On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:20:57PM +0100, kenneth johansson wrote:
>
> Only print out the target name during make.
> For old style set V=1
>
>
> Signed-off-by: kenneth johansson
Sidenote: u-boot-v2 uses the standard Linux build system and has quiet
operation as the default case.
rsc
--
Pengu
Dear Remy,
In message <3efb10970901051230w654dc1d0w2fbf878ca853c...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > I think your appraoch (and that of kbuild, too) is fundamentally
> > broken.
>
> Maybe the configure structure, like u-boot has, that is so complex, so
> hard to customise, so error prone,
Dear Scott,
In message <20090105195311.ga24...@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>
> > But that's the preferred way of doing things, at least according to
> > Unix Philosophy.
>
> Let's not get so bogged down in following some overgeneralized philosophy
> that we ignore the preferences of
Hello All,
My 2 cents: (I am NOT trying to start a flame war, although I
understand how sensitive this subject is)
> I think your appraoch (and that of kbuild, too) is fundamentally
> broken.
Maybe the configure structure, like u-boot has, that is so complex, so
hard to customise, so error
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 08:47:54PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear kenneth johansson,
>
> In message <1230715433.19628.12.ca...@duo> you wrote:
> >
> > > If you find the make output annoying, you can silence make by passing
> > > the "-s" flag.
> >
> > -s is a bit to much you get no feedback a
Dear kenneth johansson,
In message <1230715433.19628.12.ca...@duo> you wrote:
>
> > If you find the make output annoying, you can silence make by passing
> > the "-s" flag.
>
> -s is a bit to much you get no feedback at all.
But that's the preferred way of doing things, at least according to
Uni
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 06:15 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 December 2008 05:06:51 kenneth johansson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 04:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > i.e. drop all of the $(AR) calls in board/*/Makefile and replace it with
> > > a toplevel pattern kind of lik
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 05:06:51 kenneth johansson wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 04:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i.e. drop all of the $(AR) calls in board/*/Makefile and replace it with
> > a toplevel pattern kind of like:
> > %.a: %.o
> > $(AR) $(ARFLAGS) $^ -o $@
>
> sure but th
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 04:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i dont really like how the changes are integrated. it'll require constant
> maintenance to add these QUIET prefix vars. is there a reason we cant go the
> opposite direction and set CC/etc... directly ? or try unifying things with
> p
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 04:23:53 kenneth johansson wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 23:14 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear kenneth johansson,
> >
> > In message <1230636057.17914.5.ca...@duo> you wrote:
> > > Only print out the target name during make.
> > > For old style set V=1
> >
> > Wh
On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 23:14 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear kenneth johansson,
>
> In message <1230636057.17914.5.ca...@duo> you wrote:
> >
> > Only print out the target name during make.
> > For old style set V=1
>
> What is the rationale for this patch? I can see no real advantage with
> it
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 03:25:26 kenneth johansson wrote:
> Only print out the target name during make.
> For old style set V=1
your changelog summary "make make quiet" isnt really clear. it should be
something along the lines of "make default build output simple like kbuild".
-mike
signat
Dear Scott Wood,
In message <495aa094.7030...@freescale.com> you wrote:
>
> Unix scripting is inefficient, news at 11. What's the actual time
> difference?
What's the actual advantage?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 1
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear kenneth johansson,
>
> In message <1230636057.17914.5.ca...@duo> you wrote:
>> Only print out the target name during make.
>> For old style set V=1
>
> What is the rationale for this patch? I can see no real advantage with
> it.
>
> If you find the make output annoyin
Dear kenneth johansson,
In message <1230636057.17914.5.ca...@duo> you wrote:
>
> Only print out the target name during make.
> For old style set V=1
What is the rationale for this patch? I can see no real advantage with
it.
If you find the make output annoying, you can silence make by passing
t
Dear kenneth johansson,
In message <1230635276.17914.3.ca...@duo> you wrote:
>
> > PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS.
>
> THERE IS NO INSTRUCTIONS IN THE README IN U_BOOT FOR THE CASE LARGER
> THAN 100K PATCH.
Let me quote the README for you:
| Submitting Patches:
| ---
|
| Since t
Only print out the target name during make.
For old style set V=1
Signed-off-by: kenneth johansson
---
actual patch at
http://www.4shared.com/file/78174399/3496e05d/0001-make-make-quiet.html
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.
On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 11:48 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear kenneth johansson,
>
> In message <1230625526.12143.24.ca...@duo> you wrote:
> >
> > For size reason this is a binary attachment. it uncompress to
> > 244227 bytes and max for this list is 100k
>
> BINARY ATTACHMENT IGNORED.
>
> PL
Dear kenneth johansson,
In message <1230625526.12143.24.ca...@duo> you wrote:
>
> For size reason this is a binary attachment. it uncompress to
> 244227 bytes and max for this list is 100k
BINARY ATTACHMENT IGNORED.
PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS.
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering G
Only print out the target name during make.
For old style set V=1
Signed-off-by: kenneth johansson
---
For size reason this is a binary attachment. it uncompress to
244227 bytes and max for this list is 100k
0001-make-make-quiet.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
