On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> So your objection is definitely a valid point but it is not specific to
>> flash. Its a general principle of not exposing your administrative
>> password to user accounts that might have been infected by the outside
>> world.
>
> The principle i
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 23:06 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 10:58 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 22:33 -0700, JD wrote:
> >> On 04/15/2011 09:04 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> >>> http://cedarandthistle.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/on-binary-delta-algorithms/
> >> Read the article a
On 04/15/2011 10:58 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 22:33 -0700, JD wrote:
>> On 04/15/2011 09:04 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
>>> http://cedarandthistle.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/on-binary-delta-algorithms/
>> Read the article and parts of the thesis.
>> So, the final version of the
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 22:33 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 09:04 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > http://cedarandthistle.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/on-binary-delta-algorithms/
> Read the article and parts of the thesis.
> So, the final version of the algorithm
> still remains with the University of Ox
On 04/15/2011 09:04 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> http://cedarandthistle.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/on-binary-delta-algorithms/
Read the article and parts of the thesis.
So, the final version of the algorithm
still remains with the University of Oxford??
I downloaded the bsdiff srpm for fc15 and buil
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 20:43:41 -0500,
Aradenatorix Veckhom Vacelaevus wrote:
>
> Sorry but I don't understand yet how to use it. I saw a trouble with the
> nogpg but the nogpgcheck is like anotehr utility for check packages or
> something else. But I don't know what to do or how to use it, I
http://cedarandthistle.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/on-binary-delta-algorithms/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guideline
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Suvayu Ali
wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:03:00 +0900
> Joel Rees wrote:
>
>> >> Does that explain why I'm saying you don't want Flash loading every
>> >> time you run your web browser as any user?
>> >>
>> >
>> > How does this change when flash is
On 04/15/2011 04:44 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 03:42 PM, JD wrote:
>> Doing yum update cause yum to issue
>> this message
>> Finishing rebuild of rpms, from deltarpms
>>
>> What is the significance of this, and why is
>> it being done?
> Presumably, you have the presto plugin installed and
Hi:
Thanks for the link but I don't see how to fix my trouble or what to do,
there is a lot of info. u_u
Take a look At this bugzilla.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652297
>
>
Aradnix
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
Hia again:
2011/4/14 Rick Stevens
>
> > [root@Wiidora desktop-integration]# yum – nogpg install redhat *. rpm *
> > Complementos cargados:fastestmirror, langpacks, presto,
> refresh-packagekit
> > Adding es_MX to language list
>
> That has to be "yum --nogpgcheck install..." (with no spaces betw
Found this on the web at http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/139588
OpenOffice.org extension will add PDF editing
By Bruce Byfield on July 03, 2008 (7:00:00 PM)
I tried to edit a PDF file, and I have
to report that, on my unicore athlon 64, 2GB ram,
it is so painfully slow to edit a PDF file that
On 15Apr2011 04:34, Bob Goodwin wrote:
| On 14/04/11 19:09, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| >On 13Apr2011 16:11, Bob Goodwin wrote:
| >| On 13/04/11 15:47, Dave Ihnat wrote:
| >|> [ grep | sed approach ... ]
| >|
| >| [bobg@box9 ~]$ grep "Actual Usage Download" /home/bobg/foo | sed
| >|
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Dante Conti wrote:
> Is it possible to remotely upgrade a server running Fedora 6 to Fedora
> 14 (or 15)? If yes, should I use PreUpgrade?
>
> Thank you for any help you can provide.
>
> --Dante
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsub
On 04/15/2011 05:36 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 12:24 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>>
>> Am I missing something or is this the latest F14 kernel available ?
>> When are we going to see some newer kernels ?
>>
>
>
> I agree - the 2.6.38 and above has auto sched which is truly wonderful
>
Fwiw, I'm using the fc15 kernel for its support for multiple VAPs on ath5k.
PK
On 2011-04-15, at 12:40 PM, "Joe Zeff" wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 10:35 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>> I'm glad to hear that F15 will eventually have 2.6.39 kernels.
>
> So tell me, Mr. Bones, what is it about the 2.6.39 ke
On 04/15/2011 03:42 PM, JD wrote:
> Doing yum update cause yum to issue
> this message
> Finishing rebuild of rpms, from deltarpms
>
> What is the significance of this, and why is
> it being done?
Presumably, you have the presto plugin installed and active. This means
that instead of downloading
On 04/15/11 14:38, François Patte wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bonjour,
>
> I have some problem with skype and the microphone:
>
> My laptop: Dell latitute E6400
>
> Result of
> ]$ head -n 1 /proc/asound/card0/codec*
> Codec: IDT 92HD71B7X
>
> External microphone is
Doing yum update cause yum to issue
this message
Finishing rebuild of rpms, from deltarpms
What is the significance of this, and why is
it being done?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
Dante,
I know this is not the best time for a joke, but it appears the hosting
vendor didn't even ask if you preferred Phillips or slotted. Just on a
lark, is the server with the ancient Fedora in possession of hot swappable
drives? If so there may be a path you can use by just getting someone t
--- On Fri, 4/15/11, james tate wrote:
> Is there a possibility that you have Two sound
> drivers trying to load ?
What's actually loaded doesn't look too bad:
snd_hda_codec_si3054 3908 1
snd_hda_codec_analog74362 1
snd_hda_intel 23960 4
snd_hda_codec 85624 3
s
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:38:43 -0400
Dante Conti wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thank you for the quick answer. I know that Fedora 6 is very old (and
> no longer supported), but -- amazingly -- this is what the hosting
> provider just installed on the server. I don't have any data that I
> care about at thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I have some problem with skype and the microphone:
My laptop: Dell latitute E6400
Result of
]$ head -n 1 /proc/asound/card0/codec*
Codec: IDT 92HD71B7X
External microphone is working if I use audacity for instance but not if
I try to confi
On 04/15/2011 12:24 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>
> Am I missing something or is this the latest F14 kernel available ?
> When are we going to see some newer kernels ?
>
I agree - the 2.6.38 and above has auto sched which is truly wonderful
... I'm running the 2.6.28.3 from koji - pretty easy to in
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:38:43 -0400
Dante Conti wrote:
> I know that Fedora 6 is very old (and
> no longer supported), but -- amazingly -- this is what the hosting
> provider just installed on the server.
I know how you feel. I just upgraded my movie theatre to digital cinema from
35mm film and
On 04/15/2011 01:43 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> I recommend you to move to another hosting.
That would probably be a good way out of this. And, make sure that your
contract with the new service specifies not only Linux, or even Fedora,
but which version; for Fedora, of course, require Fedo
Thanks, Itamar. BTW, the vendor pointed out that it is my
responsibility to keep the server up-to-date, including applying the
latest security patches. How can I do that, when the installed
distribution is no longer supported? I know, it's not even funny. Yes,
I should have checked before buying ..
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Dante Conti wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thank you for the quick answer. I know that Fedora 6 is very old (and
> no longer supported), but -- amazingly -- this is what the hosting
> provider just installed on the server. I don't have any data that I
> care about at this ti
Hi Joe,
Thank you for the quick answer. I know that Fedora 6 is very old (and
no longer supported), but -- amazingly -- this is what the hosting
provider just installed on the server. I don't have any data that I
care about at this time, but I can only access the server remotely. If
I download the
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Dante Conti wrote:
> Is it possible to remotely upgrade a server running Fedora 6 to Fedora
> 14 (or 15)? If yes, should I use PreUpgrade?
>
> Thank you for any help you can provide.
>
> --Dante
its a very hard task, you must go to fedora 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 13, 1
On 04/15/2011 12:48 PM, Dante Conti wrote:
> Is it possible to remotely upgrade a server running Fedora 6 to Fedora
> 14 (or 15)? If yes, should I use PreUpgrade?
>
> Thank you for any help you can provide.
>
> --Dante
No. FC 6 is now eight versions out of date and current versions of
Fedora hav
On 04/15/2011 12:21 PM, Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 08:49 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
>> You want an ugly workaround? How about keeping your separate /usr, but
>> keep a very stripped-down copy (just the stuff needed during boot) under
>> the /usr directory on your root file system. That
On 04/15/2011 03:53 PM, updog wrote:
> James Wilkinson wrote:
together. Loading snd_hda_intel after pcspkr is in and working causes
loss of the terminal beep.
> "Terminal beep" also includes audible notifications from programs such as
> nedit and mozilla, e.g. search term not found. Aff
James Wilkinson wrote:
>>> together. Loading snd_hda_intel after pcspkr is in and working causes
>>> loss of the terminal beep.
"Terminal beep" also includes audible notifications from programs such as nedit
and mozilla, e.g. search term not found. Affected terminals are xterm and the
console;
Is it possible to remotely upgrade a server running Fedora 6 to Fedora
14 (or 15)? If yes, should I use PreUpgrade?
Thank you for any help you can provide.
--Dante
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 04/15/2011 02:42 PM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>> "james" == james tate writes:
> >> That's too late. Since it's a notebook, I re-boot it nearly every
> >> time I want to use it. So when it re-boots, there will be no
> >> functioning network in such a situation.
> >>
>
> "james" == james tate writes:
>> That's too late. Since it's a notebook, I re-boot it nearly every
>> time I want to use it. So when it re-boots, there will be no
>> functioning network in such a situation.
>>
james> I assume you do have the rpmfusion.rpms installed ?
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:23:32 -0600,
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 13:10 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > I am running the kernel from F15 on an F14 box and things seem to be working
> > well right now. While that isn't supported in general, if there is something
> > you re
On 04/15/2011 10:35 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> I'm glad to hear that F15 will eventually have 2.6.39 kernels.
So tell me, Mr. Bones, what is it about the 2.6.39 kernels that you're
so eager to get, or is it just that they're New!, Shiny! and Different!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproje
On 04/15/2011 10:33 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Maybe I should reboot it more often.
That just might be a good idea. I only reboot for kernel updates (or,
of course, distro upgrades) and only shut down for hardware issues or
power failures. I have BOINC running as a service, doing distributed
co
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 13:10 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:35:59 -0600,
> Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > Its going to be a long couple months waiting for a 2.6.37 kernel.
> >
> > I'm glad to hear that F15 will eventually have 2.6.39 kernels.
>
> I am running the kernel fr
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:35:59 -0600,
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Its going to be a long couple months waiting for a 2.6.37 kernel.
>
> I'm glad to hear that F15 will eventually have 2.6.39 kernels.
I am running the kernel from F15 on an F14 box and things seem to be working
well right now. While
On 04/15/2011 11:14 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>> "james" == james tate writes:
> >> Perhaps I could NOW try a yum install (with an option to force
> >> install already installed packages), and that would future-proof
> >> me until next time I install from scratch.
> ja
On 04/15/2011 10:31 AM, James Wilkinson wrote:
> updog wrote:
>> Independently pcspkr works fine for the PC speaker, and snd_hda_intel
>> for the internal speakers, however the two modules don't work
>> together. Loading snd_hda_intel after pcspkr is in and working causes
>> loss of the terminal be
On 04/15/2011 10:29 AM, James Wilkinson wrote:
> Joachim Backes wrote:
>> I heard that such sticks are only usable if the partitions are formatted
>> in fat32; formatting the partitions in ext3 or ext4 makes such
>> partitions and the total stick unusable, that means, the partitions
>> can't be mou
On 04/15/2011 10:08 AM, Phil Meyer wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 10:24 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Feb 7
>> 06:57:55 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>
>> Am I missing something or is this the latest F14 kernel available ?
>>
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 11:08 -0600, Phil Meyer wrote:
> Does this make sense?
Yes.
> Its a whole lot of work to get all of the Fedora/RH patches lined up
> for
> any given 2.6.XX release.
>
> It is much more manageable to go into maintenance mode after a major
> Fedora release, and limit kern
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 10:17 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Maybe you should update your system more often:
>
> [joe@khorlia Desktop]$ uname -a
> Linux khorlia.zeff.us 2.6.35.12-88.fc14.i686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 31 22:12:38
> UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
Maybe I should reboot it more often.
$ uname
updog wrote:
> Independently pcspkr works fine for the PC speaker, and snd_hda_intel
> for the internal speakers, however the two modules don't work
> together. Loading snd_hda_intel after pcspkr is in and working causes
> loss of the terminal beep.
>
> It's a problem in FC13; not sure about older
Phil Meyer wrote:
> Fedora releases usually don't update major kernel numbers. The idea is
> to start a release as near current as reasonable and then patch that up
> as it goes go along.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelStatus lists the maintainers’ plans:
Fedora 14 “Will follow 2.6.35.x s
Joachim Backes wrote:
> I heard that such sticks are only usable if the partitions are formatted
> in fat32; formatting the partitions in ext3 or ext4 makes such
> partitions and the total stick unusable, that means, the partitions
> can't be mounted.
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> I'm not sure who
On 04/15/2011 08:49 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 12:22 AM, Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
>> ok, so I was wrong about the webpage and the situation, well thanks, for
>> your explanation the only thing to do is install the F15, live with it
>> or try to do a workaround myself (I don't care if i
On 04/15/2011 09:24 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> $ uname -a
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Feb 7
> 06:57:55 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> Am I missing something or is this the latest F14 kernel available ?
> When are we going to see some newer kernels ?
>
M
On 04/15/2011 10:24 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> $ uname -a
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Feb 7
> 06:57:55 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> Am I missing something or is this the latest F14 kernel available ?
> When are we going to see some newer kernels ?
>
>
i am configuring mail2fax with hilafax and postfix; i find this howto between
many other: http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/howto/faxing.php
and solution seems to be to use mail2sendfax:
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/howto/misc/hyfax.2007.08.29
sadly this one needs metamail, and there is no metamai
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Am I missing something or is this the latest F14 kernel available ?
Your system is not using the current kernel for F14. The current one is:
kernel-2.6.35.12-88.fc14
> When are we going to see some newer kernels ?
You would have to ask the kernel list. My guess is that we wi
You are. The latest stable from the repos is
2.6.35.12-88.fc14
Update, if you care.
Ranjan
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:24:11 -0500 Linuxguy123
wrote:
> $ uname -a
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Feb 7
> 06:57:55 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> Am I mis
$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Feb 7
06:57:55 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Am I missing something or is this the latest F14 kernel available ?
When are we going to see some newer kernels ?
Thanks
LG
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapr
On 04/15/2011 05:16 PM, JD wrote:
On 04/15/2011 06:59 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I have the chance to purchase a used 32 GByte USB stick of type Kingston
DataTraveler 200 at a low price. On the other hand, I heard from difficulties
to use this stick under LINUX - somebody can confirm
Joachim Backes wrote:
> I heard that such sticks are only usable if the partitions are formatted
> in fat32; formatting the partitions in ext3 or ext4 makes such
> partitions and the total stick unusable, that means, the partitions
> can't be mounted.
I'm not sure who told you this, but the file s
On 04/15/2011 04:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 15:59 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I have the chance to purchase a used 32 GByte USB stick of type Kingston
DataTraveler 200 at a low price. On the other hand, I heard from
difficulties to use this stick under LINU
On 04/15/2011 06:59 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi
all,
I have the chance to purchase a used 32 GByte USB stick of type
Kingston DataTraveler 200 at a low price. On the other hand, I
heard from difficulties to use this stick under LINUX - somebody
> "james" == james tate writes:
>> Perhaps I could NOW try a yum install (with an option to force
>> install already installed packages), and that would future-proof
>> me until next time I install from scratch.
james> On Drivers that need to be updated with the kernel may not
On 04/15/2011 10:14 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>> "Eric" == Eric Mesa writes:
> Colin> It turns out that the dependency name is wrong!.
> Colin> Actually, what i needed was kmod-wl 5.100.82.38 and kmod-wl
> Colin> 2.6.35.12.88. This is REALLY weird (and plain unworkable
Once upon a time, Robert Nichols said:
> If you ever umount /usr0, though, there's no way to regain access
> without rebooting.
That's not true; if you bind mount / somewhere, so can see the /usr on
the root filesystem (bind mounts don't follow filesystem mounts
recursively; if you want that, you
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 15:59 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have the chance to purchase a used 32 GByte USB stick of type Kingston
> DataTraveler 200 at a low price. On the other hand, I heard from
> difficulties to use this stick under LINUX - somebody can confirm this?
I've used
> "Eric" == Eric Mesa writes:
Colin> It turns out that the dependency name is wrong!.
Colin> Actually, what i needed was kmod-wl 5.100.82.38 and kmod-wl
Colin> 2.6.35.12.88. This is REALLY weird (and plain unworkable,
Colin> almost).
Colin> Anyway, my network
Hi all,
I have the chance to purchase a used 32 GByte USB stick of type Kingston
DataTraveler 200 at a low price. On the other hand, I heard from
difficulties to use this stick under LINUX - somebody can confirm this?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p
On 04/15/2011 12:22 AM, Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
> ok, so I was wrong about the webpage and the situation, well thanks, for
> your explanation the only thing to do is install the F15, live with it
> or try to do a workaround myself (I don't care if it's ugly) meanwhile
> works in my use case.
You wa
Last week I started getting mails from certwatch about a certificate
from apache that got expired. Following the indications, I ran genkey
with no luck. genkey passes all the steps, looks like it updated the
.crt file, but I keep getting the same message from certwatch, and
when trying to enter the
On 04/15/2011 02:15 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> F15's current status can be found under:
>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/15/
>
> How exactly is this interpreted?
> There are many packages, but no ISOs.
These are simply yum repos, comparab
There is.
preupgrade for F-15 is now in F14 and F13's repos.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 20:15, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> > F15's current status can be found under:
> > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/15/
>
> How exactly is this interpreted?
> T
Perhaps some insight into where HDA might be hijacking the PC speaker would be
helpful.
Thanks!
> Independently pcspkr works fine for
> the PC speaker, and snd_hda_intel for the internal speakers,
> however the two modules don't work together. Loading
> snd_hda_intel after pcspkr is in and work
Perhaps some insight into where HDA might be hijacking the PC speaker would be
helpful.
Thanks!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mail
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> F15's current status can be found under:
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/15/
How exactly is this interpreted?
There are many packages, but no ISOs.
Does this mean that Fedora-15 is available, or not?
Also, what are the drpms against?
Is th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/14/2011 08:09 PM, Aradenatorix Veckhom Vacelaevus wrote:
> Thanks a lot for you helping.
>
> Now I have installed those two plug ins and the YUM looks better. But I
> have few troubles with Fedora14 and I'm not sure if I should relate them
> her
>
> It turns out that the dependency name is wrong!.
>
> Actually, what i needed was kmod-wl 5.100.82.38 and kmod-wl
> 2.6.35.12.88. This is REALLY weird (and plain unworkable, almost).
>
> Anyway, my network is working again.
> --
> Colin Adams
> Preston Lancashire
> () ascii ribbon campaign - a
> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams writes:
Colin> My macbook airport isn't working again after recent kernel
Colin> updates. I found the rpm for
Colin> broadcom-wl.5.100.82.38-1.fc14.noarch.rpm, but when I try to
Colin> install it, it says it requires the wl-kmod as a dependncy.
My macbook airport isn't working again after recent kernel updates.
I found the rpm for broadcom-wl.5.100.82.38-1.fc14.noarch.rpm, but when
I try to install it, it says it requires the wl-kmod as a dependncy.
Of course, i cannot do a yum install, as i have no network connection on
the laptop! So
On 15 April 2011 09:34, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> I am not familiar with sed and the commands are overwhelming [to
> me]. Man sed hasn't helped ... I am interested.
>
> Perhaps you can tell me what's wrong?
Wrong tool for the job... sed is not something geared to processing XML.
sam@server
On 14/04/11 19:09, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 13Apr2011 16:11, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> | On 13/04/11 15:47, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> |> [ grep | sed approach ... ]
> |
> | [bobg@box9 ~]$ grep "Actual Usage Download" /home/bobg/foo | sed
> | -e "s/^.*value=\"//" -e "s/\" .*$//"
> |
On 04/15/2011 08:51 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> When Fedora 15 repo will branch off from rawhide? Or is fedora 15 repo
> already available?
>
F15 has long been branched from rawhide.
F15's current status can be found under:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development
82 matches
Mail list logo
