On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 12:37 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > All this is going to achieve is breakage. It'd denial-of-service
> some
> > clients that are actually trying to work, perhaps even DOS something
> > that's central to all the clients, and put the whole network into
> > failure, in one go.
>
On 06/29/2012 12:32 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 09:21 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> I agree the OP's client has got a weird idea as to limiting access,
>> but perhaps they feel their uplink is too small to handle more
>> connections. There is a lot of education that's required here with
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 09:21 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I agree the OP's client has got a weird idea as to limiting access,
> but perhaps they feel their uplink is too small to handle more
> connections. There is a lot of education that's required here with the
> client.
But that's never going to
On 06/28/2012 02:06 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/28/2012 02:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a linux
box
which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allow only 4 concurrent
pcs to
ac
On 06/28/2012 04:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 27 June 2012 07:57, Jatin K wrote:
Dear All
I'm on FC 15 which is acting as a router for Cable Internet connection
for 145 PC on the LAN, which works fine... But there is one question in
my mind, How do I limit the maximum numbers of concurrent conn
On 27.06.2012 08:57, Jatin K wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I'm on FC 15 which is acting as a router for Cable Internet connection
> for 145 PC on the LAN, which works fine... But there is one question in
> my mind, How do I limit the maximum numbers of concurrent connections to
> router. i.e. if I want to
Am 28.06.2012 08:27, schrieb Jatin K:
>> Seriously?
> yes, its my client's requirement .. I can understand its not the way to
> go
> but he pays me for this ... I'm a service provider .. I have to do what they
> said and want to do
there is really a differece between service probi
On Thursday, 28. June 2012. 1.27.10 jdow wrote:
> On 2012/06/28 01:24, Jatin K wrote:
> > On 06/28/2012 01:33 PM, jdow wrote:
> >> On 2012/06/27 23:27, Jatin K wrote:
> >>> On 06/28/2012 11:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
> > well. suppose I've 5 clien
Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>Doesn't have to be all protocols. The original request only specifies
>"internet usage", these days it equals to web usage. It is quite
>common to have companies to limit web access with transparent proxies
>and a radius server. I can imagine (but not give concrete examples
On 27 June 2012 07:57, Jatin K wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I'm on FC 15 which is acting as a router for Cable Internet connection
> for 145 PC on the LAN, which works fine... But there is one question in
> my mind, How do I limit the maximum numbers of concurrent connections to
> router. i.e. if I want
On 28 June 2012 11:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
> What proxy would you recommend? I can't think of one that would proxy *all*
> protocols. That's why I suggested the pptp connection. Seems a bit more
> simple to
> set upand has the same drawbacks as the earthlink dialup connection
> limiter. :-
On 06/28/2012 04:19 PM, jdow wrote:
> About the only semi-feasible means of doing this might be to setup a
> virtual lan through a proxy with a limited number of concurrent logins
> permitted.
What proxy would you recommend? I can't think of one that would proxy *all*
protocols. That's why I sug
On 06/28/2012 01:49 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/06/28 00:02, Jatin K wrote:
On 06/28/2012 12:11 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/27/2012 11:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
how can you prove its wrong ... they need this kind of configurations,
and my duty is to provide the solutions what they need if its
possi
On 2012/06/28 01:24, Jatin K wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:33 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/06/27 23:27, Jatin K wrote:
On 06/28/2012 11:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a
linux box
which is working as a
On 06/28/2012 01:33 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/06/27 23:27, Jatin K wrote:
On 06/28/2012 11:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E )
and a
linux box
which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allo
On 2012/06/28 00:59, Jatin K wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:17 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/06/27 23:02, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
Is he trying to establish some traffic management or a means of assuring
at least one person is bored enough that she'll take care of the comp
On 2012/06/28 00:02, Jatin K wrote:
On 06/28/2012 12:11 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/27/2012 11:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
how can you prove its wrong ... they need this kind of configurations,
and my duty is to provide the solutions what they need if its possible
I don't know the solutio
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Jatin K
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:00 AM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: How to limit maximum number of TCP connections
On 06/28/2012 01
On 2012/06/27 23:27, Jatin K wrote:
On 06/28/2012 11:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a
linux box
which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allow only 4 concurrent
pcs to
access the
On 06/28/2012 01:17 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/06/27 23:02, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
Is he trying to establish some traffic management or a means of assuring
at least one person is bored enough that she'll take care of the
company's
business while the men are st
On 2012/06/27 23:02, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a linux
box
which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allow only 4 concurrent
pcs to
access the Internet, say if A,B,C,D is using inte
On 06/28/2012 12:11 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/27/2012 11:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
how can you prove its wrong ... they need this kind of configurations,
and my duty is to provide the solutions what they need if its
possible
I don't know the solution/configuration requirement to fulfil
On 06/27/2012 11:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
how can you prove its wrong ... they need this kind of configurations,
and my duty is to provide the solutions what they need if its possible
I don't know the solution/configuration requirement to fulfill
their desire, thats why I'm asking the so
On 06/28/2012 02:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
> yes, its my client's requirement .. I can understand its not the way to
> go
> but he pays me for this ... I'm a service provider .. I have to do what
> they
> said and want to do
>
>> I think you need to state the problem you are trying to solve
On 06/28/2012 11:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a linux
box
which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allow only 4 concurrent
pcs to
access the Internet, say if A,B,C,D is using i
On 06/28/2012 02:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
>> well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a
>> linux box
>> which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allow only 4 concurrent
>> pcs to
>> access the Internet, say if A,B,
On 06/28/2012 01:27 PM, Jatin K wrote:
> well. suppose I've 5 clients in my office ( say A,B, C, D, E ) and a
> linux box
> which is working as a router ( gateway ), I want to allow only 4 concurrent
> pcs to
> access the Internet, say if A,B,C,D is using internet then fifth client E can
>
On 06/27/2012 07:43 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 15:39:47 +0200,
Reindl Harald wrote:
ouch - you are missing network basics at all
I think it is also an issue of what he is really trying to do. Other
than an experiment it really doesn't make sense to only allow
conn
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 15:39:47 +0200,
Reindl Harald wrote:
ouch - you are missing network basics at all
I think it is also an issue of what he is really trying to do. Other than
an experiment it really doesn't make sense to only allow connections from
only 90 of 145 PCs to outside of th
Am 27.06.2012 11:34, schrieb Jatin K:
> On 06/27/2012 02:14 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> On 06/27/2012 08:57 AM, Jatin K wrote:
>> Your requirement is not clearly described.
>> The PCs do not do "connections" to the router, they do connections
>> to the outside world, the router is just moving pa
You can make it a proxy using squid or add another ethernet adapter and
separate the networks into allow and deny
On 06/27/2012 05:34 AM, Jatin K wrote:
On 06/27/2012 02:14 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 06/27/2012 08:57 AM, Jatin K wrote:
Your requirement is not clearly described.
The PCs do no
On 06/27/2012 02:14 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 06/27/2012 08:57 AM, Jatin K wrote:
Your requirement is not clearly described.
The PCs do not do "connections" to the router, they do connections
to the outside world, the router is just moving packets for them.
"Number of concurrent connections" a
On 06/27/2012 08:57 AM, Jatin K wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I'm on FC 15 which is acting as a router for Cable Internet connection
> for 145 PC on the LAN, which works fine... But there is one question in
> my mind, How do I limit the maximum numbers of concurrent connections to
> router. i.e. if I want
Dear All
I'm on FC 15 which is acting as a router for Cable Internet connection
for 145 PC on the LAN, which works fine... But there is one question in
my mind, How do I limit the maximum numbers of concurrent connections to
router. i.e. if I want to allow only 90 concurrent connection to the
rou
34 matches
Mail list logo
