Faldegast wrote: > Why don't do it the RHEL/CentOS way with LTS releases where user application > lake browsers etc gets updated but system stuff only get bug-fixes. > To be conservative with kernel updates is good but why be that conservative > with Firefox and OpenOffice? Im not saying we should throw the edgiest > version in to the LTS, first let it prove itself in the edgy version of > ubuntu. > So a middle way between the current LTS scheme and the current edgy version > could bridge the gap that users feel exist between them.
You can do that. You can upgrade whatever you want. You can have an LTS with bleeding edge Firefox and Open Office. Just not supported by Ubuntu. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
