a Plasma widget on the panel or desktop if you want.
So, there appears to be no separate daemon you can detect in 'ps' processes.
KDE Power Man
On 3 August 2010 13:38, JB wrote:
> JB yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> # yum reinstall upower
>> ...
>
> Hi, I forgot it.
> After reinstall (please do it even if it appears unnecessary ...; I recently
> fixed my bluetooth by reinstalling multiple related packages):
Doing that now
>
> note: l
On 3 August 2010 12:21, JB wrote:
> Chris Rouch gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> > [jb localhost ~]$ ps aux |grep -i power
>> > root 1439 0.0 0.3 6028 2364 ? S Aug01 0:04
>> > /usr/libexec/upowerd
>> > ...
>> Bingo! For whatever reason, upowerd is not running. If I start it b
JB yahoo.com> writes:
> ...
> # yum reinstall upower
> ...
Hi, I forgot it.
After reinstall (please do it even if it appears unnecessary ...; I recently
fixed my bluetooth by reinstalling multiple related packages):
note: locate db is not up to date yet
# find /etc -iname "*.rpm*"
to see any *
Chris Rouch gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> > [jb localhost ~]$ ps aux |grep -i power
> > root 1439 0.0 0.3 6028 2364 ? S Aug01 0:04
> > /usr/libexec/upowerd
> > ...
> Bingo! For whatever reason, upowerd is not running. If I start it by
> hand everything works as expected. So n
t source selection -> scroll to PowerDevil
> select item e.g. AC adaptor plugged in
> check off below e.g. Show a message in a popup
> etc
> Apply button to save
>
> The same is under:
> computer-system settings-advanced-power management- general settings-
> configure notifi
check off below e.g. Show a message in a popup
etc
Apply button to save
The same is under:
computer-system settings-advanced-power management- general settings-
configure notifications
Now look into:
computer-system settings-advanced-service manager-startup services
check off PowerDevil
Apply
I have xfce on my netbook - it works well enough there. But my current
laptop has the resources for kde or gnome, so i'd prefer to stay put
for the moment.
In any case, i installed gnome as suggested, created a new user and
logged into a gnome session. Hey presto, the power management works
On 08/01/2010 11:15 AM, Chris Rouch wrote:
> .snip .
> I'm going to try it, just to rule out the kde components. But i've
> used gnome before and was forced to junk it for fvwm when it became
> too bloated for my (old) laptop. i've never been tempted to try it
> again :-)
>
> Regards,
>
>
On 30 July 2010 00:16, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 01:17 AM, Chris Rouch wrote:
>> I think this was working for f13 too until the last time i applied
>> updates, though it may just be that i didn't test it.
>
> The first thing you should try is probably to boot the oldest F13 kernel
> th
> Try it:
>> # [root localhost jb]# yum grouplist |grep -i gnome
>> # yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop Environment"
>> JB
>>
> Hi,
> I have installed a fresh KDE desktop environment and without any changes in
> settings can confirm that power cord pull
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:16 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 01:17 AM, Chris Rouch wrote:
> > I think this was working for f13 too until the last time i applied
> > updates, though it may just be that i didn't test it.
>
> The first thing you should try is probably to boot the oldest F
On 07/29/2010 01:17 AM, Chris Rouch wrote:
> I think this was working for f13 too until the last time i applied
> updates, though it may just be that i didn't test it.
The first thing you should try is probably to boot the oldest F13 kernel
that you've got and see if the system's behavior is any
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:28 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 07:16 PM, Tim wrote:
> > While I think it's fair to ask that Fedora 13 (and its apps) can read
> > the configuration left behind by Fedora 12, and update it where needed.
> > You can't really expect Fedora 12 (when someone is dual
ot;
> JB
>
Hi,
I have installed a fresh KDE desktop environment and without any changes in
settings can confirm that power cord pull out and plug in change battery icon
and display a popup message about the corresponding event.
So it is about your machine and KDE.
Look at Applications-Setti
Chris Rouch gmail.com> writes:
>
> I have a duel boot laptop. if i boot it into f12, using kde, and pull
> out the power cord, i get a popup message telling me i've done so and
> the battery monitor icon changes. If i boot into f13, also kde, i get
> no indication at all when i pull out the cab
On 07/29/2010 07:41 PM, Chris Rouch wrote:
> Good idea. I created a new user, selected a kde session and logged in
> as that user. I did not change any configuration. The battery charge
> icon had a yellow lightning bolt indication mains power. I pulled the
> power lead, and nothing changed - no p
On 29 July 2010 13:28, Ed Greshko wrote:
> While I do agree with what you've said The one thing that hasn't
> been determined is if indeed the issue is the differences in settings
> between F12 and F13 and jumping between the 2 versions. The OP "thinks"
> it was working before the last upda
ork with your machine on a daily basis, right ?
> JB
>
i'd love to. unfortunately i have an nvidia card which doesn't work
properly in f13 (neither with nouveau or proprietary drivers). and now
power management has also failed for me. I really don't want to have
On 07/29/2010 07:16 PM, Tim wrote:
> While I think it's fair to ask that Fedora 13 (and its apps) can read
> the configuration left behind by Fedora 12, and update it where needed.
> You can't really expect Fedora 12 (when someone is dual-booting) to be
> able to handle Fedora 13 configurations.
>
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:47 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> It is up to Fedora to make sure that any config files
> that it (she?) places in /home are properly updated
> during installation of a new distribution.
While I think it's fair to ask that Fedora 13 (and its apps) can read
the configuratio
JB wrote:
>> The home directory is
>> shared between the two boots, so the configuration is the same.
>>
> Well,
> that may be the problem ...
> Unless you really have a specific reason to have a common home dir,
> I think you are asking for more or less unpredictability with both
> installations
Chris Rouch gmail.com> writes:
>
> The home directory is
> shared between the two boots, so the configuration is the same.
>
Well,
that may be the problem ...
Unless you really have a specific reason to have a common home dir,
I think you are asking for more or less unpredictability with both
i
I have a duel boot laptop. if i boot it into f12, using kde, and pull
out the power cord, i get a popup message telling me i've done so and
the battery monitor icon changes. If i boot into f13, also kde, i get
no indication at all when i pull out the cable. The home directory is
shared between the
Hi,
> You said: Lower right - I assumed you mean lower right corner of the
> desktop. Now you say it is on the Shudown menu banner, which is true.
It is on the desktop, and it is on the lower-right. I also said before
logging in.
> I also assume that your running kernel's config file has
I have
On 07/16/2010 04:22 PM, JD wrote:
> and I assume you have sufficient swap space available
> to store your entire ram to swap.
Why does suspend to ram need swap space? I can see why hibernate
(suspend to disk) might need it, but not suspend to ram
> If these conditions are met, then
> clickin
On 07/16/2010 01:09 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 08:25 -0700, JD wrote:
>> On 07/16/2010 06:51 AM, Alex wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>>> How is power management controlled in FC13? When clicking the
>>>>> "Suspend" op
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 08:25 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 07/16/2010 06:51 AM, Alex wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >>> How is power management controlled in FC13? When clicking the
> >>> "Suspend" option in the lower-right of the desktop, it does nothing.
> >
C13 boxes I have recently installed.
Choosing that "Suspend" option also does absolutely nothing on the
other two boxes as well. As does configuring the "Power Management"
options in the System Preferences.
I've also reviewed all the log files, including kernel logs, and there
is
On 07/16/2010 06:51 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> How is power management controlled in FC13? When clicking the
>>> "Suspend" option in the lower-right of the desktop, it does nothing.
>>> Just sits there. I'd like it very much if it worked. :-)
Hi,
>> How is power management controlled in FC13? When clicking the
>> "Suspend" option in the lower-right of the desktop, it does nothing.
>> Just sits there. I'd like it very much if it worked. :-)
> System -> Preferences -> Screen Saver
Yes,
On 07/15/2010 09:31 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How is power management controlled in FC13? When clicking the
> "Suspend" option in the lower-right of the desktop, it does nothing.
> Just sits there. I'd like it very much if it worked. :-)
>
> How can I tr
Hi,
How is power management controlled in FC13? When clicking the
"Suspend" option in the lower-right of the desktop, it does nothing.
Just sits there. I'd like it very much if it worked. :-)
How can I troubleshoot this?
How is it after thirteen revisions of fedora there is
menu, does nothing. That
> information is no longer being shown. Why?
>
> Once a day, or so, F12's power management applet went haywire on me, and for
> some reason insisted that my battery's capacity is somewhere around a
> thousand watts. Its current charge still showed c
tts, and its current charge,
in watts. Also its manufacturer's name. Basically, a few more details than a
single capacity percentage.
In F13, selecting "Laptop battery" from the same menu, does nothing. That
information is no longer being shown. Why?
Once a day, or so, F12's
parm -B" uses.
> Here:
>
> # hdparm -B 255 /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda:
> setting Advanced Power Management level to disabled
> HDIO_DRIVE_CMD failed: Input/output error
> HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Input/output error
> # hdparm -B /dev/sda
On 05/01/2010 03:49 AM, Peter van Hooft wrote:
>> How can I control the automatic power management feature of my SATA disk
>> drives? Right now the heads are unloading so frequently that within
>> one year I will have exceeded the rated number of load/unload cycles for
>>
> How can I control the automatic power management feature of my SATA disk
> drives? Right now the heads are unloading so frequently that within
> one year I will have exceeded the rated number of load/unload cycles for
> the drives. The drives are Western Digital model WD10EA
How can I control the automatic power management feature of my SATA disk
drives? Right now the heads are unloading so frequently that within
one year I will have exceeded the rated number of load/unload cycles for
the drives. The drives are Western Digital model WD10EADS. I tried
using "h
CPU usage if its not really shows how much
> > of maximum CPU power is used?
> >
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to show CPU usage normalized to the maximum
> > frequency rather than the current frequency?
> >
> > Does the load as display with uptime compens
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 19:51 -0400, Peter A wrote:
> Does the load as display with uptime compensate for power management?
> I went through some of the kernel code the scheduler and the cpufreq
> kernel modules but didn't see anything.
Load average (as reported by uptime or ps)
> Wouldn't it make more sense to show CPU usage normalized to the maximum
> frequency rather than the current frequency?
>
> Does the load as display with uptime compensate for power management? I went
> through some of the kernel code the scheduler and the cpufreq kernel modules
Hi,
I'm a bit confused on how power management and cpu load (should) work
together... I'm not talking about a busy cpu clocking higher and so on but
about how system usage is reported when the cpu frequency changes.
I run KDE and the CPU meter (systemloadviewer plasmoid) be
82 matches
Mail list logo
