Hi Stefano, Benoit,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:13:42PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
>Hi Benoit, Peng,
>
>On 21/09/2015 20:41, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>> Hi Peng,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 05:02:58PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
On
Hi Benoit, Peng,
On 21/09/2015 20:41, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Peng,
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 05:02:58PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 01:33:20PM +0200
Hi Peng,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 05:02:58PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>>On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 01:33:20PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>> Also If still checking mux_ctrl_ofs, we
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 05:02:58PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>Hi Peng,
>
>On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 01:33:20PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>>>Hi Stefano, Peng, Fabio, all,
>>>
>>>Sorry for seeing this only now, but...
>>>
>>>On Sun, Sep 2
Hi Peng,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 01:33:20PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>>Hi Stefano, Peng, Fabio, all,
>>
>>Sorry for seeing this only now, but...
>>
>>On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/09/2015 07:34, P
Hi Peng,
On 20/09/2015 15:02, Peng Fan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 01:33:20PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>> Hi Stefano, Peng, Fabio, all,
>>
>> Sorry for seeing this only now, but...
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/09/2015 07:34, Peng Fan wr
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 01:33:20PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>Hi Stefano, Peng, Fabio, all,
>
>Sorry for seeing this only now, but...
>
>On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14/09/2015 07:34, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> When setting iomux for a pin mux, there is no need
Hi Stefano, Peng, Fabio, all,
Sorry for seeing this only now, but...
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>
>
> On 14/09/2015 07:34, Peng Fan wrote:
>> When setting iomux for a pin mux, there is no need to check mux_ctrl_ofs.
This assumption is wrong. This check was there for a
On 14/09/2015 07:34, Peng Fan wrote:
> When setting iomux for a pin mux, there is no need to check mux_ctrl_ofs.
> Also If still checking mux_ctrl_ofs, we have no chance to set iomux
> for i.MX7D IOMUXC_LPSR_SW_MUX_CTL_PAD_GPIO1_IO00, because the mux_ctrl_ofs
> for this register is 0.
>
> Signed
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> When setting iomux for a pin mux, there is no need to check mux_ctrl_ofs.
> Also If still checking mux_ctrl_ofs, we have no chance to set iomux
> for i.MX7D IOMUXC_LPSR_SW_MUX_CTL_PAD_GPIO1_IO00, because the mux_ctrl_ofs
> for this register is 0.
When setting iomux for a pin mux, there is no need to check mux_ctrl_ofs.
Also If still checking mux_ctrl_ofs, we have no chance to set iomux
for i.MX7D IOMUXC_LPSR_SW_MUX_CTL_PAD_GPIO1_IO00, because the mux_ctrl_ofs
for this register is 0.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan
Cc: Stefano Babic
Cc: Fabio Est
11 matches
Mail list logo