On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 18:05 +0100, Giuseppe Pagano wrote:
>
> >
> > > + ksz9031_phy_extended_write(phydev, 0x02,
> > > +MII_KSZ9031_EXT_RGMII_CLOCK_SKEW,
> > > +MII_KSZ9031_MOD_DATA_NO_POST_INC, 0x03FF);
> >
> I have september 2012 revision
Hi Vadim,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Vadim Bendebury (вб) wrote:
> e
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> > [snip..]
> > Maybe I'm wrong, but my understanding was that we were not primarily
> > interested in introducing better project managemen
Hi Matti,
> From: matti kaasinen [mailto:matti.kaasi...@gmail.com]
> I try to use Angstrom distribution as a base for my design. Angstrom provides
> 3.8.13 kernel for beaglebone. There drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c seems pretty
> demanding as far as changing chip->ecc.bytes configuration is concerne
Hello Mans
> > +/*
> > + * Undef true and false here to avoid macro expansion by
> > + */
> > +#undef true
> > +#undef false
>
> This won't work if stdbool.h defines true/false as an enum. Some
> versions of gcc did this. The correct fix is to change the code so it
Thanks for your comments.
T
Some board have multiple configurations.
For example, the board "m54455evb" has many configurations:
M54455EVB, M54455EVB_a66, M54455EVB_i66, M54455EVB_intel, ...
When we modify board-related files, we need to test
all configurations based on such a board.
In such a case, the new option -b is use
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 19:03 +0530, Pekon Gupta wrote:
> > @@ -763,77 +903,47 @@ static void __maybe_unused
> omap_free_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> > * @eccstrength- the number of bits that could be corrected
> > *
All objects under api/ and examples/api/ directories are selected
by CONFIG_API.
So we can move CONFIG_API switch to the top Makefile.
In order to use CONFIG_API, the definition of SUBDIR_EXAMPLES-y
must be moved after "sinlude $(obj)include/autoconf.mk".
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
Chan
In config_cmd_default.h, it will use CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH to decide
whether include CONFIG_CMD_FLASH and CONFIG_CMD_IMLS. So, if the
CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH defined later than include/config_cmd_default.h,
These two commands will be included always.
So move CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH definition to proper posi
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC) += api_platform-powerpc.c
I made a mistake here.
s/api_platform-powerpc.c/api_platform-powerpc.o/
I will post version 2.
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/li
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 19:03 +0530, Pekon Gupta wrote:
> @@ -763,77 +903,47 @@ static void __maybe_unused omap_free_bch(struct
> mtd_info *mtd)
> * @eccstrength - the number of bits that could be corrected
> * (1 - hamming, 4 - BCH4, 8 - BCH8, 16 - BCH16)
> */
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 13:21 +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> > From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:55:07PM +0530, pekon gupta wrote:
> > > With increase in NAND flash densities occurence of bit-flips has
> > > increased.
> > > Thus stronger ECC schemes ar
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:01 +0100, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
> Hello Scott,
>
> For the kmp204x boards, UBI is used to take care of the volumes created and
> deleted on our NAND Flash. I am currently using a 3.10 kernel and when UBI
> attaches mtd0, this works fine:
>
> > UBI: attaching mtd0 to u
Hi Leif,
On 11/18/2013 12:26 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
Commit fe1378a - "ARM: use r9 for gd" - broke the ABI for users of the
U-Boot API on ARM. Users I am aware of are GRUB and the FreeBSD loader.
Since I only spotted this on Saturday, this code is well and truly in
the wild, so any users of the
> -Original Message-
> From: Pekon Gupta [mailto:pe...@ti.com]
[...]
>
> Pekon Gupta (4):
> mtd: nand: omap: make am33xx/elm.c as common driver for all OMAPx and
> AM platforms
> mtd: nand: omap: enable BCH ECC scheme using ELM for generic platform
> mtd: nand: omap: add CONF
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:22:18AM +0100, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> From: Lars Poeschel
>
> Phytec sells revision or version 3 of pcm051. It is labeled 1358.3 on
> the board. The difference for u-boot is that is has other DDR3 RAM on it:
> 1 x MT41K256M16HA125E instead of 2 x MT41J256M8HX15E on rev
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:09:44AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> I have just bisect why on the latest kernel hello world example doesn't work
> and I have end up in this patch too. After reverting hello world example
> is working.
>
> Also I would like to know if we have still bootm
Hi Pekon,
Thank you for you advices.
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/AM35x-OMAP35x-PSP_04.02.00.07_UserGuide#Selecting_NAND_ECC_scheme_for_Linux_Kernelacvices
selecting "Selecting NAND ECC scheme for Linux Kernel" by editing:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-flash.c
and
drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
I
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 13:21 +, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> > From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:55:07PM +0530, pekon gupta wrote:
> > > With increase in NAND flash densities occurence of bit-flips has
> > > increased.
> > > Thus stronger ECC schemes ar
Hello Tom,
Am 19.11.2013 16:10, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:29:49AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Tom,
Am 18.11.2013 17:00, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:07:59AM +1100, Graeme Russ wrote:
Hi All,
You do all realise that we are going about this, to use so
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 19.11.2013 08:12, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Heiko,
In message<528ae93d.2080...@denx.de> you wrote:
- Maybe a cmdline interface to change the state of a patch, so I do not
need to open a webbrowser (not necessary, would just nice ;-)
This can be done using existing
On 11/10/2013 09:25 PM, Jain Priyanka-B32167 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dependency of below patch marked under ---
> [U-Boot] powerpc/t1040qds: Add DDR Raw Timing support
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/286112/
> no longer holds true as thi patch has been deferred.
>
> But below emulator patch
I'm building U-Boot from the FSLC (repo/fork) on an i.MX6
U-Boot 2013.10-00012-g5bc3118-dirty (Nov 19 2013 - 09:17:18)
CPU: Freescale i.MX6SOLO rev1.1 at 792 MHz
After I made a small change today in the NAND FLASH layout, I can
no longer use UBI from U-Boot. Here's what I see today:
MyBoa
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis
wrote:
> (Disclaimer: u-boot newbie)
>
> Hi all,
>
> With Marek's huge help (thanks Marek!) I've tried to merge his tree [1]
> that provides lcd support for the efikamx/efikasb with recent mainline
> uboot. It boots, but I've hit some wall
Dear Marek Vasut,
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 4:37:00 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Konstantinos Margaritis,
>
> > (Disclaimer: u-boot newbie)
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With Marek's huge help (thanks Marek!) I've tried to merge his tree [1]
> > that provides lcd support for the efikamx/efikasb
Dear tvpatel12,
In message <1384859139104-167976.p...@n7.nabble.com> you wrote:
>
> I can have Ethernet connection. Can you elaborate how could i do that using
> Ethernet only on uboot mode?
Enable CONFIG_CMD_TFTPPUT in your board config, and use the tftpput
command.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Den
Hello Scott,
For the kmp204x boards, UBI is used to take care of the volumes created and
deleted on our NAND Flash. I am currently using a 3.10 kernel and when UBI
attaches mtd0, this works fine:
> UBI: attaching mtd0 to ubi0
> UBI: scanning is finished
> UBI: attached mtd0 (name "ubi0", size 128
Masahiro Yamada writes:
> Before this commit, common/cmd_test.c defined
> _STDBOOL_H in order to avoid including .
> But this work-around is not a good idea.
>
> Blackfin header file
> arch/blackfin/include/asm/blackfin_local.h
> uses bool type here:
> extern bool bfin_os_log_check(void);
>
> T
Dear Konstantinos Margaritis,
> (Disclaimer: u-boot newbie)
>
> Hi all,
>
> With Marek's huge help (thanks Marek!) I've tried to merge his tree [1]
> that provides lcd support for the efikamx/efikasb with recent mainline
> uboot. It boots, but I've hit some wall now and couldn't get passed it,
>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:29:49AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> Am 18.11.2013 17:00, schrieb Tom Rini:
> >On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:07:59AM +1100, Graeme Russ wrote:
> >>Hi All,
> >>
> >>You do all realise that we are going about this, to use some British
> >>vernacular, arse-abo
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:55:07PM +0530, pekon gupta wrote:
> > With increase in NAND flash densities occurence of bit-flips has increased.
> > Thus stronger ECC schemes are required for detecting and correcting
> multiple
> > simultaneous bi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:02:14AM +0530, Pekon Gupta wrote:
>
> OMAP NAND drivers support various ecc-schemes like (HAM1, BCH4, BCH8..)
> And, each ecc-scheme usually has 2 implementations
> - HAM1_HW or BCHx_HW (using in-build h/w engine for all computation)
> - HAM1_SW or BCHx_HW_DETECTION_S
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 07:02:58PM +0530, Pekon Gupta wrote:
[..]
>
> Pekon Gupta (4):
> mtd: nand: omap: make am33xx/elm.c as common driver for all OMAPx and
> AM platforms
> mtd: nand: omap: enable BCH ECC scheme using ELM for generic platform
> mtd: nand: omap: add CONFIG_NAND_OMA
Hi,
> From: Abraham V. [abraham.varric...@vvdntech.com]
> > Pekon Gupta wrote:
> > OMAP NAND drivers support various ecc-schemes like (HAM1, BCH4, BCH8..)
> > And, each ecc-scheme usually has 2 implementations
> > - HAM1_HW or BCHx_HW (using in-build h/w engine for all computation)
> > - HAM1_S
Hi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 11/19/13 10:59, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>> Hi Igor
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Michael Trimarchi
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Igor
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Igor Grinberg
>>> wrote:
Hi Michael,
>
Sorry sir .i got it.
在 2013-11-19 PM6:52,"Wolfgang Denk" 写道:
> Dear "James W.",
>
> In message o0mcs4kbu9q0awwpmbyycgg-1z+tg...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> >
> > You need to code a serial driver protocol. At pc end .you using putty
>
> Why would he?
>
> > > I am working with Uboot only. there is
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Pekon Gupta wrote:
>
> OMAP NAND drivers support various ecc-schemes like (HAM1, BCH4, BCH8..)
> And, each ecc-scheme usually has 2 implementations
> - HAM1_HW or BCHx_HW (using in-build h/w engine for all computation)
> - HAM1_SW or BCHx_HW_DETECTION_SW) (usin
Hi Michael,
On 11/19/13 10:59, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> Hi Igor
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Michael Trimarchi
> wrote:
>> Hi Igor
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Igor Grinberg
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> On 11/18/13 16:10, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
Enable clocks for
HI Wolfgang Denk ,
Thanks.
I can have Ethernet connection. Can you elaborate how could i do that using
Ethernet only on uboot mode?
--
View this message in context:
http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/sending-data-from-ram-to-host-machin-in-u-boot-tp167954p167976.html
Sent from the U-Boot maili
Dear "James W.",
In message
you wrote:
>
> You need to code a serial driver protocol. At pc end .you using putty
Why would he?
> > I am working with Uboot only. there is no any kernel or OS. I am running
> > program only dependent on U-boot. It stores result in RAM. Now, i want to
> > transfer
From: Lars Poeschel
Phytec sells revision or version 3 of pcm051. It is labeled 1358.3 on
the board. The difference for u-boot is that is has other DDR3 RAM on it:
1 x MT41K256M16HA125E instead of 2 x MT41J256M8HX15E on revisions 1 and
2. Both configurations are 512 MiB.
Configure your u-boot bui
Hi Albert,
I have just bisect why on the latest kernel hello world example doesn't work
and I have end up in this patch too. After reverting hello world example
is working.
Also I would like to know if we have still bootm support for standlone
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootStandalone#Sec
Hi Eric,
On 19/11/2013 04:25, Eric Nelson wrote:
> I still question the fact that we have two header files for i.MX5x
> and i.MX6x declaring the returns implemented there.
Good point.
>
> It seems that we should have a single header for routines
> implemented there.
>
> Perhaps arch/arm/inclu
Hi Eric,
On 19/11/2013 04:40, Eric Nelson wrote:
>> I have a major question: if it is possible to detect at runtime, as you
>> have already implemented, which is the board where code is running, why
>> is it possible to override it for the operator ?
>>
> First off, I want to clarify things. Ther
Hi Igor
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Michael Trimarchi
wrote:
> Hi Igor
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Igor Grinberg
> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On 11/18/13 16:10, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>>> Enable clocks for the peripherals only if they are used
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Tri
Hi Igor
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 11/18/13 16:10, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>> Enable clocks for the peripherals only if they are used
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi
>> ---
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/clock.c| 2 --
>> arch/arm/inc
Hi Michael,
On 11/18/13 16:10, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> Enable clocks for the peripherals only if they are used
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/clock.c| 2 --
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/clock.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
>
46 matches
Mail list logo