Re: [U-Boot] d-cache enable

2011-08-12 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
On 12/08/2011 15:08, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:21:18 +0200 > Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> Hi Lukasz, >> >> On 12/08/2011 13:41, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> >>> It is embarrassing to admit, but I've __wrongly__ assumed that >>> *_range() functions are accepting the

Re: [U-Boot] d-cache enable

2011-08-12 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Albert, On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:21:18 +0200 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On 12/08/2011 13:41, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > It is embarrassing to admit, but I've __wrongly__ assumed that > > *_range() functions are accepting the start address and range for > > invalidation/flushing.

Re: [U-Boot] d-cache enable

2011-08-12 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Reinhard, On 12/08/2011 14:32, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear *ALL*, >>> It is embarrassing to admit, but I've __wrongly__ assumed that *_range() >>> functions are accepting the start address and range for >>> invalidation/flushing. >> >> Do you mean we're hitting again a confusion between *_rang

Re: [U-Boot] d-cache enable

2011-08-12 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear *ALL*, >> It is embarrassing to admit, but I've __wrongly__ assumed that *_range() >> functions are accepting the start address and range for >> invalidation/flushing. > > Do you mean we're hitting again a confusion between *_range(start, stop) > and *_range(start, length)? > > If so, then

Re: [U-Boot] d-cache enable

2011-08-12 Thread Aneesh V
Hi Lukasz, On Friday 12 August 2011 05:11 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Aneesh, > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:29:25 +0530 > Aneesh V wrote: > >> Hi Lukasz, >> >> On Tuesday 09 August 2011 08:11 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> As we know dcache is now enabled in u-boot. >>> >>> I

Re: [U-Boot] d-cache enable

2011-08-12 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Lukasz, On 12/08/2011 13:41, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > It is embarrassing to admit, but I've __wrongly__ assumed that *_range() > functions are accepting the start address and range for > invalidation/flushing. Do you mean we're hitting again a confusion between *_range(start, stop) and *_ran

Re: [U-Boot] d-cache enable

2011-08-12 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Aneesh, On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:29:25 +0530 Aneesh V wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Tuesday 09 August 2011 08:11 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > As we know dcache is now enabled in u-boot. > > > > I'm trying to make the S5P Goni target working with d-cache enabled. > > There ar

Re: [U-Boot] d-cache enable

2011-08-12 Thread Aneesh V
Hi Lukasz, On Tuesday 09 August 2011 08:11 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Dear all, > > As we know dcache is now enabled in u-boot. > > I'm trying to make the S5P Goni target working with d-cache enabled. > There are some patches and ideas appearing on the list (e.g. > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/

[U-Boot] d-cache enable

2011-08-09 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Dear all, As we know dcache is now enabled in u-boot. I'm trying to make the S5P Goni target working with d-cache enabled. There are some patches and ideas appearing on the list (e.g. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/109199/ made by Aneesh V) I'm currently using the u-boot/master branch, SHA1: