Am 2010-09-01 09:30, schrieb Reinhard Meyer: > > at91_emac AND macb? > > macb works for AVR32AP700x and (at least) for AT91SAM9260/9G20/9XE. > > What is the deal with at91_emac? Is it required for some AT91's > because macb does not work there? > > Does it provide better "results" than macb? > > Best Regards > Reinhard Hello,
I think the separation has historical reasons. For AT91RM and AT91SAM existed separate drivers and separate arch. I remeber in older datascheets the ethernet inteface also marked with MACB. In my opinion, the at91_emac the latest drivers (NET_MULTI api SoC access via c structurs). But I dont know the exact differences are not of single use devices. Please ask Xu, Hong Best regards Jens _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
