Yes there needs to be a transparent process / structure involved. Currently there is none of this.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AustralianTeam/WhiteBoard/BrainStorm https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Roadmaps/Lucid/AustralianTeam Andrew G. On Mar 8, 8:27 am, peter baker <jellyw...@gmail.com> wrote: > melissa said > > While elections are typically how we used to do this back in 2006 when > > > we (both the team and ubuntu in general) were much smaller, it's > > generally now expected that a meritocratic process be followed -- put a > > motion to the team participants that the role be passed to the > > particular someone who has demonstrated they can do it, as opposed to > > taking random names and choosing who is most popular at the time. > > I don't think that the leader of a community has a right to tell the > community how the position of leader is created or maintained. I believe we > should have regular elections for leader positions within the community to > ensure that the community remains vibrant/active. > > --www.peter.id.au > > -- > ubuntu-au mailing list > ubuntu...@lists.ubuntu.comhttps://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au -- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
