On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:58 PM, 郭志鹏 wrote:
> i want to ask some question but I first use email list and this slack so if
> I do something wrong please criticize me
Thank you for your interest. The Ubuntu Slack was an experiment and
has not really been used in months, so I don't think it woul
On 08/03/16 19:47, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Please, don't write my e-mail address in any slack.com form without my
> consent.
Now why would we do that? You are not even an active team member... If people
want to join they can ask.
>
>
> El 08/03/16 a les 01:09, Tim ha escrit:
>>
>> On 08/03/16 04
Please, don't write my e-mail address in any slack.com form without my
consent.
El 08/03/16 a les 01:09, Tim ha escrit:
>
>
> On 08/03/16 04:50, Alfredo Hernández wrote:
>> Any updates about this?
> For now we have #gnome on ubuntu.slack.org, although at this stage the Ubuntu
> instance is rea
On 08/03/16 04:50, Alfredo Hernández wrote:
> Any updates about this?
For now we have #gnome on ubuntu.slack.org, although at this stage the Ubuntu
instance is really just a test. People need to be invited unless
they have an ubuntu email address, however any user can invite more people.
>
> Has
y
all have to agree on one flavour. That flavour is going to be chocolate or
vanilla every time. Groups of people don't agree on what's cool or interesting,
they agree on what's easy to agree on.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Slack
Local Time: March 7, 2016 6:50
Any updates about this?
Has Slack been set up for Ubuntu GNOME? Are there any (unlimited + free)
alternatives?
Ali has a point, Slack (and similar products) are just better for dealing
with large teams, allowing natively to set up schedules, tasks, etc.
On 29 February 2016 at 07:36, Tim wrote:
On 29/02/16 01:28, Jasper Backer wrote:
> If we're going to need anything like this, I would say Discourse is the best
> fit. How are other Ubuntu-based distro's handling this?
Discourse seems somewhat orthogonal to IRC/Chat platforms, I guess it would be
a better substitute for mailing list/f
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Usama Akkad wrote:
> Dear Ali,
>
> This is not a kingdom. It's community project. We are interested in
> Ubuntu Gnome.
Show me, don't tell me ;)
You may check the public archive of this mailing list. See how many shout
for help this community has not respon
Dear Ali,
This is not a kingdom. It's community project. We are interested in
Ubuntu Gnome. We can help as we can. Should we send you a report of our
contributions to the FLOSS community in the last month so you will
respect our opinions?
Our discussion and decisions are not related to any theori
Hi,
If we're going to need anything like this, I would say Discourse is the
best fit. How are other Ubuntu-based distro's handling this?
(Who changed the Facebook wall picture? It looks awful and does not suit
the project).
Greets,
Jasper
On 28-02-16 11:42, Tim wrote:
On 28/02/16 21:07,
On 28/02/16 21:07, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> The world is not black + white, but our right to decide our freedom is.
> Why you aren't publishing Slack source code?
> Will this question drive us to the two models discussion?
I have nothing to do with slack, and I certainly don't have access to the
s
The world is not black + white, but our right to decide our freedom is.
Why you aren't publishing Slack source code?
Will this question drive us to the two models discussion?
We are here for Ubuntu & Gnome projects, and the first principle is IT
freedom, not sparkly features.
Let's do a better com
On 28/02/16 20:43, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> +1 about me.
> I prefer freedom than sparkly features.
> Individual and collective freedom is a big and basic feature for IT.
> Ubuntu & Gnome projects are very concerned about this.
>
> Do you feel this discussion is not working well due to the mailing l
On 28/02/16 20:39, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I don't understand why we discussing here about changing free software
> model by privative software model.
We are not talking about changing the software model.
>
> Tim, I feel that this list is intended to a (composed) FLOSS project and
> its growing wi
+1 about me.
I prefer freedom than sparkly features.
Individual and collective freedom is a big and basic feature for IT.
Ubuntu & Gnome projects are very concerned about this.
Do you feel this discussion is not working well due to the mailing list way?
El 28/02/16 a les 10:38, Tim ha escrit:
>
I don't understand why we discussing here about changing free software
model by privative software model.
Tim, I feel that this list is intended to a (composed) FLOSS project and
its growing with this model, and not for proprietary proposals
discussing advantadges of privative software model.
You
On 28/02/16 20:12, Usama Akkad wrote:
> If a propriety closed source service/tool without an alternative open
> source service/tool we will use it.
Right, but what happens when the open source tool is far inferior to the
propriety service/tool. Many Foss fans will just boycott the proprietry
to
On 28/02/16 20:06, Usama Akkad wrote:
> I asked a question: for now to see what is going on with Ubuntu Gnome we
> visit this link. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-gnome/
>
> no registration required, publicly visible and indexed by search engines.
>
> How communication in Slack would be
If a propriety closed source service/tool without an alternative open
source service/tool we will use it.
This is the real issue.
Just recently Fedora launchpad a project that could be an alternative to
Github https://fedoramagazine.org/pagure-diy-git-project-hosting/
Other things you talked abo
I asked a question: for now to see what is going on with Ubuntu Gnome we
visit this link. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-gnome/
no registration required, publicly visible and indexed by search engines.
How communication in Slack would be compared to that?
On 28-02-2016 00:34, Tim wrote
Both mattermost and Rocket.chat are self-hosted, who is going to
setup/host/maintain the service? And what is the long term viability of the
person who chooses to do that?
Atleast with slack there is a migration path to mattermost, if/when we outgrow
the free tier.
On 19/02/16 13:14, Leo Fr
I also recommend taking a look at discourse. It's open source forum
software. Super slick!
Might not be exactly right for Ubuntu GNOME but it's worth checking out.
Here's a new instance that's just been setup for the Signal messenger
community:
https://whispersystems.discoursehosting.net/
Leo
On 27/02/16 22:11, Usama Akkad wrote:
> Will slack allow more communications to be hidden from the public too?
> If so this is another thing that we should use try to avoid.
How did you come to that conclusion? We are not trying to hide communications,
more the opposite, to make it easier for n
If a proprietry closed source service/tool works well, people will use it.
github is a proprietry service, but is used by many open source projects, why?
because it works well.
Dropbox, Facebook and G+ are all proprietry, yet people use them in masses.
VMware is proprietry but works ways better
Hi,
This is one of the places that we should not have to defend or encourage
using of GPL and FLOSS over propriety softwares.
Will slack allow more communications to be hidden from the public too?
If so this is another thing that we should use try to avoid. Successful
FLOSS software are usually a
GNU/Linux works better because of permanent community survey and
discussion. It's not possible with closed source tools.
El 27/02/16 a les 11:44, Alfredo Hernández ha escrit:
> Some people choose GNU/Linux because it works better, simple as that.
> The purpose and inception of Ubuntu GNOME was no
Some people choose GNU/Linux because it works better, simple as that. The
purpose and inception of Ubuntu GNOME was not to offer a free desktop, but
a desktop that works better than the alternatives.
On 27 Feb 2016 11:30 am, "Narcis Garcia" wrote:
> Tim, you are discussing basic principles that c
Tim, you are discussing basic principles that concern Ubuntu and Gnome
projects too.
IT freedom is very important for people: to control and decide what your
devices do with your data and communications. Privative software
(gratuitous too) acts the same way as privative services (gratuitous
too);
On 27/02/16 20:19, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> People is discussing two completely different focuses:
> Freedom and Gratuity.
>
> These kind of services (they are services, not software products)
> gratuity is ever incompatible with freedom (considering personal data as
> a monetary value to trade wit
People is discussing two completely different focuses:
Freedom and Gratuity.
These kind of services (they are services, not software products)
gratuity is ever incompatible with freedom (considering personal data as
a monetary value to trade with).
I prefer GNU/Linux (including Ubuntu and Gnome)
Anyway we have setup #gnome on ubuntu.slack.com as test will see how it goes.
If you dont have an ubuntu.com email address you will need to be
invited to join the ubuntu slack (I believe this is a limitation of slack,
nothing specific to the ubuntu instance), let us know on the list if
you want t
On 27/02/16 16:18, Khurshid Alam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Slack is quite efficient I think. You can have moderated channels and public
> channels (still requires a slack id though). It is always better
> to go with something that have some sort of notification systems for mobile
> and desktops. Free se
Hi,
Slack is quite efficient I think. You can have moderated channels and
public channels (still requires a slack id though). It is always better to
go with something that have some sort of notification systems for mobile
and desktops. Free service includes browsing 10k most recent messages (rest
Thanks for that Popey. Will have a play with Mattermost when I get a chance.
We should have a look at this, even if it's just for fun.
Leo
On 19/02/16 13:32, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 19 February 2016 at 13:14, Leo Francisco wrote:
>> There are open source alternatives that may be worth exploring
On 17/02/16 22:23, Ali/amjjawad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been thinking about this for sometime now. I think I'll give it a try
> and ask you to read this email carefully, think about it wisely and
> then tell me what do you think:
>
> https://slack.com/
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ivn5jfKE_
On 19 February 2016 at 13:14, Leo Francisco wrote:
> There are open source alternatives that may be worth exploring
> MatterMost and RocketChat. There's so much hype around Slack atm, not
> sure what the long term viability of it is. It's basically fancy modern
> proprietary IRC.
>
> I would alway
There are open source alternatives that may be worth exploring
MatterMost and RocketChat. There's so much hype around Slack atm, not
sure what the long term viability of it is. It's basically fancy modern
proprietary IRC.
I would always be more enthused by an open source solution for the usual
rea
On 18/02/16 00:24, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I don't find server software license information.
> Is it a tool* or is it a service?
It is a proprietry service, and it is also rather expensive unless you forego
complete project archives. There is a 10k message limit on the
free plan.
>
> "Teams who p
I don't find server software license information.
Is it a tool* or is it a service?
"Teams who put robots on Mars" use free software (FLOSS).
(*) Ubuntu's package "slack" is not related to slack.com
El 17/02/16 a les 12:23, Ali/amjjawad ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> I've been thinking about this for so
39 matches
Mail list logo
