Manually editing trusted root CA list in Thunderbird and Firefox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I'd like to remove certain root certificates from my trusted list in Firefox but any changes I make are not permanent. Is there a way to have per-user trusted root lists instead of a system wide list? I suppose manual changes are not effective

Ideas to get around error connecting an ACER Iconia Tab A500

Kernel: 2.6.40.4-5.fc15.x86_64 Fuse packages installed: fuse-libs-2.8.5-5.fc15.x86_64 fuseiso-20070708-10.fc15.x86_64 gvfs-fuse-1.8.2-1.fc15.x86_64 glusterfs-fuse-3.1.2-4.fc15.x86_64 fuse-2.8.5-5.fc15.x86_64 mtp packages installed: libmtp-1.0.6-3.fc15.x86_64 libmtp-exa

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/16/2011 01:09 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 09/16/2011 12:57 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> impression of Gnome-3 > > Sorry - what is this Gnome-3 thing? > > Perhaps that is indeed its fate .. 'Hey, you remember the Gnome 3 > experiment?' ... 'No sorry- never heard of it .. is it something

Re: Help... screwed up video config (RESOLVED)

On Fri September 16 2011, John Aldrich wrote: > I somehow managed to screw up my video config by changing the default > monitor and now X won't start. I told it I had a Dell E1701 flat > panel. Turns out I actually have a Dell E1703FP. Well, I checked and > the scan ranges are identical, so it shou

Re: RaLink 5370 USB Wifi Dongle

On 09/16/2011 05:20 AM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Kevin J. Cummings > wrote: >> The WiFi in my laptop gave up the ghost. Doesn't matter what card I put >> in the mini PCIe slot, the system doesn't think anything is there. >> >> So, I bought one of those "new" $7 Wifi

Help... screwed up video config

I somehow managed to screw up my video config by changing the default monitor and now X won't start. I told it I had a Dell E1701 flat panel. Turns out I actually have a Dell E1703FP. Well, I checked and the scan ranges are identical, so it shouldn't matter. I've tried deleting the /etc/X11/x

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:57:26AM -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > laptop with a trackpad. It takes too many resources. You haven't even It should work perfectly fine with graphics hardware 3+ years old. Mine is 3.5 old or so. There were a few bugs (nvidia binary driver was slow first 2 weeks after

Re: "wireless disabled in software"

Do you have the driver installed? iwl3945-firmware.noarch Your e-mail seems to suggest that it was working earlier, but you did not indicate what, if anything, you changed? Ranjan On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:55:38 -0500 Timothy Murphy wrote: > WiFi on my Thinkpad T60 has stopped working recently.

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Sep 16, 2011 4:07 PM, "stan" wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:19:05 +0200 > Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > > And I'm curious why doesn't anyone even mention KDE as an alternative > > for Gnome3? As it seems, these days KDE4 is by far the most advanced, > > most mature and most configurable deskto

"wireless disabled in software"

WiFi on my Thinkpad T60 has stopped working recently. I'm running Fedora-15/KDE. When I hover over the NetworkManager icon in the panel I read "Disconnected Wireless disabled in software" I'm wondering who gives this message, and what it means? My WiFi card is Intel/PRO 3945ABG The driver seem

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/16/2011 02:32 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > Right click on the panel in question, Go to Panel->Panel Preferences, > select the "Items" tab then select the items you want to delete and > click the big "-" button. That should do it. Works for me. I did. Long ago. It worked until I had to log o

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/16/2011 12:48 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/16/2011 12:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> Do you have "xfce4-settings-manager" installed? I go there and in >> this case select Desktop, etc, as above. It configure the desktop >> with a few check marks. > > The desktop was configured th

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > I still remember KDE3->4 and I'm afraid after that I don't trust there > won't be a similarly catastrophic KDE4-5 8( I doubt that. KDE3 was based on a rather old and outgrown paradigm, and that was the main reason for rewriting KDE4 from scratch.

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/16/2011 06:19 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> If you want to adapt the DE to your needs (as opposed to adapting >> yourself to a new DE), KDE seems to be the best possible choice. > > The first time I used XFCE after installing it, my desktop

Re: Network Interface Question

Could you check if the interface is enabled on booting? You could use something like grep ONBOOT /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth[0-9] --janeiros On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Dineen wrote: > Gentle People: > > I have a Fedora 14 Desktop that I am quite happy with! > Gr

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 16/09/11 15:48, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/16/2011 12:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> Do you have "xfce4-settings-manager" installed? I go there and in >> this case select Desktop, etc, as above. It configure the desktop >> with a few check marks. > The desktop was configured the way

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:08 PM, stan wrote: > On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:19:05 +0200 > Marko Vojinovic wrote: > >> And I'm curious why doesn't anyone even mention KDE as an alternative >> for Gnome3? As it seems, these days KDE4 is by far the most advanced, >> most mature and most configurable deskt

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/16/2011 12:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > Do you have "xfce4-settings-manager" installed? I go there and in > this case select Desktop, etc, as above. It configure the desktop > with a few check marks. The desktop was configured the way I wanted the first time I ran XFCE. It's t

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/16/2011 06:19 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> If you want to adapt the DE to your needs (as opposed to adapting >> yourself to a new DE), KDE seems to be the best possible choice. > > The first time I used XFCE after installing it, my desktop

Network Interface Question

Gentle People: I have a Fedora 14 Desktop that I am quite happy with! Great software! But when I boot it up the ethernet network Interfaces come up in the disabled state, and after login I have to turn them on from the menu icon located in the upper right hand corner of the screen!

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 16/09/11 15:15, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/16/2011 11:53 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> If I understand you can remove the trash icon, etc. via >> Settings> Desktop> Icons > Yes. From the desktop, not the panel. I tried removing them from the > panel but when I logged o

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/16/2011 11:53 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > If I understand you can remove the trash icon, etc. via > Settings> Desktop> Icons Yes. From the desktop, not the panel. I tried removing them from the panel but when I logged out and back in, there they were. -- users ma

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:38:32 -0400 John Aldrich wrote: > FWIW, I'm running XFCE at home, mainly because I'm connecting through an > SSH tunnel and using VNC to view my desktop at home and I need a very > lightweight DE. I use the nomachine.com nxclient and the freenx-server package (also throug

Re: Is it safe to yum remove plymouth from F-15 -

On 16/09/11 18:55, Bob Goodwin wrote: > No, rhgb, etc., is among the first things removed, I never see > the graphic login screen. I did notice the boot process stumble > over [plymouth the other morning and thought it might be > something I could eliminate. > >

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 16/09/11 14:03, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/16/2011 06:19 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> If you want to adapt the DE to your needs (as opposed to adapting >> yourself to a new DE), KDE seems to be the best possible choice. > The first time I used XFCE after installing it, my desktop looked almost > e

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:20 PM, suvayu ali wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Out of curiosity: >> >> * Are you applying fixes and security updates to gnome2 packages? >> * do you have a bug tracker/source repo for your gnome2 packages? >> >> * What do you plan on do

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri September 16 2011, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: > LXDE runs way smoother than Gnome 2 in my experience. > FWIW, I'm running XFCE at home, mainly because I'm connecting through an SSH tunnel and using VNC to view my desktop at home and I need a very lightweight DE. I still have to drop the

Re: Is it safe to yum remove plymouth from F-15 -

On 16/09/11 13:30, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 16 September 2011 17:52, Bob Goodwin wrote: >> I thought I would remove Plymouth since I don't use the graphic >> log-in but I'm not sure about the "dracut" it will take out. > Removing dracut isn't a good move if you ever want to upgra

VMware Workstation 8.0 on F15

Just a confirmation in case anyone is asking... I upgraded to VMware Workstation 8.0 this morning on my F15 x64 systems. I haven't had the chance to test all of the features yet, but the base functionality works out of the box. No muss, no fuss... More to come, especially if I run into trouble.

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Out of curiosity: > > * Are you applying fixes and security updates to gnome2 packages? > > * do you have a bug tracker/source repo for your gnome2 packages? > > * What do you plan on doing when F14 goes end of life? Are you going to >  provide

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:11:12 +0100 Noah Hall wrote: > > Fuduntu[1] will be staying with Gnome 2 for the foreseeable future, > while being on a F14 base with several upgrades to what we deem stable > versions of certain software (latest stable Kernel, web browsers, etc) > so that users who dislik

Re: Is it safe to yum remove plymouth from F-15 -

On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:52:26 -0400 Bob Goodwin wrote: > I thought I would remove Plymouth since I don't use the graphic > log-in Some things plymouth provides are good (like finally a boot.log file), but the graphics are silly and just prevent you from seeing what happened if your new kernel free

Re: davfs2 - Problem

On 09/16/2011 12:46 AM, Reinhard Sy wrote: > # BOX NET > https://www.box.net/dav /media/box.net davfs > rw,noauto,user,uid=500,gid=100 0 0 Try this instead: https://www.box.net/dav /media/box.net davfs noauto,user,umask= 0 0 and see if it works better. -- users mailing list users@lists.f

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/15/2011 11:03 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: >> I never really tried XFCE to be honest, guess someone else would have to >> give the verdict on that. > > I use F14.  As soon as I learned what Gnome3 was like I did some > research and ended

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/16/2011 06:19 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > If you want to adapt the DE to your needs (as opposed to adapting > yourself to a new DE), KDE seems to be the best possible choice. The first time I used XFCE after installing it, my desktop looked almost exactly the same way it had under Gnome 2.

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/16/2011 09:30 AM, Charlie Brune wrote: > On 09/15/2011 01:13 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 09/15/2011 11:03 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: >>> I never really tried XFCE to be honest, guess someone else would have to >>> give the verdict on that. >> I use F14. As soon as I learned what Gnome3 w

Re: Is it safe to yum remove plymouth from F-15 -

On 16 September 2011 17:52, Bob Goodwin wrote: >        I thought I would remove Plymouth since I don't use the graphic >        log-in but I'm not sure about the "dracut" it will take out. Removing dracut isn't a good move if you ever want to upgrade the kernel. You can remove the rhgb from the

Is it safe to yum remove plymouth from F-15 -

I thought I would remove Plymouth since I don't use the graphic log-in but I'm not sure about the "dracut" it will take out. Removing: plymouth x86_64 0.8.4-0.20110510.2.fc15 @koji

Re: [389-users] ad nested objects sync

On 09/16/2011 08:48 AM, solarflow99 wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rich Megginson > wrote: On 09/16/2011 08:55 AM, Vasil Mikhalenya wrote: > hi all, > > can windows sync agreement replicate nested objects ? like > cn=user1,ou=location1

Re: [389-users] can't install 389-ds-base 1.2.9.9 on RHEL 6.1

Thanks Rich. It works. # yum install 389-ds Loaded plugins: rhnplugin Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package 389-ds.noarch 0:1.2.2-1.el6 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: 389-ds-console for package: 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch --> Pr

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/16/2011 12:57 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > impression of Gnome-3 Sorry - what is this Gnome-3 thing? Perhaps that is indeed its fate .. 'Hey, you remember the Gnome 3 experiment?' ... 'No sorry- never heard of it .. is it something for the lawn or a comedic horror movie?' :-) -- users mai

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/16/2011 09:30 AM, Charlie Brune wrote: > On 09/15/2011 01:13 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 09/15/2011 11:03 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: >>> I never really tried XFCE to be honest, guess someone else would have to >>> give the verdict on that. >> I use F14. As soon as I learned what Gnome3 w

XFCE and Rhythmbox and media keys

When I was using Gnome 2 and Gnome 3, the media keys on my Logitech keyboard "just worked" with Rhythmbox. I've actually worn through the top of the pause/play button. Now that I'm using XFCE, the media buttons don't work. When I look at the keyboard configuration dialogs, it seems that XFCE is s

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

> I really don't see why Gnome2 lovers and Gnome3 haters fall back to > XFCE and LXDE automatically, without even trying the KDE spin... Is > there some silent collective KDE-boycotting in place here or what? Xfce is basically what Gnome 2 should have been, but perhaps with a few rougher edges. KD

Re: System starts by itself

On 09/16/2011 08:02 AM, j...@mbstemps.com wrote: [snip] > Now I just wish I could get the stupid looking bird in a tree screen gone > from the startup user selection screen, does anyone know what procedure is > called to start the system? It's called "plymouth" and it's controlled by the "them

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/15/2011 01:13 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/15/2011 11:03 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: >> I never really tried XFCE to be honest, guess someone else would have to >> give the verdict on that. > I use F14. As soon as I learned what Gnome3 was like I did some > research and ended up with XFC

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

> I strongly suspect both XFCE and LXDE will wind up having the > same thing happen, they both seem to exhibit evidence of being > actively developed, which means bees could arrive in new bonnets > at any moment :-). Xfce has evolved rather than go for mad redesigns. Xfce today is certainly quite

Suspend doesn't always resume

Hi, I have a fedora15 x86_64 install on an AMD Phenom system and doesn't always resume from suspend. I have no idea how to troubleshoot this or any idea why this would be happening. What can be done to fix this? When pressing the power button to resume, the computer powers on but is unresponsive.

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

LXDE runs way smoother than Gnome 2 in my experience. On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:08 PM, stan wrote: > On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:19:05 +0200 > Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > > And I'm curious why doesn't anyone even mention KDE as an alternative > > for Gnome3? As it seems, these days KDE4 is by far the

Re: DNS mystery: NetworkManager vs SELinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/15/2011 10:28 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > | From: Daniel J Walsh > > | Well I just tried to run NetworkManager as root and see > something | similar, although I also end up with the resolv.conf > having bogus data | in it. I can fix F16 to

System starts by itself

I had posted a prblem with FC15 about an updated system that started by itself for no apparent reason. The solution was, do a new install from scratch, NOT an update. That problem was solved but the system still had a number of small problems, my solution was to do a yum update , things have go

Re: [389-users] fixed epel-6 repo

On Ven, 16 Settembre 2011 4:19 pm, Rich Megginson wrote: > The EPEL-6 repo has been fixed. You can now install 389-ds-base-1.2.9.9 > via yum. See http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Download for more > information. > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://a

[389-users] fixed epel-6 repo

The EPEL-6 repo has been fixed. You can now install 389-ds-base-1.2.9.9 via yum. See http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Download for more information. -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] can't install 389-ds-base 1.2.9.9 on RHEL 6.1

On 09/15/2011 08:32 PM, Thang Nguyen wrote: > Hi Rich, > > I got the same result after doing > yum clean all > yum repolist > yum install 389-ds > > # yum clean all > Loaded plugins: rhnplugin > Cleaning repos: epel epel-389-ds-base rhel-x86_64-server-6 vmware-tools > Cleaning up Everything > > # y

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:19:05 +0200 Marko Vojinovic wrote: > And I'm curious why doesn't anyone even mention KDE as an alternative > for Gnome3? As it seems, these days KDE4 is by far the most advanced, > most mature and most configurable desktop environment out there. On my old hardware, KDE is

Re: running programs as root in KDE

Am 15.09.2011 19:32, schrieb Joe Zeff: > On 09/13/2011 02:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> why you need something as root does nobody know except you >> and would you explain us what is "screwy"? > > I'm guessing that he wants to use a GUI editor to tweak a file that > requires root access * sft

Re: [389-users] problem with admin client

Trying Links on localhost showed that I could access it. There was a firewall restriction in between that I was not previously aware of. Thanks for setting me straight. From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 11:13 AM To: General discussio

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:19:05 +0200 Marko Vojinovic wrote: > I really don't see why Gnome2 lovers and Gnome3 haters fall back to > XFCE and LXDE automatically, without even trying the KDE spin... Is > there some silent collective KDE-boycotting in place here or what? I have a theory, based on the

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

>> Why LXDE instead of XFCE? Just curious... [snip] > That's what LXDE and possibly XFCE are satisfactory - they give me > impression (still subjective) of a relative freedom using a GUI. I > dislike (as in "loath") OSX and Windows for the opposite reason. As for > Gnome3 and Unity, it has became t

Re: F15 Samba shares: SWAT, smb.conf, system-config or KDE file share properties ? Bug ?

On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 19:07 -0600, linux guy wrote: > After a while I realized that the server was running with the settings > from several changes ago and that the only way I could be sure that my > changes were being used was to reboot after every change. First thought: Stop the service, change

Re: evolution hack?

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 08:21 -0700, Randolph Jones wrote: > fc 14, evolution 2.32.0 > > my inbox has suddenly started showing the same piece of mail regardless > of which message I try to open. > the message line appears ok, but when i click to open it I get the same > piece of junk mail. this appl

Re: davfs2 - Problem [FIXED]

Am Freitag, den 16.09.2011, 12:37 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Sy: > Am Freitag, den 16.09.2011, 11:24 +0200 schrieb Raphael Groner: > > In-Reply-To=%3C1316159218.4092.22.camel%40gibi.hackerstr.local%3E Hi, There > > is upstream availability of a new release version 1.4.6 of davfs2. I’ve > > filed a

Re: davfs2 - Problem

Am Freitag, den 16.09.2011, 11:24 +0200 schrieb Raphael Groner: > In-Reply-To=%3C1316159218.4092.22.camel%40gibi.hackerstr.local%3E Hi, There > is upstream availability of a new release version 1.4.6 of davfs2. I’ve filed > a bug report already. Unfortunately, I can’t tell what concrete fixes ar

Re: RaLink 5370 USB Wifi Dongle

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:20 AM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Kevin J. Cummings > wrote: >> The WiFi in my laptop gave up the ghost.  Doesn't matter what card I put >> in the mini PCIe slot, the system doesn't think anything is there. >> >> So, I bought one of those "ne

Re: Unable to install image file of Fedora 15 into my laptop

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:12 AM, siddharth wrote: >              I have an image file of Fedora 15, which I got with a magazine. > After burning it to a CD,the disk remains empty.Please suggest. What happens when you try to do the installation? You should be able to boot off the CD. What happen

Re: davfs2 - Problem

In-Reply-To=%3C1316159218.4092.22.camel%40gibi.hackerstr.local%3E Hi, There is upstream availability of a new release version 1.4.6 of davfs2. I’ve filed a bug report already. Unfortunately, I can’t tell what concrete fixes are included. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737300 Could y

Re: RaLink 5370 USB Wifi Dongle

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > The WiFi in my laptop gave up the ghost.  Doesn't matter what card I put > in the mini PCIe slot, the system doesn't think anything is there. > > So, I bought one of those "new" $7 Wifi dongles for the USB port. > Surprisingly small!  802

Unable to install image file of Fedora 15 into my laptop

I have an image file of Fedora 15, which I got with a magazine. After burning it to a CD,the disk remains empty.Please suggest. -- siddharth -- siddharth -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraprojec

davfs2 - Problem

Hi, I have problem in using davfs2. I can mount the filesystem and can remove files from the fs but could not create any file on the davfs. I am running FC14 and the davfs2 packages is FC13 (davfs2-1.4.5-2.fc13.i686) My /etc/fstab looks like: # BOX NET https://www.box.net/dav /media/box.net da