InterBase opened up (was Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations)

2000-01-10 Thread jennyw
Inprise plans to make InterBase open source the first half of the year. This might only be version 6, which was in beta and not necessarily ready for prime time. But the idea of a commercial SQL-92 compliant RDBMS being made open source is a welcome one. http://slashdot.org/articles/00/01/03/155

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-04 Thread Julie Meloni
We use MySQL for all of oour database-driven/e-commerce sites, and it's the example database used throughout my soon-to-be-published PHP Essentials book (although PHP's other database functions are documented as well...). However, I don't do really well in holy wars, so I'm just offering the UR

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-04 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Aaron Malone wrote: > > mysql is not free according to the DFSG[1] (or opensource according to > > the OSD[2], if you take that side). See > >http://www.mysql.com/Manual_chapter/manual_Licensing_and_Support.html > > However, if you don't mind using a slightly-old version,

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-04 Thread Steve Kudlak
Samantha Jo Moore wrote: > I suggest you check Informix (tm). It's really good, solid, easy > to use, and the Linux developer distro is free (at least a while > back). Check out: > > http://www.informix.com > > Samantha Jo Moore > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.thetahoegroup.com > >

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Kelly Lynn Martin
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 19:55:52 -, "Ian Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Bur if by "real" database you mean a genuine RDBMS then both mSQL and >mySQL fail the test. One of the reasons that they are so fast is that >a lot of functionality is missing from them. Have a look though, and >see what

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Kelly Lynn Martin
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 07:19:14 -0800 (PST), Michelle Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Working on my first resolution - to get a "real" database system >running. Our existing database to date consists of bunches of >flatfiles and directory filesystems. Access is through perl >scripts/html pages.

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Aaron Malone
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 07:55:52PM -, Ian Phillips wrote: > > You might want to take a look at MySQL. We use it in combination with > > the DBI perl module. > > Bur if by "real" database you mean a genuine RDBMS then both mSQL and mySQL fail the >test. One of the reasons that they are so fa

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Gregory Conron
On Mon, 03 Jan 2000, you wrote: > Working on my first resolution - to get a "real" > database system running. Our existing database to > date consists of bunches of flatfiles and directory > filesystems. Access is through perl scripts/html > pages. I would like to get a more formal database > s

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Jeff Dike
> > Also, mysql (mysql.com) and msql, both free. Freeness makes them good > > for > > learning what you want in a "real" database. And they might turn out > mysql is not free according to the DFSG[1] (or opensource > according to the OSD[2], if you take that side). See True. I was being a b

RE: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Ian Phillips
> You might want to take a look at MySQL. We use it in combination with > the DBI perl module. Bur if by "real" database you mean a genuine RDBMS then both mSQL and mySQL fail the test. One of the reasons that they are so fast is that a lot of functionality is missing from them. Have a look th

RE: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Samantha Jo Moore
I suggest you check Informix (tm). It's really good, solid, easy to use, and the Linux developer distro is free (at least a while back). Check out: http://www.informix.com Samantha Jo Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thetahoegroup.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Aaron Malone
> mysql is not free according to the DFSG[1] (or opensource according to > the OSD[2], if you take that side). See >http://www.mysql.com/Manual_chapter/manual_Licensing_and_Support.html However, if you don't mind using a slightly-old version, MySQL v3.20.32a is available under the GPL. -- A

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Laurel Fan
Just because I think roxen challenger's database access tags are cool, and somewhat on topic: http://www.roxen.com/documentation/creator/database/index.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 3-Jan-100 Re: [techtalk] need databas.. by Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Also, mysql (mysql.com) and msql, both free. Freeness makes them good for > learning what you want in a "real" database. And they might turn out be be mysql is not free according to the DFSG[1] (or op

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Adriana Gonzalez
You might want to take a look at MySQL. We use it in combination with the DBI perl module. It is very fast and can handle very large databases. The DBI module is clean and easy to use. It handles several kinds of databases and most of the basic functionality is the same across all of them, so y

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Jeff Dike
> Hey girl, I'd probably get flayed if I said something like that :-) > What I use is postgres. Also, mysql (mysql.com) and msql, both free. Freeness makes them good for learning what you want in a "real" database. And they might turn out be be "real" enough for you.

Re: [techtalk] need database recomendations

2000-01-03 Thread Vanessa Little
Hey girl, What I use is postgres. Its a freeware SQL database for linux and has ports to most distros of Unix. I also wrote some html front ends that put stuff in and pull stuff out of the database using cgis written in C. Its pretty good for what we use it for, but pretty soon I think we are g