I am in the US, so my observations may not apply to your region.
("Your" meaning all of the readers, not just GizmoGuy)
thegizmoguy wrote:
> Ubuntu is clearly in competition with Microsoft or this bug thread
> wouldn't exist!
Ferrari is not in competition with Ford. But Ford's larger market sha
thegizmoguy wrote:
> For the autologin in XP watch how fast it can be done:
>
> Start-> Run-> control userpasswords2..can figure it out from there.
A command line abstraction. Start -> run and a box for a command line
option is not GUI.
> I'd bet in linux it would be a 50 line config file
Kamujin wrote:
> @Alberto
>
> Telling people that 0.7 is "better in many ways" is not very compelling
> considering that application is missing critical functionality. 0.7 is
> not ready for a release environment.
More troubling to me is how this is happening more and more often...
Major bugs th
jmcantrell wrote:
> If you're looking for the most rock-solid Ubuntu experience, then you
> should stick with the LTS releases. The last one was Hardy Heron. Using
> the non-LTS releases, you have to understand that they're going to be a
> bit more bleeding edge. At the very least, you should wait
1longtime wrote:
> Any fix for this?
>
> Many users have experienced this bug, Google around and see the numerous
> forums. VPN connections were working fine until I upgraded from Ubuntu
> 8.04 to 8.10.
>
> VERY disappointing to find bugs for important services after an upgrade.
While I agree,
Me too, on a fresh Intrepid with a brand new repo install of Kompozer.
All sub menus crash out, but keyboard navigation is stable. There was
also a random crash that started this odyssey. :) I can't remember what
caused it.
--
kompozer crashes in intrepid when opening the recent files menu
http
ktulu77 wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a XPS M1530 and I have the strange HD clicks 1 or 2 times per
> minutes.
>
> I am on ubuntu 9.04 x64. I don't understand why this bug is marked as
> fixed.
>
> I don't understand what I have to do to fix this problem. The bug report
> is huge. What can I do to sav
Ittay Dror wrote:
> houstonbofh wrote:
>
>> This really shows that we have a perception problem. I am addressing
>> your issues, not to attack you, but to show you other answers. The real
>> question is why you did not see them.
>>
> Why do you dismiss th
Ittay Dror wrote:
> So what you are saying is that since everything is working fine for you,
> then it means nothing is wrong with Linux and I have a perception
> problem. So everything is fine with Linux if not for the perception
> issue? I think not.
I think you keep missing my point. Lets
This really shows that we have a perception problem. I am addressing
your issues, not to attack you, but to show you other answers. The real
question is why you did not see them.
Ittay Dror wrote:
> Ever since Ubuntu 8.04 I have seen a regression in how usable the
> distribution is for me:
>
As I was unable to make it work as intended, I went with a different
package. I do not know if this bug exists anymore or not.
--
gproftpd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Conrad Knauer wrote:
> My prediction is that companies which decide to put Windows 7 Starter
> (limited to 3 concurrent applications... can we say "crippleware"? ;)
> on netbooks are going to have unhappy customers and low sales, those
> who continue to preload XP will continue to do well and those
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michal Suchanek ha scritto:
>> Is there a key for these repositories published somewhere (the one apt
>> would use to check the packages)?
>
>
> sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 623C928A
I added your PPA with the key above. I had
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> houstonbofh ha scritto:
>
>> Intrepid. It found 2 upgrades. However, the kompozer-data upgrade
>> crashed. I had to fix broken packages, and then everything worked fine.
>
> What do you mean with crashed? Have you a log?
Aport exited with
Me Too...
New install and same problem. No settings changes help. It never even
touches the remote VPN, and nothing is in the remote logs. Reproducable
if you want me to try anything.
--
last upload of nm breaks vpn connections
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284901
You received this bug noti
Tuomo Lesonen wrote:
> After updating from Hardy to Intrepid, I was no longer able to connect
> to a Windows 2000 server using PPTP (worked out-of-box with 8.04). After
> installing the latest packages (mentioned above), still had no luck. But
> then I checked "Use Point-to-Point encryption (MPPE)"
John Brown Jr. wrote:
> Today I installed the latest NetworkManager from "deb
> http://ppa.launchpad.net/network-manager/ubuntu intrepid main". I can
> now finally connect to my VPN network! However, if I try to save the
> password in the keyring, I still get a VPN error about 'shared secrets'.
> A
BUGabundo wrote:
> Fully updated at this time, NM from PPA, no passwords on keyring, new
> VPN configurarion, and I fail to connect to all my 3 test case servers
Have you tried checking "Use Point-to-Point encryption (MPPE)" under the
"Advanced" button? It fixed an issue for me. Seems that it u
Endolith wrote:
>> So I have a bit of an issue with using "on battery" to mean "likely to
> be dropped while being used"
>
> Yes, this is a silly assumption. My laptop is plugged in 99% of the
> time I am using it, but it is just as likely to be dropped as any other
> time. Even if it's parking
Another "Me Too..."
This is connecting to m0n0wall VPN's. They have worked from Dapper on
with default settings, and are very stable. With Intrepid, no joy.
(This is after deleting the password from the keyring)
Enclosed are the syslogs from a Intrepid box failing, and logs from
m0n0wall with a
*Patch Submission*
One of the biggest advantages Microsoft has had is the installed user
base. People had XP, liked XP and understood XP. It is hard to compete
with that, and now that Microsoft is having to compete with XP it is
having major issues. But remember that Microsoft is a marketing com
Marcelo Boveto Shima wrote:
> ** Description changed:
>
> I installed 8.04 LTS server on a system. Then installed ubuntu-desktop
> using apt. Installed Nomachine's NX server and connected to it.
>
> The unlock buttons on Users and Groups or Network are greyed out and un-
> accessible.
This problem also occurs when you use 'ssh -X' and try and run 'users-
admin' for example. There is no way to admin a Hardy system via ssh
using the GUI tools.
--
Policy Kit Unlock Buttons Greyed Out when using NX
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221363
You received this bug notification because
volksman wrote:
> @Marcelo: Just realized you fixed FreeNX. Not nomachines NX. Wonder
> if I should switch. I tried to change Nomachines nxnode config to use
> your nx-session-launcher but it doesn't work, just crashes.
>
> Are you confirming this is a problem with NX though and not policy kit
Gabor CZIGOLA wrote:
> I can not believe that it is normal for a basic, non-enterprise disk to
> overheat, not even when it is permanently used.
> If disabling power management causes any other issue than decreased battery
> life by max. 5%, then this is obviously some disk/firmware related bug.
shane fagan wrote:
> Stop talking about microsoft's priorities. Their priorities have lead to
> the release of vista which we all agree is poor. What our priorities
> should be to forget about microsoft and release a stable and strong
> Ubuntu and that sounds a lot better than vista which glitches
Nick_Hill wrote:
>>From discussing on IRC and between friends, it seems uncontroversial to
> suggest 8.04 has more bugs than we'd like. Far more than we'd like for
> an LTS. Many of them being regressions. Not to mention beta Firefox.
Understatement. Company wide, we have frozen on Gutsy other th
Allen Graham wrote:
> OK, Tom notes that he heard negative remarks about Linux, in general.
> Problem here is simple, since it's "free" the stores and tech shops see it
> as a non-starter, no money to be made, I've heard this lots.
> But, many techs have asked me to help them with Linux, oops, no m
Alexandros wrote:
> http://austinist.com/2008/12/10/aisd_teacher_throws_fit_over_studen.php
> http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/10/austin-teacher-threa.html
> http://linuxlock.blogspot.com/2008/12/linux-stop-holding-our-kids-back.html
Big follow up to this!
http://linuxlock.blogspot.com/2008/12/ch
Tom wrote:
> With regards to non-free technical support it must be worth reading
> through the GPL and other licensing agreements to clarify that this is
> not against the agreement.
That is so not a problem. I can charge for my time however I want. If
I deliver solutions that include software
jaypmcwilliams wrote:
> "How can we begin advertising LINUX on Radio, TV & stores"? Please tell
> me & I would be happy to help.
The problem is that advertising is expensive. I will spend the money,
but only to promote my business. If I promote my business, and some of
my vendors, I can get c
Anders wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/26/dziuba_linux_desktop/
Old news and FUD.
Summery: People want things not to change, and Linux is different, so
people wont change.
Problem: So is Vista.
The premise is accurate, and that is why Vista was such a resounding
failure for so
Tom wrote:
> People often say they will stick with Windows because they "just want
> something that works out of the box". Clearly these people are
> completely clueless and not at all techie. A witty quip like Amir's is
> more likely to work than pedantic 'brow-beating'.
Funny that you should
kylea wrote:
> SO why use MS Windows? - No reasons other than some sites sites (ATO and
> St George Bank) taht force users to have a windows licence.
There is a patch for this bug at
http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/page/Main_Page which will work in a
pinch. But I would complain as well. A
This is a major bug-fix to the broken mjpeg streaming. Please mark this
as a security / bugfix, not a feature improvement.
--
Please upgrade firefox 3.0 to 3.0.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308816
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Another major component of this bug is the poor failure status. If you
install from the GUI, there is no error indicating that the package did
not install. This also happened when Flash went from 8 to 9, so this
part of the bug is very longstanding!
--
Hardy: Flash can't be installed since inst
Robert Schlanstein wrote:
> "If you install from the GUI, there is no error indicating that the
> package did not install."
>
> The error ist not pointed out by the pop-up window, but the error itself
> remains. You can click on "details" to read the same output as the
> terminal would give.
And
kylea wrote:
> To answer Vadim - sorry this is not spam, My comments go to heart of
> matter - why is Linux, after so many new versions still so poorly
> represented on the desktop? Its because IT managers and re-sellers
> cannot cope with the stupid bugs that constantly require man months to
> res
Public bug reported:
Installation on Gutsy of flashplugin-
nonfree_9.0.124.0ubuntu1~gutsy1_i386.deb results in a failure that never
shows up to the user. You simply have no flash, and do not know why.
Installing from the cli gives some information... Specifically that the
binary is not there any
Jon Bernard wrote:
> This is likely a duplicate of #304969
>
Man... And I looked too! But I am also bugging the poor fail state.
This bug was also in Dapper when 9 came out. With the poor
notification, unskilled users are really left in the cold.
--
Package fails to download binary without
Tom wrote:
> People still see Ubuntu as something that's very difficult to get
> working.
This is the problem. It is false, but a real problem.
> Why not just let them stick with Windows which "just works"
It doesn't.
> and also with Windows isn't everything "plug & play"
It isn't.
> wherea
Conrad Knauer wrote:
> There is no mystery (no "somehow") as to why NVIDIA drivers are
> "rejected by the community"; they are closed-source. If you want to
> argue that performance-ends justifies the licensing-means, then we
> might as well all switch to Macs
This is like saying if you don't li
Alexander Sack wrote:
> jaunty is out long enough, we won't put effort into fixing bugs in
> intrepid anymore - and hence risking regressions for those that are
> happy.
>
> ** Changed in: network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu Intrepid)
>Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
This is one thing I never un
Vikas Mohan wrote:
> Hello erik,
>You are right.But it is very simple thing for the ubuntu
> team.All they have to put the latest flash file in their repo and they are
> not doing despite the bug reports,so i thought my article will help if other
> users doesn't know how to workarou
Saw the status change, so I hit the latest updates 9both compiz and
nvidia-glx-new) and rebooted. No fix as yet.
--
[MASTER] broken initial stacking (was: compiz hides quick loading windows at
login)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147943
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Fix confirmed for me. nvidia 7950 with P35 chipset and core2duo. The
last major bug for me is now fixed.
$ apt-cache policy compiz
compiz:
Installed: 1:0.6.0+git20071008-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:0.6.0+git20071008-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 1:0.6.0+git20071008-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://u
I just submitted a dupe. It was a clean install of Gutsy from the 9.24
daily. Default theme, and compiz on an nvidia 7950 card with restricted
driver. It is a new machine. Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L with a 2.33 Core2duo
and 2 gig of ram. All SATA system.
--
MASTER firefox crashed on print preview
Me too... Fresh install from 9/24 daily builds. nVidia graphics.
Random screen saver.
--
[apport] cyclone crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ub
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 145360 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145360
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9549551/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9549552/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 145360 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145360
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: compiz
May be a dupe. New install of Gutsy from the 9/24 daily build, and
patched to current with "essential" packages. Added new user, and
logged in. Desktop is
Just to clarify an unclear issue... I installed Gutsy fresh from the
9/24 daily build. Updated to current, added the nvidia driver, and all
the codecs and other "essential" stuff. All is working fine. Create
new user, and log in. The desktop is oversized (1600x1400 on a
1280x1024 screen) and c
wyo wrote:
> It's now almost 2 year since I've written something about this bug here
> (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1/comments/62) and it's now about 1
> year since I've lost fait that this bug will be solved before I die. Yet
> it's time to make a review if anything has changed regarding thi
Brian Visel wrote:
> Good info!
>
> It shouldn't be too difficult to include a script that monitors the
> system for the bug, to be run by cron, then notifies the user, providing
> an option to automatically disable power management on the disk if so.
> I could do that. Is there a way I could get
Sarah has the right idea. Do this a while, and you get a thick skin. :)
That said, I do not feel it should be in a release repo. Unless a
breakthrough comes in the next few days, it should be pulled on the
19th. I want it to work, and I want it in the repositories, but as it
stands, this is not
Brian Visel wrote:
> This bug has been around for over two years. It has been reported for
> over one year.
>
> It's incredibly demotivating. I'm just disappointed with Ubuntu's
> organization at this point.
This kind of thing amazes me. This bug is present to some extent in all
operating sys
I am seeing this bug on a Dell with nVidia go5200 graphics. It happens
with the Live CD on startup before any user input.
--
jockey-gtk crashed with AssertionError in __init__()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187148
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
This bug was marked "expired" today. However, since the last activity I
have helped several people involved in the zoneminder project using
ubuntu with this bug. It is still unpatched, and still a problem. The
wrapper script is a viable patch, so why not use it before letting the
bug die on the
I love the plan of addressing this from the other side. Specifically
try and stop the spin up, not just the spin down. Ubuntu has been
getting more and more power hungry,
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=878&num=1 and this is
one big way to address it. If you could park and slee
http://resources.zdnet.co.uk/articles/features/0,102000,39291080,00.htm
While I doubt they have heard of it, or even realize how similar it is,
the fact remains that the #1 thing out of "Ten things holding back tech"
is our Bug #1. As a matter of fact, Open Source answers almost all of
those
Ubuntu QA Tracker wrote:
> ** Tags added: iso-testing
>
Stéphane Graber wrote:
> ** Tags removed: iso-testing
>
Darn! I REALLY wanted to see that iso!
--
Microsoft has a majority market share
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Providing a "free" OS if different from delivering a free OS. Yes, Dell
is adding there "value add" to Ubuntu. Have you looked at a Dell
Windows PC lately? If you want a clean Windows install on a Dell, you
reinstall Windows. An entire project (The Dell Decrapiffier) was
created just to address
Conrad, I think you miss-remember Bug #1.
"Microsoft has a majority market share in the new desktop PC
marketplace. This is a bug, which Ubuntu is designed to fix."
For every Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Linspire or Apple Mac that is sold, we get
a little fix to that bug. And more non-microsoft means les
Me too!
It only seems to show up in my primary user. No other effect noted.
--
Cups Server error. There was an error during Cups operation:
'server-error-service-unavailable'.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182551
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
More information... It only happens when I log in immediately. If I
boot and go away, and log in some time after the boot process completes,
it never happens. This is repeatable. Sounds like a init order issue.
--
Cups Server error. There was an error during Cups operation:
'server-error-ser
mihai007 wrote:
> So after all this time... how does every Ubuntu release stands?
> Just made a google trends and here are the results:
> http://www.google.com/trends?q=ubuntu+breezy+%7C%7C+ubuntu+5.10%2C+ubuntu+dapper+%7C%7C+ubuntu+6.06%2C+ubuntu+edgy+%7C%7C+ubuntu+6.10%2C+ubuntu+feisty+%7C%7C+ubu
David Benjamin wrote:
> So, are there any plans to backport this to Gutsy? It seems strange that
> a fix has been in Hardy and for quite some time now, and yet Gutsy still
> doesn't have it.
>
> I can hardly imagine that "stable users" want the old package, seeing as
> it doesn't work.
Well, a br
Dan Gilliam wrote:
> It's not all Ubuntu, of course. All the other distros are showing the
> same as I've hopped around a bit. I tried applying the various fixes
> that I've found, but I'm not seeing any difference in the increased load
> counts. Which is frustrating, because windows is obvious
This is a verry good example of Bug1 which is perception, not reality.
So, I am including this "perception patch" that should be tactfully
applied whenever you find this bug in a running system
rhinoFinn wrote:
> I'm not so sure whether this bug is due or only due to Microsoft, bcause
> I (once
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 145360 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145360
Trey Earl wrote:
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 145360 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145360
>
> Will someone please remove me from this damn bug? I get about 10 e-mails
> about it every fuck
wyo wrote:
>> A quick look in the bug database suggests there are 155,000 bugs ever
>> reported against Ubuntu, and 46,000 marked fixed. That's from a team of
>> 30 full time engineers and about 100 committed volunteers, an amazing
>> effort by people who care about Ubuntu.
>
> I do not question t
One more on Feisty with nvidia 7xxx graphics. Easy workaround (-nodga)
that is not trivial to find. I am surprised that this bug has been
around so long with no change.
--
fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76501
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6542721/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6542722/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6542723/ProcStatus.txt
--
{feist
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-notifier
After todays update, updat notiffier crashes every time I log in or
finish with synaptic.
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Feb 26 16:42:25 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check
I
I would not call this low urgency. Everyone will be getting this, and
breaking the only way most know to fix it. A quick look at the dupes
for 88104 will show how bad this is already. (and yes, one is mine...
Doh!) Keep in mind that no one with this bug will see the update
notifier announcing th
I didn't mean to sound rude. :) Just sharing the implications as my
inbox filled with 88104 dupes. I am posting the progress in 88104 as
well.
--
Package is empty except for documentation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88134
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
Fix is now distributed to the US servers. Update python-apt, and all is well.
But you may want to skip the kernel upgrade for now...
--
[apport] apt-check crashed with ImportError in ()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88104
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
I also marked all upgrades. It broke Nvidia. I also lost the control
panel. However, these are different bugs. This bug is fixed by
updating python-apt only. Anything else is a new issue. As someone
said to me, "You should expect problems on the bleeding edge."
--
[apport] apt-check crashed
Just to confirm, the i386 fix is out to the US servers, and it works.
Good job, and thanks.
--
Package is empty except for documentation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88134
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
A fix has been punched out for bug 88134. It may take a while to
trickle down, but synaptic will be able to find it with a reload and a
"mark all upgrades." And end to the bug report dupes is near!
--
[apport] apt-check crashed with ImportError in ()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88104
--
ubuntu
I too use the Live CD often to fix systems. For one, it has a good
Ubuntu Xorg.conf to compare with. :) I would also like gparted on the
live cd.
--
gparted is missing in iso image for feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93604
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Another "Me too" post. Feisty from Heard4 patched to current. If
launched from a shell...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ democracyplayer
/usr/bin/democracyplayer:81: DeprecationWarning: The dbus_bindings module is
deprecated and will go away soon.
dbus-python 0.80 provides only a partial emulation of the
I too have noticed a significant difference in both Feisty and Edgy.
Boot times seem slightly quicker as well, but that my be wishful
thinking. :) The only difference in mine is I added FQDN. (And the
intellitext filter)
127.0.0.1 localhost boat.dnsalias.net boat nasioc.us.intellitxt.com
toms.us.
I am willing to debug, but I am not sure what you need. No actual error
occurs. I believe it is more an application timeout issue. With a
stock feisty hosts file, some applications take a little longer to start
than if you changed the hosts file as described. I timed it with
Firefox, and it was
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-terminal
gnome-terminal 2.17.91-Oubuntu1
kismet 2006.04.R1-1.1
Hardware SMC2532W-B highpower 802.11b Prism WiFi card.
Running kismet for the first time, and gterm crashes hard. Was
repeatable after removing and reinstalling pcmcia orinoco wireless
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6482921/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6482922/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6482923/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
As a frequent visitor/contributor to Ubuntu Forums, I can see this
generating a lot of new user posts.
An example of how this could happen.
User has XP, and shrinks partition. User reads that a fat 32 partition
should be used to share files. User reads that a /boot partition should
be first so
Martin Wildam wrote:
> I think, you are right and completely agree with you. I also find it
> annoying that for instance my Ubuntu 9.10 does not get Open Office
> upgrade to 3.2 during normal upgrades.
Do you all realize that the "patch" to this bug is to open a ppa for
firefox or open office on
This is not a support forum, but...
Martin Wildam wrote:
> What?!? - Really? - Is there a list of ppas that can be added this
> way? Doesn't that conflict then with security updates from Canonical?
You have to look. A quick google
http://www.google.com/search?q=ubuntu+firefox+ppa showed 2 good
Once again we have a problem communicating with the customer. We still
have all these old myths that are no longer true.
Bob! wrote:
> can i just say that windows has majority market share for a reason. imho
> ubuntu isnt nearly as good in a number of areas the concern the average
> user.
But t
Let me add a "Me Too." I understand the need to push people to the open
version, but there are too many apps that it just doesn't work for.
Until it is ready for prime time, there needs to be an easy fallback.
--
[needs-packaging] sun-java6 for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515678
You re
You forgot to add "ssh -X" to the title. Yes, it is a bad decision, in
my opinion.
--
Policy Kit Unlock Buttons Greyed Out when using NX / VNC / LTSP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221363
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Jordan wrote:
> Since the upstream bug report mentions that this happens on BIOSs that
> can only read the first portion of large drives,...
I doubt this is the case. I am having this problem on a BIOSTAR K8M800
motherboard, and I have only a single data partition on an 80 gig IDE
drive. (Swap
Hanno Böck wrote:
> Ubuntu-devs, can you please put a HIGH priority on this one and NOT release
> any more kernel or grub updates till this is fixed?
> I just got the problem on someones machine where I've worked around it
> recently. The new kernel update regeerated the grub config and the probl
This is my 4th clean install of Karmic, and I got bit. The bad part is
that this one was at a client, with a time crunch. The workaround in
the grub2 boot works, but I can't have a client do that. And I am
afraid to use the fix in post #10, as an upgrade means a service call
with "an emergency."
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561794
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.co
IDWMaster wrote:
> Only problem is; they made me sign a confidentiality agreement, and if I
> told anyone names; they would have far more powerful lawyers.
For a confidentiality agreement to be valid (in most locations... I am
not a lawyer), you have to receive something in return. If they left
Lucid Daily patched to current 28-2-2010. Clean install from 27-2-2010.
CUPS 1.4.2-9 has one printer installed. (HP Color Laser 2550)
>From within Gnome;
Open Printing applet.
Add new printer to open "new Printer" applet. (Button or menu makes no
difference)
Expand "Network Printer" options.
Hit
Faldegast wrote:
> Why don't do it the RHEL/CentOS way with LTS releases where user application
> lake browsers etc gets updated but system stuff only get bug-fixes.
> To be conservative with kernel updates is good but why be that conservative
> with Firefox and OpenOffice? Im not saying we shoul
Another me too... Present in kernels 2.6.32-19 2.6.32-21 and 2.6.32-22.
I am running an i855 graphics chipset with the patch, but it is still
present in the -19 which does not need the patch. Is there a workaround
other then a 1.6.34 kernel?
--
kernel BUG at
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/drivers/
I had a working system with the fix in post #10. Then after running
updates today, (including a grub update that removed the fix) it failed
with "Out of Disk" and the fix in post 10 did not help. Also no access
to grub menu. I am trying a reinstall with a 10GB /boot partition.
Perhaps the "fix"
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
