Why are you submitting other people's code and then being a smart ass about it? If it were my option, I wouild say "not in a million years". I don't think you ever have that authority anyway. But, ask McGrady, who already said, if you check the lists, that he doesn't want the code in Struts, probably for the reasons he stated, which are very different from yours.. If you continue on this tack, I would strongly recommend you learn how the code actually works before claiming it is yours. I get a huge kick, however, out of the fact that no one else is calling you out on this, even though the facts are as clear as they ever will be that you are not the author of spit. Why don't you do your own code and then submit that?
On 7/25/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/23/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyway, sorry for being overly excited, I might have said something > > > wrong. I just wanted Struts to continue to evolve. Seems that I chose > > > a bad class to submit. > > > > I don't think it's a bad class to submit - I'm just not sure how > > different it is than the other lookup action McGrady submitted? > > I agree, McGrady's approach using suffix instead of prefix is easier, > works for regular or image buttons. I used his code and submitted it > to Bugzilla. Jack, is it OK with you that I submitted your code? > > Maybe I should just patch DispatchAction class, keeping the name and > simply adding functionality? > > Michael. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
