Dear Marek Vasut,
On Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:56:32 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Benoît Thébaudeau,
>
> > Dear Marek Vasut,
> >
> > On Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:11:47 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > Dear Fabio Estevam,
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
>
Dear Benoît Thébaudeau,
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> On Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:11:47 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Fabio Estevam,
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Great! So can you confirm that for my series, all I have to change
> >
Dear Marek Vasut,
On Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:11:47 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Fabio Estevam,
>
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Great! So can you confirm that for my series, all I have to change is:
> > > #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE
Dear Fabio Estevam,
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
>
> wrote:
> > Great! So can you confirm that for my series, all I have to change is:
> > #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE 0x32000
>
> Yes, correct. This is the only change you need to do in your series.
>
> > Did yo
Dear Troy Kisky,
> On 2/22/2013 1:09 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > Hi Fabio,
> >
> > On Friday, February 22, 2013 8:30:36 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >>> Just tested your patch series on a mx31pdk, but unfortunately it does
> >>> not f
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Great! So can you confirm that for my series, all I have to change is:
> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE 0x32000
Yes, correct. This is the only change you need to do in your series.
> Did you also have a chance to test nand comma
Hi Fabio,
On Friday, February 22, 2013 11:08:14 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >
> >> U-Boot code: 87F0 -> 87F2C184 BSS: -> 87F311B4
> >> CPU: Freescale i.MX31 rev 2.0 at 532 MHz.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
>> U-Boot code: 87F0 -> 87F2C184 BSS: -> 87F311B4
>> CPU: Freescale i.MX31 rev 2.0 at 532 MHz.
>> Reset cause: WDOG
>> Board: MX31PDK
>> monitor len: 000311B4
>> ramsize: 080
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> U-Boot code: 87F0 -> 87F2C184 BSS: -> 87F311B4
> CPU: Freescale i.MX31 rev 2.0 at 532 MHz.
> Reset cause: WDOG
> Board: MX31PDK
> monitor len: 000311B4
> ramsize: 0800
> TLB table from 87ff to 87ff4000
> Top of RAM usable for
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Troy Kisky
> wrote:
>> On 2/22/2013 2:13 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Fabio,
>>>
>>> On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:06:42 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Benoît,
On Fri, Feb 22, 20
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> But Fabio, how have you been able to program u-boot-with-spl.bin if it
> overlaps
> the next MTD partition, unless you destroyed what follows or
> CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE does not match your NAND images layout?
Yes, I program u-boo
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Troy Kisky
wrote:
> On 2/22/2013 2:13 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>>
>> Hi Fabio,
>>
>> On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:06:42 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Benoît,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
>>> wrote:
>>>
It looks very
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:31:13 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:27:57 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > Hi Troy,
> >
> > On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:30:21 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> > > On 2/22/2013 2:13 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > > > Hi Fabio,
> > > >
>
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:27:57 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Troy,
>
> On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:30:21 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> > On 2/22/2013 2:13 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > > Hi Fabio,
> > >
> > > On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:06:42 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > >> Hi Beno
Hi Troy,
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:30:21 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> On 2/22/2013 2:13 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > Hi Fabio,
> >
> > On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:06:42 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >> Hi Benoît,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> >> wrote:
> >>
On 2/22/2013 2:13 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Fabio,
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:06:42 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Benoît,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
It looks very much like the issue that Marek had on i.MX53 (which
self-resolved
for an unknown reason)
Hi Fabio,
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:26:47 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE seems fine according to this trace. But anyway, can
> > you
> > test with this change in mx31pdk.h?
> > #define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE seems fine according to this trace. But anyway, can you
> test with this change in mx31pdk.h?
> #define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE0x8400
> #define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE0x8300
>
> Can you try to revert 10/19,
Hi Fabio,
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:06:42 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > It looks very much like the issue that Marek had on i.MX53 (which
> > self-resolved
> > for an unknown reason).
> >
> > Try to enable the d
Hi Troy,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Troy Kisky
wrote:
> It does look familiar, can you try changing imximage.c
>
>
> *header_size_ptr = ROUND(sbuf->st_size + imxhdr->flash_offset, 512);
>
> to
>
> *header_size_ptr = ROUND(sbuf->st_size + imxhdr->flash_offset, 4096);
>
> (or whatever your n
Hi Benoît,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> It looks very much like the issue that Marek had on i.MX53 (which
> self-resolved
> for an unknown reason).
>
> Try to enable the debug trace to see if anything else is printed after
> display_dram_config(). I would especial
On 2/22/2013 1:09 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Hi Fabio,
On Friday, February 22, 2013 8:30:36 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Just tested your patch series on a mx31pdk, but unfortunately it does
not fix mx31pdk boot.
I will start looking at it
Hi Fabio,
On Friday, February 22, 2013 8:30:36 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> > Just tested your patch series on a mx31pdk, but unfortunately it does
> > not fix mx31pdk boot.
> >
> > I will start looking at it, but any suggestion is welcome.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Just tested your patch series on a mx31pdk, but unfortunately it does
> not fix mx31pdk boot.
>
> I will start looking at it, but any suggestion is welcome.
Ok, just changed to a proper toolchain and the result is a bit better now:
U-Boot
Hi Benoît,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> This also fixes support for mx31pdk and tx25, which had been broken by commit
> e05e5de7fae5bec79617e113916dac6631251156.
Just tested your patch series on a mx31pdk, but unfortunately it does
not fix mx31pdk boot.
I will sta
This also fixes support for mx31pdk and tx25, which had been broken by commit
e05e5de7fae5bec79617e113916dac6631251156.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
---
Changes in v7: None
Changes in v6:
- Automate 'u-boot.imx' and 'SPL' make targets for all imx processors.
- Move board_init_f() to .c.
-
26 matches
Mail list logo
