Hi group,
I've got a little OT question.
We have about 80 pop accounts for one domain on our Mailserver in the Net.
Now we do a fetchmail every 15Minutes for every account with our
intranet mailserver.
This is boring because it like power-fetching ;-)
I think about using uucp for domain-based tra
Rene wrote:
Hi group,
I've got a little OT question.
We have about 80 pop accounts for one domain on our Mailserver in the Net.
Now we do a fetchmail every 15Minutes for every account with our
intranet mailserver.
This is boring because it like power-fetching ;-)
I think about using uucp for doma
Eero Volotinen schrieb:
Rene wrote:
Hi group,
I've got a little OT question.
We have about 80 pop accounts for one domain on our Mailserver in the
Net.
Now we do a fetchmail every 15Minutes for every account with our
intranet mailserver.
This is boring because it like power-fetching ;-)
I think
Hello,
As most of you, I'm in a permament battle with spammers. But,
unfortunately, all actions (including chkuser, rbl, spamassassin) are
not enough to win. Now I'm seriously thinking about greylisting
patch, so could you please share your thoughts regarding it.
Maybe somebody already use this pa
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Hello,
As most of you, I'm in a permament battle with spammers. But,
unfortunately, all actions (including chkuser, rbl, spamassassin) are
not enough to win. Now I'm seriously thinking about greylisting
patch, so could you please share your thoughts regarding it.
Maybe somebo
Hello Jason,
> It works. Mostly. And it's quite effective. Usually.
> Delays are the biggest problem with the greylisting patch. That and
> those few mailers that just won't retry. As long as you set your delays
> to a short period of time, and watch for broken mailers to add to the
> whitel
Vladimir Kozlov schrieb:
What are your suggestions regarding delays? Currently I've installed
this patch on one of my servers with default delay (55min), and it seems
it works.
As for broken mailers - I do not think there are a lot of them...
Kind regards,
Vladimir.
Do you think 55 minutes is a rea
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
What are your suggestions regarding delays? Currently I've installed
this patch on one of my servers with default delay (55min), and it seems
it works.
I've seen suggestions for lowering the delay to something like 5
minutes. That way direct-to-mx is essentially blocked,
Hello Jason,
>>What are your suggestions regarding delays? Currently I've installed
>>this patch on one of my servers with default delay (55min), and it seems
>>it works.
>>
>>
> I've seen suggestions for lowering the delay to something like 5
> minutes. That way direct-to-mx is essentially b
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Sad, but... Nevertheless, both my users and I are very angry against
spam, so let's try.
Agreed.. I dropped greylisting about 3 months ago when I rebuilt our
mailservers. I just haven't had time to work on a new greylisting
system, but .. In the meantime, between chku
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
What are your suggestions regarding delays? Currently I've installed
this patch on one of my servers with default delay (55min), and it seems
it works.
I've seen suggestions for lowering the delay to something like 5
minutes. That way d
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 08:16 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Carl Parrish wrote:
>
> > *Update* in /etc/int.d I found something called courier-imap-old so I
> > decided to try /etc/init.d/courier-imap-old stop that seemd to work then
> > I tried to start courier-imap again. I got the same error mes
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Hello,
As most of you, I'm in a permament battle with spammers. But,
unfortunately, all actions (including chkuser, rbl, spamassassin) are
not enough to win. Now I'm seriously thinking about greylisting
patch, so could you please share your thoughts regarding it.
Maybe somebo
Carl Parrish wrote:
I got a lot back I'm guessing this is what is relavent.
tcp0 0 *:pop3s *:*
LISTEN
tcp0 0 *:pop3 *:*
LISTEN
tcp0 0 *:smtp *:*
LISTEN
run it on root. it gives program name. try also command
Bill Shupp wrote:
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Hello,
As most of you, I'm in a permament battle with spammers. But,
unfortunately, all actions (including chkuser, rbl, spamassassin) are
not enough to win. Now I'm seriously thinking about greylisting
patch, so could you please share your thoughts regardin
Bill Shupp wrote:
Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
As most of you, I'm in a permament battle with spammers. But,
unfortunately, all actions (including chkuser, rbl, spamassassin) are
not enough to win. Now I'm seriously thinking about greylisting
patch, so could you please share your thoughts regarding it.
Not sure this is a problem or not but in the toaster for installing
courier-imap it says
Edit /usr/lib/courier-imap/etc/authdaemonrc
* Change authmodulelist="..." to authmodulelist="authvchkpw"
for me authdaemonrc already said
authmodulelist="authcustom authcram authuserdb authvchkpw authsh
I am working on appropriate config for spam throttle.
I installed the toaster 0.7.8. Can someone share your
config files?
Thanks
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Thanks Bill.
I did this and users are still able to use SMTP. I'm using mysql, there's
any diference ?
Regards,
Julio
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [toaster] Disabling SMTP for my users
> Júlio Olivar
Júlio Olivares wrote:
Thanks Bill.
I did this and users are still able to use SMTP. I'm using mysql, there's
any diference ?
No. Make sure that smtp-auth is failing. Next, double check that
open-smtp is clear, that you don't have any relays setup in tcp.smtp,
and that tcp.smtp.cdb is updated.
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 17:16 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Carl Parrish wrote:
>
> > I got a lot back I'm guessing this is what is relavent.
> > tcp0 0 *:pop3s *:*
> > LISTEN
> > tcp0 0 *:pop3 *:*
> > LISTEN
> > tcp0 0 *:smtp
On Thursday 17 Mar 2005 16:57, Carl Parrish wrote:
> Not sure this is a problem or not but in the toaster for installing
> courier-imap it says
> Edit /usr/lib/courier-imap/etc/authdaemonrc
> * Change authmodulelist="..." to authmodulelist="authvchkpw"
> for me authdaemonrc already said
> aut
On Mar 17, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Bill Shupp wrote:
I did this and users are still able to use SMTP. I'm using mysql,
there's
any diference ?
No. Make sure that smtp-auth is failing. Next, double check that
open-smtp is clear, that you don't have any relays setup in tcp.smtp,
and that tcp.smtp.cdb
Thanks Bill and Tom, the problem is solved.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: [toaster] Disabling SMTP for my users
> On Mar 17, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Bill Shupp wrote:
> >> I did this and users are still
24 matches
Mail list logo
