- Original Message -
From: "Wolfgang Denk"
To: "MrGates" <120368...@qq.com>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] "b reset" does not work in u-boot_v2010.12-rc3 with
eldk4.2
> Dear "MrGates",
>
> please always keep the mailing list on cc:
OK, i will.
>
Dear =?UTF-8?B?5byg5oms?=,
In message you
wrote:
>
> > i trying to sue the kernel's Makefile rule, but the issue is not solved.
> WARNING: could not set linux,stdout-path FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND.
> ERROR: /chosen node create failed - must RESET the board to recover.
Well, seems your device tree h
On 01/11/2011 08:48 PM, Ben Gardiner wrote:
> There are two separate issues causing failure of ea20 builds.
>
> I discovered them while trying to build a da850evm load with RMII support. The
> second patch affects all boards that could use CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC_USE_RMII
> of which ea20 is the onl
On 01/11/2011 08:48 PM, Ben Gardiner wrote:
> This patch fixes ea20 after commit 6d8962e814c15807dd6ac5757904be2a02d187b8
> where $(obj)lib$(BOARD).a was changed to $(obj)lib$(BOARD).o in almost all the
> Makefiles except ea20, probably due to merge path of the changes in 2010.12.
>
> Signed-off-b
2011/1/12 Wolfgang Denk :
> Dear =?UTF-8?B?5byg5oms?=,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>>
>> i use dtc compiler with following command:
>> dtc -R 8 -b 0 -O dtb -I dts -S 0x3000 -o my.dtb my.dts
>>
>> Booting process gives following error and reset the board.
>> WARNING: could not creat
Dear Shaohui Xie,
In message <1294817626-4727-1-git-send-email-b21...@freescale.com> you wrote:
> PBL(pre-boot loader): SPI flash used as RCW(Reset Configuration Word) and
> PBI(pre-boot initialization) source, CPC(CoreNet Platform Cache) used as 1M
> SRAM
> where PBL will copy whole U-BOOT image
Dear "MrGates",
In message <745589936d574232be24ea063064b...@mrgates> you wrote:
>
[ lots of unrelated quote deleted]
Please restrict your quoting to the relevant parts; see
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
>I use SkyEye 1.2.5 cooperates with arm-linux-gdb .
>Now the seri
Dear "Wolfgang Denk",
I Think i am debugging on u-boot.Because i am upgrading u-boot from v1.1.2
to v2010.12-rc3.
I have tried to run u-boot on skyeye 1.2.5 ,and that works fine.
Two version of U-boot are base on the same hardwares:
CPU: S3c44b0
FLash: SST30vf3201 (4MByt
Rather than defining it config.mk we can set it in config.h and remove
config.mk from several boards that don't need it.
We mimic what 4xx does and introduce CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS for
config.h to set.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot.lds |8 +++-
boar
On Jan 12, 2011, at 2:10 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> diff --git a/board/freescale/corenet_ds/config.mk
>> b/board/freescale/corenet_ds/config.mk
>> index 15bbf20..918775d 100644
>> --- a/board/freescale/corenet_ds/config.mk
>> +++ b/board/freescale/corenet_ds/config.mk
>> @@ -24,4 +24,10 @@
>> #
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <1294822268-22266-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you
wrote:
>
> #ifndef RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
> +#define RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
> +#else
> #define RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS 0xfffc
> #endif
>
Michal Simek wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> please pull the following changes.
Ping.
Michal
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> The following changes since commit
> 89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
> Mike Frysinger (1):
> asm-offsets: generate bd_t size
>
> are available in the git rep
On Saturday 08 January 2011 07:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 08/01/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit :
>
+/* some utility macros */
+#define mask(start, end) \
+ (((1<< ((end) - (start) + 1)) - 1)<< (start))
+
+#define mask_n_get(reg, start, end) \
+ (((reg)& mask(sta
Old address of RESET_VECTOR were overwritten by the bss sector, making
impossible its run from xmd.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
---
boards.cfg | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boards.cfg b/boards.cfg
index 94b8745..2ba603d 100644
--- a/
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <1294816806-32614-2-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> Global question: do we really need an CONFIG_DIGSY_REV5? Is there not
> a way to determine the revision by probing the hardware? For example,
> the RTC's show up at different addresse
>> ---
>> Use CONFIG_RAMBOOT_PBL instead of CONFIG_PBL_BOOT_INDIRECT according to
>Kumar's comment.
>
>CONFIG_RAMBOOT_PBL needs to be documented in the README!
[Xie Shaohui] OK, I'll submit a patch of README.
>
>
>> /* TLB 1 */
>> /* *I*** - Covers boot page */
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_S
On Jan 12, 2011, at 2:59 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kumar Gala,
>
> In message <1294822268-22266-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you
> wrote:
>>
>> #ifndef RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
>> +#define RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESSCONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_A
Rather than defining it config.mk we can set it in config.h and remove
config.mk from several boards that don't need it.
We mimic what 4xx does and introduce CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS for
config.h to set.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot.lds |8 +++-
boar
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <1294824140-22519-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you
wrote:
> Rather than defining it config.mk we can set it in config.h and remove
> config.mk from several boards that don't need it.
>
> We mimic what 4xx does and introduce CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS f
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <4d2d7122.60...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > Global question: do we really need an CONFIG_DIGSY_REV5? Is there not
> > a way to determine the revision by probing the hardware? For example,
> > the RTC's show up at different addresses on the bus - but ther emight
> >
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> This patch add the MX53 boot image support.
>
> This patch has been tested on Freescale MX53EVK board
> and MX51EVK board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
>
Tested on vision2 board, too.
Tested-by: Stefano Babic
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
==
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> Add initial support for Freescale MX53 processor,
>
> - Add the iomux support and the pin definition,
> - Add the regs definition, clean up some unused def from mx51,
> - Add the low level init support, make use the freq input of setup_pll macro
>
> ---
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> This patch add FEC support for Freescale MX53 processor
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> ---
> drivers/net/fec_mxc.c |2 +-
> drivers/net/fec_mxc.h |4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks.
Best
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> This patch add UART support for Freescale MX53 processor
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> ---
> drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c |6 ++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> This patch add mxc_gpio support for Freescale MX53 processor
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
>
> ---
> Changes for v2
> - put this patch into the same patchset with MX53 support as
> Stefano comments,
> ---
> drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c |9 +++--
>
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> This patch add I2C support for Freescale MX53 processor
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
>
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> -address the comments of Heiko, add #if defined(CONFIG_MX31)
> to avoid break MX31 build. Move CONFIG_HARD_I2C to the top
> of the file an
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> This patch add I2C interface for fsl_pmic driver support
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
>
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - Address the comments from Stefano,
> - factor out the param_check in pmic_reg for both spi/i2c
> - Address the comments from Stefano,
>
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> This patch add the MX53 boot image support.
>
> This patch has been tested on Freescale MX53EVK board
> and MX51EVK board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
>
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - Address the following comments from Stefano,
> - Get rid of #ifdef
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
> Add initial support for MX53EVK board support.
> FEC, SD/MMC, UART, I2C, have been supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
>
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> -Address the comments from Stefano, Albert and Wolfgang,
> -remove the ivt.S file and use imxi
Hi Wolfgang,
> Dear Heiko Schocher,
>
> In message <4d2d7122.60...@denx.de> you wrote:
>>
>> > Global question: do we really need an CONFIG_DIGSY_REV5? Is there not
>> > a way to determine the revision by probing the hardware? For example,
>> > the RTC's show up at different addresses on the bu
Hello Heiko,
[...]
>>> diff --git a/boards.cfg b/boards.cfg
>>> index 94b8745..9e1fc14 100644
>>> --- a/boards.cfg
>>> +++ b/boards.cfg
>>> @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ cm5200 powerpc mpc5xxx
>>> digsy_mtcpowerpc mpc5xxx digsy_mtc
>>> digsy_mtc_LOWBO
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <4d2d7122.60...@denx.de> you wrote:
>>> Global question: do we really need an CONFIG_DIGSY_REV5? Is there not
>>> a way to determine the revision by probing the hardware? For example,
>>> the RTC's show up at different addresses on the bus - but
Hello.
On 11-01-2011 17:52, seedshope wrote:
> Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM
> initial function must be change.
> Signed-off-by: seedshope
> diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
> b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
> index 35aa40b..52b44a8 100644
> ---
Hi,
I am trying to make the new relocation scheme to work on the mx31pdk board.
With this patch applied the mx31pdk build works, but not able to get a U-boot
prompt yet.
I copied the nand_spl/board/karo/tx25/u-boot.lds to the mx31pdk one.
I am not certain whether the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE shoul
On 11.01.2011 3:31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> it isnt a problem to have the parens, and it keeps things sane if someone
>>> does something like:
>>> #define CONFIG_SYS_BD_INFO_ADDR SOME_DEFINE + 0x1000
>> This would be a violation of basic rules of defensive coding.
>> Please drop these parens
Hi Wolfgang & Heiko,
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 08:59:20 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > diff --git a/doc/README.cfi b/doc/README.cfi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..fa35108
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/doc/README.cfi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> > +known issues:
> > +
> > +using M29W128GH from Nu
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <4d2d81c3.7010...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > Maybe you can ask the hardware guys again?
>
> Ok. done. As Detlev mentioned in the meantime the "LOWBOOT" cases
> can be removed, done.
Thanks.
> > For the probing, a temporary address can be used. You set up the
> >
Hi Dirk,
On Monday 10 January 2011 13:33:23 Dirk Eibach wrote:
> Board support for the Guntermann & Drunck DLVision-10G.
A few comments below...
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach
> ---
> MAINTAINERS|1 +
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/global_data.h |3 +
> board/gds
Hi Dirk,
On Monday 10 January 2011 13:33:24 Dirk Eibach wrote:
> Add support for multiple FPGAs per board for gdsys
> 405ep architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/global_data.h |2 +-
> board/gdsys/405ep/405ep.c | 62 +
> board/g
Hi Dirk,
On Monday 10 January 2011 13:33:25 Dirk Eibach wrote:
> Add support for dual link osd hardware for gdsys 405ep.
This patch also changes many lines introduced by the 2 previous patches. Again
I'm thinking if it makes more sense to squash all those 3 patches into one.
Would be interestin
On 01/12/2011 07:08 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 11-01-2011 17:52, seedshope wrote:
>
>> Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM
>> initial function must be change.
>
>> Signed-off-by: seedshope
>
>> diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
>> b/board/samsun
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> From: Alexander Holler
>
> gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
> avoid that as done in the kernel.
>
> Reading C99 6.7.3 8 and the comment 114) there, I think it is a bug of that
> gcc version to ignore the volatile type q
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
> avoid that as done in the kernel.
Have had a look at the asm generated by gcc 4.5.1, looks good.
The wrong optimization in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/clock.c is gone and
the writeb in d
On Jan 12, 2011, at 3:27 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kumar Gala,
>
> In message <1294824140-22519-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you
> wrote:
>> Rather than defining it config.mk we can set it in config.h and remove
>> config.mk from several boards that don't need it.
>>
>> We
> Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2010/12/17 17:13:47:
> >
> > Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
> >
> > In message
> >
> > you wrote:
> > >
> > > > Great! then we got:
> > > > [PATCH] PowerPC: Move -fPIC flag to common place
> > > > [PATCH] PowerPC: Add support for -msingle-pic-base
> > >
> > > How about the abov
Hwconfig is called before relocating. Use the new hwconfig APIs.
Signed-off-by: York Sun
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fsl_corenet_serdes.c | 15 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fsl_corenet_serdes.c
b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc
Dear seedshope,
In message <4d2dc040.7040...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> ok, But I don't know how number tab indent is appropriate. May be the
> effect as following?
You should start reading http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/CodingStyle
(and follow the links shown there).
Best regards,
Wolfgang Den
Dear Alexander Holler,
In message <4d2dcb18.20...@ahsoftware.de> you wrote:
> Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
>
> > gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
> > avoid that as done in the kernel.
>
> Have had a look at the asm generated by gcc 4.5.1, looks good.
Am 12.01.2011 17:40, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Alexander Holler,
>
> In message<4d2dcb18.20...@ahsoftware.de> you wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
>>
>>> gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
>>> avoid that as done in the kernel.
>>
>> Have had a
> -Original Message-
> From: Paulraj, Sandeep [mailto:s-paul...@ti.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:00 PM
> To: Tom Warren; Tom Warren; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] arm: Tegra2: Add support for NVIDIA
> Seaboard board Signed-off-by: Tom Warren
>
> Hi To
Hi Wolfgang,
> Hi all,
>
> In message Detlev Zundel wrote:
>>
>> > may I ask again for opinions about enabling that feature?
>>
>> I also would like to see it. Wolfgang, is there anything that you
>> don't like about this option?
>
> Do you have any comments or pros or cons for/against this re
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 18:47:45 Detlev Zundel wrote:
> >> > may I ask again for opinions about enabling that feature?
> >>
> >> I also would like to see it. Wolfgang, is there anything that you
> >> don't like about this option?
> >
> > Do you have any comments or pros or con
Le 12/01/2011 05:31, Lei Wen a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Lei Wen wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Le 11/01/2011 16:40, Lei Wen a écrit :
flush_cache function should only be called when the dcache is on.
>>
(I realize I did not answer the other ones)
Le 08/01/2011 11:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
>> Out of curiosity, can you elaborate on why the compiler would optimize
>> better in these cases?
>
> While counting down the termination condition check is against 0. So
> you can just decrement the loop count
Le 12/01/2011 10:08, Aneesh V a écrit :
> On Saturday 08 January 2011 07:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Le 08/01/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit :
>>
>
>
> +/* some utility macros */
> +#define mask(start, end) \
> + (((1<< ((end) - (start) + 1)) - 1)<< (start))
> +
> +#define ma
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1294636905-30832-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
>
> asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
---
drivers/block/Makefile |1 +
drivers/block/mxc_ata.c | 149 +++
2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/block/mxc_ata.c
diff --git a/drivers/block/Makefile b/drivers/block/Make
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
---
board/efikamx/Makefile | 52
board/efikamx/config.mk| 25 ++
board/efikamx/efikamx.c| 668
board/efikamx/imximage.cfg | 124
boards.cfg |1 +
include/configs/efikamx.h
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1294636905-30832-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
>
> asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://
Dear Michal Simek,
In message <4d2d6d68.3090...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
> Michal Simek wrote:
> > Dear Wolfgang,
> >
> > please pull the following changes.
>
> Ping.
pong.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, O
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 17:43:37 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > The following changes since commit
89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
> > asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > git://www.d
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 17:44:18 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > The following changes since commit
89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
> > asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > git://www.d
Dear Michal Simek,
In message <4d2abcaf.1040...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> please pull the following changes.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> The following changes since commit 89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
>Mike Frysinger (1):
> asm-offsets: generate bd_t size
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <20110105.30744...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> The following changes since commit 89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
>
> asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://www.de
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <20110045.45419...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> The following changes since commit 0e7790d45c1a2cda40458adb28707eaa5041:
>
> LAN91C*: Change chip names to fit the eth_device struct size (2011-01-10
> 22:38:36
> +0100)
>
> are available in the
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <20110111.42910...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> The following changes since commit 0e7790d45c1a2cda40458adb28707eaa5041:
>
> LAN91C*: Change chip names to fit the eth_device struct size (2011-01-10
> 22:38:36
> +0100)
>
> are available in the
Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
In message you
wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang Denk,
>
> The following changes since commit 0e7790d45c1a2cda40458adb28707eaa5041:
>
> LAN91C*: Change chip names to fit the eth_device struct size
> (2011-01-10 22:38:36 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201101121750.06963.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > I cannot find any trace of these commits on the mailing list nor in
> > patchwork. Am I missing something?
>
> i mentioned in the original summary that these were too large for the list
> because i did quite a
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201101121750.37504.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > See previous message. Not pulled either.
>
> you replied to the same e-mail twice
Sorry, I somehow had a duplicated message in my folder.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
MAINTAINERS |1 +
board/bf506f-ezkit/Makefile | 54 +++
board/bf506f-ezkit/bf506f-ezkit.c | 27 ++
boards.cfg|1 +
include/configs/bf506f-ezkit.h| 102 +++
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 18:03:35 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > I cannot find any trace of these commits on the mailing list nor in
> > > patchwork. Am I missing something?
> >
> > i mentioned in the original summary that these were too large for the
> > list because i
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1294874051-19958-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
> ---
> MAINTAINERS |1 +
> board/bf506f-ezkit/Makefile | 54 +++
> board/bf506f-ezkit/bf506f-ezkit.c | 27
Replying from my Gmail account until NVIDIA IT can remove the canned disclaimer.
Sorry for the top-quote - just wanted to see if Gmail would correctly
quote previous text.
If there are no other critiques or NAKs, etc., then I'll start working
on a V2 patch with
Sandeep's changes.
Thanks,
Tom
O
The following changes since commit c6b734f5aea2ba75caaa1929f7e649ecda8d2f31:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-sh
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash.git master
Alexander Holler (1):
nand: fix bug with m
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 18:10:24 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
> > ---
> >
> > MAINTAINERS |1 +
> > board/bf506f-ezkit/Makefile | 54 +++
> > board/bf506f-ezkit/bf506f-ezkit.c | 27 ++
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201101121808.17659.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> stop making crap up. i'm not "sneaking" anything thing in. i explicitly
> called out these patches on the list and mentioned exactly where to find them.
Did you? In some summary message nobody is going to re
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 14:48:17 Ben Gardiner wrote:
> This patch fixes ea20 after 8ef583a0351590a91394499eb5ca2ab8a703d959 where
> the u-boot custom PHY_ macros were replaced with those of linux/mii.h MII_
> definitions except in the RMII support for davinci_emac. Probably also due
> to the m
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 07:07:32 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Linker needs to use the proper endian/bfd flags even when doing partial
> linking. LDFLAGS_u-boot sets linker option which is called it when U-boot
> is built (u-boot final).
> LDFLAGS sets necessary option by partial linking (use in
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:00:52 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear =?UTF-8?B?5byg5oms?=,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
> >
> > > i trying to sue the kernel's Makefile rule, but the issue is not solved.
> > WARNING: could not set linux,stdout-path FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND.
> > ERROR: /chosen node create
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201101121808.17659.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> stop making crap up. i'm not "sneaking" anything thing in. i explicitly
> called out these patches on the list and mentioned exactly where to find them.
Actually I can see absolutely no good reason for not po
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 18:18:25 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > stop making crap up. i'm not "sneaking" anything thing in. i explicitly
> > called out these patches on the list and mentioned exactly where to find
> > them.
>
> Did you? In some summary message nobody is
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 18:32:36 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > stop making crap up. i'm not "sneaking" anything thing in. i explicitly
> > called out these patches on the list and mentioned exactly where to find
> > them.
>
> Actually I can see absolutely no good reason
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201101121837.43007.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > Actually I can see absolutely no good reason for not posting these patches.
> > As far as I can tell, none of them exceeds the ML's hard size limit.
>
> i dont know what you're looking at, but you're mistaken.
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201101121836.14803.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> that's crap. the whole point of the summary message is to *summarize* the
> patchset and give an overview of what's going on.
Right. But (links to) patches are NOT posted in a summary message but
sperately, w
Hi,
Your Signed-off-by seems to have made its way into the subject line. It
should be moved into the email contents. A brief description of what
this patch does, what peripherals are supported, etc would be nice too.
> create mode 100644 board/tegra2/common/board.c
> create mode 100644 boar
> --- a/boards.cfg
> +++ b/boards.cfg
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ omap4_panda arm armv7
> panda ti
> omap4_sdp4430arm armv7 sdp4430 ti
>omap4
> s5p_goni arm armv7 go
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> In message<4d2d324c.3010...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I met this error (use GNU make 3.80).
>>
>> $ make MPC885ADS_config
>> $ make
>> /home/namsh/work/u-boot/arch/powerpc/config.mk:35: Extraneous text after
>> `else' directive
>> /home/namsh/work/u-boot/arch/p
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:47:08 +0900
gmane wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I met this error (use GNU make 3.80).
"else ifdef" appears to be new in make 3.81.
> $ make MPC885ADS_config
> $ make
> /home/namsh/work/u-boot/arch/powerpc/config.mk:35: Extraneous text after
> `else' directive
> /home/namsh/work/u
> >
> > 1. I want to fit an environment and the bootloader
> into a single flash
> > sector.
>
> This is a very bad idea as it will open a window brick your
> system at
> each and every "saveenv" command.
>
> I strongly recommend not to do that.
This issue is well understood.
Yet, we are talkin
I just got EHCI support working with our chip and I was wondering what sort of
performance I could expect using ext2? Right now it seems extremely slow
coming off of a fast solid-state drive. I'm getting around 100KB/second. It's
running at full-speed (480Mbps). Is this normal?
We are basicall
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, but just looked in patchwork and found that
> I am responsible for your patch, so ...
>
> Chris Packham wrote:
>> This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
>> have 1
Hallo,
Das Managementteam unserer Organisation mochte sich hiermit bei Ihnen fur Ihr
Interesse an unseren Job Angeboten bedanken.
Die Firma AVEKO ist ein Handler der fuhrenden Klimaanlagehersteller, wie z.B.
SAMSUNG, YORK, LG. Au?erdem ist unsere Firma ein Handler von AIRELEC
Gesellschaften, d
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES1_ADDR was defined wrong as CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES2_OFFSET. It should be CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES1_OFFSET.
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/immap_85xx.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deleti
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:02 +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> > Hello Chris,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply, but just looked in patchwork and found that
> > I am responsible for your patch, so ...
> >
> > Chris Packham wrote:
> >> This adds su
Dear Aaron Williams,
In message <201101121955.04367.aaron.willi...@caviumnetworks.com> you wrote:
> I just got EHCI support working with our chip and I was wondering what sort
> of
> performance I could expect using ext2? Right now it seems extremely slow
> coming off of a fast solid-state dri
Dear Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579,
In message
<071a08f2c6a57e4e94d980eca553f874070...@039-sn1mpn1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net> you
wrote:
>
> CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES1_ADDR was defined wrong as CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
> CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES2_OFFSET. It should be CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
> CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_
Thanks for your comments. Please see my response inline.
Regards,
Prabhakar
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 11:42 AM
> To: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] PATCH][v0][85xx/P1_
Hi Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit cdc51c294ad33879c4e57edf4c9d2155381b1d59:
Merge branch 'next' of ../next (2010-12-22 21:16:17 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-imx.git master
Liu Hui-R64343 (9):
MX51EVK: UART does not print ou
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Michal Simek,
>
> In message <4d2d6d68.3090...@monstr.eu> you wrote:
>> Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Dear Wolfgang,
>>>
>>> please pull the following changes.
>> Ping.
>
> pong.
:-)
Best regards,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Le 13/01/2011 07:40, Stefano Babic a écrit :
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> The following changes since commit cdc51c294ad33879c4e57edf4c9d2155381b1d59:
>
>Merge branch 'next' of ../next (2010-12-22 21:16:17 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-imx.git mast
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
