That makes sense, thanks! And yeah Java 17 is fine for me.
> On Dec 4, 2024, at 4:51 PM, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: > > There's no strict schedule for releases. It really depends on what's being > developed and what folks want. This year there have been 7 Artemis > releases, and I expect there will be another one (i.e. 2.39.0) this month. > > It's possible that 2.39.0 may require Java 17. Would that be a problem for > you? > > > Justin > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 2:36 PM <cooper.r.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask but are there any resources >> available to track when the next version of Artemis (2.39) is planning on >> being released? >> >> Thanks, >> Cooper >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@activemq.apache.org >> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@activemq.apache.org For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
