On 8/03/2010 6:13 PM, Melissa Draper wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:45 +1100, Norm, VK3XCI wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I've had a fair bit to do with "committees" over a vast range of
>> involvements,
>> from Radio Clubs to rural Progress Associations and Distance Education parent
>> Committee
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:45 +1100, Norm, VK3XCI wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've had a fair bit to do with "committees" over a vast range of
> involvements,
> from Radio Clubs to rural Progress Associations and Distance Education parent
> Committees. All have a couple of things in common. Dissent (is t
Great input Norm.
Yes legal interests need to be taken into account.
Forming (and running) non-profit organisations takes a lot of work.
We need to be clear on our objectives, on what can and cannot be
achieved.
Yes you always get descent when you bring a group of people together
(the nature of th
Hi Melissa,
Just wondering if this means that the meeting is happening at 9 PM
Monday 15 January? currently it has the highest vote.
Has the poll closed yet?
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Benjamin Chen
On Mar 7, 5:47 pm, Melissa Draper wrote:
> To figure when the best time for a meeting woul
Folks,
I've had a fair bit to do with "committees" over a vast range of involvements,
from Radio Clubs to rural Progress Associations and Distance Education parent
Committees. All have a couple of things in common. Dissent (is that the word
you
were looking for Scott?) and egos. From an almost
On 8 March 2010 16:19, Andrew Gaydon wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Matthew Rossi wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 8 March 2010 15:40, AndrewG wrote:
>>
>>> Nice Summary Matthew.
>>>
>>>
>>> On the State representative model, (of which you know that I am in
>>> favour of)
>
Hi Michael...
Your input is valuable because from what you see currently (most likely)
without any prior knowledge of any disagreements (wrong word but it all
that I could think of!) between person A to person B. This is the
information needed, because for those that have been involved with
ubuntu
Hi.
I'm only new here but have been reading with interest the happenings
of the last few days. Here is what this situation looks like to a
newcomer. With all due respect the Australian Loco has let things
slide and is now scrambling to stay afloat. From my readings if it
wasn't for Mellisa the Loc
On 8 March 2010 15:01, Matthew Rossi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I agree with what Scott is saying. It would be a good idea to be flagging
> those contributing to this thread as those with a vested interest in the
> LoCo, and that we need to work out overall what our LoCo is trying to
> achieve.
>
> Goi
Hi all,
Ubuntu AU does need some revamping, as things stand there is not a lot
happening the community as it has gone stale and no one seemed to have
the interest in doing anything under the current state of Ubuntu AU.
The big problem that is going to be faced is getting the interest of
people to
Hello,
I agree with what Scott is saying. It would be a good idea to be flagging
those contributing to this thread as those with a vested interest in the
LoCo, and that we need to work out overall what our LoCo is trying to
achieve.
Going back to the talk about the Governance structure, we have
I think that those that are showing any interest in this discussion
should be automatically flagged as having a vested interest in the
future of ubuntu-au loco. We can go around in circles forever and a day
saying that person X isn't right or person Y has got it all wrong...
@Melissa you have don
Andrew Swinn,
Now we are getting somewhere.
Lets have the 'Call to arms'.
Lets get a definite date & time for the IRC meeting that Melissa
has proposed.
Let's set an agenda.
Let's get an article on the ubuntu.org.au Website & wiki, to
generate some publicity.
Andrew G.
On Ma
On 8/03/2010 1:25 PM, AndrewG wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 12:05 pm, Paul Gear wrote:
>
>> Melissa Draper wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 11:25 +1100, Andrew Swinn wrote:
>>>
>>
Just a quick 2 cents worth on the whole committee thing.
>>
I would a
On 8 March 2010 13:05, Paul Gear wrote:
> Melissa Draper wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 11:25 +1100, Andrew Swinn wrote:
>
>
> Just a quick 2 cents worth on the whole committee thing.
>
> I would agree that having an overall president plus a representive from
> each state would be the way to
On Mar 8, 12:05 pm, Paul Gear wrote:
> Melissa Draper wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 11:25 +1100, Andrew Swinn wrote:
>
> >> Just a quick 2 cents worth on the whole committee thing.
>
> >> I would agree that having an overall president plus a representive from
> >> each state would be the way
Melissa,
On Mar 8, 11:44 am, Melissa Draper wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 11:25 +1100, Andrew Swinn wrote:
> > Just a quick 2 cents worth on the whole committee thing.
>
> > I would agree that having an overall president plus a representive from
> > each state would be the way to go.
>
> Linux A
Melissa Draper wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 11:25 +1100, Andrew Swinn wrote:
>
>> Just a quick 2 cents worth on the whole committee thing.
>>
>> I would agree that having an overall president plus a representive from
>> each state would be the way to go.
>>
>
> Linux Australia has gone t
Hello everyone.
On 8 March 2010 10:08, benchen70 wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thank you for your ideas, I think they are wonderful.
>
> Just out of curiosity, I am just wondering about the state
> requirements of the ordinary committee members. Is there any
> particular reason for 2 preferentially f
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 11:25 +1100, Andrew Swinn wrote:
> Just a quick 2 cents worth on the whole committee thing.
>
> I would agree that having an overall president plus a representive from
> each state would be the way to go.
Linux Australia has gone through this discussion regularly over the
y
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 09:27 +1100, peter baker wrote:
> melissa said
>
> While elections are typically how we used to do this back in
> 2006 when
> we (both the team and ubuntu in general) were much smaller,
> it's
> generally now expected that a meritocrati
Hi Narayan,
Also, further to my last post, what kind of computer are you
installing on? Linux with what kind of hardware? Thank you very much.
Regards
Benjamin Chen
benchen70
On Mar 8, 9:16 am, benchen70 wrote:
> Hi Narayan,
>
> Your post does not make clear what you need. I am a Three custome
Just a quick 2 cents worth on the whole committee thing.
I would agree that having an overall president plus a representive from
each state would be the way to go.
I would also suggest that these state positions could be dual roles with
the other needs, ie as well as representing their state/te
Matt & Benjamin,
IMHO.
I would propose that the committee be a representative one, being
'one' State leader from each state.
Why, because most implementation of Goals of Ubuntu-au will be enacted
on at a local level.
Ie. Exhibition stalls, Install fests, cd distribution etc.
A 'State
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Melissa Draper wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 12:55 +1100, Ferdinand Lehnard wrote:
>>
>> After that I didn't had a look on the web page for a longer time, just
>> recently I was coming back and had seen some improvement. The
>> membership application seems still to
HI Steve,
'Loco' stands for Local community. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loco_team
Cheers.
On Mar 8, 9:10 am, "Steve Pagratis" wrote:
> what is a LoCo ?
>
> steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ubuntu-au-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> [mailto:ubuntu-au-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Beha
Hi Narayan,
Your post does not make clear what you need. I am a Three customer,
what exactly do you need? Which mobile are you talking about? Model?
Brand? Are you intending to have some special software to go with it,
eg, Nokia has the Nokia PC Suite. Or is it the Huawei 3 Mobile
internet dongle
Hi Matthew,
Thank you for your ideas, I think they are wonderful.
Just out of curiosity, I am just wondering about the state
requirements of the ordinary committee members. Is there any
particular reason for 2 preferentially from states outside Victoria,
Queensland and NSW?
Also with the electio
what is a LoCo ?
steve
-Original Message-
From: ubuntu-au-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
[mailto:ubuntu-au-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of
ubuntu-au-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Monday, 8 March 2010 9:31
To: ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: ubuntu-au Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8
Send
Yes there needs to be a transparent process / structure involved.
Currently there is none of this.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AustralianTeam/WhiteBoard/BrainStorm
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Roadmaps/Lucid/AustralianTeam
Andrew G.
On Mar 8, 8:27 am, peter baker wrote:
> melissa said
>
> While electio
Hi Mathew,
Thanks for your thoughts as they are very detailed.
Whilst I agree with your sentiment there are a lot of practicalities
in setting up & maintaining such a structure.
Some time back I started a Wiki page. I would suggest that
everybody have a read.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Aus
melissa said
While elections are typically how we used to do this back in 2006 when
> we (both the team and ubuntu in general) were much smaller, it's
> generally now expected that a meritocratic process be followed -- put a
> motion to the team participants that the role be passed to the
> partic
Yes Subject line makes it pretty clear what I am looking for , please
advise.
Thank You.
Cheers,
Narayan
--
ubuntu-au mailing list
ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
Hello,
In light of the recent discussions regarding the future of our LoCo, I
thought that I would pitch in my own idea for how we can govern the LoCo.
Over the last few years, it has become obvious that the unstructured way
that our LoCo operates isn't working too well. From the surface, it does
34 matches
Mail list logo
