Re: [uml-user] UML console not coming

On 01/09/15 11:07, Vijay Tandeker wrote: > Dear Sir, > - Downloaded "linux-3.18.20.tar.xz" from kernel.org > - compiled it for UML using "ARCH=um". > - Downloaded "Ubuntu-TrustyTahr-i386-root_fs" and > "Fedora21-x86-root_fs". > - Still same issue with Ubuntu as

Re: [uml-user] 64-bit UML with 32-bit root

On 27/08/15 20:14, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > The (unofficial?) FAQ at http://uml.devloop.org.uk/faq.html implies that > it is possible to build UML on a 64-bit system to run a 32-bit guest. You can build a 32-bit *kernel* from a 64-bit host. > The best that I can manage on e.g. Debian "Jessie" x8

Re: [uml-user] Patch skas3 - Kernel 2.6.32

On 23/07/13 00:27, Michael Richardson wrote: > 1) I don't thikn that skas3 every got ported to 2.6.32. You can find links to more up to date skas3 patches here: http://uml.devloop.org.uk/links.html > 2) Why do you want it? skas0 usually does better. Usually. Antoine > > -- > ] Never

[uml-user] UML build broken since 3.0.75 (also affects 3.2.x)

ake[1]: *** [mm/memory.o] Error 1 make: *** [mm] Error 2 This fix is just a copy of what is found in later kernels. Compiled and boot tested both 3.0.80 and 3.2.45, x86_64 and i386. Signed-off-by: Antoine Martin --- a/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h 2013-05-25 09:20:51.42000 + +++ b/ar

Re: [uml-user] kmalloc returns NULL during module init

On 03/21/2013 05:53 AM, Han wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I hit other issues after moving to a recent kernel UML (i.e. cannot > fully bring up the UML). Now I am back and trying to debug UML > itself. However, when I started GDB with UML, I would hit a crash > like the following. > > I was wonderin

Re: [uml-user] Steps to Build FS and deploy using systemd?

On 02/03/2013 03:53 AM, Tony Su wrote: > Thx, > Sorry about not copying the List, needing to keep track which Lists > adhere strictly to RFC which require "Reply To" cannot be configured to > point to the List, only the OP. > > The two kernels I've been using initially are direct links from the UM

Re: [uml-user] Steps to Build FS and deploy using systemd?

ng. The only FS I found which misbehaves and isn't documented on the website is Fedora 17, where the login shell does not show up as expected. No word on your "research" of systemd vs others host setup then? Cheers Antoine > > Thx, > > Tony > > On Fri, Feb 1, 201

Re: [uml-user] Steps to Build FS and deploy using systemd?

On 01/31/2013 07:53 AM, Tony Su wrote: > Hello, > > Actually, 4 questions... > > 1. I noticed the standard procedure for preparing and launching > including applying chroot 755 to the backing file. Is this really > necessary? I should think that any file system that is installed into > a file sho

Re: [uml-user] cannot log in UML

On 01/31/2013 06:59 AM, Han wrote: > Hi, > > just to follow up as I still face this issue. I was wondering if > there is any way I can debug this issue? Basically, there is no any > errors printed. The login prompt just comes back without going to ask > "password". I tried the "uml" account

Re: [uml-user] SMP on UML

On 08/24/2012 11:19 PM, Dragos Diaconescu wrote: > Hello, > > I try to compile the UML, from a linux kernel(make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386) > and I have configured it to use SMP (make config). I am getting the > following error: > >CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h >CC arch/um/kernel/a

Re: [uml-user] SKAS host patches and wiki

On 02/16/2012 03:47 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: > On 01/21/2012 07:14 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Antoine Martin >> wrote: >>> On 01/19/2012 10:01 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:23

Re: [uml-user] SKAS host patches and wiki

On 02/16/2012 04:42 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: >> On 01/21/2012 07:14 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Antoine Martin >>> wrote: >>>> On 01/19/2012

Re: [uml-user] SKAS host patches and wiki

On 01/21/2012 07:14 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: >> On 01/19/2012 10:01 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Nick Cripps wrote: >>>> I saw this thread: >>&

Re: [uml-user] UML root image sharing

On 02/14/2012 07:25 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello List, > > Is there a particular format of the root image that UML uses? See block devices here: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/configure.html As for partition tables and filesystem types, UML is a Linux kernel so it will support wha

Re: [uml-user] SKAS host patches and wiki

On 01/19/2012 10:01 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Nick Cripps wrote: >> I saw this thread: >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=CAFLxGvz2wdfRtryzJ1t0G11rxzOmhdNEVi6A%3DXS5uLG0PA7VAQ%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=user-mode-linux-user >> w

Re: [uml-user] the filesystem (fedoracore5) is OK for Ubuntu 1004 (2.6.32)?

On 01/16/2012 03:47 PM, Yiming wrote: > Hi, all > > I am trying to using uml on Ubuntu 1004 (2.6.32). I was wondering > whether I can use the filesystem (fedoracore5) on official website as > the rot fs for my uml. Thank you! I assume you followed the link from the completely out-of-date uml sourc

Re: [uml-user] Cannot bringup DHCP (2.6.39 kernel + Debian 5.0 rootfs)

(snip) >>> Having been struggling this for 1 week, any help appreciated ! >> Have you tried following these instructions: >> http://uml.devloop.org.uk/howto.html > Question here, if uml is running in my desktop, i need to install and run > dhcpd in my desktop ? If you are following the howto yes.

Re: [uml-user] Cannot bringup DHCP (2.6.39 kernel + Debian 5.0 rootfs)

On 11/30/2011 02:54 AM, ning ji wrote: > > Hi everyone, > I'm new to UML, having issues bring up DHCP for my uml. > step 1:./kernel2.6.39 ubda=./debian50.rfs mem=128M > eth0=tuntap,,,10.50.183.254 Have you tried using a specific tap device here? Like: (...) eth0=tuntap,tap1,fe:f0:00:00:00:01,1

Re: [uml-user] build a own image

On 11/30/2011 08:25 PM, mattias wrote: > how to do it? > without bebootstrap I assume you mean debootstrap? And why would you want to avoid it? You aren't saying which distro or version you are trying to create which makes it difficult to give you any advice. For Fedora and Debian/Ubuntu distros y

Re: [uml-user] modules are appended with "gdea2244-dirty" so unable to insmod custom modules

On 09/17/2011 05:42 PM, Lakshmipathi.G wrote: > When it comes to loading modules, UML is no different from a regular >> kernel. You seem to be a bit confused by kernel module versioning and >> module loading in general, I think you should start there. >> > > Thanks I'll read more about them. > >

Re: [uml-user] modules are appended with "gdea2244-dirty" so unable to insmod custom modules

On 09/17/2011 04:35 PM, Lakshmipathi.G wrote: > Hi - > I'm having kernel version 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 and download version > 2.6.32 created a uml kernel but it modules are named as > "2.6.32-gdea2244-dirty". Thus I can't insert custom modules created from > 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 kernel. >

Re: [uml-user] Running a 32 bit Filesystem on a 64 bit kernel

On 15/08/11 04:04, Aniruddha Laud wrote: > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1002.2/01983.html > > I see this thread discussing a similar issue where the main question is > unanswered. Is it just a case of the Kconfig option not being there? No, minimal support for 32-bit on 64-bit ker

Re: [uml-user] user mode linux and pts/tty issues?

Hi, There is a an issue with recent Ubuntu filesystems when used with UML, they don't seem to start a console. I've tried removing plymouth, adding tty0 entries, etc (anyone with a suggestion on how to fix this would be most welcome) Try another filesystem and it should be fine. Cheers Antoine

Re: [uml-user] Running UML on a x86_64

On 06/11/2011 01:33 AM, lanas wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know if the only way to run a 32-bit UML on a x86_64 > is to compile the UML kernel (ARCH=um) on a 32 bit machine (virtual > machine for instance) and then use that kernel on the x86_64 machine to > run UML with a 32-bit UML file

Re: [uml-user] Help with installing UML

> naman-mint@naman-mint-laptop ~/uml/linux-2.6.23.13 $ First, use something more recent. FYI: I've just checked the instructions I posted here: http://uml.devloop.org.uk/howto.html And all the kernels on there now run ok. So, you should be able to get UML running in 5 easy steps. Cheers Antoine

[uml-user] building -longterm releases [was Help with installing UML]

On 06/09/2011 12:25 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: >> It seems this version (2.6.35.x) is broken, I'll try to rebuild it, in >> the meantime the other versions seem to work ok for me. > > I guess the kernel

Re: [uml-user] Help with installing UML

>> Okay, I made a fresh attempt. Here's wat I did: >> ./linux-2.6.22-rc2 ubda=Slackware-12.2-root_fs > (snip) > > Apologies for posting the whole thing. Is it fine? It's absolutely fine. > One more thing. This was what I got the second time. the first time I had > some errors saying "device out

Re: [uml-user] Help with installing UML

On 06/08/2011 10:18 PM, Edmundo Carmona wrote: > Just curious. Are you running UML on Natty? I had some issues with UML > on natty because of the gcc version. Are you using gcc 4.5? If you > are, can you try compiling the UML kernel with 4.4 and try again? It > can be easily done specifying the pat

Re: [uml-user] uml issue - Read-only file system

On 05/06/2011 07:51 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Lakshmipathi.G > wrote: >> I'm not sure as I didn't create them ,manually.But Its not working after >> initial shutdown. > > I guess the root fs was damaged. > >> Are you using ext4 to read ext2/3? >> Yes,i

Re: [uml-user] uml issue - Read-only file system

On 05/06/2011 06:59 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Lakshmipathi.G > wrote: >>> Is this really a UML issue? >>> Tell the kernel to mount the rootfs rw... >>> >> When booted it for the first with same command ,its worked fine. After >> doing init 0 and startin

Re: [uml-user] Help Password Debian Squeeze

Hi, Looks like you downloaded from (right?): http://fs.devloop.org.uk/ I think I rebuilt the squeeze images recently and I forgot to clear the root password (now fixed). As I have been asked this question before, I will try to make it quite clear: there is no password set (so don't ask me what it

Re: [uml-user] 32 bit UML kernel over Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit

You would have to give more details than "cannot boot". Clearly, it's something in your environment, so look for differences. Antoine On 03/09/2011 05:08 PM, Augusto wrote: > I've noticed that my 32-bit UML kernel cannot boot on Ubuntu-64, while it > works > correctly on the corresponding Ubun

Re: [uml-user] Running 32bit binaries in a 64bit uml kernel

On 03/08/2011 03:33 PM, Eric Dacquay wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing around with uml these past few days and I was > wondering if it was possible to run a 32 bit binary under a 64bit uml > kernel. I've got no issues running 64bit binaries but I've had no > such luck with the 32bit binaries. If

Re: [uml-user] Running 32bit binaries in a 64bit uml kernel

On 03/09/2011 04:32 PM, clow...@clownix.net wrote: > I do the following: > > make mrproper ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 > cp ${KCONFIG} .config > # make menuconfig ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 > make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 > make modules_install ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$HERE > > To make runnin

Re: [uml-user] Unable to install UML

root > filesystem(ext4 types) as rootfs for uml. > > Please help me in my efforts and since this is my first post to any > forums/threads please excuse me for any lack of details provided. > > Regards, > Sarthak Dash > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Antoine M

Re: [uml-user] Unable to install UML

Hi Sarthak, You're not saying which kernel you are using or which filesystem... which makes it hard for people to help you. My guess is that you're trying to mount an ext3/ext4 filesystem on an older kernel that does not support its features. Cheers Antoine On 14/02/11 05:09, sarthak dash wr

Re: [uml-user] hang after Starting crond: [ OK ]

On 12/10/2010 08:43 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: > On 12/09/2010 04:55 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: >> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010, hxqq wrote: >> >>>Hi everyone, >>>*** My OS is Fedora 11, I download Linux kernel 2.6.36.1 and use >>> >> >&g

Re: [uml-user] hang after Starting crond: [ OK ]

On 12/09/2010 04:55 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > On Thu, 09 Dec 2010, hxqq wrote: > >>Hi everyone, >>*** My OS is Fedora 11, I download Linux kernel 2.6.36.1 and use >> > >>Initialized stdio console driver >>Console initialized on /dev/tty0 >>console [tty0] enabled >>Ini

Re: [uml-user] X in uml?

. What is the difficulty you are encountering? Antoine > Vincent > > > > > > Le lundi 28 décembre 2009 à 23:43 +0700, Antoine Martin a écrit : >> clownix wrote: >>> I do not understand the need here, any application such as wireshark, >>> firefox .

Re: [uml-user] X in uml?

dy knows if is doable to run X in uml (not Xnest or similars) ? Antoine > Le lundi 28 décembre 2009 à 14:47 +0700, Antoine Martin a écrit : >> Anselm Lingnau wrote: >>> Rodrigo Baroni wrote: >>> >>>> Does anybody knows if is doable to run X in uml (not X

Re: [uml-user] X in uml?

Anselm Lingnau wrote: > Rodrigo Baroni wrote: > >> Does anybody knows if is doable to run X in uml (not Xnest or similars) ? > > The problem with this idea is that a »real« X server expects to talk to > graphics hardware of some description. VMware & co. solve this problem by > actually emula

Re: [uml-user] 2.6.31.2 broke UML build (2.6.31 was fine)

Confirmed with gcc 4.1.2 and 4.3.2 Use this config if yours does not exhibit the problem: http://uml.devloop.org.uk/kernels/kernel64-2.6.31.config Shall I forward this to LKML? Antoine Martin wrote: > 64-bit host: > > tar -jxf linux-2.6.31.2.tar.bz2 > cd linux-2.6.31.2 >

[uml-user] FYI: [Fwd: pulling FC5 image]

For those of you wondering why there is a broken link on the UML home page. I pulled the link a few months after sending this email. --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Jeff, I will be removing the FC5 disk image which is linked from the home page. It is takin

[uml-user] 2.6.31.2 broke UML build (2.6.31 was fine)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 64-bit host: tar -jxf linux-2.6.31.2.tar.bz2 cd linux-2.6.31.2 cp ../.config ./ make ARCH=um [...] MODPOST vmlinux.o GEN .version CHK include/linux/compile.h UPD include/linux/compile.h CC init/version.o LD init/bui

Re: [uml-user] Building a Arch Linux root image

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Amit Saha wrote: > Hi! > > I am following this link at > http://uml.jfdi.org/uml/Wiki.jsp?page=BuildingRootFileSystems for > building a UML root image to boot from. I want to build a Arch Linux UML > image. Which tool or technique should I follow

Re: [uml-user] How to create UML file system

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Leonid Chaichenets wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 07:38:17PM +0200, Flavio wrote: >> This is very easy in case you want to install debian based >> distributions, such as ubuntu, but I am wondering about doing the >> same for other distr

Re: [uml-user] root_fs images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi John, John Reiser wrote: >> http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/Linux-Virtualization-Filesystems.torrent > >>> Attempts to seed from two clients with significantly different network >>> paths have failed to transfer any data for the last 22

Re: [uml-user] root_fs images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 John Reiser wrote: >> please consider using the torrent and seeding: >> http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/Linux-Virtualization-Filesystems.torrent > > Attempts to seed from two clients with significantly different network paths > have failed t

Re: [uml-user] root_fs images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Dave, David Houlden wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 Antoine Martin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I finally got around to moving the site to a new host: >> http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/ >> > Antoi

[uml-user] root_fs images

Hi all, I finally got around to moving the site to a new host: http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/ If you are going to download a few images, please, please consider using the torrent and seeding: http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/Linux-Virtualization-Filesystems.torrent (as I do pay

[uml-user] root_fs images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, I finally got around to moving the site to a new host: http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/ If you are going to download a few images, please, please consider using the torrent and seeding: http://virtual.nagafix.co.uk/filesystems/Linu

Re: [uml-user] http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/

No, this is just another vhost, since uml.nagafix.co.uk has been moved, apache uses the first vhost as default. It will be back when I get a chance to look at it. Jerrad Pierce wrote: > UML images. Has someone mistakenly changed your DNS configuration? > The link given on your website (and many o

Re: [uml-user] [Fwd: pulling FC5 image]

Hi, I had to take the site down as I moved some servers around. It will be restored when I get a chance. root wrote: > I also have noticed that http://uml.nagafix.co.uk only shows > "It works!". > You can find a debian etch rootfs and a "cloonix" customized rootfs at > http://clownix.net, if it

[uml-user] [Fwd: pulling FC5 image]

FWD: I've had no reply so I've pulled the images. --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Jeff, I will be removing the FC5 disk image which is linked from the home page. It is taking a fair chunk out of my bandwidth allowance and I never got as much as a credit or

Re: [uml-user] Nagafix UML Web site now closed?

Ooops, bit busy with other stuff at the moment... Will take care of it later. Sorry about the inconvenience, paying customers first... Cheers Antoine Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ > > Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access / on this server. > Apache Server at

Re: [uml-user] Network Difficulties II

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Brendan McNally wrote: | Don't know why I'm doing it the hard way! | | Thanks for your help though, I'm sorted now. Would you care to share what you did wrong? It might help some other users in the future. Antoine | | Brendan | | Jeff Dike wrote:

Re: [uml-user] Network Difficulties II

ping the host machine. If you can, but >> can't ping the world, check if your IP Masquerading is on. E.g. >> >> iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE >> >> Jay >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [uml-user] cant boot 2.6.25

have you tried adding root=/dev/ubda ? using ubda/b/c instead of ubd0/1/2? And for the parse_chan_pair warnings, you may also want: con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=null Antoine Jon Rafkind wrote: > I just tried UML with the new 2.6.25 kernel but it would not boot up > properly. I was using the same rootfs

Re: [uml-user] Network Difficulties II

Brendan, You're not explaining what doesn't work Have you tried pinging, traceroute, tcpdump, etc.. Cheers Antoine Brendan McNally wrote: > Hi All > > I am having major problems getting my UML sessions networked > correctly. Can someone please review my configuration or suggest a > so

Re: [uml-user] Fwd: yum: not found

http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html fang zheng wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: *fang zheng* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: 2008-4-17 21:21 > Subject: Re: [uml-user] yum: not found > To: Flavio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [uml-user] Changing network device names

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Will Morton wrote: | Greetings UMLers; | | I am booting a custom 2.6.24.4 UML kernel, running a debian etch guest | created using debootstrap. I am booting using the kernel command | line: | | root=/dev/ubda ubd0=./etch.rootfs ubd1=./etch.swapfs mem

Re: [uml-user] looking for network-ready fedora 8 kernel and root fs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Robert P. J. Day wrote: | On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Antoine Martin wrote: | |> Well, the problem is that if you don't want to use dhcp, you either have |> to edit some config files on the guest or you have to login and bring |> the netw

Re: [uml-user] looking for network-ready fedora 8 kernel and root fs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Robert P. J. Day wrote: | On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Antoine Martin wrote: | |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- |> Hash: SHA512 |> |> The kernels and filesystems here: |> http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ |> Should all be set to use dhcp net

Re: [uml-user] looking for network-ready fedora 8 kernel and root fs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The kernels and filesystems here: http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ Should all be set to use dhcp network configuration, just start a dhcp server and you should be up and running. Antoine Robert P. J. Day wrote: | as the next step in my UML recipe for fe

Re: [uml-user] ubd0 versus ubda??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 IIRC ubd0=ubda ubd1=ubdb and so on... Antoine Robert P. J. Day wrote: | the first of what will undoubtedly be numerous newbie-level | questions about UML, since i've been perusing the wealth of online | docs for UML and, with few exceptions, all

Re: [uml-user] Problem running UML on my amd64 SKAS4 patched

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 2.6.18 does not have skas4, you need 2.6.24 + skas4 patch for the guest. Antoine Flavio wrote: > Hello! > > I've just upgraded my kernel up to the 2.6.24-gentoo-r2 release, > patching it with the skas4 patch successfully. > Once I try to run UML,

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] skas3 for 2.6.24

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Ryan Finnie wrote: > On Jan 25, 2008 9:01 AM, Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Has anyone managed to apply skas3 to 2.6.24? >> Things have moved around so much that I can't figure out where is what... > &g

Re: [uml-user] 64 bit host ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > Indeed. Mow works fine with a 64 bit UML kernel > (kernel64-2.6.22.12-am1) and a 64-bit filesystem > (FedoraCore6-AMD64-root_fs). > > That kernel that I got from nagafix makes about 52 MB. Quite hefty. > Any reason why it is so large ? Debuggin

Re: [uml-user] uml running problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Use something more recent. 2.6.16 is way too old. Antoine Eddy Zheng Zhang wrote: > Hi, list, > > This is my first time using UML. I have downloaded the UML > "linux-2.6.16.tar.bz2", unzipped, built from source successfully. > But when I run UML b

Re: [uml-user] Reg: Debugging kernel module with UML

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Bhagwan Sahai wrote: > Hello, >My kernal gets panick when I insert my kernel module inside. I have > with me same version of UML kernel compiled and running. I have read > many articles on how to debug kernel module using UML, but they all > wor

Re: [uml-user] request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c

g with mainline and using the latest stable kernel you can find. Antoine > Thanks in advance and sorry for my english. > > Antoine Martin wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Hi to the list, >>> I'm getting confused in the patching procedure, >>> I

Re: [uml-user] A user mode linux problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 WANG Cong wrote: > Hi, list! > > This is my first time to use UML. However, I met the following problem. > After compiling the whole uml, I tried to run it with: > > $ ./linux ubd0=~/Download/Fedora7-x86-root_fs root=/dev/ubd0 > > But it failed a

Re: [uml-user] request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi to the list, > > I'm getting confused in the patching procedure, > > I've compiled as a host on a amd64 the kernel 2.6.18.8 patched with the > skas-freemap-2.6.18-v9-pre9.patch from > http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~bl

Re: [uml-user] Wanted: "Cross-UML"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dominique Quatravaux wrote: > Hi UML people, > > I'd like to be able to use i386 applications under a x86-64 UML (and > who doesn't? :/ ) Following a discussion today with jdike on IRC, we > had the idea of trying to compile a 32-bit UML using a 64-

Re: [uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Nix wrote: > On 20 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I'm afraid that on x86-32 I get an extremely efficient coredump from all >> UML guests with this patch installed :/ however, I haven't tried >> building a skasless 2.6.23 host kernel yet: maybe

Re: [uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jay Shah wrote: > Hey, > >> Thanks for the reply. > No Problem. Please remember to reply to the list address, though. > >> Considering a few of my host kernels are 2.6.9, even going to 2.6.20 >> would be a big step up! >> Good to know that I wasn't

Re: [uml-user] INIT: Id "c2" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 fang zheng wrote: > Hi, > I am working on FedoraCore (linux-2.6.18) and running UML > (linux-2.6.18.1),but when UML boot,some errors happen as fowllowing: > Starting crond: [ OK ] > Starting squid: [ OK ] > Starting xfs: [ OK ] > Starting

Re: [uml-user] network eth0/tap0 problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Christian Beine wrote: > Hi. I build my own root_fs of my running system (redhat 9). > It works fine - but without network. I have problems > setting up the eth0/tap0 device. The lo device is up. > At boot time i get the message: SIOCARDDRT: unknown

Re: [uml-user] newbie building root filesystems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 All the filesystems I have made include the script to (re-)generate them: http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ No Slackware 12 (yet) - but there is a CentOS 5 (==RedHat5 except for the repo) Antoine Mark Lidd wrote: > I can email you a script tomorrow (I thin

Re: [uml-user] Does UML support 64bit environment?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Vishal Soni-G20083 wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > I was able to compile and run 64bit UML on 64bit PC. My end objective is > to run 32bit application on 64bit UML kernel. But i'm unable run 32bit > application on 64bit kernel. > > To run 32bit applicati

Re: [uml-user] How to setup UML cluster and use ocfs2?

Linux Lover wrote: > Hi Jeff, > It seems that aio_reserved3 was removed from (struct iocb).. > So I just removing it from the initialization code in uml. > Am I wrong? ;) That also works, see my post from 2 days ago. Or this patch from Jeff: http://marc.info/?l=user-mode-linux-devel&m=1185219822270

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 09:54:33PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > >>> The BusyBox image just seems broken. If you loop-mount it and chroot >>> bin/sh into it, it dies with a SIGFPX. >>> >>> >> Is this the 32-bit or 64-

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:10:34PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > >> Getting a few people to report which combinations do/don't work would >> also be quite helpful. >> > > The BusyBox image just seems broken. If you loop-mount it a

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

Blaisorblade wrote: >> then all is well - just my >> inexperience showing. But it would also be nice to have an indication one >> way or the other in a prominent place. >> > > Well, stating clearly such a thing is a very good idea - can you do it, > Antoine? > Sure, the only issue that I

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

Richard Andrews wrote: > --- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Recent distros (except slackware) may not work with 2.4 (udev/devfs/etc) >> but apart from that any recent 2.6 kernel should do (bearing in mind >> that few bugfixes are backported (exc

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

Richard Andrews wrote: > Which uml guest kernels should be used with which filesystem images (does it > matter)? > I'm asking because I assume that more recent distros will make use of kernel > features which are not present in older kernels. > Recent distros (except slackware) may not work with

Re: [uml-user] iptables modules

Haywood Floyd wrote: > Hi, > > I downloaded the debian 3.1 file system and debian 4.0 file system. > After the uml boot, i typed at the shell prompt > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE > he replays with > FATAL: Module ip_tables not found. > iptables v1.3.6: can't initial

Re: [uml-user] another small brken link on the nagafix uml website

Urs Rau wrote: > Hi Antoine, > > Thank you soo much for the uml files you provide. Sorry it is taking me > so long to help with feedback for Jeff Dike, so that the uml will also > work out of the box under fedora 7 and rhel 5. Wish there were more > hours in the day. > > Sorry back on subject, I

Re: [uml-user] how to get uml going on a fully patched and up-to-date CentOS 5 machine?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Urs Rau wrote: > Antoine, > > Antoine Martin wrote: >> Urs Rau wrote: >>> I get the error: >>> arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c: In function âstart_ptraced_childâ: >>> arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c:110: error: âPA

Re: [uml-user] Trying to run X11 inside UML

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Partha R wrote: > Hi All, > > I need some help in setting up X11 inside UML - it hangs after the > following set of messages: > ~/uml/linux-2.6.18$ ./linux ubd0=debian-3.0r0.ext2 stderr=1 > . > TCP: Hash tables configured (es

Re: [uml-user] how to get uml going on a fully patched and up-to-date CentOS 5 machine?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Urs Rau wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:07:16PM +0100, Urs Rau wrote: >>> What should I do on a CentOS 5 box that runs 2.6.18-8.1.4.el5xen? AFAIK >>> there is not going to be a higher than 2.6.19.5 kernel for this very >>> rec

[uml-user] [ANNOUNCE] Fedora 7 + CentOS 5 images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, I've just finished some new images (x86 and amd64): http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/Fedora7/ http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/CentOS-5/ (uploading now) As usual, the pages include the scripts used to (re)create the images. Works-for-me (tm) Antoine

Re: [uml-user] swap file

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Haywood Floyd wrote: > I'm sorry for that. I just click reply, not replay to all. My mistake. > Thanks for kernel info. > > I am looking for debian 3.1 r* Sarge, or above, filesystems ? Debian 4.0 here: http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ Debian 3.1 here: ht

Re: [uml-user] swap space

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 kewlemer wrote: >> >> > Warning: couldn't stat file: /root/.uml/linux/mconsole - No such file >> > or directory >> > Warning: couldn't stat file: /tmp/uml/linux/mconsole - No such file >> or directory >> > Sending command to 'linux' : Connection refu

Re: [uml-user] hostfs broken?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > I am running 2.6.18-bb1 on the vm (blaisorblade's precompiled binary), Have you tried something more recent? There have been lots of fixes to hostfs since 2.6.18-bb1! > and 2.6.20-15-server (linux kernel from ubuntu package) on the host. PS: we s

Re: [uml-user] was "forkbomb into guest" - help with SuSE

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Prasad, Please stop hijacking threads. As for SuSE, I do not know. But it looks like some error with your host kernel. Try updating it or/and using a more recent guest. Antoine battipatisainagendra Bhavaniprasad wrote: > Hi all, >This

Re: [uml-user] not booting into UML :(

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 srikanth wrote: > > > Hi, i learnt about UML from a kernel-debugging workshop.. :) > > I* am running FC5 (kernel:2.6.15) on my system. * > > T*he new kernel for UML is a 2.6.20. * Try to 2.6.21.1 (more likely to work ok) > *Where to enable /proc

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] doubt in debugging.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 battipatisainagendra Bhavaniprasad wrote: > Hi, > Does Suse linux consist of skas patch bult in??? No, I am not aware of any vendor kernels that contain the skas patch. Antoine > > rgds, > Prasad > >

Re: [uml-user] Problem installing FC4 guest using NFS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 David Bull wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to install a Fedora UML image over NFS and I'm having some > issues. From a couple of websites I found it looks like it should be > possible: > > http://linuxhacker.ru/uml/ > http://web.archive.org/web/2006011

Re: [uml-user] UML based web hosting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Flavio wrote: > Hi Jeff! > > Now I perfectly understand what your purpouses are and I agree with > you as regard tool set personalization. > Actually there are many hosting companies that are not allowing the > root access to their servers. > A tipi

  1   2   3   >