>
> --Tom
> ___
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hello Stefan
Since Georg patch for fx12mm needs this patch. So I have to make
any change to it?
Best regards
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de
Configuring for ml507 board...
>
> powerpc-eabi-ld: u-boot: Not enough room for program headers (allocated
> 2, need 5)
>
> powerpc-eabi-ld: final link failed: Bad value
>
> make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
>
> size: './u-boot': No such file
>
>
>
&
Hello Benny
Maybe if you move your _start to the booptg section you will solve
your problem or you can also modify the jump to be a long jump.
Best regards
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 06:11, Benny Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
> Changing my tool chain
file in
> board/xilinx/fx12mm ?
Instad of doing that you can add this line to you config file
#include "../board/xilinx/ml507/xparameters.h"
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.
patches that are
sent to the mail list, commented and not applied or not in the bug
track system: The author must resend them? is this "unpolite" to the
u-boot ML policie?
Best regards
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
RTNS550_1_BASEADDR + 3)
>> +#endif
>> +};
>> +#endif
>
> This code is ugly and close to unreadable.
>
>> +int
>> +serial_init(void)
>> +{
>> +#if USE_CHAN1
>> + int clock_divisor;
>> +
>> + clock_divisor = XPAR_UARTNS550_0
neCFG_INTC_0_ADDR XPAR_XPS_INTC_0_BASEADDR
> +#defineCFG_INTC_0_NUM XPAR_INTC_MAX_NUM_INTR_INPUTS
> +#endif
> +
> +/* u-boot commands configuration */
> +#include
> +#undef CONFIG_CMD_NET
> +#define CONFIG_CMD_JFFS2
> +
> +/* u-boot confi
>
> ocotea_config: unconfig
> --
> 1.5.6.1
>
> _______
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
> wrote:
> Dear Ricardo,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> This problem is solved in "Unification of virtex5 pp440 boards",
>> which is ready to be merged in mainline (Today's pullgit by Stefan),
>> Please revert this patch
Hello Wolfgang
The version on your repositore do not create that file. It should
be an ancient file of older versions
Best Regards
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 03:33, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Ricardo,
>
> I wrote:
>
>> With the latest code
fig.mk
> +/u-boot.lds
> --
> 1.5.6.5
>
> ___
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot
board and we
decide to generate a generic board called ppc440-generic which will be
the skeleton of all the fpgas boards with the ppc440 processor.
What I am asking you is to create the same architechture for the
ppc400 processor.
Best Regards
--
Ricardo Ribald
Hello all
Sorry for the error in the numbers. There are just 2, not 9!
Regards
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
g for the new version and
> imx8mm_evk_rohm_defconfig for the old one.
>
> What do you think?
Maybe a dynamic way to identify if BD71837 or PCA9450 (by probing i2c)
would work better?
Different configs would imply different builds and binaries, which is
a problem when trying to support a single build for both the old EVK
and EVKB (and the main difference is the PMIC, nothing really major).
I also share Andrey's concerns, as we do have several EVKs in hands,
and having one single build would facilitate quite a bit.
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
tly again, but I just wanted to
reply back here first before submitting as I'm surprised nobody
reported this issue before.
Can you verify on your target hardware if this is indeed working as intended?
Thanks,
--
Ricardo Salveti
A/TF-A/OP-TEE/U-Boot
proper), which can easily reach up to 10MB, so increase the default
CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE size to 16MB to cover more advanced
scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --g
Hi Aswath,
Thanks for the quick response.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 1:55 AM Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On 07/07/21 4:39 am, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> > Hi Aswath,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 4:19 AM Aswath Govindraju
> > wrote:
> >&
files I noticed it works fine with the
latest firmware when using an older bcm2710-rpi-3-b-plus.dtb
(placed together with the firmware). If I use the latest
bcm2710-rpi-3-b-plus.dtb from the 5.4 downstream kernel, it doesn't
work (only tested on rpi3-b-plus).
This is with CONFIG_OF_BOARD=y, if I use CONFIG_OF_EMBED instead it
works just fine (which gives me the impression that u-boot might not
be happy with the dtb generated by the firmware when enable_uart is
not set).
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
Hi Aneesh,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Thursday 22 September 2011 01:47 AM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
>> Not all padconfs are the same between 4430 and 4460, so instead of
>> working around this with an if, we should hav
.
I bet that when timer interrupts CPU, it jumps to code section not defined.
The question is... How can I program the expected behaviour? I mean
executing "do_irq" when the interrupt is generated.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best regards,
Ricardo Martinez
_
ete address depending on interrupt
source. With install_hdlr we define where to jump after. This example makes
me think I'm missing a lot of things for ARM926...
Regards,
Ricardo
-Mensaje original-
De: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
Enviado el: miércoles, 26 de agosto de 200
Any piece of advice in order to implement that kind of easy logger would be
really appreciated.
Thank you very much
Ricardo
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
iated.
Thanks in advance,
Ricardo
=> ls
Scanning JFFS2 FS: / Unknown node type: 2005 len 24 offset 0x28
.- Unknown node type: 2005 len 24 offset 0x2c
\ Unknown node type: 2005 len 24 offset 0x30
| Unknown node type: 2005 len 24 offset 0x34
./ Unknown node type: 200
_ACCURATE | 3) //0x2003
#define JFFS2_NODETYPE_PADDING (JFFS2_FEATURE_RWCOMPAT_DELETE |
JFFS2_NODE_ACCURATE | 4) //0x2004
Then, 0x2005 is not defined. I'm not familiar with filesystems, no idea
about what does this mean.
Any ideas?
Ricardo
-Mensaje original-
De: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.d
jffs2
format. Silly question and my fault.
Thank you very much for your help
-Mensaje original-
De: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
Enviado el: lunes, 26 de octubre de 2009 15:20
Para: Ricardo Martínez
CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Asunto: Re: [U-Boot] do_jffs2_ls fails
Dear =?iso-8859-1?
Hi all,
I would like to use the power on self test feature (POST) for the
mpc8323e board.
How can I configure and compile this feature for this board?
Thanks and best regards
Ricardo
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http
e is still valid.
Jon, did you have any issue when testing that patch set on SOMs
without eMMC support?
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Baruch,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 5:07 AM Baruch Siach wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:42:44AM -0200, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:52 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
>
Hi Baruch,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 7:51 AM Baruch Siach wrote:
>
> Hi Peter, Ricardo,
>
> Peter Robinson writes:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 1:06 AM Ricardo Salveti
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 5:07 AM Baruch Siach wrote:
> >> > On T
Hi Baruch,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 6:29 PM Baruch Siach wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> Ricardo Salveti writes:
> > The line where it locks up waiting for the command to complete:
> > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c;h=3cdfa7f5a689789ea2f24da8
ng infinite loop inside esdhc_send_cmd_common()
>
> while (!(esdhc_read32(®s->irqstat) & flags))
> ;
>
> Instead of looping forever, provide an exit path so that a timeout
> error can be propagated in the case irqstat does not report
> any interru
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:03 PM Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:31 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >
> > The following hang is observed on a Hummingboard 2 MicroSOM
> > i2eX iMX6D - rev 1.3 with no eMMC populated on board:
> >
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:42 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:25 PM Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
>
> > Looking a bit further, this ends up adding a significant boot delay
> > because the mmc driver still tries to send another two
Make the external devices the preferred ones when booting the system
(usb is already the first option). This allows users to easily boot
custom distributions without requiring them to reflash/customize u-boot.
Cc: Mateusz Kulikowski
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
include/configs
Cc: Mateusz Kulikowski
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
include/configs/dragonboard410c.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/dragonboard410c.h
b/include/configs/dragonboard410c.h
index 74a827d..1dbe219 100644
--- a/include/configs/dragonboard410c.h
+++ b
In some Linux distributions (e.g., Arch Linux) the Python binary points to
Python 3.x instead of Python 2.x. This is an issue when building the libfdt
SWIG extension, as the generated extension file will be called something
like _libfdt.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so instead of just _libfdt.so. By
all the other boards using MMC2 and doing
only one single call will have the same problem.
Not sure if there is an easy fix here, but converting everything to
dynamic mmc initialization will required quite a bit of effort.
Thanks,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:13 AM Adam Ford wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 6:44 PM Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:11 PM Adam Ford wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently, when the spl_boot_device checks the boot device, it
>
erence to `fit_image_load'
bootm.c:(.text+0x132): undefined reference to `image_decomp'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
scripts/Makefile.host:106: recipe for target 'tools/dumpimage' failed
Guess it is better to isolate the other individual pieces instead.
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Commit e37ac717d796 ("Convert to use fsl_esdhc_imx for i.MX platforms")
converted FSL_ESDHC to FSL_ESDHC_IMX, but the config check for
apalis_imx6 wasn't updated accordantly.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
board/toradex/apalis_imx6/apalis_imx6.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 i
: Ricardo Salveti
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c
index 1f230aca33..a98fab8f1c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c
@@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ __weak void __noreturn
OP-TEE uses the memory region defined by the maximum DRAM address minus
CONFIG_OPTEE_TZDRAM_SIZE, so subtract CONFIG_OPTEE_TZDRAM_SIZE from the
available DRAM size to avoid conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
board/toradex/apalis_imx6/apalis_imx6.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5
Toradex Apalis iMX6 modules are available in the iMX6D and iMX6Q
variants, which are quite similar and already managed via only one
dtb in u-boot (imx6-apalis.dtb). Select MX6Q via Kconfig by default in
order to automatically enable the HAS_CAAM and MX6_SMP features.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo
Only one dtb is currently supported, so match with imx6-apalis.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
board/toradex/apalis_imx6/apalis_imx6.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/toradex/apalis_imx6/apalis_imx6.c
b/board/toradex/apalis_imx6/apalis_imx6.c
index
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 9:58 AM Max Krummenacher <
max.krummenac...@toradex.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 18:12 -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> > Commit e37ac717d796 ("Convert to use fsl_esdhc_imx for i.MX platforms")
> > converted FSL_ESDHC to FSL_ESDH
CONFIG_OPTEE_TZDRAM_SIZE from the available DRAM size to avoid
> > conflicts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
> > ---
> > board/toradex/apalis_imx6/apalis_imx6.c | 5 +
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/board/toradex/
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:34 AM Igor Opaniuk wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:53 PM Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 12:09 AM Peng Fan wrote:
> > >
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] apalis_imx6: allocate sp
Commit e37ac71 converted FSL_ESDHC to FSL_ESDHC_IMX, but the config
check for colibri_imx6 wasn't updated accordantly.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
board/toradex/colibri_imx6/colibri_imx6.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/toradex/colibri
e.g. config.txt
> >> and
> >> that will break booting the system.
> >>
> >> But from your response it seems thats not what you are experiencing. Or do
> >> you
> >> change the DTB loaded from FW in the U-Boot shell?
> >
> >
> > Maybe I wasn't too clear in my explanation ;-)
> >
> > At every boot, u-boot executes set_fdt_addr() function. At the very first
> > boot,
> > if nobody has changed the default u-boot environment built in u-boot,
> > adding a
> > custom fdt_addr variable, this function saves the fdt_addr variable in
>
> Which function are we talking about? Adding a custom fdt_addr can be done via
> the CLI or by adding that to the U-Boot sources (include/configs/rpi.h) but
> not
> through a 'function'.
>
> Do you mean that in some script you made saveenv is called? I used overlays in
> RPi and never had that problem.
>
> Actually I'm a bit puzzled about the problem. Can you give me a step by step
> reproducer, starting with which config I should use to compile U-Boot?
Yes, this issue only happens if you save the environment at least
once, as then on following boots it won't set the address based on
what the firmware uses, but instead restore the value from the saved
environment, which can be wrong.
I noticed the same when moving one sdcard between boards, and I was
only able to get it to boot correctly after removing the saved
environment.
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:12 AM Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 29/09/2021 23:05, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:49 PM Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >> On 29/09/2021 14:19, Mauro Salvini wrote:
> >>> Hi Matthias,
> >>>
> >>>
NOWHERE when no valid
mode is found.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/soc.c | 35 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/soc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/soc.c
index f2ddc834d4b
ng default environment
In:serial
Out: serial
Err: serial
Net:
Warning: ethernet@30be using MAC address from ROM
eth0: ethernet@30be
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
MMC Device 0 not found
no mmc device at slot 0
MMC Device 0 not found
no mmc device at slot 0
Will investigate more tomorrow, but reporting as you might know where
the problem is.
Thanks,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
Hi Fabio,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 6:44 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:20 PM Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>
> > Can you also confirm if mmc is working correctly on imx8mm evk?
>
> I don't have access to a imx8mm_evk at the moment,
restore_jtag();
#else
if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_I2C) && CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(I2C_EEPROM))
Do you want me to send a patch directly to you or do you prefer to
squash the changes as it seems this wasn't asked to be merged upstream
yet?
Thanks,
--
Ricardo Salveti
Config check should be done without the SPL_ prefix.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
board/xilinx/zynqmp/zynqmp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/board/xilinx/zynqmp/zynqmp.c b/board/xilinx/zynqmp/zynqmp.c
index dfb5dab7afa..2b5239ccb47 100644
--- a/board
is available in env_get_bootm_size when bootm_size is
not defined by the default environment.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
board/xilinx/common/board.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/xilinx/common/board.c b/board/xilinx/common/board.c
index 78a5d0efa86
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:33 AM Michal Simek wrote:
> On 1/19/22 23:52, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> > The available ram can be limited by ram_top as that depends on the
> > reserved memory nodes provided by the device-tree (via
> > board_get_usable_ram_top), so make sure to
is available in env_get_bootm_size when bootm_size is
not defined by the default environment.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti
---
Change in v2:
- Declare bootm_size based on ram top and base
board/xilinx/common/board.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/board
k.
Thanks,
--
Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2/14/22 21:10, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Michal,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a bit similar to the issue raised on iMX8-based targets a few
> >>>>
hat can be used on almost
any design with xilinx ppc405 replacing the file ppc405-generic/xparameters.h
This patch is prepared to work with the latest version of EDK (10.1)
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Please patch it against ppc4xx
hat can be used on almost
any design with xilinx ppc405 replacing the file ppc405-generic/xparameters.h
This patch is prepared to work with the latest version of EDK (10.1)
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Includes changes propossed by Stefan Roese
-Remove
. This should be done step by step... Right
now there is one board incoming for this infrastructure (by Georg
Schardt)
Best regards
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.d
hat can be used on almost
any design with xilinx ppc405 replacing the file ppc405-generic/xparameters.h
This patch is prepared to work with the latest version of EDK (10.1)
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
v2
Includes changes propossed by Stefan Roese
-Remove
Xilinx ppc440 and ppc405 have many similarities. This patch merge the
config files of both infrastuctures
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/avnet/fx12mm/xparameters.h |2 +-
include/configs/fx12mm.h |3 -
include/configs/ml507.h
you think?
Best regards
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 18:02, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Ricardo Ribalda Delgado,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I thi
I think I did send this mail to the old mail list
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 08:59
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] (Resend)Allows negative offset in
command loads
To: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL
that the srec.
On the other hand, it cant be avoided in the .bin object. It has no
information about memory location.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 8
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/xilinx/ml507/.gitignore |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 board/xilinx/ml507/.gitignore
diff --git a/board/xilinx/ml507/.gitignore b/board/xilinx/ml507/.gitignore
new fil
Cheap board by Avnet for evaluating the Virtex5 FX technology.
This patch adds support for:
- UartLite
- 16MB Flash
- 64MB RAM
Prior using U-boot in this board, read carefully the ERRATA by Avnet
to solve some memory initialization issues.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EM
Using this philosophy, there is no code replication, boards are
explicitly supported and future boards with rare features will be also
supported easily
Any ideas/sugestion?
Best regards
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 15:05, Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ricardo, Stefan
oday after.
Regards
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 05:33, Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
>> Hi Michal, Hi Ricardo,
>>
>> On Sunday 24 August 2008, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> I agree with you that the code of ml507 and other board
the generic board should not support it: otherwise
the generic board will have many defiles like #ifdef
STRANGE_BOARD_USED_ONCE :)
Waiting for your comments.
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot
mpile
c) Complex boards (1% of the time)
Create a new folder for the board, like the ml507
Waiting for your comments
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
CREDITS|3 +-
MAINTAINERS
some month
> ago special bsp called top which just create a wrapper on every useful bps and
> run them.
> In my case I only set top bsp which pass information to u-boot bsp, petalinux,
> ecos, fdt and some others which I use for developing. Adding one more for
> older
> ppc boar
here was a discussion about this
on the list.
>> Thanks again for your comments
>>
>
> OK. I think we found a solution.
>
Again, Thanks for your comments, and sorry for not adding you in the
Hello line. At least I did also sent
d-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
CREDITS|3 +-
MAINTAINERS|2 +
MAKEALL|4 +
Makefile
Hello Wolfwang
Ok, next version will include the xilinx word
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 14:04, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Ricardo Ribalda Delgado,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> This patch provides an unificated wa
changed (wdenx)
- Copyright issues
- RFC->Patch Propossal
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
CREDITS|3 +-
MAINTAINERS|2 +
MAKEALL
Best regards
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 03:48, Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ricardo,
>
> sorry that the review took so long. Here we go:
>
> On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>> This patch provides an unificated way o
Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Ricardo,
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>> ml507_flash_config: unconfig
>>BOARD_DIR=$(obj)board/xilinx/ml507 \
>>TEXT_BASE=0xFE36 \
>>
rds that have to be configured the same way. Nevertheless is
your/Stefan choose.
Regards
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 17:01, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear "Ricardo Ribalda Delgado",
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>&g
18:24, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear "Ricardo Ribalda Delgado",
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> Before this "unification" patch I send another path that did treat
>> the avnet board as a new board (a lot
via
jtag cable or a first stage loader: it is used for debugging and
restore the system. ml507_flash generates an image that is stored in
the flash of the system: It will be used on a normal base.
Thanks and Best Regards
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
_
changed (wdenx)
- Copyright issues
- RFC->Patch Propossal
v4 diff:
- MAKEALL gives same output as other boards (stefan)
- Simplify board configuration (wdenx)
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
CREDITS|
For the record:
What Stefan says is completely true. Last version of u-boot does not
give wrong info without my patch.
Regards
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:54, Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ricardo,
>
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrot
SREC files do not need gap fill: The load address is specified in the file.
On the other hand, it can't be avoided in a .bin object. It has no
information about memory location.
diff in v2:
-Change comment (wd)
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile |
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not
> stopped.
>-- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hello Stefan
You can forget about this patch.
With the commit e07f4a8033b6270b8103049adb6456f660ff4a89 it is not again needed
Best regards
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 08:56, Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 August 2008, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>>
This patch solves the problems compiling ml507, v5fx30teval and
ppc440-generic out of tree.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile | 49 +++---
board/xilinx/ppc440-generic/Makefile |4 +-
2
Hello Wolfgang
I just wanted to avoid the creation of one config.mk per board. A
new version is in the mailbox.
Best regards
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 09:18, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Ricardo Ribalda Delgado,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
This patch solves the problems compiling ml507, v5fx30teval and
ppc440-generic out of tree.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile | 46 ---
board/avnet/v5fx30teval/.gitignore |1 -
board
Any feedback?
Thanks
--
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
CONFIG_EEPROM_SIMUL_LEN
and CONFIG_EEPROM_SIMUL_DATA to define the content
of the simulated eeprom
Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/i2c/Makefile |1 +
drivers/i2c/eeprom_si
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/xilinx/ppc440-generic/config.mk |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/xilinx/ppc440-generic/config.mk
b/board/xilinx/ppc440-generic/config.mk
index 8d220da..6d76755 100644
--- a
only work out of three,
Best regards
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 17:44, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/xilinx/ppc440-generic/config.mk |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index e8bbd78..116d9e7 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1488,9 +1488,9 @@ v5fx30teval_flash_config: un
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/avnet/v5fx30teval/.gitignore |1 +
board/xilinx/ml507/.gitignore |1 +
board/xilinx/ppc440-generic/.gitignore |1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 board
Hello Stefan,
Hello Wolfgang,
Hello Michal,
I have tried the code on a Propietary Virtex5 fx board (ppc440) and it
works Thanks for your work.
Regards!
--
Ricardo Ribalda
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo