Affected versions:
- Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 before 6.1.6
- Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.0 before 5.18.7
- Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.0 before 5.17.7
- Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 before 5.16.8
Description:
Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ.
During unmarshalling of
Matt
What you provided is what I was finding as well but I wanted to see if I missed
something.
Thanks for the information
Jason Jackson
From: Matt Pavlovich
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2025 1:16 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Classic
I am pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.41.0.
* Downloads:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
* Complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.41.0
I would like to highlight these improvements:
- AMQP
Hi Jason-
ActiveMQ uses OCSP support provided by the Java JDK and default security
provider.
My quick read of the Java JDK doc indicates that the OCSP is a single URL
entry. That would mean support for multiple OCSP would be an update to the Java
JDK security provider, or a custom
Quick question
For the java.security file and the OCSP settings that are available within
ActiveMQ, does the file allow for multiple OCSP servers via multiple lines or
using a coma delimited entry
Jason Jackson
AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: ActiveMQ 5.19.0 Security Vulnerabilities
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Verify the
sender before clicking links, downloading attachments, or performing any
requested tasks.
> Critical: CVE-2016-12
> Critical: CVE-2016-127 —
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-127
The link indicates the CVE impacts "Spring Framework through 5.3.16."
However, ActiveMQ Classic 5.19.0 ships with Spring 5.3.39. This seems like
a false positive from your scanner.
Justin
On Mon, Ap
Hi,
I am new to the group. Hoping to get some information on two vulnerabilities
that were returned when running a Trivy scan on ActiveMQ 5.19.0. I realize
these would be resolved if we just upgraded to ActiveMQ 6.1.6, but another
piece of software on our system is not compatible with Java
Severity: moderate
Affected versions:
- Apache ActiveMQ NMS OpenWire Client before 2.1.1
Description:
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ NMS OpenWire
Client.
This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ NMS OpenWire Client before 2.1.1 when
performing connections to
t the last change.
>
> What's wrong ?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Regards.
>
> 2025-04-15T17:02:54,403 | WARN | qtp386478079-34 |
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel |
> /echanges/activemq/admin/sendMessage.action
> javax.servlet.ServletExce
her instance without the last change.
What's wrong ?
Thanks for your help.
Regards.
2025-04-15T17:02:54,403 | WARN | qtp386478079-34 |
org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel |
/echanges/activemq/admin/sendMessage.action
javax.servlet.ServletException: javax.servlet.ServletException:
o
Affected versions:
- Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 1.5.1 before 2.40.0
Description:
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Apache
ActiveMQ Artemis. All the values of the broker properties are logged when the
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.config.impl.ConfigurationImpl
I am following up on this some more.
ActiveMQ Classic has the capability to perform Idempotency built in, it just
needs to be configured. For normal ActiveMQ usage I have not had any issues
with duplicates. I am also able to enable the MemoryIdempotent server and do
not have any issues.
The
You might have noticed that the release announcement mentions a "New &
Improved Management Console." Also, the upgrade instructions mention this
as well [2]. In short, the new console in 2.40.0 doesn't require the
activemq-branding.war and artemis-plugin.war files. It loo
Affected versions:
- Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.0.0 through 2.39.0
Description:
A vulnerability exists in Apache ActiveMQ Artemis whereby a user with the
createDurableQueue or createNonDurableQueue permission on an address can
augment the routing-type supported by that address even if said
Hello All,
I have a question on tuning ActiveMQ
Can you help me with refining ActiveMQ consumer configurations over a high
latency network, latency is 42 milli seconds. We are struck resolving this
issue for a while, any inputs is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Nagaraj Murali.
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.40.0.
* Downloads:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
* Complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.40.0
I would like to highlight these improvements:
Hi all,
With 2.40.0 we are missing activemq-branding.war and artemis-plugin.war as
mentioned in documentation.
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/web-server.html#embedded-web-server
Do we have to setup Web Console separately, beginning with 2.40.0
Thanks, Felix
eaded "Setting Expiration on Messages in the
DLQ" approaching half way down.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 13:07, Ephemeris Lappis
wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm looking for a simple way to clean DLQ queues on our ActiveMQ brokers.
> Messages are moved to DLQ queues when some une
Hello
We're using ActiveMQ "classic" 5.18.3
Regards.
Le mar. 11 mars 2025 à 15:01, Justin Bertram a écrit :
> Are you using ActiveMQ Classic or ActiveMQ Artemis? Also which version are
> you using?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 8:08 A
Hello.
Original messages globally (we already have some kind of messages that use
it) must not have a time to live. And I found no way to tell ActiveMQ to
add a time to live when a message is moved to a DLQ by a rollback of the
recipient process :I don't think we have to change the transa
Are you using ActiveMQ Classic or ActiveMQ Artemis? Also which version are
you using?
Justin
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 8:08 AM Ephemeris Lappis
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm looking for a simple way to clean DLQ queues on our ActiveMQ brokers.
> Messages are moved to DLQ queues whe
of messages, where X is specified on startup.
--
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Ephemeris Lappis
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 9:07 AM
To: us...@camel.apache.org; users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL SENDER:] Camel JMS consumer with dynamic selector to read
ActiveMQ DLQueues
Hello
Hello.
I'm looking for a simple way to clean DLQ queues on our ActiveMQ brokers.
Messages are moved to DLQ queues when some unexpected conditions lead
consumers to fail. We've no automatic processing for DLQ messages that are
only needed for diagnosis. Nevertheless, when the queues c
: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 6.1.5 Performance Tuning Issue
[You don't often get email from mattr...@apache.org. Learn why this is
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
Hi William-
A lot goes into performance tuning a broker for various use cas
you are seeing.
- Matt Pavlovich
> On Feb 27, 2025, at 9:39 AM, William Crowell
> wrote:
>
> Disclaimer before reading this: This is a tuning issue and not a performance
> problem with ActiveMQ.
>
>
>
> Description of the issue:
>
>
>
> I believ
Disclaimer before reading this: This is a tuning issue and not a performance
problem with ActiveMQ.
Description of the issue:
I believe I have a tuning problem with ActiveMQ 6.1.5 on Rocky Linux 9.5
running on a virtual machine with 8 vCPUs and 32GB of RAM. The underlying disk
is
Alternatively, you can use keycloak to authenticate a web console user and
configure Azure Entra ID as an identity provider of keycloak, for further
details on using keycloak to authenticate a web console user see
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-examples/tree/2.39.0/examples/features/standard
Azure Entra ID either. Does it use Oauth?
Justin
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 4:40 AM Shirley Mwombe wrote:
> Hi @All/Justin,
>
> I have deployed ActiveMQ Artemis 2.34.0 in my prod environment, but this
> has been flagged b
Hi @All/Justin,
I have deployed ActiveMQ Artemis 2.34.0 in my prod environment, but this
has been flagged by auditors for exposing web console credentials (mostly
concerned with password) when the web browser request payload is captured
by burpsuite or browser developer tools. See sample
There was a lot of work in testing after 2.20. I highly recommend resina a
recent version às Anton said.
Clebert Suconic
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:17 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
> I agree with Anton here 100%.
>
> Netty uses direct memory for performance reasons. If you disable it there
> will
I agree with Anton here 100%.
Netty uses direct memory for performance reasons. If you disable it there
will certainly be performance trade-offs. Whether that really impacts you
depends on your use-case.
Also, keep in mind that if Netty doesn't use direct memory it will use the
JVM's heap instead
In absolute terms AIO is faster than NIO. That's the whole reason we
created the activemq-artemis-native integration layer.
However, whether this difference actually impacts your deployment depends
on whether disk writes are a bottleneck. Therefore, it's really impossible
for us to a
Send a blank email to users-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org to unsubscribe
from ActiveMQ Users mailing list, for further details see
https://activemq.apache.org/contact
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 11:15, 23F3000346 NASHEETA FARZANA <
23f3000...@ds.study.iitm.ac.in> wrote:
> Please unsubscrib
Please unsubscribe me from this mailing list
On Thu, 20 Feb, 2025, 3:15 pm Anton Roskvist, wrote:
> Sorry, but to my knowledge that is almost impossible to say for sure, as
> it's highly dependent on your specific use case and setup. As before
> though, if you can safely try it out, it might hel
Sorry, but to my knowledge that is almost impossible to say for sure, as it's
highly dependent on your specific use case and setup. As before though, if you
can safely try it out, it might help in narrowing down the source of the issue.
I'd really like to reiterate that version upgrades to any p
Ok,
In case the problem is direct memory
Do you think disable netty direct memory would have a serious impact on
performance?
E.g.
-Dio.netty.noPreferDirect=true -Dio.netty.maxDirectMemory=0
-Dio.netty.allocator.type=unpooled
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:47 AM Anton Roskvist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thi
Hi,
I think the point would be that if possible, the idea would be to try the same
conditions against a more recent version of the broker. All else being equal,
this would rule out any and all issues that might already have been addressed
in the roughly 3000 commits since 2.14.0. Same could app
e so when they have issues we can rule out things that have already
> been fixed. Are you able to at least try the latest release to see if it
> resolves the issue you're seeing (assuming it is a legitimate problem)? If
> not, could you provide any kind of test-case which reproduces
e out things that have already
been fixed. Are you able to at least try the latest release to see if it
resolves the issue you're seeing (assuming it is a legitimate problem)? If
not, could you provide any kind of test-case which reproduces the problem?
Justin
[1] https://github.com/apache
gt; scripts.
>
> Regards,
>
> William Crowell
>
> From: Christian Kurmann
> Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 1:55 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
> [You don't often get email
eph
is really slow.
However both ActiveMQ Classic dealt with this surprisingly well.
I checked with direct local disks and performance was much faster but the
tradeoff for being able to run these in the kubernetes cluster and have a
way to shift them around when required meant I kept it on Ceph.
Pleas
:55 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
[You don't often get email from c...@tere.tech. Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
I run approximately 15 million messages per day on 8 cores
I run approximately 15 million messages per day on 8 cores with 16GB memory
using ActiveMQ classic.
I unfortunately have peaks and while most messages are 1kb I have some that
are >2mb.
I have done lots of performance testing to manage this and found that
Artemis unfortunately was not usable
I agree with François 40M messages a day is a drop in the bucket for a modern
server to handle running ActiveMQ Classic.
> On Feb 19, 2025, at 12:27 PM, Francois Papon wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> From my side, I have customers that are using ActiveMQ Classic for heavy
> wor
Hi William,
From my side, I have customers that are using ActiveMQ Classic for
heavy workload and with the right tuning and hardware setting it works
very well so I cannot see why you should migrate to Artemis to make it work.
regards,
François
Le 19/02/2025 à 17:49, William Crowell a
: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
I agree with Matt 100%.
Aside from wide variation in the workloads there is also wide variation in
performance goals. Some folks don't mind a heavy workload with relatively
high latency.
Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
Have you tried using your OpenWire client with Artemis? If so, what did you
find?
Justin
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:05 AM William Crowell
wrote:
> Justin,
>
> It would be OpenWire.
>
> Regards,
>
> Wil
Matt,
Thank you and that is very valuable information.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Matt Pavlovich
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 11:31 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
Hi William—
Keep in mind that ActiveMQ
uary 19, 2025 at 10:56 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
> Which "Classic library" are you referring to? Artemis supports the OpenWire
> protocol used by the JMS client implementation shipped
:31 AM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> Hi William—
>
> Keep in mind that ActiveMQ Classic will continue to advance OpenWire
> versions for new features and capabilities. The current roadmap includes
> plans to finish out JMS 2.0 support, etc. Artemis will always need to
> consume those
Hi William—
Keep in mind that ActiveMQ Classic will continue to advance OpenWire versions
for new features and capabilities. The current roadmap includes plans to finish
out JMS 2.0 support, etc. Artemis will always need to consume those changes,
and some Artemis distributions are dropping
Justin,
It would be OpenWire.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 10:56 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
Which "Classic library" are you referring to? Artemi
is.
>
> Regards,
>
> William Crowell
>
> From: Justin Bertram
> Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 10:37 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
> I agree with Matt 100%.
>
> Aside from wide v
ich wrote:
> Hi William-
>
> This is a mission impossible question. The hardware required to address
> different workloads can vary wildly. For example — thousands of
> connections handling a few million messages per day vs a hundred
> connections handling 1B messages per day.
&g
Hi William-
This is a mission impossible question. The hardware required to address
different workloads can vary wildly. For example — thousands of connections
handling a few million messages per day vs a hundred connections handling 1B
messages per day.
ActiveMQ can be embedded down to run
Hi, all
I have a case with an Artemis ActiveMq cluster which process a very large
number of messages per second.
Each few weeks of operation, JVM memory is still cleaning properly but
native memory is not getting cleared.
Did anyone encounter this case?
Does it sounds more like a configuration
Hi,
Are there any hardware recommendations (not minimum requirements) for ActiveMQ
Classic? I am trying to determine what CPU, RAM, and SSD type I will need when
sizing out a production environment. Are there any recent benchmark tests for
a particular hardware setup? What I will probably
l unread messages in the queue seem not to cause it.
In our real business case, messages payloads are between 1 KB to 120 MB,
and the consumer is always slower, leading to many unread messages for a
while.
We have history data that seems to say that the problem exists with older
versions of ActiveMQ
instance of a single
_producer_ and not any wider scope. Queues can be multi-threaded, so there is
no order guaranteed across multiple producers.
Thanks,
Matt Pavlovich
> On Feb 11, 2025, at 6:31 AM, Ephemeris Lappis
> wrote:
>
> Hello !
>
> I'm a bit embarrassed: I reporte
Hello !
I'm a bit embarrassed: I reported a problem on ActiveMQ (Classic),
regarding the disordered distribution of messages, both on this list and by
creating a JIRA ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9653),
but I have no feedback. I'm a bit surprised. We would really ne
Hello group,
I am using the ActiveMQ-CPP (3.9.5) product to connect to an ssl host.
In my case, I am using a self-signed certificate, which I am setting with
the respective decaf.net.ssl.* properties.
I am running into hostname validation with this certificate, as the
following runtime error
I am pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis Console 1.1.0
*Downloads
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis-console/download/
*Complete list of updates
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis-console/download/release-notes-1.1.0
I would like to highlight these
; isn't actually working.
>
> If we want to change this behavior I think we'd have to do it in the next
> major version (i.e. 3.0).
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 9:57 AM Alexander Milovidov
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > Recently I
Hello.
We're using ActiveMQ Classic version 5.18.3. In our last load tests we have
some errors that seem to be related to unordered message delivery. The
broker is configured with a Postgresql database persistence.
The Camel+Java producers generate messages in different queues : som
am,
>
> Recently I have mentioned that ActiveMQ Artemis fails to start if it has an
> incorrect filter in the divert configuration. It logs an AMQ224006 Invalid
> filter error and does not start.
> Expected behavior: server does not create a divert and start successfully.
>
gt;
>
> I am running an embedded ActiveMQ Artemis broker on version 2.39 using
> Windows 11 and am running into some weird logs on console startup and I am
> unsure if they matter or not. I attached the logs I see when starting the
> broker. The logs I am wondering about are t
Hi Team,
Recently I have mentioned that ActiveMQ Artemis fails to start if it has an
incorrect filter in the divert configuration. It logs an AMQ224006 Invalid
filter error and does not start.
Expected behavior: server does not create a divert and start successfully.
For example, if invalid
The former is applicable to either the inbound or outbound adapter. The
latter is for an admin object.
Justin
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 3:42 PM Martin Czakó wrote:
> I’m a liitle bit confused. What’s the difference between
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-examples/blob/main/ex
I’m a liitle bit confused. What’s the difference between
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-examples/blob/main/examples/features/sub-modules/artemis-ra-rar/src/main/resources/ra.xml#L55
a
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-examples/blob/main/examples/features/sub-modules/artemis
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.39.0.
* Downloads:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
* Complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.39.0
I would like to highlight these improvements:
-
The ActiveMQ Artemis JCA RA supports admin objects for creating either
ConnectionFactory or XAConnectionFactory based on your needs. These admin
objects take a config property named "BrokerURL" which you can use to
specify SSL resources (e.g. keyStorePath & trustStorePath) &a
For a ConnectionFactory.
Martin Czakó
> On 16. 12. 2024, at 6:06 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> Are you configuring this for an MDB (e.g. via activation configuration
> properties) or for a ConnectionFactory (e.g. lookup via JNDI to send
> messages)?
>
>
> Justin
>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at
Are you configuring this for an MDB (e.g. via activation configuration
properties) or for a ConnectionFactory (e.g. lookup via JNDI to send
messages)?
Justin
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 3:38 PM Martin Czakó wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I configure the Artemis resource adapter to use my keystore and
>
Hi,
How can I configure the Artemis resource adapter to use my keystore and
truststore (plus their passwords)? I am looking into the possible configuration
properties and so far I was able to find only the option to specify Username
and Password.
Thanks
Martin Czakó
--
gt;
>Regards
>JB
>
>On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 7:19 AM Zhu wrote:
>>
>> Hello team,
>>There was a mistake with the previous
>> email(https://lists.apache.org/thread/6to6lt69vxvp3sbslr8xob24p61bb6ow ),
>> please refer to this one.
>>My activeM
email(https://lists.apache.org/thread/6to6lt69vxvp3sbslr8xob24p61bb6ow ),
> please refer to this one.
>My activeMQ cluster running on master-slave mode.Two nodes try aquiring
> mysql lock to become master.I upgrade the MySQL from 5.7 to 8.0，and noticed
> that it will crash every 4-
Hello team,
There was a mistake with the previous
email(https://lists.apache.org/thread/6to6lt69vxvp3sbslr8xob24p61bb6ow ),
please refer to this one.
My activeMQ cluster running on master-slave mode.Two nodes try aquiring
mysql lock to become master.I upgrade the MySQL from 5.7 to 8.0，and
Hello team,
My activeMQ cluster running on master-slave mode.Two nodes try aquiring
mysql lock to become master.I upgrade the MySQL from 5.7 to 8.0，and noticed
that it will crash every 4-5 days.It will goes will shortly after i restart the
service.
The error log is like:
It seems that
gt; > I have a process where I am consuming a message on a "status" queue. I make
> > connection to an ActiveMQ server, create a session, create a consumer to
> > "status" with a JMSCorrelationID set, start the connection and receive a
> > message.
> &
consumer obtaining a
connection to one queue then switching to the 2nd queue.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, at 15:00, David Cole wrote:
> I have a process where I am consuming a message on a "status" queue. I make
> connection to an ActiveMQ server, create a session, create a consumer to
&
ly on the
queue?
Justin
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 8:01 PM David Cole wrote:
> I have a process where I am consuming a message on a "status" queue. I
> make connection to an ActiveMQ server, create a session, create a consumer
> to "status" with a JMSCorrelati
I have a process where I am consuming a message on a "status" queue. I make
connection to an ActiveMQ server, create a session, create a consumer to
"status" with a JMSCorrelationID set, start the connection and receive a
message.
Apache.NMS.IConnectionF
This query might be helpful as well, and it doesn't require a Jira account:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ARTEMIS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.39.0
It returns everything that's marked for 2.39.0 (which you can easily
change).
Justin
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 3:58 PM
Thanks!
> On Dec 4, 2024, at 4:58 PM, ski n wrote:
>
> You can also track upcoming features on the Jira of Apache (Just need an
> Apache account):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin%3Arelease-page&status=unreleased
>
> Raym
That makes sense, thanks!
And yeah Java 17 is fine for me.
> On Dec 4, 2024, at 4:51 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> There's no strict schedule for releases. It really depends on what's being
> developed and what folks want. This year there have been 7 Artemis
> releases, and I expect there wil
You can also track upcoming features on the Jira of Apache (Just need an
Apache account):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARTEMIS?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin%3Arelease-page&status=unreleased
Raymond
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 10:51 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
> There'
There's no strict schedule for releases. It really depends on what's being
developed and what folks want. This year there have been 7 Artemis
releases, and I expect there will be another one (i.e. 2.39.0) this month.
It's possible that 2.39.0 may require Java 17. Would that be a problem for
you?
Hey,
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask but are there any resources available
to track when the next version of Artemis (2.39) is planning on being released?
Thanks,
Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@active
Hi Ravindu-
The ActiveMQ web console uses a separate JAAS realm in 5.x — you will need to
modify the conf/jetty.xml and related realm files used by Jetty. (Jetty is the
sub-component that provides the http:// services in ActiveMQ)
Thanks,
Matt
> On Dec 4, 2024, at 4:13 AM, Ravindu Wanasin
HI Matt,
We need to use this sldap authentication when logging to the activemq
console(GUI) from a browser. Could you please guide us which
files/configurations are used for the authentication in activemq console.
Regards,
Ravindu.
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 04:14, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
ing LDAP for login to Active MQ.
>> >
>> > We have removed the existing LDAP configuration, and now we need to set up
>> > secure LDAP.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ravindu.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at
ng LDAP configuration, and now we need to set
> up
> > secure LDAP.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ravindu.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 19:58, Justin Bertram wrote:
> >
> > > By "Secure LDAP" do you mean LDAP over SSL
fic way do you want to "configure Secure LDAP for ActiveMQ"?
> LDAP typically holds name & role information for users who are connecting
> to the broker. The broker can integrate with LDAP to either authenticate or
> authorize these users (or both). Do you want to configure eit
uthorization-module>.
Please follow the documentation links to see what best suits your needs.
Patrick
From: Justin Bertram
Sent: Monday 2 December 2024 06:27
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support requesting to config SLDAP for ActiveMQ
By "Se
By "SLDAP" are you referring to LDAP over SSL?
Are you wanting to configure authentication or authorization or both?
Justin
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 2:42 AM Ravindu Wanasinghe <
ravindu.wanasin...@chakray.com> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> We are using Classic ActiveM
Hi Justin,
No, I want to configure Secure LDAP for ActiveMQ .
Thanks,
Ravindu.
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 19:44, Justin Bertram wrote:
> By "SLDAP" are you referring to LDAP over SSL?
>
> Are you wanting to configure authentication or authorization or both?
>
>
> Justi
By "Secure LDAP" do you mean LDAP over SSL?
In what specific way do you want to "configure Secure LDAP for ActiveMQ"?
LDAP typically holds name & role information for users who are connecting
to the broker. The broker can integrate with LDAP to either authenticate or
a
hanks,
> Ravindu.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 19:58, Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> > By "Secure LDAP" do you mean LDAP over SSL?
> >
> > In what specific way do you want to "configure Secure LDAP for ActiveMQ"?
> > LDAP typically holds n
Hi Justin,
We are using Classic ActiveMQ.
Regards,
Ravindu Wanasinghe.
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 at 21:15, Justin Bertram wrote:
> Which ActiveMQ broker are you asking about? Classic or Artemis?
>
>
> Justin
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 5:12 AM Ravindu Wanasinghe <
> rav
1 - 100 of 1627 matches
Mail list logo
