On 14.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> Also, I am losing files!!! Sorry for this long listing, but I think
> something is seriously wrong with the hibernation code.
Does S2R work for you?
Anyway, I have debugged some S2D problems in the last months, and my gut feel
says you're most probably right. The
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 14:45 -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
> I agree that on cheap hardware this might be needed, however, I don't
> think it's the case on good systems. A lot of thought goes into the
> design of the hardware, so things like overheating don't occur.
Speaking as someone who's done electro
On 04/13/2015 08:32 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 04/13/2015 02:00 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 13.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
I hibernated and next day I powered up. My previous session was not
restored; i.e., Logged in as normal login and had to start all the
apps all over again.
https://www.kernel.org
On 04/13/2015 02:00 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 13.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
I hibernated and next day I powered up. My previous session was not
restored; i.e., Logged in as normal login and had to start all the
apps all over again.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debuggi
On 04/10/2015 06:51 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I need to use Firefox to connect to a specific site which has
> an unrecognized SSL certificate (the specific error is
> "Peer's Certificate issuer is not recognised"). I get the usual
> dialogue asking if I accept the risks, but clicki
When I was running FF 37.0.1 (between crashes) I noticed it would not
let me create any new Bookmark folders. The Add button would stay grayed
out. This is not the case on 36.0.4, adding a new folder works just
fine.
Jim Lewis
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
> On 04/12/2015 05:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> <<>>
>
>> This is a SWAG However, checking the differences between a
>> Fedora supplied FF and a downloaded version leads me to suggest
>> editing
>>
>> app.update.enabled to "false"
>
> correct, you are. see #3 below.
>
> not needing, never looked
> On 04/13/2015 12:21 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>Wow, thanks Ed for trying that. Just a thought, but maybe this
>> crashing
>> issue is related to what graphics adapter is being used. I have a Radeon
>> HD 5700 Series which takes up 2 slots to run both of my 23" monitors. If
>> this is the case I
On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote:
> I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was
> fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with one package
> (libbabeltrace). Please see the output[*] at the end of the message. Any
> advice is welcome.
>
> Thank
On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 20:30 +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 23:17 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 20:09 +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > > > Thanks, I was hopeful but it didn't work, even after restarting FF.
> > >
> > > I believe you want to se
On 13.04.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> I hibernated and next day I powered up.
> My previous session was not restored;
> i.e., Logged in as normal login and had to
> start all the apps all over again.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
--
users mailing list
users@lis
Btw, I have been trying midori for the past few days and it is much less buggy
and more improved, with many (but not all) features also available on firefox.
One feature I would like to also have is DuckDuckGo with encrypted google's
search suggestions.
http://ddgg.nfriedly.com/
I am not quit
On 04/13/2015 12:21 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
Wow, thanks Ed for trying that. Just a thought, but maybe this crashing
issue is related to what graphics adapter is being used. I have a Radeon
HD 5700 Series which takes up 2 slots to run both of my 23" monitors. If
this is the case I may have to cut
On 04/12/2015 05:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
<<>>
> This is a SWAG However, checking the differences between a
> Fedora supplied FF and a downloaded version leads me to suggest
> editing
>
> app.update.enabled to "false"
correct, you are. see #3 below.
not needing, never looked.
for referenc
> On 04/13/15 04:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> You mean like it never crashes for me on F21 but it crashes for you on
>> F14? That kind of evidence?
>
> FWIW, I can't even get it to crash on F14.
>
> Just installed F14 from the original DVD, downloaded the latest version of
> firefox from mozilla, di
Hi.
Machine has 8GB ram, and 16GB swap.
I hibernated and next day I powered up.
My previous session was not restored;
i.e., Logged in as normal login and had to
start all the apps all over again.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
ht
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This is a gtk3 bug. ;(
>
> Update to the version in updates-testing that has the problem commit
> reverted:
>
> yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gtk3
Thanks for the info on this bug and upcoming fix. Fedora almost always
gets these thin
I would like to add to what @birger already said that currently Fedora
mounts /tmp as /tmpfs by default; that means that the /tmp directory
we access is in fact a sort of ram disk that is destroyed every time
we shut down our system.
You can learn more tmpfs here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tmpf
Hi guys,
I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the
packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with
one package (libbabeltrace). Please see the output[*] at the end of the
message. Any advice is welcome.
Thanks in advance,
Germán.
[*]
[root@skytu
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
Is there a setting that controls where temporary files are stored (/tmp vs
/var/tmp)?
When I did a fresh install of F21 temporary files such as the pdf ones opened
by Firefox are now stored in /tmp; before they were stored in /var/tmp.
Mu
I am old school / enterprise oriented, so I feel /var/tmp is correct for
this kind of files.
Traditionally /var/tmp was for larger temporary files, and more
long-lived ones. /var/tmp traditionally survives a reboot while /tmp may
not. Some systems regenerate /tmp on boot, and some use a memory fil
On 04/12/2015 12:04 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On 04/12/2015 11:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:48:24 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
Upgraded f21 XFCE.
nm-applet is running:
ps aux | grep nm-applet
user 2856 0.0 0.3 644532 29480 ?Sl 11:25 0:00
nm-applet
but there's
On 04/13/2015 03:11 AM, poma wrote:
On 12.04.2015 17:48, sean darcy wrote:
Upgraded f21 XFCE.
nm-applet is running:
ps aux | grep nm-applet
user 2856 0.0 0.3 644532 29480 ?Sl 11:25 0:00 nm-applet
but there's no icon at the top of the screen.
Of course, this means the only
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 21:05 -0600, Robin Laing wrote:
> In yum.conf I have (domain hidden) proxy=http:/webproxy.XXX.X:8080
Does your actual proxy config have "http://"; rather than "http:/"?
Can you check that your proxy is working properly?
--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.19.3-100.fc
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 13.04.2015, Tim wrote:
>>
>> Is the second one (efi) actually a partition, or just a directory
>> inside /boot?
>
> It is a partition of its own, and must be FAT formatted.
"/boot/efi" doesn't have to be a separate mount.
If you use gummib
On 13.04.2015, Tim wrote:
> Is the second one (efi) actually a partition, or just a directory
> inside /boot?
It is a partition of its own, and must be FAT formatted.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.
Greetings,
Is there a setting that controls where temporary files are stored (/tmp vs
/var/tmp)?
When I did a fresh install of F21 temporary files such as the pdf ones
opened by Firefox are now stored in /tmp; before they were stored in
/var/tmp.
Much thanks,
Max Pyziur
p...@brama.com
--
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> While others may have sustantially different opinions:
> you should at least have
>
> /boot
> /boot/efi
Is the second one (efi) actually a partition, or just a directory
inside /boot?
--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.19.3-100.
On 12.04.2015 17:48, sean darcy wrote:
> Upgraded f21 XFCE.
>
> nm-applet is running:
>
> ps aux | grep nm-applet
> user 2856 0.0 0.3 644532 29480 ?Sl 11:25 0:00 nm-applet
>
> but there's no icon at the top of the screen.
>
> Of course, this means the only way to control Netwo
On 12.04.2015 18:08, Jonathan Allen wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 04:28:02PM +0200, poma wrote:
>> Then here's a tip, to not waste time with Xfce configs:
>> - backup "stuck" user data
>> - delete "stuck" user
>> - create homonymous user
>> - restore backuped data
>> - reconfigure Xfce session
>
On 13.04.2015, Adel ESSAFI wrote:
> Could some one tell me what are the partitions that should necessary be
> installed on the main hard disk on which Linux is installed ? i,e, that
> should not be placed on a mountable partition!
While others may have sustantially different opinions:
you shoul
31 matches
Mail list logo
