On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 06:45 +1300, Benjamin Humphrey wrote: > My original plan was to have version 1.0 for lucid, then revisions to > lucid would be like 1.1, 1.2 etc. > > Then the release for 10.10/lucid+1 could either be 2.0 or we just > repeat what we've done for this release, 0.x for development and 1.0 > for first release.
Yes, that's what I wanted to avoid. We can't expect that our readers know the meaning of the major.minor scheme, but most people should have a reasonably good idea of what a "2nd Edition, "2nd Version" or "2nd Release" is supposed to mean, it's just that my initial proposal with "Edition" might set too far reaching expectations. I really don't want to see a 1.1 document for Ubuntu 10.04, even less a 2.0 for 10.10 ... -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual Post to : ubuntu-manual@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
