Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Feedback for 48 hours

2010-02-25 Thread Kevin Godby
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Benjamin Humphrey wrote: > Hi guys, > So as most of you should know, not only was 48 hours a chance for us to > actually get some stuff done and teach new people about the manual project, > but it was also a chance to test out some new stuff, like ClassBot, Lernid,

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] New code

2010-02-25 Thread Kevin Godby
Hey, Ben. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Ben <6180339g...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hopefully I haven't gotten too annoying ... :) Nah, we're just working out all the kinks in the script. > FYI, I had to manually install ccicons, following the readme ... and it > still didn't work. It's finding th

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Getting going and hit a speed bump, LaTex 2009 install and install_pkgs.sh

2010-02-25 Thread Kevin Godby
Hello, Maia. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM, maia grotepass wrote: > I am trying to get the environment sorted to work on this project and I am >  having a few problems. I have a relatively clean Karmic install and I > didn't have any Tex version installed. I followed the instructions on the > H

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] New code

2010-02-25 Thread Kevin Godby
Hello, Ben. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Ben <6180339g...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I tried reinstalling and re-running your script. Both processes were > happy until I attempted a 'make show', when it complained about beramono and > libertine (I think ... logs attached). Thanks for reporting

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] New code

2010-02-25 Thread Kevin Godby
Hello, Jamin. 2010/2/25 Jamin Day : > I'm also having issues compiling the pdf through Ground Control. > I followed the instructions on the wiki to remove all previous texlive > packages and install texlive 2009. I'm using English only so didn't install > any language or documentation packs. Then

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] New code

2010-02-25 Thread Kevin Godby
Hello, Martin. 2010/2/25 Martin Lukeš : > I don't know if I'm not late. ;) > I ran new install-pkgs.sh and it installed some packages, but "Make > Translated PDF" still wants three-times press Enter and Evince still doesn't > open. > But as it was before - compiled .pdf seems fine with no errors.

[Ubuntu-manual] List of LaTeX commands

2010-02-25 Thread Jamin Day
Hi all, I am compiling a list of any LaTeX commands we are using throughout the manual. There are a number of commands we are using (some specific to our manual) that aren't clearly documented anywhere and our 'Technical Help' wiki page hasn't been updated for a while with some of the newer ones (

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Sindhudweep Sarkar
opengpg has a command for exporting secret keys.. You can always create a new ssh key and register it with launchpad, or you can copy the ~/.ssh folder to your new machine if you want to transfer ssh keys. Seahorse might have some facility for both of these too. -Sindhudweep. On Thu, Feb 25, 20

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Bryan Behrenshausen
Yes. So far, it's working very much like that! Result! Now I need only worry about how to transfer my OpenGPG and SSH keys with me when I reformat the computer and upgrade to Lucid next month. But that's an adventure for another day. ___ Mailing list:

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Benjamin Humphrey
Sweet. Once you get used to it you'll find it's really cool, just open it up, pull the latest changes, then work on some stuff, pull again to make sure no one has pushed while you've been working, then you just commit and push and then bam! On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Bryan Behrenshausen < b

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Feedback for 48 hours

2010-02-25 Thread Josh Holland
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:56:21AM +1300, Benjamin Humphrey wrote: > Hi guys, > > So as most of you should know, not only was 48 hours a chance for us to > actually get some stuff done and teach new people about the manual project, > but it was also a chance to test out some new stuff, like ClassB

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Bryan Behrenshausen
Duly noted. I'm just happy to have a concrete workflow! On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Benjamin Humphrey wrote: > That's great! Actually, smaller and more often pushes are better. Lots of > people working on stuff all the time, reduces the chance of ugly merges and > file conflicts. > > On 26/

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Benjamin Humphrey
That's great! Actually, smaller and more often pushes are better. Lots of people working on stuff all the time, reduces the chance of ugly merges and file conflicts. On 26/02/2010 11:52 AM, "Bryan Behrenshausen" wrote: Now they are! I just reviewed the bazaar commands everyone sent, and managed

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Bryan Behrenshausen
Now they are! I just reviewed the bazaar commands everyone sent, and managed to push /commit my changes. Thanks to everyone for your patience and support. In the future, I will not be making multiple tiny changes (rather, I will focus on larger revisions at longer intervals), but today was about

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Benjamin Humphrey
Bryan, they're working fine: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual/ubuntu-manual/main On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Benjamin Humphrey wrote: > Yeah you could be committing but not pushing > > On 26/02/2010 11:39 AM, "Elan Kugelmass" wrote: > > Did you push your commits up to launc

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Benjamin Humphrey
Yeah you could be committing but not pushing On 26/02/2010 11:39 AM, "Elan Kugelmass" wrote: Did you push your commits up to launchpad? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-manual/Help#How to make changes the RIGHT way Elan On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Bryan Behrenshausen wrote: > > Hi folks

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Elan Kugelmass
Did you push your commits up to launchpad? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-manual/Help#How to make changes the RIGHT way Elan On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Bryan Behrenshausen wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm new to the team (just finished configuring my machine this > afternoon), and will be acti

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Feedback for 48 hours

2010-02-25 Thread Elan Kugelmass
My Lernid instance started with only the web browser portion visible, so I was initially confused by the lack of IRC and slides. I eventually realized that those frames had been collapsed. I would also recommend more IRC settings in Lernid. I imagine the interface could a little more full-featured

[Ubuntu-manual] Revisions

2010-02-25 Thread Bryan Behrenshausen
Hi folks, I'm new to the team (just finished configuring my machine this afternoon), and will be acting as another proofreader/copyeditor on Jamin's team. I recently filed three revisions using bazaar (#s 321, 322, and 323) but they haven't appeared on the revisions list for the main branch in La

[Ubuntu-manual] Feedback for 48 hours

2010-02-25 Thread Benjamin Humphrey
Hi guys, So as most of you should know, not only was 48 hours a chance for us to actually get some stuff done and teach new people about the manual project, but it was also a chance to test out some new stuff, like ClassBot, Lernid, Ground Control etc. I've told the heads of these projects that I

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Edition?

2010-02-25 Thread Benjamin Humphrey
I agree with ilya. All going to plan we'll only have one edition each release. On 26/02/2010 10:07 AM, "Ilya Haykinson" wrote: I suggest that we keep the edition within the context of an Ubuntu version. So: title = "Getting Started with Ubuntu 10.04", subtitle = "First edition" title = "Getting

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Edition?

2010-02-25 Thread Ilya Haykinson
I suggest that we keep the edition within the context of an Ubuntu version. So: title = "Getting Started with Ubuntu 10.04", subtitle = "First edition" title = "Getting Started with Ubuntu 10.04", subtitle = "Second edition" title = "Getting Started with Ubuntu 10.04", subtitle = "Third edition" .

[Ubuntu-manual] [Blueprint chapter6] Chapter 6 - System Maintenance and Security

2010-02-25 Thread Bryan G. Behrenshausen
Blueprint changed by Bryan G. Behrenshausen: Whiteboard changed: Kelvin Gardner now writing for Chapter 6 + Bryan Behrenshausen registered as editor -- Chapter 6 - System Maintenance and Security https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/+spec/chapter6 ___

[Ubuntu-manual] Getting going and hit a speed bump, LaTex 2009 install and install_pkgs.sh

2010-02-25 Thread maia grotepass
I am trying to get the environment sorted to work on this project and I am having a few problems. I have a relatively clean Karmic install and I didn't have any Tex version installed. I followed the instructions on the Help page on the wiki and Prerequisites page. I installed groundcontrol and got

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Edition?

2010-02-25 Thread সাজেদুর রহিম জোয়ারদ ার
I supports Nasir Khan Saikat. রিং +8801671411437 2010/2/26 Nasir Khan Saikat > i think Daniel Schury's suggestion is the most suitable solution. But i > want to add that instead of using the release date we may use the the terms > "first edition", "second edition" . then then name will be "Ubu

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Edition?

2010-02-25 Thread Daniel Schury
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What about following Ubuntu? Calling the upcoming release Ubuntu Manual 10.04, the next 10.10? So it would be clear, to which Ubuntu Version the manual belongs. If it is planned to release updated versions between the Ubuntu releases, what about namin

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Edition?

2010-02-25 Thread Nasir Khan Saikat
i think Daniel Schury's suggestion is the most suitable solution. But i want to add that instead of using the release date we may use the the terms "first edition", "second edition" . then then name will be "Ubuntu Manual 10.04, First edition" , "Ubuntu Manual 10.10, Third Edition" ... On Fri, Feb

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Edition?

2010-02-25 Thread Daniel Schury
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> What about following Ubuntu? Calling the upcoming release Ubuntu Manual >> 10.04, the next 10.10? So it would be clear, to which Ubuntu Version the >> manual belongs. > > The Ubuntu version is part of the title: > "Getting Started with Ubuntu 10.04

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Edition?

2010-02-25 Thread Thorsten Wilms
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 19:12 +0100, Daniel Schury wrote: > What about following Ubuntu? Calling the upcoming release Ubuntu Manual > 10.04, the next 10.10? So it would be clear, to which Ubuntu Version the > manual belongs. The Ubuntu version is part of the title: "Getting Started with Ubuntu 10.0

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Edition?

2010-02-25 Thread Thorsten Wilms
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 06:45 +1300, Benjamin Humphrey wrote: > My original plan was to have version 1.0 for lucid, then revisions to > lucid would be like 1.1, 1.2 etc. > > Then the release for 10.10/lucid+1 could either be 2.0 or we just > repeat what we've done for this release, 0.x for developm

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] New code

2010-02-25 Thread Martin Lukeš
I don't know if I'm not late. ;) I ran new install-pkgs.sh and it installed some packages, but "Make Translated PDF" still wants three-times press Enter and Evince still doesn't open. But as it was before - compiled .pdf seems fine with no errors. And again .log files are attached. --- Regards Mar

[Ubuntu-manual] Edition?

2010-02-25 Thread Thorsten Wilms
Hi! I proposed to use "Second Edition" and so on to mark follow-up releases of our document as long as it is targeted at the same Ubuntu version (Lucid). Today Kevin made a good point about "Edition" implying additions or changes to the content beyond simple corrections. He suggested to use a co