Re: Building isapi_redirect on Win 2003

Hello, A few questions hopefully you guys can help: 1) The instructions here: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/install/iis.html mentions about using VS 6.0 and IIS developers SDK but what OS version I should be using to compile isapi_redirect? Windows 2000 or 2003 server? 2) I

Re: Building isapi_redirect on Win 2003

On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:07:11 0200 tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote: > You will need the Platform SDK at least from March 2003. I installed the IIS SDK in the package found here: http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/platformsdk/sdkupdate/psdk-full.htm I am still getting the exact same errors.

Re: Building isapi_redirect on Win 2003

Lyndon Tiu wrote: Hello, I read the instructions on how to build isapi_redirect.dll on: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc-archive/jk2/jk/iishowto.html But I am getting these errors: C:\tmp\jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.14.1-src\jk\native\iis>msdev isapi.dsp /make all --

Re: Building Question

- Original Message - From: "Bruce Keats" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:20 AM Subject: Re: Building Question > Hi Bill, > > I think we emailed back and forth awhile ago about CRLs in tomcat 5.5 > u

Re: Building Question

Hi Bill, I think we emailed back and forth awhile ago about CRLs in tomcat 5.5 using JDK 1.5. I am also interested in getting CRLs working for tomcat 5.5. I have been looking into the code, but I just have not had time to finish it off and integrate it into tomcat. If you need someone to code i

Re: Building Question

OK On Apr 10, 2005 6:05 PM, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Developers List" > Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 11:45 PM > Subject: Re: Building Quest

Re: Building Question

- Original Message - From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 11:45 PM Subject: Re: Building Question CLR ? Typo. It should be CRLs. As in java.security.cert.CRL. On Apr 10, 2005 3:33 AM, Yoav

Re: Building Question

Henri Gomez wrote: CLR ? Bill's doing .not stuff now. He must be using some hidden JDK features, as I didn't read about any .not compatibility features in JDK 1.5. Neat stuff. :D More seriously, Tomcat is built with JDK 1.4, for best compatibility. I don't know what the consequences of moving t

Re: Building Question

CLR ? On Apr 10, 2005 3:33 AM, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm thinking of starting on implementing CLRs for Tomcat 5.5. However, > > it's > > a PITA for < 1.5. I wanted to check that the binary builds for TC 5.5 are > > being built with JDK 1.5, or, I'm probably wastin

RE: Building Question

Hi, > I'm thinking of starting on implementing CLRs for Tomcat 5.5. However, > it's > a PITA for < 1.5. I wanted to check that the binary builds for TC 5.5 are > being built with JDK 1.5, or, I'm probably wasting my time (not many > people > use the source distro :). I've been building with 1.4

RE: building tomcat source in eclipse

lipse forums out there(I have used them myself) Thanks, dean -Original Message- From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 1:58 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: building tomcat source in eclipse > > The trick is to get all dependencies. Do an &q

Re: building tomcat source in eclipse

IA - Original Message - From: "Patrick Lacson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 2:08 AM Subject: Re: building tomcat source in eclipse > Thanks Costin, I'll give that a try. >

Re: building tomcat source in eclipse

gt; > dean > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:24 PM > > To: 'Tomcat Developers List'; 'Patrick Lacson' > > Subject: RE: building tomcat source in eclipse

Re: building tomcat source in eclipse

ommand line. Thanks, dean -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:24 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List'; 'Patrick Lacson' Subject: RE: building tomcat source in eclipse What are you trying to achieve? I use Eclipse to

Re: RE: building tomcat source in eclipse

Thanks for your email. This is an auto response to confirm we have received your email. If you are wishing to check the whereabouts of an order please use our order tracker at - http://www.seetickets.com/tracker have your reference number and email address handy! If you wish to change your d

RE: building tomcat source in eclipse

ant script from Eclipse. I'll send you the eclipse files directly - the apache mailing server won't accept zips. Mark > -Original Message- > From: Hiller, Dean D (Dean) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 11:52 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List; P

RE: building tomcat source in eclipse

riginal Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:24 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List'; 'Patrick Lacson' Subject: RE: building tomcat source in eclipse What are you trying to achieve? I use Eclipse to develop TC5 (& TC4) but alw

RE: building tomcat source in eclipse

I second this. That would rock. If anyone could provide the .project and .classpath files, that would be easy to set up in eclipse. (I am currently trying to build from command line first but my next step was to bring it into eclipse) dean -Original Message- From: Patrick Lacson [mailto

RE: building tomcat source in eclipse

What are you trying to achieve? I use Eclipse to develop TC5 (& TC4) but always build from the command line. I have each of the top level directories created by the build script as an Eclipse project. You can still use remote debugging etc as well as all the other Eclipse features. Mark > -Or

Re: Building

cd jakarta-tomcat-5 ant download pouf! Everything you need :-) -- Jeanfrancois Lars Stenberg wrote: Hi! I Tried to apply a patch to tomcat earlier today, it went fine, BUT! =) In the BUILDING.TXT there is 1000 things to download, isnt there any download-all-all-depends-script? Mvh Lars ---

Re: Building TC5

Thanks, that's worked great, Kevin Jones On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 20:33, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > I've just commited a fix for build.properties.default. You should try: > > cvs checkout jakarta-tomcat-5 > cd jakarta-tomcat-5 > ant download > ant checkout > ant dist > > I've jus

Re: Building TC5

Kevin Jones wrote: Still doesn't work for me I get BUILD FAILED file d:\xxx\jakarta-servletapi5/jsr154/build.xml:67: srcdir "d:\xxx\jakarta-servletapi5/jsr154/src/share" does not exist where xxx is shorthand for the tomcat.source directory mentioned in the instructions, That directory must exi

Re: Building TC5

Hi Kevin, I've just commited a fix for build.properties.default. You should try: cvs checkout jakarta-tomcat-5 cd jakarta-tomcat-5 ant download ant checkout ant dist I've just did it from a clean workspace and everything works fine. -- Jeanfrancois Kevin Jones wrote: Still doesn't work for m

Re: Building TC5

Still doesn't work for me I get BUILD FAILED file d:\xxx\jakarta-servletapi5/jsr154/build.xml:67: srcdir "d:\xxx\jakarta-servletapi5/jsr154/src/share" does not exist where xxx is shorthand for the tomcat.source directory mentioned in the instructions, Kevin On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 17:30, Remy Mau

Re: Building TC5

Kevin Jones wrote: Thanks Remy, I assume you mean I should start from scratch again? Yes, follow these instructions: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/building.html Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Building TC5

Thanks Remy, I assume you mean I should start from scratch again? Kevin On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 17:12, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Kevin Jones wrote: > > I'm trying to build TC 5 from sources and failing horribly. > > > > Firstly I connected to cvs and checked out jakarta-tomcat-5 this > > contains a

Re: Building TC5

Kevin Jones wrote: I'm trying to build TC 5 from sources and failing horribly. Firstly I connected to cvs and checked out jakarta-tomcat-5 this contains a buildme.txt file. Reading this, I followed the instructions, downloaded the build.xml and ran ant. This proceeeds to download all the appropr

RE: Building Tomcat5 (JavaServices)

Try the latest built code from http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/nightly-5. I am using it successfully. -Original Message- From: Radim Kubacki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Building Tomcat5 (JavaServices)

Re: Building Tomcat5 (JavaServices)

Radim Kubacki wrote: Hello, I am trying to build Tomcat-5 but during execution of 'ant download' it fails to get JavaService from http://www.alexandriasc.com/software/JavaService/JavaService-bin-1.2.0.zip. The site seems to be down. Indeed. Maybe it's time to try to switch to Mladen's code.

Re: help....please.....RE: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError after re-building

> I'm getting the following error when trying to run tc 4, after having built > the current cvs version succesfully: > > java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > javax.management.MBeanServerFactory.findMBeanServer(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava > /util/List; > at org.apache.commons.modeler.Registry.getS

help....please.....RE: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError after re-building

I know you are all busy, but should I have posted this to the users list? -Ryan -Original Message- From: Smith, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:06 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError after re-building I

java.lang.NoSuchMethodError after re-building

I'm getting the following error when trying to run tc 4, after having built the current cvs version succesfully: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: javax.management.MBeanServerFactory.findMBeanServer(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava /util/List; at org.apache.commons.modeler.Registry.getServer(Registry

Re: Building mod_jk2 on Solaris 8

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>>FYI: >>> >>>In building the jk2 module on Solaris 8, I >>>had to include add the -DBSD_COMP compiler >>>flag when making in $jk/native2/server/apache13. >> >>Why? What was wrong? > > > 'FIONBIO' definition wasn't being found in > jk_chan

RE: Building mod_jk2 on Solaris 8

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > FYI: > > > > In building the jk2 module on Solaris 8, I > > had to include add the -DBSD_COMP compiler > > flag when making in $jk/native2/server/apache13. > > Why? What was wrong? 'FIONBIO' definition wasn't being found in jk_channel_socket.c. -- To unsubscribe

Re: Building mod_jk2 on Solaris 8 + a question.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > FYI: > > In building the jk2 module on Solaris 8, I > had to include add the -DBSD_COMP compiler > flag when making in $jk/native2/server/apache13. Why? What was wrong? > > Could someone with jk/jk2 experience answer > a few questions for me? Namely, what are the >

Re: Building the Java part of WebApp...

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Ok, I'm about to tackle *my disgrace* build.xml. >> >>When building Tomcat, what properties does it supply me, and what targets >>does it execute? And (last but not least) where the heck does it want the >>warp.jar? >> >>(

Re: Building the Java part of WebApp...

"Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I'm about to tackle *my disgrace* build.xml. > > When building Tomcat, what properties does it supply me, and what targets > does it execute? And (last but not least) where the heck does it want the > warp.jar? > > (I assume this: it passes cata

RE: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

>> JF is working on the same kind of exotics OS I do and even >> worst our boxes speak EBCDIC ;) > >Guys, that's _your_ problem. Not mine... I want to solve my >problem which is >to build like APR and Apache 2.0 do (so that all platforms >supported by that >build system are supported in the same

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Back to NetLife > >>> Libtool also has history: it "supports" old versions of OSes >>> and compilers... > > Exact but libtool is missing on many majors OS like Windows (native > not cygwin) and OS/400 (in my case it's a major os). jkant could be >

RE: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

Back to NetLife >> Libtool also has history: it "supports" old versions of OSes >and compilers... Exact but libtool is missing on many majors OS like Windows (native not cygwin) and OS/400 (in my case it's a major os). jkant could be an alternative (even if it didn't fix all problems) >Da

Re: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > > I've defined HAVE_UNIXSOCKETS, and i'm making the ifdefs with that it > > seems to me a little better, i think that not having unix sockets ( at > > least with that name :) maybe is more common than only win32?.. > > That's fine. The goal is

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > Mostly compiling, i about to commit in half of an hour.. > > How to deal with content-length apr_off_t? here is defined as __int64, > and code is using int and unsigned, and i got a warning about precision > lost, maybe use apr_off_t where now is u

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: viernes 12 de abril de 2002 16:32 > > Same here. Since I'm not a windows user I'll wait for your > code. Let me > know how I can help. > Mostly compiling, i about to commit in half of an hour.. How to deal with content-length

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > This way there is no need to ifdef unix sockets, thanks :)), but it's > done now ;), so should i commit this change? Of course. FYI - I'm cleaning the jni worker now ( I want to have all components in a working state before a beta release for

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: viernes 12 de abril de 2002 16:32 > bit on linux ). You can exclude channel_apr_socket completely > on windows, > for socket you can use the old channel_socket. > This way there is no need to ifdef unix sockets, thanks :)), but

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > I've defined HAVE_UNIXSOCKETS, and i'm making the ifdefs with that it > seems to me a little better, i think that not having unix sockets ( at > least with that name :) maybe is more common than only win32?.. That's fine. The goal is to be able to

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: viernes 12 de abril de 2002 1:46 > > I think it's a good workaround - I hope those will be included in APR > and we'll remove the ifdefs. > I've defined HAVE_UNIXSOCKETS, and i'm making the ifdefs with that it seems to me a litt

Re: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > Hola a todos: > > I'm in the process to have a build of mod_jk2 for Win32, modiying needed > build.xml files aling the way, i imagine that unix domain sockets stuff > need , needs to be ifdefed for win32, i'm right? > > Are there more things that

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"Punky Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It DOESN'T... Before, all constants were defined in Constants.java, and the >> pr_warp_defs.h was generated from it, so that with each build we were sure >> that the WARP definitions were correct, and if something did went wrong, >> simply the baby wouldn

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Probably you even do not need 20 Oses to get a PITA... Because there are always > more than one compiler per OS. > > Libtool also has history: it "supports" old versions of OSes and compilers... Ant just calls libtool - if libtool works, ant wi

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

> It DOESN'T... Before, all constants were defined in Constants.java, and the > pr_warp_defs.h was generated from it, so that with each build we were sure > that the WARP definitions were correct, and if something did went wrong, > simply the baby wouldn't have built... I support pr_warp_defs.h b

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Good if _they_ build it over there, _they_ can build the >> modules as well. > > you think they will build mod_jk and mod_jk2 ? Frankly, given that I don¹t care much about JK, I don¹t care if they build it as well.. > In fact mod_jk is present in OS

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Go and build APR on 20something different OSes with ANT, and we'll see >> what's a PITA. > > > Probably you even do not need 20 Oses to get a PITA... Because there are > always > more than one compiler per OS. > > Libtool also has history: i

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm like you and use exotic OS, OS/400, where autoconf/automake/libtool didn't works (yet ?). >>> >>>If autoconf/libtool doesn't work, then you can't even build >>>APR, you can't >>>build Apache, therefore you don't f**

RE: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

>Good if _they_ build it over there, _they_ can build the >modules as well. you think they will build mod_jk and mod_jk2 ? In fact mod_jk is present in OS/400 but is really an old version (from 3.2) so wouldn't works against 3.3 / 4.0, that's why I want to work on it, without autoconf >Whe

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I'm like you and use exotic OS, OS/400, where >>> autoconf/automake/libtool didn't works (yet ?). >> >> If autoconf/libtool doesn't work, then you can't even build >> APR, you can't >> build Apache, therefore you don't f***ing need mod_webapp, k? > >

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

GOMEZ Henri wrote: >>Ok, so then don't destroy MY build by introducing shit around >>the CVS tree, >>moving files along and NOT patching what I've done before... >>Thanks JF for >>doing that, but I'm still not able to build the java code interactively >>without passing thru ANT... > > > You co

RE: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

>Ok, so then don't destroy MY build by introducing shit around >the CVS tree, >moving files along and NOT patching what I've done before... >Thanks JF for >doing that, but I'm still not able to build the java code interactively >without passing thru ANT... You could notice that I avoided to tou

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Partly, and I still am. GNU LibTool sucks badly, but I have to >> live with it >> because that has been the choice of the APR/HTTPD projects >> (although I'm not >> the only to think that it's bad)... > > Yes and I've got also some problems with newer

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ant is a good choice for java projects, not too bad for c projects >> and will be veru usefull when playing with gcj. > > And you could still use ant to call make ;) Yeah. Looks like RPM... So f***ed up... To convert: #!/bin/sh If [ -z "$INSTALL_DIR

RE: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

>Partly, and I still am. GNU LibTool sucks badly, but I have to >live with it >because that has been the choice of the APR/HTTPD projects >(although I'm not >the only to think that it's bad)... Yes and I've got also some problems with newer projects on some Linux Redhat 6.2 where there is a 1.3

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> BTW, to build Java code with ant there have been an introduction of >> dependancies with code outside "webapp" itself... Therefore, I >> can't build >> the java code using it... >> >> Back to the old command line . WHATEVERERRR > > Are you sur

RE: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

>Ant is a good choice for java projects, not too bad for c projects >and will be veru usefull when playing with gcj. And you could still use ant to call make ;) >From http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-nativegui/?loc=j =>

RE: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

>BTW, to build Java code with ant there have been an introduction of >dependancies with code outside "webapp" itself... Therefore, I >can't build >the java code using it... > >Back to the old command line . WHATEVERERRR Are you sure ? Wasn't you complaining sometimes ago on some apache l

RE: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

>From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >pr_warp_defs.h is still generated from it... >And I WILL remove pr_warp_defs.h from cvs if someone put it there. Argh, someone made JF angry ;) >Why? Ant is Jakarta. >There is still some work to do to have ant doing the configure... >And to

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why? Ant is Jakarta. Because I'm not going to download, install, debug, and learn a 1.5 megs package to run JAVAC on 10 classes within the same package... I'd rather compile them manually everytime... > There is still some work to do to have an

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > "Punky Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Jean, >> >>Your correction/fix is good, and I remembered that you solved my problem. >>The things that screwed up is the move of Constant.java, which is not made >>by you... And I recalled that it is very hard to find out the d

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"Punky Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jean, > > Your correction/fix is good, and I remembered that you solved my problem. > The things that screwed up is the move of Constant.java, which is not made > by you... And I recalled that it is very hard to find out the dependency of > Constant.java

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> "Punky Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The problem described is a compilation problem and isn't related to to the >>> >>> make install. I had this problem when I tried to compile the source after >>> downlo

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

> >> > >>I recalled that lib/pr_warp_defs.h was failed to be generated when > >>Constant.java had been moved. > >> > >>See the diff: > >>http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/lib/Makefil e. > >>in.diff?r1=1.21&r2=1.22&diff_format=h > > > > > > If someone would have cared t

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > "Punky Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>The problem described is a compilation problem and isn't related to to the >> >>make install. I had this problem when I tried to compile the source after >>downloading it a while ago. The problem is caused by the constants T

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

"Punky Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The problem described is a compilation problem and isn't related to to the > make install. I had this problem when I tried to compile the source after > downloading it a while ago. The problem is caused by the constants TYPE_... > not being defined

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

> > The problem described is a compilation problem and isn't related to to the make install. I had this problem when I tried to compile the source after downloading it a while ago. The problem is caused by the constants TYPE_... not being defined anywhere in the source. To solve this problem I

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

The problem described is a compilation problem and isn't related to to the make install. I had this problem when I tried to compile the source after downloading it a while ago. The problem is caused by the constants TYPE_... not being defined anywhere in the source. To solve this problem I

Re: Building modapp for Tomcat4.0 and apache1_3.23

make install? I don't run it. I manually copy mod_webapp.so from apache-1.3/.libs to libexec directory. README.txt should have all information you need. Punky - Original Message - From: "Noaman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 9:18 PM S

Re: Building the WebApp module instruction errors

Thanks, committed in jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/docs Andrew Savory wrote: > > Hi, > > Working through the instructions for building WebApp at: > http://nagoya.apache.org/~pier/documentation/build-u.html > ... I noticed a few possible errors. > > The line: > # rmdir jakarta-tomcat

Re: Building the WebApp module instruction errors

Andrew Savory wrote: > # rmdir jakarta-tomcat-connectors >should be > # rm -rf jakarta-tomcat-connectors >(because the CVS directory inside will prevent rmdir from working) Sorry for coming into this cold, but do you really need force on that rm? Other than that, it seems to agr

Re: Building mod_webapp on Solaris 8

ginal Message- > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:11 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Building mod_webapp on Solaris 8 > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:55:51PM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote: > > I'm als

RE: Building mod_webapp on Solaris 8

>> Add -R/path/to/gcc-3.0/lib to your LDFLAGS. Where exactly? (axps, tomcat, or apache?) Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:11 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Building mod_webapp on Sol

Re: Building mod_webapp on Solaris 8

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:55:51PM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote: > I'm also having the same problem with libgcc when I try and build and > compile my own mod_jk. > > Any pointers on where libgcc should be so that Apache/mod_xx finds it would > be appreciated. Add -R/path/to/gcc-3.0/lib to your LDFLAG

RE: Building mod_webapp on Solaris 8

I'm also having the same problem with libgcc when I try and build and compile my own mod_jk. Any pointers on where libgcc should be so that Apache/mod_xx finds it would be appreciated. And this is the error I get when trying the pre-compiled mod_webapp for Solaris 8: Syntax error on line 206 of

RE: Building Apache and Tomcat on HPUX and AIX?

Yes it is. I'm currently running Apache and JRun on HP-UX 11 quite successfully and I've run Tomcat on HPUX 11 too. We also run Apache and Tomcat on Solaris 2.7. Apache you can get a binary distribution for HP-UX (http://httpd.apache.org/dist/binaries/hpux/) 11 or build it yourself. Frankly, I

Re: Building mod_jk 3.2.1 on Solaris

http://news.pakana.com/mod_jk.so already compiled. try using the "-ipxl4" (something like that) flag Filip ~ Namaste - I bow to the divine in you ~ Filip Hanik Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.filip.net - Original Message - From: "Chris Pepper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL P

Re: building mod_jk on freebsd 4.0

Hi Jeremy! I have exactly the same setup as you, and it works fine after som tweaking. Here's what I had to do to Makefile.freebsd to make it work. Maybe it will help? --- Makefile.freebsd.orig Tue Dec 5 18:51:22 2000 +++ Makefile.freebsdTue Dec 5 19:24:07 2000 @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ ##

Re: building mod_jk on freebsd 4.0

Hello there, I am currently tasked with upgrading our current tomcat 3.1 deployment to tomcat 3.2. So far I am pleased with both versions of tomcat. Although, while attempting to switch over to the recomended mod_jk.so from the older mod_jserv.so I run into errors loading mod_jk.so into

Re: Building nsapi_redirector

Thanks Barbara. It works after dos2unix conversion of dsp/dsw files. Barbara Nelson wrote: > I think the problem is that the project file has carriage-returns only at > the end of each line, rather than CRLF. You can verify this by opening the > project file in notepad. Instead of looking lik

Re: Building nsapi_redirector

I think the problem is that the project file has carriage-returns only at the end of each line, rather than CRLF. You can verify this by opening the project file in notepad. Instead of looking like 'normal' text, it is all on one line. If you delete the CRs, and insert your own CRLF in notepad,

RE: building Tomcat 3.2 on JDK 1.1

Thanks for the patch i'll commit it ASAP, i think tomcat 3.2 is not suppoused to build on JDK 1.1, some time ago this issue was discussed on Tomcat-dev and the result was 3.x is built on jdk 1.2 and can run on 1.1 and tomcat 4.x only runs on 1.2 and up, but your patch it's needed to be able to