Re: General Question in JSP

2004-10-26 Thread Jack
I am not sure why what I said does not make sense to you, Rajesh. When you do something with a processor, it takes time. So, of course, if you run the code you mentioned it will take the time it takes. Is there something other than that you are asking? I appreciate that we may be looking at a b

Re: General Question in JSP

2004-10-26 Thread Dakota Jack
I personally use a multithreaded pool for my database connections. Jack On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:40:10 +0200, dmu2201 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rajesh wrote: > > > Hai McGrady > > > >I cant get you . > > > >I am writing a public final class

Re: LookupDispatchAction problem with double byte resource files

2004-10-27 Thread Dakota Jack
better alternatives in various places. Some of them are itemized at http://www.michaelmcgrady.com/button/ . Jack On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:17:56 -0600, Kumar V Kadiyala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using LookupDispatchAction to submit a form with multiple s

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
ur question has been extensively discussed in the lists and you can find the answers you need at: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user&r=1&w=2 Jack On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:14:15 -0400, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you've coded your app without hard r

[OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
les at all. LOL Jack On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:45:20 -0400, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, as of Struts 1.1, you only had to hard code the '.do' in a few tags. > As of Struts 1.2.4, every struts tag (that needs to) will let you specify > action="/myAc

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
rson that said that the tags always add ".do" was mistaken. What you say, of course, is right. Jack On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:07:02 -0400, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are mistaken that the tags add ".do". They don't. > > The tags

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
spankMe ? (Think I might have lost that client) > > > > > > > > > > -- > > James Mitchell > > Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist > > EdgeTech, Inc. > > 678.910.8017 > > AIM: jmitchtx > > > > - Original Messag

Re: LookupDispatchAction problem with double byte resource files - working with DisplayTag ?

2004-10-29 Thread Dakota Jack
other dispatch action in struts whose name I have forgotten. Anyway, with that you don't need the parameter value or to use struts-config at all, except for other issues with respect to action mapping. Jack On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:46:53 -0700 (PDT), lixin chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: LookupDispatchAction problem with double byte resource files - working with DisplayTag ?

2004-10-30 Thread Dakota Jack
thing here. I don't have time to look at it in further detail at this time. Jack On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:46:53 -0700 (PDT), lixin chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi jack, > thanks, the solution is cool ! I am trying it. > > a small problem i am experiencing now is that

Re: LookupDispatchAction problem with double byte resource files - working with DisplayTag ?

2004-10-30 Thread Dakota Jack
ot;.dispatch" as a suffix, e.g. property=myAction.suffix. Jack On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 05:18:41 -0700 (PDT), lixin chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > problem solved - I made a mistake in the JSP file, > here is the right one to return a parameter for a > submit button: >prop

Wikie Page Hits

2004-10-30 Thread Dakota Jack
Is the page hits functionality on the Jakarta Wikis not working? Jack -- "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." ~Native Proverb~ "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows." ~Hunkesni (Sitt

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts Dialogs: DispatchAction on steroids

2005-06-07 Thread Dakota Jack
for DialogAction and amples is located at: > Folder: > > https://easywizard.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=3494&expandFolder=3494&folderID=3494 > File name: > strutsdialog.zip > > Michael Jouravlev. > >

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts Dialogs: DispatchAction on steroids

2005-06-09 Thread Dakota Jack
TED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts Dialogs: DispatchAction on steroids

2005-06-09 Thread Dakota Jack
to a problem that bears directly on what you are doing without you even knowing about the problem, i.e. name.x and name.y, is pretty weird, no? Very weird. On 6/9/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/9/05, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I still am

Re: [Fwd: Re: [fileUpload] Question about file name]

2005-06-09 Thread Dakota Jack
trick, no? > > > Martin Cooper > > -- > Frank W. Zammetti > Founder and Chief Software Architect > Omnytex Technologies > http://www.omnytex.com > > - > To unsubscr

Re: LookupDispatchAction

2005-06-14 Thread Dakota Jack
. > With images scaled form looks weird. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --

Re: LookupDispatchAction

2005-06-14 Thread Dakota Jack
l. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: long struts-config.xml file

2005-06-18 Thread Dakota Jack
ems on configure file so I used > > another MVC approach. If I know I could do this way, I may stick with > > struts in this large project. > > > > If you had struggles with editing a large configuration file, I

Re: [ANN] Java Web Parts release

2005-06-20 Thread Dakota Jack
CTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Market Share / Best of Breed

2005-06-21 Thread Dakota Jack
Anyone have figures on the market share and best of breed analyses on J2EE, .NET, COBOL, etc.? Thanks for any assistance ahead of time. -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~D

Re: Market Share / Best of Breed

2005-06-21 Thread Dakota Jack
lab/languages.html > Martin- > - Original Message ----- > From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:16 AM > Subject: Market Share / Best of Breed > > > Anyone have figures on

Re: Anyone going to JavaOne!

2005-06-26 Thread Dakota Jack
> ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Form-Action combo

2005-06-26 Thread Dakota Jack
patch to Bugzilla and encourage people to vote? > > Michael. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back

Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-01 Thread Dakota Jack
pplication, > otherwise you spend lots of time on getters and setters. > > .NET is good technology but it can not work on other systems. I like .net's > web services. Overall, I still like Java better than .net. > > I had designed rather large Java-based system with J2EE

Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-01 Thread Dakota Jack
ditional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-01 Thread Dakota Jack
> So good GUIs to automate repeatable codes are neccessary to cut those 5 > million dollars. > > Jack H. Xu > Technology columnist and editor > > http://www.usanalyst.com > > http://www.getusjobs.com (The largest free job portal in North America) > > > >

Re: Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-01 Thread Dakota Jack
No, I don't. This is a really superficial analysis. On 7/1/05, John Henry Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > V., in any cases of programming, more lines and more classes means more work > and more money. Don't you agree? > > Jack H. Xu > Technology

Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-01 Thread Dakota Jack
s to JSF and > other things such as spring and hibernate,we are in very good shape again. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- &q

Re: [OT] Re: Unacceptable Behaviour of Mark Galbreath

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
ECTED]> wrote: > Here is a thought: > > If Dakota Jack has been thought by some to be multiple people/posters, why > couldn't this Ilias Lazaridis be another 'personality' of Mark Galbreath, or > even another 'identity' of Dakota Jack himself? > > R

Re: [OT] Re: Unacceptable Behaviour of Mark Galbreath

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
with the evil > Dr. Multiple Personality. Same list time, same > list channel! > > And now back to your regularly scheduled POSTS. > > =-=-= > > Regards with impish grins OFTEN, > David Friedman > > -Original Message- > From: Dakota Jack [mail

Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
t; comparison than JSF vs .NET (as you suggested in another email). > > Jack H. Xu > Technology columnist and editor > > http://www.usanalyst.com > > http://www.getusjobs.com (The largest free job portal in North America) > > - Original Message - > From: &quo

Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
; - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
No, Xu go first! LOL On 7/2/05, John Henry Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dakota Jack, > > Do you always accuse people don't understand framework if they don't > agree with you? > > You need evidence to back up your claims. Show us some large struts web &g

Re: [OT] Re: Unacceptable Behaviour of Mark Galbreath

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
I am a lawyer. I suggest you stop trying to analyse the law. You have no clue. On 7/2/05, Aleksandar Matijaca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/2/05, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The first person who steps far enough over the line is going to be > > slam

Re: [OT] Re: Unacceptable Behaviour of Mark Galbreath

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
You know what a "canard" is Newton? On 7/2/05, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dakota Jack wrote: > > >The first person who steps far enough over the line is going to be > >slammed with a lawsuit by yours truly. You are getting close > >Friedman

Re: [OT] Re: Unacceptable Behaviour of Mark Galbreath

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
5, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The first person who steps far enough over the line is going to be > > slammed with a lawsuit by yours truly. You are getting close > > A lawsuit?? On the basis of what?? Slander? On the internet > you can say anything you wa

Re: Struts vs .NET??? -> Real Stats

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
sharp corners of what you > are currently using that you have grown too used to for them to register as > worth fixing. > > } Regards > } Leon > --Greg > > > - > To unsubscr

Re: J2EE vs .Net (was Struts vs .NET???)

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
Xy, where is the column that makes you a oolumnist? On 7/2/05, John Henry Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Show us a portal application. > > or anything you think was decent. (not hello world. -) > > I know some also but they seems not developed by D.J. (joking) > &

Re: J2EE vs .Net (was Struts vs .NET???)

2005-07-02 Thread Dakota Jack
However, I did not see struts' > signature from there yet by trying to filling some forms. > It looks like JSP-servlets handling form submision. > > One former site that used struts is reuters.com. Now they have > redesigned/re-developed the site with Asp.net. > > Jack

Re: Struts vs .NET??? -> Real Stats

2005-07-04 Thread Dakota Jack
Actually, this did not help me at all. I understand that differences, etc. I just wondered what you thought, since I thought your conclusions were contrary to the facts. On 7/3/05, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 11:48:37PM -0700, Dakota Jack wrote:

Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-04 Thread Dakota Jack
I didn't ask how Mono runs on Apple, did I? On 7/3/05, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 11:34:44PM -0700, Dakota Jack wrote: > } And how does C# run on Apple? LOL > > See http://www.mono-p

Re: Struts vs .NET???

2005-07-06 Thread Dakota Jack
but once you learn it you can apply it to > any app or other apps that are coded with it. Conversely, if we take > your "JSP+Javabean+taglibs only" application it will be much more > difficult for a new person to the application to understand (again, y

Re: Struts MVC design

2005-07-06 Thread Dakota Jack
t; > The above is possible with adding of only two action classes to classic > Struts. > > Michael > > -- > Struts Dialogs > http://struts.sourceforge.net/strutsdialogs > > - > To unsubscribe, e-

Re: banned

2005-07-07 Thread Dakota Jack
as a whole. > > Craig McClanahan > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OT] Re: Unacceptable Behaviour of Mark Galbreath

2005-07-12 Thread Dakota Jack
> > Sent: 11 July 2005 21:34 > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Unacceptable Behaviour of Mark Galbreath > > > > Dakota Jack wrote: > > > > >You know what a "canard" is New

Re: basic struts question using a Map in an ActionForm

2005-07-15 Thread Dakota Jack
ubt look at the docs:) > > The above worked fine..and then... > > > > -- > Rick > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but

Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-21 Thread Dakota Jack
uot;You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Polymorphism

2005-07-21 Thread Dakota Jack
> > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
> If you still think there are ownership issues, then you need to raise them > on the bugzilla ticket to which Michael Jouravlev has posted his code - > otherwise your comments are likely to get lost here on the user list. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3029

Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
equently removed it - but I did > find the following "wiki change message" in the dev list archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg03379.html > > If you still think there are ownership issues, then you need to raise them > on the bugzilla ticket

Re: [FRIDAY] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
to image > >button parameters to determine the method to execute as being "code > >purloined from Michael McGrady"? (If not, then what?) > > > > > No offense to anybody, but hasn't everybody had to deal with this issue > in one way or another if they

Re: [FRIDAY] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
5, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/21/05, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This code does not belong to Michael. It is purloined from > > www.michaelmcgrady.com and other discussion on this list. Michael did > > not even know the reasons for

Re: [FRIDAY] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
n't), but I'm just making the point that I find it nice to have > one consistent way of doing things that's easy for other developers to > follow. > > -- > Rick > > - > To unsubs

Re: [FRIDAY] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
ing. > > Michael. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [FRIDAY] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
AIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-22 Thread Dakota Jack
Guess the topic of code was too tiresome for Craig, Niall, and David G., once again. On 7/22/05, David G. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone put that list of assumed or presumed identities > for Dakota Jack on the Wiki? Trying to keep up with that > list makes my

Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-23 Thread Dakota Jack
05, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dakota Jack wrote: > > >Guess the topic of code was too tiresome for Craig, Niall, and David > >G., once again. > > > > > No no, I think you misinter

Re: [FRIDAY] J2EE Web frameworks are in a state of flux

2005-07-23 Thread Dakota Jack
reasons that have been discussed in detail here and elsewhere. -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How to cancel a cancel

2005-07-23 Thread Dakota Jack
from a certain flow it allows me to call my prep() method and prep > > the reulting page with whatever it needs for display. > > I second that approach. Instead that I use redirect instead of > forward, so all request parameters including Cancel are cleared &g

Re: [FRIDAY] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-24 Thread Dakota Jack
pt checkbox case I described) comes up. > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [FRIDAY] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-25 Thread Dakota Jack
gt; > different it is than the other lookup action McGrady submitted? > > I agree, McGrady's approach using suffix instead of prefix is easier, > works for regular or image buttons. I used his code and submitted it > to Bugzilla. Jack, is it OK with you that I submitted your c

Re: [FRIDAY] J2EE Web frameworks are in a state of flux

2005-07-25 Thread Dakota Jack
horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OT] Re: SelectAction - an improved DispatchAction

2005-07-25 Thread Dakota Jack
ECTED]> wrote: > Dakota Jack wrote: > > >Then there is Dave, dear sweet, but > > > > > *awww* > > >ever so odd, Dave, closer to Fig than Isaac. > > > That much might be true; we have a fairly detailed family tree back to > the very late 1500s and

Re: JSF is the beginning of the end of Struts !!!

2005-07-28 Thread Dakota Jack
_ > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

Re: JSF is the beginning of the end of Struts !!!

2005-07-28 Thread Dakota Jack
> >>> > >>>http://www.GetusJobs.com (The largest free job portal in North America) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> - Original Message - > >>> From: netsql > >>> To: user@struts.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: JSF is the beginning o

Re: JSF is the beginning of the end of Struts !!!

2005-07-29 Thread Dakota Jack
Committers have a way of speaking for the world. That is a wonderful thing. I can only speak for myself. I can also only listen for myself. On 7/28/05, Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael / Jack / Thingamabob, > > Struts is licensed in such a way that if you a

Re: JSF is the beginning of the end of Struts !!!

2005-07-29 Thread Dakota Jack
jmitchtx > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skype: jmitchtx > > > > On Jul 29, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Dakota Jack wrote: > > > Committers have a way of speaking for the world. That is a wonderful > > thing. I can only speak for myself. I can also only li

Re: JSF is the beginning of the end of Struts !!!

2005-07-29 Thread Dakota Jack
/ Open Source Evangelist > Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance > EdgeTech, Inc. > http://www.edgetechservices.net/ > 678.910.8017 > AIM: jmitchtx > Yahoo: jmitchtx > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skype: jmitchtx > > > > On Jul 29, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Dakota Jack wr

Re: OT: Good Java host

2005-07-31 Thread Dakota Jack
ail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [STRUTS 2X]: Ideas

2005-08-02 Thread Dakota Jack
wants to join in. If anyone is interested in pursuing this from the bottom up and also understands what is going on, let me know and we can work together on getting a base started. The first thing I am going to do is to see if the web fr

Re: Does affect ?

2005-08-04 Thread Dakota Jack
ork. > > Struts 1.2.4 (? I guess) > > Michael. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."

Re: DTOs are evil

2005-08-05 Thread Dakota Jack
--- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [OT] What to choose: Struts, JSF, Shale or Spring

2005-08-05 Thread Dakota Jack
> > > > Craig > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -

Re: Why interface

2005-08-11 Thread Dakota Jack
Os for Hibernate, not just the base class? > > Obviously though the business tier is coded to the interface so is > unaffected. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, > > Adam > > -

Re: Locale Aware Form Objects?

2005-08-14 Thread Dakota Jack
> > Is there any reason not to? (Form Scoping issues? etc) > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > > > -Joe > > > > > > > > --- > avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. > Virus Database (VPS): 0532-6, 08/13/2005 > Tested on: 8/14/2005 9:58:18 AM > avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software. > http://www.avast.com > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Locale Aware Form Objects?

2005-08-15 Thread Dakota Jack
On 8/14/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Jack: he's not talking about > localizing natural language data entered by the user, that's clearly not > feasible!] Fair enough! Out of curiosity, how do you "edit" the data without "natural language

Re: Locale Aware Form Objects?

2005-08-15 Thread Dakota Jack
I know how you edit. How do you edit an i18n file? That is something that is a bit of a mystery to me. Don't you see the problem? Imagine doing it. On 8/15/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dakota Jack wrote: > > On 8/14/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Check Disk space before file upload

2005-08-23 Thread Dakota Jack
--- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Check Disk space before file upload

2005-08-24 Thread Dakota Jack
Thanks! On 8/23/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > You can grab the latest version off the Bugzilla ticket: > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36325 > > It's one of those things that you'll look at the code a

Re: Is Struts Evolving (was ... Dying?)

2005-08-27 Thread Dakota Jack
gridlock that afflicts mature projects. And, happily, this approach > also makes room for the new kids on the block, like Shale and Ti > <https://www.twdata.org/projects/struts-ti>. > > HTH, Ted. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~

Re: JSF -> Shale transition

2005-09-07 Thread Dakota Jack
purely a component architecture. > > Craig McClanahan > > Regards, > > Kaleb > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JSF -> Shale transition

2005-09-08 Thread Dakota Jack
al jsp/servlet specs) to something that defines > interactions more concretely. Our current frustrations include form > handling, page transitions, forwarding, etc. > > Regards, > Kaleb > > -Original Message- > From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > S

Re: Who decides?

2005-09-09 Thread Dakota Jack
you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JSF -> Shale transition

2005-09-09 Thread Dakota Jack
ation processing pretty high? > > > > In perspective, vanilla servlet programming is faster than Struts. > > Isn't it relative to what you *value* in a web framework. > > Gary > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JSF -> Shale transition

2005-09-09 Thread Dakota Jack
iday right?:) > > -- > Rick > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on i

Re: Who decides?

2005-09-10 Thread Dakota Jack
do. What I was saying is that the community is unstable and that a person starting an application would be taking a risk at this point starting with Struts. On 9/10/05, Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dakota Jack on 10/09/05 07:09, wrote: > > I sympathize entirely with

Re: Who decides?

2005-09-10 Thread Dakota Jack
t; > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Who decides?

2005-09-10 Thread Dakota Jack
fetime of the > > technology will correspond with the lifetime of the application you build on > > > top of it. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. > > ... > > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Who decides?

2005-09-11 Thread Dakota Jack
ed in the first place, this spaghetti would not be necessary. -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Who decides?

2005-09-11 Thread Dakota Jack
or Spring over > Struts is the stability of the project? > > > Dakota Jack on 10/09/05 21:24, wrote: > > The main issue, Adam, was stability. I believe that my statements > > were useful for the person asking the question. I am not interested > > in being "non-

Re: How do I prefill a form

2005-02-09 Thread Dakota Jack
the form and do so in your action then the information will be there. So, you need to show us what you are doing. My guess is that the data stored is null. But, without seeing your code, I cannot tell for sure. Jack -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its

Re: How do I prefill a form

2005-02-09 Thread Dakota Jack
bean from the > request. The bean exists and has the previously entered > information. Something is wrong here. You said the information was stored in the session, but here you are retrieving it from the request. If you are retrieving it from the request, it should be in the form, right? Pl

Re: Handle images path in one place

2005-02-10 Thread Dakota Jack
different, e.g. resource.do?alias='dog'> or but the idea is the same. The difference in the tag should tell you how it is done. Jack -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." "Heaven has changed. The Sky now goes all the

Re: Submit button and MyAction

2005-02-12 Thread Dakota Jack
; For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." "Heaven has changed. The Sky now goes all the way to our feet. ~Dakota Jack~ "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged info

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts subproject: Struts Flow

2005-02-17 Thread Dakota Jack
At the risk of causing people to run around in little circles [ ;-) ], can you tell me what Faces is? Is that MyFaces? How does Faces differ from Shale? Thanks for any information. If the question upsets anyone, my apologies. Jack On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:03:32 -0800, Don Brown <[EM

[OT] Gmail Invites

2005-02-17 Thread Dakota Jack
I have 50 gmail invites, if anyone wants one. Jack -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." "Heaven has changed. The Sky now goes all the way to our feet. ~Dakota Jack~ "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged informa

Re: Struts or SpringFramework

2005-02-17 Thread Dakota Jack
I assume you know this but just in case: Struts (a web application framework) is not a "rival" not for the Spring Framework (which is a lightweight j2ee applicatoin framework). I assume, then, that you must mean the standard web application framework that comes with Spring? Is that ri

Re: Struts or SpringFramework

2005-02-17 Thread Dakota Jack
code behind the Spring framework.) 'Hope this is helpful. Jack -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." "Heaven has changed. The Sky now goes all the way to our feet. ~Dakota Jack~ "This message may contain confidential and/or pr

Re: Strange Behaviour (ClassNotFoundException)

2005-02-18 Thread Dakota Jack
other web developers have had this kind of > problem before, or indeed if anyone knows how I can fix it. > > Thank you for any help. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Yo

Re: Struts or SpringFramework

2005-02-18 Thread Dakota Jack
Exactly, Wendy, what is intended is very hard to track. Jack > Wait... I think it was Joe who said that if we had never cared about the > Struts RequestProcessor up to now, we could ignore 'chain' since it is just > replacing things behind the scenes inside Struts. >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >