Re: [U-Boot] AT91RM9200 boots from NOR Flash or not

ranch to the > lowlevel_init no matter what. > > I know its what someone would call a hack, but it works :) > > Mvh. / Best Regards > > Martin Hejnfelt Thanx Martin, the board speaks to me. Regards Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot maili

[U-Boot] AT91RM9200 boots from NOR Flash or not

-boot can't boot without a preloader as long CONFIG_AT91RM9200 is defined. Is there an open patch to resolve this? Can you get an example for a working implementation? Best regarts Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lis

Re: [U-Boot] AT91RM9200 boots from NOR Flash or not

> Dear Jens Scharsig, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> the board speaks to me. > > A patch, a patch - submit a patch, please. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > Dear Wolfgang Denk, I can do this in few weeks. But I have

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91rm9200: fix broken boot from nor flash

igned-off-by: Jens Scharsig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/cpu/arm920t/start.S b/cpu/arm920t/start.S index 17977c2..52aff13 100644 --- a/cpu/arm920t/start.S +++ b/cpu/arm920t/start.S @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ * MA 02111-1307 USA */ - #include #include #include @@ -178,8 +177,6 @@

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91rm9200: fix broken boot from nor flash

9200DF board. Blame it on this solution is the #ifdef construct in /cpu/arm920t/start.s at line 264. There are no low_level_init run for DK, EK andDF board. It's only effect on Atmel Boards. I can't test is it truth. So the question goes to DK users and arm

[U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91RM9200 BGA port D defines

This patch add's the defines for port d I/Os on AT91RM9200 (BGA package) Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-at91rm9200/AT91RM9200.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-at91rm9200/AT91RM9200.h index 95db017..308dea1 100644 --- a/include/a

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91rm9200: fix errors with CONFIG_CMD_I2C_TREE

This patch prevents linker error on AT91RM9200 boards, if CONFIG_CMD_I2_TREE is set. It implements i2c_set_bus_speed and i2c_get_bus_speed as a dummy function. Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91rm9200: fix errors with CONFIG_CMD_I2C_TREE

ff-by: Jens Scharsig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c index 826cea8..48d3986 100644 --- a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c +++ b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c @@ -203,4 +203,14 @@ void i2c_reg_write(uchar i2c_addr, uchar reg

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2012.04-rc2 and -rc3 are out

push out April 21, 2012. Tested-by: Jens Scharsig for both boards (eb_cpux9k2 and EB_MCF-EV123) maintained by myself Best regards, Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH] eb_cpux9k2: fix chip select

* fix chip select initialization for frame buffer, this will be increase frame buffer access speed Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- board/BuS/eb_cpux9k2/cpux9k2.c |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/BuS/eb_cpux9k2/cpux9k2.c b/board/BuS

[U-Boot] [PATCH] eb_cpux9k2: add ram target configuration

* add ram target for EB+CPUx9k2 board (eb_cpux9k2_ram_config) Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- boards.cfg |3 ++- include/configs/eb_cpux9k2.h |5 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/boards.cfg b/boards.cfg index 3cf75c3..efca4fc 100644

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] eb_cpux9k2: fix chip select

Please ignore this patch, it was send with misconfigured mail server The resend http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/155739/ is the valid one. Best regards Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk

* Fix: return value of get_tbclk * this fixes issue with prematurely restart/retry, if BOOT_RETRY_TIMEOUT is used Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- the V2 supports the actually file structure. the original patch http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-April/069415.html use the old

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk

Sorry I have attach the wrong patch file I ll resend the right as V3 regards Jens ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk

* Fix: return value of get_tbclk * this fixes issue with prematurely restart/retry, if BOOT_RETRY_TIMEOUT is used Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- the V3 supports the actually file structure. the original patch http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-April/069415.html use the old

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk

d be corrected. Right, but this isn't only a problem of AT91 arch. Is should be fixed global. The code is correct, if get_ticks returns real long long values. > > I was going to rework that timer sooner or later to address all > those issues, but yo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91_emac.h: fix typo in register definition

Am 29.08.2010 13:54, schrieb Andreas Bießmann: > Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_emac.h |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_emac.h > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_e

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk

Am 2010-08-31 09:36, schrieb Reinhard Meyer: > Hi, > } > -- 1.6.0.2 > > Applied to u-boot-atmel/next > Thanks, > > Reinhard > What is the reason for the new branch/Custodian Tree u-boot-atmel. Thanks for more details Jens ___ U-Boot mailing list U-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk

Am 2010-09-01 09:30, schrieb Reinhard Meyer: > > at91_emac AND macb? > > macb works for AVR32AP700x and (at least) for AT91SAM9260/9G20/9XE. > > What is the deal with at91_emac? Is it required for some AT91's > because macb does not work there? > > Does it provide better "results" than macb? >

Re: [U-Boot] date time

Am 2010-09-10 23:08, schrieb Charles Seedle: > There is a messege in the u-boot boot log showing where it set the system > time. I tried to setting the date and time using the linux command, "date". > It set them but once the I rebooted the board the values for date and time > were wrong again. Cou

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2010.09-rc2 is out / "next" branch available

Boot/ReleaseCycle > > Please help testing, and check if all your relevant patches have been > included. > > I've checked the boards eb_cpux9k2 and EB+MCF-EV123, both work with rc2 regards Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH] add new board vl_ma2sc

* add support for board VL+MA2SC * adds vl_ma2sc_config for standard NOR boot configuration * adds vl_ma2sc_ram_config for RAM load configuration Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- MAINTAINERS |1 + board/BuS/vl_ma2sc/Makefile | 54 board/BuS/vl_ma2sc/vl_ma2sc.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add new board vl_ma2sc

ATMEL_BASE_LCDC, }; This block i have "stolen" from at91sam9263 board. and #define CONFIG_ETHADDR 00:4D:41:02:52:43 /* MA2SC */ Can your teach me the right format for things like this? Thanks Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boo

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] add new board vl_ma2sc

* add support for board VL+MA2SC * adds vl_ma2sc_config for standard NOR boot configuration * adds vl_ma2sc_ram_config for RAM load configuration Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- Changes since V1: * remove dead targets from Makefile * remove fantasy mac address from config * fix: codesyle 0

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2012.07-rc1 is out - release date July 23

Am 2012-07-10 09:31, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > Hi everybody, > > this is to let you know that the v2012.07-rc1 prerelease is out. > Tested-by: Jens Scharsig for boards maintained by myself (EB_MCF-EV123, eb_cpux9k2 and vl_ma2sc) Best regards, J

Re: [U-Boot] Splash Screen Enable in (u-boot-2009.08.tar.gz) U-boot source code.

Hello, Am 2013-03-25 10:55, schrieb nandakumar.ramasw...@pricoltech.com: > > Hello, > > I would like to enable & view the splash screen in U-Boot source > (u-boot-2009.08.tar.gz) code. > > Please help me to come-out from this task. Please read the U-Boot documentation

Re: [U-Boot] Splash Screen Enable in (u-boot-2013.01.01.tar.bz2) U-boot source code.

Dear Nandakumar. > So, please share the SPLASH SCREEN image enable procedure for latest U-boot > (u-boot-2013.01.01.tar.bz2) source code for i.mx53loco. I'm not familiar with imx53loco board. But I see Splash and BMP are enabled in config. So you need only burn you splash to flash and set the en

Re: [U-Boot] Fwd: uboot compilation problem

Dear Rajeev Rao Battu: > Hi, > I am working As R&D engineer. Presently i am compiling u-boot.2011.03 > and i am facing bit problem.following is the problem while compiling u-boot. > i am using cross compile tool chain. I am trying to compile for > AT91SAM9260/61 controller. > The AT91SAM9260

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot 1.3.4 - splash screen problem

Am 2011-08-29 16:04, schrieb Ramonf: > > Hi, I'm running uboot 1.3.4 on AT91SAM9M10EKES board. I'm trying to load BMP > into it, but I get > "There is no valid bmp file at the given address" when I'm running bmp info. > > what I do is this: > > $ tftp 1 tftpboot/ramon.bmp > $ bmp i 1 >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] eb_cpux9k2: fix chip select

Dear Andreas Bießmann, Please could you apply this open patch. I've just tested this against the current atmel and master tree. It works. best regards Jens Scharsig > * fix chip select initialization for frame buffer, this will be > increase frame buffer access speed > > Si

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] eb_cpux9k2: add ram target configuration

Dear Andreas Bießmann, Please could you also apply this open patch. I've just tested this against the current atmel and master tree. Thanks best regards Jens Scharsig Am 2012-04-29 20:01, schrieb Jens Scharsig: > * add ram target for EB+CPUx9k2 board (eb_cpux9k2_ram_config) > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] eb_cpux9k2: add ram target configuration

Dear Andreas Bießmann, >> >> Please could you also apply this open patch. > > sorry, this one slipped through. Please add some at91/atmel to the > subject line next time to get my attention. Blame it on myself. I forgot the arch comment in subject Best r

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2013.01-rc2 released

Am 2012-12-14 22:52, schrieb Tom Rini: > In my TODO list in patchwork, nothing strikes me as new feature posted > before the merge window closed. I see a few bug fixes I might pull in, > or might sit on to make sure they don't cause surprises. It's of course > possible I missed something, or som

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] m68k/lib: fix serial driver relocation

gd->reloc_off = dest_addr - CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE; > > + serial_initialize(); > + > monitor_flash_len = (ulong)&__init_end - dest_addr; > > #if defined(CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC) > Acked-by: Jens Scharsig (BuS Elektronik) Tested-by: Jens Scharsig (BuS Elektronik) ___

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2013.01-rc3 out

something else that needs reviewing and > going in, thanks! > the relocation of serial functions on m68k arch does not work correct. we need the patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/201421/ in finale release regards Jens Scharsig ___ U-Bo

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2012.04-rc1 is out

2012.04-rc1. But for full functionality, please apply patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104279/ Thanks and Best regards, Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2012.04-rc1 is out

lease. Btw. it's marked accepted in > patchwork, how come? I don't know, but I have following theory: Reinhard Meyer has accept the patch for long time for atmel tree. But since Reinhard is busy, there are no pull requests or rebases from/to atmel repository. Best regards, Jens Sch

[U-Boot] [PATCH][resubmit] eb_cpux9k2: add USB host support to board

* add USB host support to eb_cpux9k2 board Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- include/configs/eb_cpux9k2.h | 14 ++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/eb_cpux9k2.h b/include/configs/eb_cpux9k2.h index 9046cf0..eb05e2a 100644 --- a/include

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][resubmit] eb_cpux9k2: add USB host support to board

Dear Marek Vasut, Dear e...@bus-elektronik.de, Am 2012-04-01 18:14, schrieb Marek Vasut: Dear Jens Scharsig, * add USB host support to eb_cpux9k2 board Did you test this too? Of course, I've test this with/against current RC1. Ok, I can pick this up and push through my staging .

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][resubmit] eb_cpux9k2: add USB host support to board

Dear Marek Vasut, Dear e...@bus-elektronik.de, Am 2012-04-01 18:14, schrieb Marek Vasut: Dear Jens Scharsig, * add USB host support to eb_cpux9k2 board Did you test this too? Of course, I've test this with/against current RC1. Ok, I can pick this up and push through my st

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] new video driver for bus vcxk framebuffers

ving this code to functions which use board specific macros? > These functions should be placed in this new video driver then. > I will complete review the code. I think, i can sent a new patch set within one week Best regards, Jens Scharsig

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2 V2] new video driver and board update

completely revised. No board-specific VCxK code is located in the config files. Some alignment, indent and code style issues are fixed. regards Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 V2] update the EB+MCF-EV123 board support

Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/board/BuS/EB+MCF-EV123/EB+MCF-EV123.c b/board/BuS/EB+MCF-EV123/EB+MCF-EV123.c index 73dfb3d..ef09246 100644 --- a/board/BuS/EB+MCF-EV123/EB+MCF-EV123.c +++ b/board/BuS/EB+MCF-EV123/EB+MCF-EV123.c @@ -27,7 +27,18 @@ #include #include #include &quo

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] new video driver for bus vcxk framebuffers

This patch adds a new video driver * adds common bus_vcxk framebuffer driver Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/doc/README.bus_vcxk b/doc/README.bus_vcxk new file mode 100644 index 000..4eb8fe8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/README.bus_vcxk @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +/* + * (C) Copyright 2008

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] new video driver for bus vcxk framebuffers

ter terminal screen. The > answer to that is that if you need more than 3 levels of > indentation, you're screwed anyway, and should fix your > program. > > Please clean up and resubmit. Fixed Please see [PATCH 1/2 V3] new video driver for bus vc

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V3] new video driver for bus vcxk framebuffers

This patch adds a new video driver * adds common bus_vcxk framebuffer driver Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/doc/README.bus_vcxk b/doc/README.bus_vcxk new file mode 100644 index 000..4eb8fe8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/README.bus_vcxk @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +/* + * (C) Copyright 2008

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 V2] update the EB+MCF-EV123 board support

Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > Dear Jens Scharsig, > > Please restrict the line length of the commit message to 70 characters > or less. > ... > > Incorrect brace style. > > ... > Please s/,/, /g > > Fixed in [PATCH 2/2 V3] update the EB+MCF-EV123 board su

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 C3] update the EB+MCF-EV123 board support

Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/board/BuS/EB+MCF-EV123/EB+MCF-EV123.c b/board/BuS/EB+MCF-EV123/EB+MCF-EV123.c index 73dfb3d..7190aa1 100644 --- a/board/BuS/EB+MCF-EV123/EB+MCF-EV123.c +++ b/board/BuS/EB+MCF-EV123/EB+MCF-EV123.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* - * (C) Copyright 2005 + * (C

[U-Boot] [Patch] Fix compiler warning vcxk

My new video driver vcxk produce a compiler warning. I'm sorry about this. This patch will * FIX: bus_vcxk.c:383: warning: unused variable 'lineptr' Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/drivers/video/bus_vcxk.c b/drivers/video/bus_vcxk.c index b3b53e1..7726bb3 10064

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch] Fix compiler warning vcxk

Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > > Please note that comments to the patch should go below "---" > line so that they do not appear in the commit message, e.g. > in this case: > > This patch will > > * FIX: bus_vcxk.c:383: warning: unused variable 'lineptr' > > Your SOB > --- > Here is the place for c

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch] Fix compiler warning vcxk

Dear Wolfgang Denk, > Applied (after editing the commit message; hope this is OK). No problem, the change commit message describes the right thing. best regards Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx

Re: [U-Boot] AT91SAM9260 Ethernet Device

Dear J.Hwan.Kim, > Hi, everyone > > I'm trying to connect ethernet with AT91SAM9260. > My board uses DM9161A as a ethernet transceiver. > > The u-boot ethernet initialization routine runs auto-negotiation, > it works fine. Ethernet controller of AT91SAM9260 > (MACB0) receives Auto negotiation c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT92RM9200 EMAC driver for NET MULTI API

Dear Wolfgang Denk, Dear Ben Warren, I'm still working on a patch set for AT91 SoC access with c structures. This will include a reintroduce of this patch. Best regards, Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.de

[U-Boot] [Patch 1/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* prepare board config files for Soc access update Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- include/configs/afeb9260.h |4 ++ include/configs/at91cap9adk.h |4 ++ include/configs/at91rm9200dk.h | 13 - include/configs/at91rm9200ek.h | 11 - include/configs

[U-Boot] [Patch 0/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

ready I hope there are somewhere a some volunteers to make the next steps. Best regards Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [Patch 3/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add new hardware header files for at91 emac, matrix, mc, pdc, st and tc controller * add at91rm9200 definitions, need for join at91rm9200 into at91 arch Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91_emac.h | 145 +++ include/asm-arm/arch

[U-Boot] [Patch 5/8 Part2/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* insert AT91 SoC access using c-stuctures Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c index 98d90f2..274a135 100644 --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91

[U-Boot] [Patch 6/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add new at91_gpio driver, using c structure SoC access Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 240 ++ 1 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c diff --git a/drivers/gpio

[U-Boot] [Patch 8/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add's support for new board eb_cpux9k2 * demonstrates, how to integrate at91rm9200 boards into at91 arch Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- MAKEALL|3 + Makefile |3 + board/BuS/eb_cpux9k2/Makefile | 51 + board/BuS/eb_cp

[U-Boot] [Patch 5/8 Part1/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* insert AT91 SoC access using c-stuctures Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/at91sam9263ek.c | 146 +- board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c |9 +- cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91cap9_devices.c | 88 --- cpu/arm926ejs

[U-Boot] [Patch 5/8 Part3/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* insert AT91 SoC access using c-stuctures Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9g45.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9g45.h index 0feed9c..78c0b16 100644 --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9g45.h +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9g45.h

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch 2/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

Sorry about the fault sender Best regards Jens ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [Patch 7/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add new at91_emac driver * using c structure SoC access * supports NET_MULTI for AT91RM9200 Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- drivers/net/at91_emac.c | 498 +++ 1 files changed, 498 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/net

[U-Boot] [Patch 2/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add at91 soc to arm920t, needs to join at91rm9200 into at91 arch Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu/arm920t/at91/Makefile| 47 ++ cpu/arm920t/at91/lowlevel_init.S | 177 ++ cpu/arm920t/at91/reset.c | 58 cpu

[U-Boot] [Patch 4/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* prepare AT91RM9200 arch for SoC access update Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/bcm5221.c |4 ++-- cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/dm9161.c |3 +-- cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/timer.c |1 - cpu/arm920t/cpu.c

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch 0/8] add at91 SoC access with c structures

Hello Tom, >> >> I hope there are somewhere a some volunteers to make the next steps. >> > Jens, > Will you be able to make the revisions to this patchset ? > Tom > Yes, I will. But I have not time enough to convert other boards and driver

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch 5/8 Part2/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

0##PORT - 9) * 32 + ((PIN) & 0x1F)) Best regards Jens Scharsig ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [Patch 5/8 Part2/3 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* insert AT91 SoC access using c-stuctures Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c index 98d90f2..274a135 100644 --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch 5/8 Part2/3 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

Am 2010-01-16 16:18, schrieb Tom: > Where are the other patches ? > Is this a pending patchset ? > Tom Hello Tom sorry about the confusions. The V2 change is described in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066408.html so only the [Patch 5/8 Part2/3] is effected. Thats the reason

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* prepare board config files for Soc access update Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- include/configs/afeb9260.h |4 ++ include/configs/at91cap9adk.h |4 ++ include/configs/at91rm9200dk.h | 13 - include/configs/at91rm9200ek.h | 11 - include/configs

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add at91 soc to arm920t, needs to join at91rm9200 into at91 arch Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu/arm920t/at91/Makefile| 47 ++ cpu/arm920t/at91/lowlevel_init.S | 177 ++ cpu/arm920t/at91/reset.c | 58 cpu

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add new hardware header files for at91 emac, matrix, mc, pdc, st and tc controller * add at91rm9200 definitions, need for join at91rm9200 into at91 arch Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91_emac.h | 145 +++ include/asm-arm/arch-at91

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* prepare AT91RM9200 arch for SoC access update Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/bcm5221.c |4 ++-- cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/dm9161.c |3 +-- cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/timer.c |1 - cpu/arm920t/cpu.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8 V2 Part 1/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* insert AT91 SoC access using c-stuctures Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/at91sam9263ek.c | 146 +- board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c |9 +- cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91cap9_devices.c | 88 --- cpu/arm926ejs

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8 V2 Part 1/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* insert AT91 SoC access using c-stuctures Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c index 98d90f2..274a135 100644 --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8 V2 Part 3/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* insert AT91 SoC access using c-stuctures Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9g45.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9g45.h index 0feed9c..78c0b16 100644 --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9g45.h +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91sam9g45.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add new at91_gpio driver, using c structure SoC access Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 240 ++ 1 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c diff --git a/drivers/gpio

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add new at91_emac driver * using c structure SoC access * supports NET_MULTI for AT91RM9200 Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- drivers/net/at91_emac.c | 498 +++ 1 files changed, 498 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/net

[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* add's support for new board eb_cpux9k2 * demonstrates, how to integrate at91rm9200 boards into at91 arch Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- MAKEALL|3 + Makefile |3 + board/BuS/eb_cpux9k2/Makefile | 51 + board/BuS/eb_cp

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8 V2 Part 2/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

* insert AT91 SoC access using c-stuctures Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c index 98d90f2..274a135 100644 --- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9m10g45_devices.c +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8 V2 Part 1/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

Sorry should named [PATCH 5/8 V2 Part 2/3] add at91 SoC access with c structures ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

Hello Tom > It is unclear why arm920t/at91rm9200 -> arm920t/at91 > I am not in favor of renaming dirs or making multiple copies > of the same file. the intention is, the at91rm9200 integrates in at91 tree. So I create a new dir for files with c structur soc access. If all boards converted to at91

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

Please look at for Patchset details ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

Am 2010-01-17 19:25, schrieb Tom: > > By bisectable, i mean that early patches do not depend on later patches. > It should be possible to just apply patch 1 without applying any of > the other patch. > This is my current problem. I underestimated the extent of the changes, when I started. Secondl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8 V2] add at91 SoC access with c structures

Hello Tom, > By bisectable, i mean that early patches do not depend on later patches. > It should be possible to just apply patch 1 without applying any of > the other patch. > > Patch 1 looks like is contains the union of all the config file changes. > What it should have contained was only 1 cha

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9 V3] add at91 SoC access with c structures

What this Patch set do: * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs that not converted by this patch * add's a warning to all files, that not converted by this patch * add's the support for AT91RM9200 in at91 tree * add's c stucture SoC defines * convert all files cpu/../at

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 V3] add new CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

* add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs * This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated SoC is used. * please see README.at91-soc for details Signed-off-by: Jens Sch

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9 V3] add c structures for SoC access

* add's c structures for SoC access to pheriperials head files * add's missing pheriperials head files (new SoC) Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91_matrix.h | 125 +++ include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91_pdc.h| 41

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9 V3] add a new AT91 GPIO driver

* add a real AT91 GPIO driver instead of header inline code * change board config files to use new driver Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- drivers/gpio/Makefile |1 + drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 240 include/asm-arm/arch-at91

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9 V3] convert common files to new SoC access

* convert common files in cpu/../at91 and a lot of drivers to use c stucture SoC access * add's a warning to all files, which need update to new SoC access Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91cap9_devices.c |4 + cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9261_devi

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9 V3] convert all at91 files to use at91_gpio driver syntax

* convert all files cpu/../at91 to use at91_gpio driver syntax * change AT91_PINP([A-F])(\d+) to AT91_PORTPIN(\1, \2), this makes all 160 AT91_PINPxxx defines obsolete * AT91_PINPxxx defines can be remove if all boards converted to new SoC access Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9 V3] update at91sam9263ek board to new SoC access

* convert at91sam9263ek board to use c stucture SoC access * demonstates how to use new SoC Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/at91sam9263ek.c | 147 +++-- board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c |9 +- include/configs/at91sam9263ek.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9 V3] prepare joining at91rm9200 into at91

* prepare joining at91 and at91rm9200 * please read README.soc-at91 for details Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- cpu/arm920t/at91/Makefile | 47 + cpu/arm920t/at91/lowlevel_init.S | 177 cpu/arm920t/at91/reset.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9 V3] new at91_emac network driver (NET_MULTI api)

ff-by: Jens Scharsig --- README | 10 + board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/at91rm9200dk.c | 15 + board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/at91rm9200ek.c | 14 + board/cmc_pu2/cmc_pu2.c | 13 + board/csb637/csb637.c | 13 + board/eukrea/cpuat91/cpua

[U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9 V3] new board (eb_cpux9k2)

* support for EB+CPUx9K2 board by BuS Elektronik GmbH & Co. KG * select via make eb_cpux9k2_config * this also demonstrates, how to use boards with AT91RM9200 cpu in at91 arch tree Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- MAINTAINERS| 14 +- MAK

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 V3.1] add new CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

* add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated SoC is used. Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig --- doc/README.at91-soc|

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9 V3] add c structures for SoC access

Tom wrote: >> > > I was expecting this patch to convert existing #define's to c struct's > I was not expecting it to add new features. > The features should be broken out into their own patch. > Specifically at91_matrix > > These are significant enough changes that you should > append a copyright

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9 V3] update at91sam9263ek board to new SoC access

Tom wrote: >> #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_DBW_16 >> - AT91_SMC_DBW_16 | >> + AT91_SMC_MODE_DBW_16 | > > Name of define should not change > apply globally Some flag names are not refer to hw register (e.g.AT91_SMC_DBW_16). In this case defines with new name are add

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9 V3] prepare joining at91rm9200 into at91

Tom wrote: > > Many copyrights like this > Please check > >> + * >> + * Copyright (C) 1999 2000 2001 Erik Mouw (j.a.k.m...@its.tudelft.nl) and >> + * Jan-Derk Bakker (j.d.bak...@its.tudelft.nl) >> + * >> + * Modified for the at91rm9200dk board by > > Maybe change to > 'Based on t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9 V3] convert common files to new SoC access

Tom wrote: >> * convert common files in cpu/../at91 and a lot of drivers to use chose>> >> #include >> +#ifndef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY > > This should be > #ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY > The additions you made to the board configs should take care of this. > Perhaps add an > #ifndef CONFIG_AT91_LEGAC

  1   2   3   >