On Friday 11 February 2011 06:16 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
[snip...]
>>>
>>> Note also that there was a recent patch to ARM926's start.S (replacing
>>> 'adr r1, _start' with 'ldr r1, _TEXT_BASE' at line 284). The same should
>>> be done on arm1136.
>>
>> Is this going to happen for armv7 too? What
Le 11/02/2011 11:51, Aneesh V a écrit :
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Wednesday 09 February 2011 02:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Le 08/02/2011 21:18, stefano babic a écrit :
>>> Am 08.02.2011 20:26, schrieb Magnus Lilja:
Patch reposted as a separate mail a couple of minutes ago.
As I mentio
Hi Albert,
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 02:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 08/02/2011 21:18, stefano babic a écrit :
>> Am 08.02.2011 20:26, schrieb Magnus Lilja:
>>> Patch reposted as a separate mail a couple of minutes ago.
>>>
>>> As I mention in the patch I think Fabio's patch has to be app
Hi Albert,
On 2/8/2011 6:50 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 08/02/2011 21:18, stefano babic a écrit :
>> Am 08.02.2011 20:26, schrieb Magnus Lilja:
>>> Patch reposted as a separate mail a couple of minutes ago.
>>>
>>> As I mention in the patch I think Fabio's patch has to be applied first.
>>
>> I
Le 08/02/2011 21:18, stefano babic a écrit :
> Am 08.02.2011 20:26, schrieb Magnus Lilja:
>> Patch reposted as a separate mail a couple of minutes ago.
>>
>> As I mention in the patch I think Fabio's patch has to be applied first.
>
> I think your patch is ok - Fabio fixed the syntax error as you d
Am 08.02.2011 20:26, schrieb Magnus Lilja:
> Patch reposted as a separate mail a couple of minutes ago.
>
> As I mention in the patch I think Fabio's patch has to be applied first.
I think your patch is ok - Fabio fixed the syntax error as you do. We
need only one of them.
> Another solution wou
Hi
>> Please let me know how you want me to proceed.
>
> I think the correct way is that Magnus adds his Signed-off-by to his
> patch, repushing the patch to the list. Please put Albert in CC, as this
> file is competence of the ARM maintainer (well, we tested only on i.MX,
> I see...). I will ta
Am 08.02.2011 18:09, schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> I confirmed that by applying my original patch of this thread plus
> Magnus´ patch above I can get MX31PDK to boot.
Fine.
>
> Please let me know how you want me to proceed.
I think the correct way is that Magnus adds his Signed-off-by to his
patch,
Hi Stefano,
On 2/7/2011 5:48 PM, Magnus Lilja wrote:
...
>
> Here's a somewhat cleaner version of my patch. Hope the mail looks ok, I'm
> having internet connectivity issues this evening so I'm using a different
> installation of Thunderbird than usual.
>
> Regards, Magnus
>
> diff --git a/ar
Hi
On 2011-02-07 15:13, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> I have no idea if this breaks other boards but at least it's start
>>> for further work. I tried it on the imx31 litekit (which boots from
>>> NOR) but that board doesn't seem to boot even before applying
>>> Fabios patch, I'll see if I can figure o
On 02/07/2011 12:32 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> On 2/6/2011 10:03 AM, Magnus Lilja wrote: ...
>
Hi,
>> I have no idea if this breaks other boards but at least it's start
>> for further work. I tried it on the imx31 litekit (which boots from
>> NOR) but that board doesn't seem to b
Hi Magnus,
On 2/6/2011 10:03 AM, Magnus Lilja wrote:
...
> I've done some testing now and ended up comparing start.S for ARM1136 with
> ARM926EJS since
> the latter is used on the Karo TX25 board which seems to have been updated and
> also boots from NAND.
Thanks for looking into this.
> The
Le 06/02/2011 13:03, Magnus Lilja a écrit :
> Hi all
>
> On 01/14/2011 07:33 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> On 1/13/2011 11:38 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> On 01/12/2011 01:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi,
>>>
>>> Hi Fabio,
>>>
I am trying to make the new relocation sch
Hi all
On 01/14/2011 07:33 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 1/13/2011 11:38 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 01:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi Fabio,
>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to make the new relocation scheme to work on the mx31pdk board.
>>>
>>> With this patch
Hi Stefano,
On 1/13/2011 11:38 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 01:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
>>
>> I am trying to make the new relocation scheme to work on the mx31pdk board.
>>
>> With this patch applied the mx31pdk build works, but not able to get a
>> U-boot
On 01/12/2011 01:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Fabio,
>
> I am trying to make the new relocation scheme to work on the mx31pdk board.
>
> With this patch applied the mx31pdk build works, but not able to get a U-boot
> prompt yet.
I have tried to imagine some issues, but I cannot find a
Hi,
I am trying to make the new relocation scheme to work on the mx31pdk board.
With this patch applied the mx31pdk build works, but not able to get a U-boot
prompt yet.
I copied the nand_spl/board/karo/tx25/u-boot.lds to the mx31pdk one.
I am not certain whether the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE shoul
17 matches
Mail list logo
