netscape should out of the box, run java fine by default, but if it
doesn't get up to edit -> prefrences -> advanced and then make sure the
appropriate boxes are enabled.
"Tania M. Morell" wrote:
> When I try to open the datek streamer ( a java applet)
> It opens but then I get nothing.
> Can
When I try to open the datek streamer ( a java applet)
It opens but then I get nothing.
Can someone tell me if I need to set up java on my
linux box or somthing??
Any help is good
-Tania
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can acces
> > Britta.. I'd love to have this link.. but, this
> > one didn't work.. Would you mind sending it again?
>
> That link did work for me. However, the url at the site is
> http://faqfinder.ics.uci.edu:8001/ .
>
> =
> Glen Strom
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks G.. I found that Netscape in win
--- K Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In keeping with all the links posted here, there's a site
> called FAQFinder http://faqfinder.cs.uchicago.edu)
> >
> > Britta
> >
>
> Britta.. I'd love to have this link.. but, this
> one didn't work.. Would you mind sending it again?
That link di
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, K Kirby wrote:
http://faqfinder.cs.uchicago.edu
> I'd love to have this link.. but, this
> one didn't work.. Would you mind sending it again?
I'm assuming it's due to the paranthesis; try it now.
--
http://home.swipnet.se/sunnanvind
I am you.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: Britta Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In keeping with all the links posted here, there's a site called FAQFinder
>http://faqfinder.cs.uchicago.edu) which will find natural language questions in FAQ
>files. I don't think it has all the Linux FAQs, but if you need
In keeping with all the links posted here, there's a site called
FAQFinder (http://faqfinder.cs.uchicago.edu) which will find natural
language questions in FAQ files. I don't think it has all the Linux
FAQs, but if you need a fast answer to a question that you think might
be in a FAQ, try that one
- Original Message -
From: Tarah Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 6:37 PM
Subject: RE: [techtalk] question
[quoting readjusted for readability]
> > Actually it isn't much trouble.
> > RTFM means "R
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I chuckled too...
>
> If we're making them up, then we could say that to a lot of mean and nasty newsgroup
>readers who like jumping down people's throats for this sort of thing, it means
>"Right, This Fella's Mincemeat!". :-)
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tarah Hofmann wrote:
> april -
> Does it? Hmm...this may be one of those acronyms that strays from the
> original meaning, kind of urban-legendy. Maybe all of us are just too eager
> to cuss!
>
> > Actually it isn't much trouble.
> > RTFM means "Read The FAQ's & Manua
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Michelle wrote:
> > NOTE - on the word "fucking": I hope noone here knows what it means, but I
> >think you all do. It's a rude word. Respect that people don't want to hear
> it.
> >Sunnan
> >--
> my apologies on that one - it's the only definition I've been told and I
> could
Inc.
http://www.optimiz.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of aprilk
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 4:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: [techtalk] question
Actually I made it up, just then
April
Tarah Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
K Kirby wrote:
> > "Robert The Fanatical Masochist"
> Thank you, Brian... I like your
> first explanation best..
I chuckled too...
If we're making them up, then we could say that to a lot of mean and
nasty newsgroup readers who like jumping down people's throats for this
sort of thing, it mean
-Original Message-
From: Brian Engle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> better late than never,
>
> "Robert The Fanatical Masochist"
>
> However there's a subversive movement running tacross the internet trying to
>convince people it stands for "Read The Fscking Manual".
>
> You can replace the "s
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oh, by the way, ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/ is the traditional repository of Usenet
> FAQs. A great source of info ...
>
> Jen
>
Thank you..I'll bookmark that url..
kakirby
--
= http://www.MAILPUPPY.com ==
10MB, Auto-Reply,
Actually I made it up, just then
April
Tarah Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>april -
>Does it? Hmm...this may be one of those acronyms that strays from the
>original meaning, kind of urban-legendy. Maybe all of us are just too eager
>to cuss!
>
>> Actually it isn't much trouble.
>> RTFM m
april -
Does it? Hmm...this may be one of those acronyms that strays from the
original meaning, kind of urban-legendy. Maybe all of us are just too eager
to cuss!
> Actually it isn't much trouble.
> RTFM means "Read The FAQ's & Manuals"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linu
Actually it isn't much trouble.
RTFM means "Read The FAQ's & Manuals"
K Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
>
>Kelly
>--
>
>
>= http://www.MAILPUPPY.com ==
>10MB, Auto-Reply, Address Book, & more FREE!
>Your FREE E-Mail Retriever!
>po
Oh, by the way, ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/ is the traditional repository of Usenet
FAQs. A great source of info ...
Jen
- Original Message -
From: "K Kirby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: [techtalk] qu
better late than never,
"Robert The Fanatical Masochist"
However there's a subversive movement running tacross the internet trying to
convince people it stands for "Read The Fscking Manual".
You can replace the "s" with any letter of your choosing, it's like Alphabet
Soup
Brian
>
> What is R
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 02:01:01AM +0800, K Kirby wrote:
> What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
>
aehm... read the f* manual?!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
> NOTE - on the word "fucking": I hope noone here knows what it means, but I
>think you all do. It's a rude word. Respect that people don't want to hear
it.
>Sunnan
>--
my apologies on that one - it's the only definition I've been told and I
could've at least used asterisks for subtlety when I po
> > What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
>
> Read The Fing Manual!!!
>
> Samantha
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
>
oh!
Thank you.
Kelly
--
= http://www.MAILPUPPY.com ==
10MB, Auto-Reply, Address Book, & more FREE!
Your FREE
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, K Kirby wrote:
> What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
No trouble at all! It means "Read the fucking manual". It's the nineties
version of the classic "Take your bed and walk". People say it and think that
it solves all problems.
NOTE - on the word "fucking": I hope n
Read the Funny Manual :-)
Cheers!
Sriram
- Original Message -
From: Kelly Lynn Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [techtalk] question
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 02:01:01 +0800, "K Kirby"
"Read The Fucking Manual"
Like we really need MORE acronyms to confuse our day? *grin*
Michelle
-Original Message-
From: K Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 12:23 PM
Subject: [techtalk] questi
Read The Fine Manual. There are other interpretations of what the F stands
for. ;-)
Jen
- Original Message -
From: "K Kirby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 10:01 AM
Subject: [techtalk] question
> What is RTFM? If
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 02:01:01 +0800, "K Kirby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
Read The F*cking (or Fine) Manual
Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
It means Read The (appropriate F word) Manual
K Kirby wrote:
>
> What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
>
> Kelly
> --
>
> = http://www.MAILPUPPY.com ==
> 10MB, Auto-Reply, Address Book, & more FREE!
> Your FREE E-Mail Retriever!
> powered by OutBlaze
>
>
RTFM is a rude way of telling someone to check the documentation
What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
Kelly
--
= http://www.MAILPUPPY.com ==
10MB, Auto-Reply, Address Book, & more FREE!
Your FREE E-Mail Retriever!
powered by OutBlaze
[EMAIL PROTE
> What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
Read The Fing Manual!!!
Samantha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
K Kirby
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [techtalk] question
What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
Kelly
--
= http://www.MAILPUPPY.com ==
10MB, Auto-Reply, Address Book, & more FREE!
Your FREE E-Mail Retriever!
p
What is RTFM? If it's not too much trouble?
Kelly
--
= http://www.MAILPUPPY.com ==
10MB, Auto-Reply, Address Book, & more FREE!
Your FREE E-Mail Retriever!
powered by OutBlaze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
Chris J/#6 wrote:
> Well, using gphoto (www.gphoto.org), I can use my digi camera quite happily
> (Olympus Camedia C420L). With a little wrapper and patience, you cn turn your
> digi camera into a webcam as well using gphoto :)
>
> Chris...
>
> >
> >
> > Has anyone interfaced any sort of digita
Well, using gphoto (www.gphoto.org), I can use my digi camera quite happily
(Olympus Camedia C420L). With a little wrapper and patience, you cn turn your
digi camera into a webcam as well using gphoto :)
Chris...
>
>
> Has anyone interfaced any sort of digital camera to linux. Are there pre
I have an Epson PhotoPC 750Z. It interfaces *great* via serial port using
the photopc package. Check out www.average.org - I have their ftp site
tagged (www.average.org/ftp/photopc/).
There is also the gphoto package, which is a graphical interface with
backends for a lot of cameras. According
> Has anyone interfaced any sort of digital camera to linux. Are there
> pre-written drivers written, or is that a write your own sort of
> thing. Any info would be appreciated, or experiences. Either using
> the serial or the USB port.
i have an epson photopc 600 that interfaces fine with linux
Has anyone interfaced any sort of digital camera to linux. Are there pre-written
drivers written, or is
that a write your own sort of thing. Any info would be appreciated, or experiences.
Either using the
serial or the USB port.
Thanks,
Have Fun,
Sends Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:16 PM 10/14/1999 -0400, Laurel wrote:
\>themselves..) As long as its done right, there's no reason a virus
>can't be cross-platform and portable. (Ok, this is nontrivial. but it
>is possible.)
>
Actually, there are over 3,000 "cross-platform" viruses -- the MS macro
viruses (about 45 of
At 07:03 PM 10/14/99 GMT, you wrote:
>
>for example, restrict a user's access to control panel so that they can't
>alter the network configuration, even restrict their access so they can't
>right click on Network Neighborhood and change the network configuration,
>all they have to do is access the
Hmm. It is well known how to exploit a buffer overflow for any unix
platform. It is also usually possible to determine remotely or locally
what OS a machine is running. Root can watch what any user does. So,
to have an interesting virus/worm:
1. Get on a system.
2. Get root. (Either use a n
At 02:31 PM 10/14/99 -0400, Brian Engle wrote:
>http://www.ciac.org/ciac/CIACVirusDatabase.html
>
>UNIX AT&T Attack virus
>UNIX Ebola
>
>
>and as someone already stated, bliss for the linux platform, not sure if
>it's distribution dependent or kernel dependent, or ev
At 11:52 AM 10/14/99 -0600, Clare Smith wrote:
>
Steve says: Whoops...Speaking of inadvertly doing this worng...Just sent an
empty message via a mistake I made in Eudora. Speaking of Windoz,
misdesign. OK, this is kind of sociological and hope I won't get snarled at
for it.
There haven't been th
At 06:08 PM 10/14/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>I have never heard of a unix system having a virus problem... EVER! I have
>>never known of a virus checker for unix. I don't believe these systems are
>>immune to viruses, however. I think that it's just a matter of the system
>>not being widely po
resist!)
>
>thanks much
>c
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Samantha Jo Moore
>Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 11:43 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [techtalk] Question for the group
>
>
>I have
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Clare Smith wrote:
> One of my unix students ask me if unix/linux had the same plethora of
> viruses that Windows/NT has. While I couldn't sight any statistics, I said I
> hadn't heard of any successful unix/linux viruses. I did some research this
> morning and still can't co
for example, restrict a user's access to control panel so that they can't
alter the network configuration, even restrict their access so they can't
right click on Network Neighborhood and change the network configuration,
all they have to do is access the windows help file, look up network
config
t; Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 1:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [techtalk] Question for the group
>
>
> I have never heard of a unix system having a virus problem...
> EVER! I have
> never known of a virus checker for unix. I don't believe
> thes
> One of my unix students ask me if unix/linux had the same plethora of
viruses that
> Windows/NT has. While I couldn't sight any statistics, I said I hadn't
heard of any
> successful unix/linux viruses. I did some research this morning and still
can't come
> up with any hard data. Any ideas?
Vi
There was a virus "demo" created for linux called bliss or .bliss.
It would attach itselft to binaries and propagate much like win/dos
based viruses.
However the only damage it could do would be to files that it owned.
Unless it was part of a trojan and gained root perms it wouldn't be
a big thre
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Samantha Jo Moore
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [techtalk] Question for the group
I have never heard of a unix system having a virus problem... EVER! I have
never known of a virus checker for unix. I don'
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:27:41 -0600, "Clare Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>One of my unix students ask me if unix/linux had the same plethora of
>viruses that Windows/NT has. While I couldn't sight any statistics, I
>said I hadn't heard of any successful unix/linux viruses. I did some
>research
the internet worm .. but
as I understand that was something totally different
hope
that helps :)
Henti
Viruses
-Original Message-From: Clare Smith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 6:28
PMTo: TechtalkSubject: [techtalk] Question for the
group
I have never heard of a unix system having a virus problem... EVER! I have
never known of a virus checker for unix. I don't believe these systems are
immune to viruses, however. I think that it's just a matter of the system
not being widely popular, and the fact that the hardware platforms in
One of my unix
students ask me if unix/linux had the same plethora of viruses that Windows/NT
has. While I couldn't sight any statistics, I said I hadn't heard of any
successful unix/linux viruses. I did some research this morning and still can't
come up with any hard data. Any ideas?
Clar
55 matches
Mail list logo
