On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > This way there is no need to ifdef unix sockets, thanks :)), but it's > done now ;), so should i commit this change?
Of course. FYI - I'm cleaning the jni worker now ( I want to have all components in a working state before a beta release for the native) > > > from ant, may be mod_jk2 will be the first apache project being dsp > > > files free :)).. > > > > :-) > > did you know <http://sourceforge.net/projects/ant-contrib> ? I heard about them some time ago. Is the CPP task working better than JKANT ? I don't have time to merge them, we should use whatever works better. > > Same here. Since I'm not a windows user I'll wait for your > > code. Let me > > know how I can help. > > > > which is the intended int return value for jk_bean.setAttibute ? JK_TRUE if the attribute was recognized. JK_FALSE if not. We don't stop if a wrong attribute is used, but warn. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
